Citations

Abstract Background We previously reported that patients with MF enrolled in a randomized Phase II study of fedratinib (SAR302503) (ARD11936; NCT01420770) had clinically meaningful reductions in splenomegaly and improvements in MF-associated constitutional symptoms after 24 weeks of treatment (Haematologica 2013;98:S1113). Here, we report updated efficacy and safety results from this study after 48 weeks of treatment (end of Cycle 12). Methods Patients with intermediate risk-2 or high-risk MF were randomized to receive once-daily fedratinib at doses of 300 mg, 400 mg, or 500 mg, for consecutive 4-weekly cycles, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, with palpable splenomegaly (5 cm below costal margin), and a platelet count ≥50 × 109/L. The primary measure for this study was percent change in spleen volume from baseline at the end of Cycle 3 (Blood 2012:120;Abstract 2837. Haematologica 2013;98:S1113). Endpoints for the current analysis included spleen response (≥35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline, assessed by a blinded independent central review by MRI), safety, and changes in bone marrow fibrosis (BMF). Results A total of 31 patients were randomized and treated: median age 63 years, 52% male, 58% primary MF, 58% high-risk MF, 90% JAK2V617F positive. The median numbers of treatment cycles were 12, 14, and 13 in the 300 mg, 400 mg and 500 mg dose groups, respectively, with median durations of exposure of 48.2, 56.2, and 52.4 weeks. At the cut-off date for this analysis, 21 patients (68%) remained on treatment; the most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were adverse events (AEs) (n=5) and withdrawal of consent (n=2). Overall, 58% (18/31) of patients achieved a spleen response at any time during treatment. The median spleen response duration was >35 weeks at all doses (Table). At Week 48, a spleen response was achieved by 30% (3/10), 80% (8/10), and 45% (5/11) of patients in the 300 mg, 400 mg, and 500 mg groups, respectively. Responses were generally maintained across all treatment groups. From Week 24 to Week 48 two additional patients achieved a spleen response (both in the 400 mg group), while one patient in the 500 mg group did not maintain a response (this patient had a fedratinib dose reduction to 200 mg). Changes in BMF up to Week 48 are being evaluated. The most common non-hematologic AE was diarrhea, with a Grade 3 rate of 13% (4/31 patients) but no Grade 4 cases were recorded. The rates of diarrhea decreased after the first cycle of treatment; from Cycle 2, the incidence of diarrhea (any grade) did not exceed 16% (5/31) at any cycle, and only one case of diarrhea was reported at Week 48 (end of Cycle 12). Anemia was the most-common hematologic toxicity, with a Grade 3 rate of 58% (18/31); no Grade 4 cases were reported. All Grades thrombocytopenia occurred in 55% (17/31) of patients, Grade 3 in three patients, and Grade 4 in two patients. Discontinuation of treatment due to AEs occurred in five patients over the 48 weeks (300 mg [n=2]; 400 mg [n=2]; 500 mg [n=1]), with two cases reported after Week 24 (dyspnea and leukocytosis [400 mg]; anemia and thrombocytopenia [500 mg]). There were 2 deaths (one in the 300 mg group due to unknown reasons [85 days after fedratinib discontinuation] and one in the 500 mg group due to disease progression [36 days after fedratinib discontinuation]). No cases of leukemic transformation were reported. Conclusions This updated analysis of the ARD11936 Phase II trial shows that treatment with fedratinib results in durable reductions in splenomegaly in patients with MF. No additional safety signals were observed with prolonged exposure to fedratinib. This study was sponsored by Sanofi. Disclosures: Pardanani: Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, PharmaMar and JW Pharma: Clinical trial support Other. Jamieson:J&J, Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lebedinsky:Sanofi: Employment. Gao:Sanofi: Employment. Talpaz:Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ariad, Deciphera: Research Funding; Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ariad, Deciphera: Speakers Bureau.

Abstract Abstract 201 Background: Pomalidomide at doses of 2 or 4 mg/d has demonstrated excellent activity in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). Between November 2007 and March 2012, we opened 6 sequential phase 2 trials and treated 345 patients with relapsed MM with pomalidomide at differing doses with weekly dexamethasone (Pom/dex). Results of 164 of these patients have been previously published. Here we describe long term follow up of these patients as well as results of an additional 181 patients with relapsed MM treated with the Pom/dex regimen. Methods: The six cohorts consisted of: Cohort 1 (N=60): relapsed MM with 1–3 prior regimens, 2 mg dose; Cohort 2 (N=34): lenalidomide (LEN) refractory, 2 mg dose; Cohort 3 (N=35): BZ)/LEN refractory, 2 mg dose; Cohort 4 (N=35): BZ/LEN refractory, 4 mg dose; Cohort 5 (N=60) LEN refractory, 1–3 prior regimens, 4 mg dose; and Cohort 6 (N=120) LEN refractory, 4 mg dose. Pomalidomide was given orally 2 mg daily or 4mg daily on days 1–28(cohorts 1–5) or 1–21 (cohort 6) of a 28-day cycle with oral dexamethasone given 40 mg daily on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. Response was assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria. All patients received aspirin 325 mg daily for deep venous thrombosis (VTE) prophylaxis or full dose anticoagulation. Results: A total of 345 patients were enrolled across all 6 cohorts. One patient was ineligible and excluded from analysis. The median age was 64 years (32–88). The median time since diagnosis was 53 months. The median number of prior therapies was 3 (1–14). 147 (44%) had high-risk molecular markers by mSMART criteria. Prior therapies consisted of thalidomide 52%, lenalidomide 87%, bortezomib 75%, autologous stem cell transplant 70% and allogeneic transplant 3%. The median follow-up is 10.4 months (5.4–34 months). Sixty-seven percent are alive and 32% remain progression free. 46 patients are continuing to receive treatment. The most common toxicities (grade 3 or higher) were neutropenia (31%), anemia (16%), thrombocytopenia (12%), pneumonia (8%) and fatigue (8%). VTE was seen in 10 patients (3%). Outcomes are shown in Table 1. Across all 6 cohorts confirmed responses of partial response (PR) or better were seen in 34%. The response rate in all patients with mSMART high risk status was 30.6%. Responses and duration of response (DOR) in those with high risk molecular markers include: 17p– 19 of 56 (34%) DOR 8.2 months; t(4;14) 6 of 24 (25%) and DOR 4.8 months; t(14;16) 7 of 11(64%) and DOR 9.5 months; deletion 13 by cytogenetics 13 of 37 (35%) with DOR 8.2 months. In a multivariate analysis, only LDH > ULN, number of prior regimens, and prior BZ therapy were predictive of a shorter TTP and factors associated with a poor OS following initiation of pomalidomide therapy included B2M > 5.5, LDH > ULN,number of prior regimens, and prior BZ therapy. Conclusions: Pom/dex is active and well tolerated even in heavily pretreated patients and those with high risk molecular markers. Remissions are durable. Response rates and toxicity are similar between the 2 mg and 4 mg doses. Disclosures: Lacy: Celgene: Research Funding. Stewart:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Reeder:Celgene: Mayo Clinic receives funding from Celgene to support clinical trials Other, Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 800 Background: Ruxolitinib (RUX), an oral JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, reduced spleen volume (SV), improved myelofibrosis (MF)-associated symptoms and quality of life (QoL), and appeared to exhibit a survival advantage over placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with MF regardless of JAK2V617F mutation status in the phase III COMFORT-I study. We describe long-term efficacy and safety of RUX from COMFORT-I, with 1 year of additional follow up beyond previously published data. Methods: Eligible pts (N=309) were randomized (1:1) to RUX or PBO. The primary analysis occurred when all pts completed 24 weeks (wks) and when half the pts completed 36 wks of treatment. All pts receiving PBO were eligible for crossover to RUX after the primary analysis; crossover before wk 24 was permitted if pts met protocol-defined criteria for worsening splenomegaly. The proportion of pts with ≥35% SV reduction at 24 wks (primary endpoint) and durability of SV response were assessed. Although symptom burden (measured daily using the modified MF Symptom Assessment Form v2.0) was only measured up to wk 24, QoL continued to be evaluated beyond wk 24 (every 24 wks) using the EORTC QoL Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30). Overall survival (OS) was assessed according to original randomized treatment. Results: In this updated analysis, median follow-up of pts randomized to RUX was 102 wks. All pts receiving PBO completed crossover or discontinued within 3 months of the primary analysis. Of 134 pts randomized to RUX who remained on treatment after the primary data analysis, 100 continue on study. Mean SV reduction in pts randomized to RUX was 31.6% at wk 24 and has remained stable with additional follow up through wk 96 (Table). In pts who achieved a ≥35% SV reduction, response was durable, with a median response duration of 108 wks. RUX treatment was also associated with durable improvements in the Global Health Status/QoL (Table) and the 5 functional domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Twenty-seven (27) pts randomized to RUX and 41 pts randomized to PBO died, representing a continued OS benefit in favor of RUX (HR=0.58; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.95; P = 0.028; Fig 1) similar in magnitude to that previously reported. OS favored RUX across subgroups including starting dose as well as baseline risk status and hemoglobin (Hgb). Of 34 pts randomized to RUX who discontinued after the primary analysis, 4 discontinued for an adverse event (AE). In pts who continued on RUX, anemia and thrombocytopenia remained the most frequently reported AEs. New onset of grade 3 or 4 anemia and thrombocytopenia was reported in only 12 and 5 pts, respectively. One pt discontinued for anemia. Overall, among all pts randomized to RUX, Grade 3 and 4 anemia regardless of baseline Hgb was reported in 37.4% and 14.8% of pts, respectively. Similarly, Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was reported in 11.0% and 5.2% of pts, respectively. These rates were similar to those reported in the primary analysis. By wk 36, the proportion of pts receiving red blood cell transfusions decreased to the level seen with PBO and remained stable thereafter (Fig 2). Rates of nonhematologic AEs adjusted for increased follow-up duration remain similar to those seen at the time of the primary data analysis. No additional cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in pts randomized to RUX were reported. Two pts originally randomized to PBO developed AML, 21 and 178 days after crossover to RUX. There continued to be no reports of a withdrawal syndrome after RUX discontinuation. Conclusions: RUX provides durable reductions in SV and improvements in QoL. Although all pts randomized to PBO crossed over to RUX shortly after the primary analysis, with 1 year of additional follow up, RUX continues to be associated with a survival advantage over PBO. RUX continues to be well tolerated; the AE profile with long-term treatment is consistent with that previously reported. The proportion of pts receiving transfusions decreased over time to rates similar to PBO, and there were no reports of a specific withdrawal syndrome or cytokine rebound phenomenon after RUX discontinuation. Disclosures: Verstovsek: Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Mesa:Incyte: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; YM Bioscience: Research Funding. Gotlib:Incyte: Consultancy, travel to congress Other. Levy:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gupta:Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; YM Biosciences: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofiå]Aventis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Catalano:Incyte: Consultancy. Deininger:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy. Miller:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, development of educational presentations Other; Incyte: development of educational presentations, development of educational presentations Other. Talpaz:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; B.M.S.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Winton:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria. Arcasoy:Incyte: Research Funding. Lyons:Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Telik: Research Funding. Paquette:Incyte: Consultancy. Vaddi:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Erickson-Viitanen:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sun:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sandor:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kantarjian:Incyte: grant support Other.

Abstract Abstract 2095 Celiac disease (CD) is an increasingly recognized disorder in Caucasian populations of European origin. Little is known about its prevalence in non-Caucasians. While CD is thought to be a cause of iron deficiency anemia, the extent to which CD contributes to iron deficiency in Caucasians and especially non-Caucasians is unknown. Iron deficiency is one of the most common nutritional deficiencies in both the developed world and in developing countries. Thus, it is important to know the prevalence of CD in different populations and in iron-deficient and iron-replete persons. To answer these questions, we tested serum collected from Caucasian and non-Caucasian men aged ≥ 25 y and women ≥ 50 y in the Hemochromatosis and Iron Overload Screening (HEIRS) Study. In the HEIRS Study, 101,168 participants were screened with serum biochemical tests of iron status, which not only detected participants with iron overload but also identified a unique multiethnic population of participants with iron deficiency. We hypothesized that CD is more common in those with iron deficiency than in iron-replete individuals. We also examined the difference in frequency of CD between Caucasians and non-Caucasians with iron deficiency. Cases with iron deficiency (defined as serum ferritin ≤ 12 μg/L [cases]) and iron-replete controls (serum ferritin > 100 μg/L in men, serum ferritin > 50 μg/L in women) were further evaluated by using a sequential serological testing scheme whereby all samples were tested with an ELISA for human recombinant tissue transglutaminase IgA antibodies, and positive values were confirmed by endomysial antibodies. Those positive for both tests were considered double positives and were presumed to have untreated CD. Those positive for tissue transglutaminase IgA antibodies but not for endomysial antibodies were termed single positives and were considered indeterminate and excluded from analysis. We further hypothesized that low serum ferritin and an appropriate human leukocyte antigen (HLA) variant, may be predictive of CD. We used SNP-based analysis to determine HLA genotype and DQ8, DQ2.2 or DQ4, and DQ2.5 risk variants. Fisher's exact test was used to examine the association between iron−deficient case and control status and the presence of celiac disease. Log-binomial regression was applied to estimate the odds of celiac disease in iron-deficient cases relative to that of controls. A total of 1713 subjects were tested for tissue transglutaminase IgA antibodies. Participants included 1100 Caucasians, 221 African Americans, 153 Asians, and 239 Hispanics. Fourteen of 571 iron-deficient cases were positive for the double serology compared to just one of 1142 controls. All of the seropositive tests were seen in Caucasians and none in the non-Caucasians. Excluding data from participants with indeterminate serological screen results (6 Caucasians, 4 non-Caucasians), we found that CD occurred in 14 of 567 cases (2.5%) and in only 1 of 1136 (0.1%) controls (Fisher's exact test, p=1.92 10−6). CD was more common in Caucasian cases (14 of 363, 4%) than in non-Caucasian cases (0 of 204, p=0.003). Only one Caucasian control and none of the non-Caucasian controls had CD. The odds of CD in individuals with iron deficiency was 28 (3.7, 212.8) times that in controls. Thirteen of 14 iron-deficient cases with CD carried the DQ2.5 variant of the HLA genotype. Presence of DQ2.5 was highly significantly associated with celiac disease status in iron-deficient cases compared to controls (Fisher's exact test, p = 7.183 × 10−8). The results indicate that CD is a small but significant contributor to iron deficiency in Caucasians. CD is very rare in other races, even among individuals with features frequently seen in CD, such as iron deficiency. CD is also rare in Caucasians who are iron replete. CD testing should be considered for adult Caucasian males or post-menopausal females having iron deficiency without evidence of other etiologies such as gastrointestinal blood loss. Patients identified with CD may benefit from appropriate treatment. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) are key regulatory RNAs that do not code for protein. Recently lncRNAs have been recognized as key regulators of gene expression and chromatin organization. Although, deregulation of lncRNAs such as HOTAIR, MALAT1 and H19 has been reported in solid cancers, role of lncRNAs in lymphoma or other hematologic malignancies is not known. The aim of this study is to identify lymphoma-associated lncRNAs and elucidate their role in disease pathogenesis. Next generation RNA-sequencing and validation studies were carried out on mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patient samples along with normal controls. As a result, hundreds of lncRNAs were found overexpressed in the MCL samples as compared with normal B cells, including RP11-24J23.2 (50 fold), RP11-12A2.3 (36 fold) and DLEU7-AS1 (19 fold). Quantitative RT-PCR (QRT-PCR) confirmed higher expression of RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3, and DLEU7-AS1 in MCL patient samples as compared to normal B cells. To investigate the biological significance of lncRNAs in MCL cells, we overexpressed RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3, and DLEU7-AS1 lncRNAs and analyzed effects on cell proliferation and apoptosis. To achieve overexpression lncRNAs, RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3, and DLEU7-AS1 were cloned individually in expression pcDNA3.1 generating constructs: pcDNA3RP11-24J23.2, pcDNA3RP11-12A2.3 and pcDNA3DLEU7-AS1and then transfected into MCL cell lines along with pcDNA3.1. QRT-PCR revealed effective overexpression (~100 fold increase over baseline) for each transfected lncRNAs construct in Granta and Mino cells. Analysis of proliferation and survival showed that overexpressing RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3 or DLEU7-AS1 promotes cell proliferation and survival in these cells as compared to the vector controls. Most of the lncRNAs found so far have been linked to the transcriptional regulation of the target genes through their association with chromatin remodeling factors such as Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2). To identify the functional relevance of RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3, and DLEU7-AS1 lncRNAs, we examined the binding of the lymphoma specific lncRNAs with PRC2 complex, by performing RNA immunoprecipitation (RNA-IP) using specific antibodies to EZH2, EED and SUZ12. The RNA-IP results demonstrate high affinity binding of all three lncRNAs with SUZ12 and EED but a weak binding with EZH2. Furthermore, RNA-IP using antibody to histone 3-lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3), a suppressive histone mark associated with PRC2 complex, also showed efficient binding with RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3, and DLEU7-AS1. These results suggest that RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3, and DLEU7-AS1 lncRNAs can directly associated with PRC2 complex at chromatin. To understand the mechanism of increased cell growth after overexpression of lncRNAs, RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3 or DLEU7-AS1, we analyzed expression level of important genes signature of MCL pathogenesis that include cyclin D1, cyclin D3, c-Myc, P14, and SOX11, a member of the group C SOX (SRY-related HMG-box) transcription factor family. Our results demonstrate that overexpression of lncRNAs RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3 or DLEU7-AS1 enhanced the levels of cyclin D1 (>2 fold) mRNA without any impact on cyclin D3 or c-Myc transcript levels. In contrast overexpression of RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3 or DLEU7-AS1 lncRNAs decreased SOX11 (0.08, 0.1 and 0.06 respectively) and P14 (0.06, 0.7 and 0.40 respectively) mRNA expression in Mino cells. To gain understanding of the mechanism involved in the suppression of SOX11 by the lncRNAs, we performed Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays with EZH2, EED and SUZ12 antibodies on Mino cells transfected with pcDNA3RP11-24J23.2, pcDNA3RP11-12A2.3 and pcDNA3DLEU7-AS1 or vector control. The data showed that overexpression of RP11-12A2.3 and DLEU7-AS1 significantly increased the binding of EED and to a lesser extent of EZH2 to SOX11 promoter while the binding of SUZ12 to SOX11 promoter was not changed as compared to vector alone. In conclusion, our results imply that lncRNAs are overexpressed in the MCL. Moreover, lymphoma associated lncRNAs (RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3 and DLEU7-AS1) regulate SOX11 expression via PRC2 complex contributing towards growth of MCL cells. Specific nature of lncRNAs found in lymphoma samples suggests that lncRNAs can be used as potential biomarkers for mantle cell lymphoma. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 169 The Philadelphia positive (Ph+) arm of the international adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) trial UKALL12/ECOG2993 opened in 1993 and is the largest single study of patients with Ph+ ALL, with a total of 441 participants. The first cohort of study patients was treated prior to Imatinib (N=266 “Pre Imatinib“) with 2 phases of induction therapy given over 2 months followed by matched sibling or unrelated donor myeloablative allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) whenever possible. The treatment protocol and outcome for these patients has been published (Fielding et al, Blood 2009). Beginning March 2003, a second cohort of study patients had Imatinib 600mg daily added, as a consolidation block after the second induction chemotherapy, (N=86, “Late Imatinib”). From late 2005, a final cohort within the trial were given Imatinib earlier, in conjunction with the second phase of induction (N=89, “Early Imatinib”). Patients in both Imatinib cohorts resumed the drug for a further 2 years following alloHSCT, if tolerated. If alloHSCT was not possible, Imatinib was permitted for 2 years, with maintenance. The trial closed to recruitment in December 2006 (USA) and October 2008 (UK). All except 8 patients have now completed therapy. An earlier analysis of these data did not indicate a clear long-term advantage to receiving Imatinib. We now report 3-year follow-up, which shows large outcome differences between the 3 groups. There were no pre-existing differences between the 3 cohorts in terms of gender, presenting white blood cell counts and presence of central nervous system disease at diagnosis. However, the Pre-Imatinib cohort was younger than the two Imatinib cohorts, due to an increase in the upper age limit for study entry. Percentage complete remission (CR) rates and survival of induction therapy are shown in table 1. The total CR rate for the imatinib cohorts was significantly higher than for the pre-imatinib cohort (p=0.004). Table 1 Pre-Imatinib With Imatinib N=266 Total With Imatinib N=175 Part 1 Late Imatinib N=86 Part 2 Early Imatinib N=89 Died in induction<d56 5 5 3 7 Survived induction but never achieved remission 13 3 5 1 Total not achieving CR 18 8 8 8 CR on protocol induction 67 77 73 80 Total CR rate (includes those achieving remission later than post induction) 82 92 92 92 Pre- Imatinib, only 28% of patients went on to receive alloHSCT as per protocol. With any Imatinib, 44% of patients received alloHSCT as per protocol. Survival outcomes of patients in the 3 cohorts are shown in the table 2. Overall survival (OS), event free survival (EFS) and relapse free survival (RFS) are all at 3 years with 95% confidence intervals (CI) shown in brackets. The P values are for two comparisons - ** denotes the comparison between patients receiving any Imatinib and patients receiving none and ^ denotes the comparison between the Early and Late Imatinib cohorts. Table 2 Pre-Imatinib With Imatinib Total With Imatinib Part 1 Late Imatinib Part 2 Early Imatinib % OS (95% CI) (see also Figure 1) 25 (20–30) 42 (34–49) 34 (24–44) 48 (36–60) p=0.0001** p=0.05^ % EFS (95% CI) 19 (14–24) 36 (29–44) 29 (19–38) 45 (34–56) p=0.0001** p=0.04^ % RFS (95% CI) 36 (28–43) 54 (45–63) 45 (33–57) 62 (50–75) p=0.0001** p=0.02^ Figure 1 Three-year OS for patients who received per protocol alloHSCT was 59% vs. 28% (with no plateau on the curve) for those who did not receive alloHSCT as per protocol. By comparison, pre-imatinib, 5 year OS was 40% for transplanted- and 19% for non-transplanted patients. Hence, the extent to which Imatinib without subsequent alloHSCT can improve the outcome for adult Ph+ ALL is not yet clear. Figure 1. Three-year OS for patients who received per protocol alloHSCT was 59% vs. 28% (with no plateau on the curve) for those who did not receive alloHSCT as per protocol. By comparison, pre-imatinib, 5 year OS was 40% for transplanted- and 19% for non-transplanted patients. Hence, the extent to which Imatinib without subsequent alloHSCT can improve the outcome for adult Ph+ ALL is not yet clear. In conclusion, receiving any Imatinib during induction for Ph+ ALL significantly enhances CR rate and increase alloHSCT rate. This translates into a highly significant EFS, OS and RFS advantage to receiving Imatinib during therapy. An earlier start to Imatinib is significantly better than a later start. Though comparisons between study cohorts are not randomised, the large differences seen are unlikely to be explained by factors other than treatment. There can be no basis for omitting Imatinib from the initial therapy of adult patients with Ph+ ALL. However, our data show that the best outcome is seen when patients receive Imatinib followed by myeloablative alloHSCT, where nearly 60% of such patients survive 3 years from diagnosis. Disclosures: Goldstone: Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract Abstract 718 Introduction: In a previously reported phase 2 study of single agent lenalidomide in 25 untreated CLL patients (pts), we reported an overall response rate (ORR) of 56% (14 pts), 40% SD (10 pts) and no CR at a median follow-up of 20.7 months (Chen et al. JCO 2010;29:1175). Although an amended protocol with conservative lenalidomide dosing was used to mitigate tumor lysis and severe myelosuppression observed in the first 2 accrued pts, we continued to observe frequent toxicities of grade 3–4 neutropenia (72%) and tumor flare (TF 88%). We now report long-term efficacy and toxicity from this study at a median follow-up of 47 months (mos). Methods: Patients were eligible if previously untreated and symptomatic (cytopenias, symptomatic adenopathy/organomegaly, constitutional symptoms, lymphocyte doubling count <12 mos). The amended starting dose for lenalidomide was 2.5mg daily on days 1–21 of a 28 day cycle, with slow monthly dose escalations (2.5mg cycle 1, 5mg cycle 2, 10mg cycle 3 and if required for response, further 5mg increments to a maximum of 25mg daily were allowed). Results: Longterm toxicities: Hematologic toxicities were common: grade 3–4 neutropenia (76%), thrombocytopenia (28%), anemia (20%). With longer term use, neutropenia tended to recur (12% of all cycles) and 10 pts required GCSF support (5 routinely during each cycle). Most common non-hematologic toxicities (all grades) were TF (88%), fatigue (76%), rash (60%), muscle cramping (40%), diarrhea (40%). All non-hematologic toxicities were mild (grade 1–2), except for 1 pt each with grade 3 rash and diarrhea. Although TF was most common during cycle 1, repeat flare symptoms upon resuming lenalidomide after the 7 day rest period of each cycle were noted in 16% of all 898 cycles administered, and as late as at cycle 28. Infections were mild (most respiratory, skin) with only 2 grade 3 events (disseminated zoster, S.pneumoniae bacteremia). Other malignancies: 2 pts developed transformed large cell lymphoma 7 and 18 mos after study discontinuation, 1 pt developed squamous cell carcinoma of skin at cycle 51, and 1 pt developed recurrence of remote non-small cell lung cancer at cycle 34. Dose modifications/discontinuation: The median highest dose achieved for all 25 pts was 15 mg (range 2.5–25 mgs); 8 pts were able to escalate to the maximal 25mg dose. Ten pts (40%) required dose reductions for grade 3 cytopenias [neutropenia (2), thrombocytopenia (2), both (2)], febrile neutropenia (2), and diarrhea (2). Of all 25 pts, the median duration on therapy was 31.1 mos (range 28 days – 60.6 mos). Twelve pts (52%) currently remain on study, receiving a median of 59 cycles of therapy (range 48–66). Causes of discontinuation for 13 pts included: treatment-related toxicity (8), lack of response/progressive disease (4), and recurrence of remote lung cancer (1). Toxicities leading to discontinuation included: prolonged cytopenias (3), recurrent infections (1), atrial fibrillation (1), disseminated herpes zoster (1), persistent grade 2 diarrhea (1), and grade 3 skin rash (1). Efficacy: With extended median follow-up from 20.7 to 47 mos, the ORR improved from 56% (14 pts) to 72% (18 pts), with 3 pts in PR upgrading to CR, and 1 SD to PR. Although the median time to response was 7.7 mos, responses occurred as quickly as 1.8 mos to as late as 27.0 mos of therapy. For the 3 CR pts, prolonged therapy with an additional 14.9, 28.3 and 40.6 mos beyond the time of first response was required to achieve CR. To date, 7 pts have progressed with 3-year PFS 68.8% (95% CI:52–91%) and OS 85.3% (95% CI:71.1–100%). Correlatives: Cereblon (CRBN), recently identified as a direct protein target of lenalidomide, was evaluated by gene expression profiling and Western blot and found to be uniformly expressed in all 19 evaluable day 1 pt samples regardless of lenalidomide response. Thus, baseline CRBN expression does not appear to be a useful predictive biomarker of response in this population. The mechanism by which CRBN is linked to response is reported by Trudel et al, ASH 2012. Conclusions: Long-term followup of this study demonstrates that when using low doses of single agent lenalidomide in CLL, prolonged therapy is feasible and may be required for the achievement of durable, high quality responses. Maximal daily doses of 25mg can be reached and may also be needed for optimal response, though recurrent myelosuppression remains limiting. Disclosures: Chen: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Lundbeck: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide is not approved for use in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Kukreti:Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Ortho: Honoraria. Trudel:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract Abstract 664 Background: Survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who received prophylactic cranial radiation therapy (CRT) are at increased risk for deficits in neurocognitive skills, including attention, working memory and processing speed. As survivors age, global brain injury from CRT may reduce cognitive reserve, placing them at risk for early onset dementia or long-term memory deficits. The prevalence of dementia and memory abnormalities in adult survivors of childhood ALL has not previously been established. Methods: Analyses were conducted on 265 of 445 (60%) eligible survivors of childhood ALL (median age 36 years, range 26–54 years; 52% female) treated with 18Gy (n=127) or 24Gy (n=138) CRT with a median time from CRT of 30 years (range 15–46 years). Participants completed the Wechsler Memory Scale IV, including the Brief Cognitive Status Exam (BSCE), and the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). Age-adjusted standard scores were calculated and the BSCE was also adjusted for education level. Prevalence of memory impairment (<1 SD below age-expected mean), stratified by RT dose exposure, is reported and logistic regression used to identify risk factors for impairment. A subset of survivors (n=85) completed brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including assessment of hippocampal volume, cortical thickness, white matter volume, diffusion tensor imaging, and functional MRI (fMRI) during a cued-recall memory task. Results: Survivors who received 24 Gy CRT had increased impairment on global measures of both short-term recall (33%; p<0.001) and long-term recall (30%; p<0.001), while no increase in impairment was seen after 18Gy. Impaired short-term recall was associated with smaller right (p=0.02) and left (p<0.01) temporal lobe volumes, while impaired long-term recall was associated with thinner parietal and frontal cortices. On subtests evaluating narrative memory (i.e. story recall) and design memory, increasing RT dose (24 vs. 18Gy) was associated with an increased prevalence of long-term memory impairment (narrative: 28% vs. 12%, p=0.001; designs: 13% vs. 3.2%, p=0.003). However, no CRT dose response was identified for short term narrative and design memory. Survivors with impaired long-term memory for designs demonstrated a compensatory increase in left hippocampal fMRI activation (p=0.005), and the effect was greater in the higher dose group (p = 0.04). The mean score for long-term narrative memory among survivors who received 24Gy was equivalent to the mean score of a 70–74 year old adult population. Neither young age (0–4 years) at CRT (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8–2.7), time from CRT (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.9–1.1) nor intrathecal methotrexate exposure (OR 3.9, 95% CI 0.4–36.1) were significantly associated with long-term memory deficits. Reduced cognitive status (by BSCE) was identified after 18Gy (9%, p=0.11) and 24Gy (18%, p<0.001), suggesting a CRT dose-response effect. On diffusion tensor imaging, increased radial diffusivity in the frontal, parietal and temporal regions, an inverse measure of white matter integrity, was associated with reduced BSCE. Current employment rates were equivalent (63%) in both CRT dose groups, suggesting no difference in functional status. Conclusions: Aging adult survivors of ALL who received 24Gy CRT have reduced cognitive status and significant impairment in short-term and long-term memory. There appears to be a dose response effect selective for long-term narrative and design memory, but not for short term narrative and design memory. These patterns are consistent with early onset of age-related (long-term) memory loss, and early stage dementia, yet at a median age of only 36 years. After 24Gy, survivors have the narrative memory equivalent to a 70 year-old in the general population. Survivors with memory impairment demonstrated reduced integrity on structural and functional neuroimaging in anatomical regions established as essential for memory formation and long-term recall. However, these memory impairments do not seem to affect functional status (employment rates) suggesting that, rather than frank dementia, deficits in middle adulthood are consistent with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Longitudinal evaluation of this population is needed as MCI often progresses into early onset dementia with age. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 3689 Background: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is characterized by the presence of CD30-positive Hodgkin Reed-Sternberg cells. The standard of care for patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory HL is salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT). However, approximately 50% of pts experience relapse of HL after auto-SCT and this population represents a pronounced unmet need. In a 756-pt retrospective analysis, the median overall survival (OS) in HL pts who relapsed after auto-SCT was 2.4 years, as measured from the time of auto-SCT, with shorter time to relapse after auto-SCT being the most predictive factor for shortened survival (Horning et al, 2008). Brentuximab vedotin (ADCETRIS®) comprises an anti-CD30 antibody conjugated by a protease-cleavable linker to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), a microtubule-disrupting agent. Brentuximab vedotin selectively induces apoptotic death of CD30-positive cells by binding, internalizing, and releasing MMAE. A pivotal phase 2 study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin in 102 pts with relapsed or refractory HL after auto-SCT (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT00848926). Long-term survival data from this ongoing trial are described. Methods: Pts received 1.8 mg/kg brentuximab vedotin every 3 weeks as a 30-minute outpatient IV infusion for up to 16 cycles. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) per independent review according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Long-term follow-up assessments to determine survival and disease status occurred every 3 months (mos) for 2 years, every 6 mos during Years 3 to 5, and annually thereafter. Results: In these heavily pretreated pts with poor prognosis, the median time to relapse after auto-SCT was 6.7 mos (range, 0–131 mos). Pts received a median of 9 cycles of brentuximab vedotin and the ORR was 75% (76 of 102 pts), with complete remissions (CRs) obtained by 33% of pts (n=34). At the time of this analysis (July 2012), the median observation time from first dose was 29.5 mos (range, 1.8 to 36.9 mos). 60 of 102 pts (59%) were alive at the time of last follow up and the median OS has not yet been reached. The estimated 24-mo survival rate was 65% (95% CI: 55%, 74%). Median OS by best clinical response was 31.6 mos for pts with partial remission (PR, n=42), 20.6 mos for pts with stable disease (SD, n=22), and 10.2 mos for pts with progressive disease (PD, n=3); median OS for pts who obtained a CR (n=34) has not yet been reached. Evaluation of numerous demographic and baseline characteristics including age, gender, bone marrow involvement, presence of B symptoms, tumor size, and ECOG performance status showed that the only subgroup of pts who had a significantly more favorable survival rate following brentuximab vedotin treatment were those with a baseline ECOG score of 0 (24-mo survival rate of 81% vs. 47% for pts with ECOG scores of 0 vs. 1, respectively). Notably, no significant difference in OS was evident in the subgroup of pts who had relapsed within a year of auto-SCT compared with those who had relapsed >1 year after auto-SCT. As previously reported, the most common (≥15%) brentuximab vedotin-related adverse events of any grade were peripheral sensory neuropathy, nausea, fatigue, neutropenia, and diarrhea. Adverse events of Grade 3 or higher that occurred in ≥5% of pts were neutropenia, peripheral sensory neuropathy, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. Conclusions: After a median observation time of approximately 2.5 years from first dose of brentuximab vedotin, 60 of 102 pts (59%) with relapsed or refractory HL were alive at the time of last follow up and the median OS has not yet been reached. The estimated 24-mo survival rate was 65%. The only pretreatment factor evaluated that was associated with a higher 24-mo survival rate was a baseline ECOG score of 0. Prolonged OS was observed in pts with both long and short progression-free intervals after auto-SCT. Pts who achieved a CR with brentuximab vedotin experienced longer OS than pts who did not achieve a CR. Based upon these findings, combination regimens that incorporate brentuximab vedotin are presently being evaluated in clinical trials to determine whether the proportion of pts who achieve durable CRs might be further increased. Disclosures: Chen: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, Travel Expenses Other. Gopal:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Smith:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; Cephalon: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmith Kline: Speakers Bureau. Ansell:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Rosenblatt:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Savage:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Connors:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Engert:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria. Larsen:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sievers:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Younes:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Affimed: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 2203 Background: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is frequently characterized by severe ADAMTS13 deficiency, the cause of which is unknown. An important exception is ticlopidine-associated TTP (tc-TTP), the most common drug-induced TTP syndrome. In 1998, a possible association of TTP with ticlopidine was reported. In 1999, two additional series reported this association. In 2000, a fourth study reported severe A DAMTS13 deficiency among six of seven tc-TTP persons- suggesting a causal pathway. All of these reports were from the United States. Recently, we reported characteristics of 186 acquired idiopathic (ai)- TTP patients in Japan with severe ADAMTS13 deficiency, noting that clinical and laboratory findings for ai-TTP patients in Japan differed from those for cohorts of ai-TTP patients in Europe and North America- raising concern that TTP findings vary by region of the world. (PLOS One 2011) We now on report clinical and laboratory characteristics of a cohort of TTP patients from Japan with tc-TTP, and compare these findings to three cohorts of tc-TTP in the United States and one cohort of ai-TTP patients from Japan. Methods: We queried a database of thrombotic microangiopathy patients identified from a national TTP referral laboratory in Japan of cases identified between 1998 and 2008. Severe ADAMTS13 deficiency was characterized by activity levels < 5%. All tc-TTP patients and 186 of 911 ai-TTP patients in the database had severe ADAMTS13 deficiency and first onset of TTP. Comparisons were made to tc-TTP patients reported previously from the United States. Results: Characteristics of ai- TTP with severe ADAMTS13 deficiency in Japan and tc-TTP in Japan and US Conclusions: These data from Japan validate insights about tc-TTP initially proposed in 1998, 1999, and 2000 in the United States. Ticlopidine is a likely cause of TTP, the mechanism is via a cross-reactive antibody to ADAMTS13:AC resulting in formation of an ADAMTS13:INH, and therapeutic plasma exchange is necessary for treatment. Disclosures: Ortel: Eisai: Research Funding; Glaxo SmithKline: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Instrumentation Laboratory, Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy. Fujimura:Baxter BioScience: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.