Citations

AbstractBackgroundHospital‐at‐home has become a more recognized way to care for patients requiring inpatient hospitalization. At times, these patients may require escalation of care (transfer from home back to the brick‐and‐mortar (BAM) hospital for ongoing hospitalization care needs), a process that has not been extensively studied.ObjectiveTo evaluate what patient factors contribute to escalations of care in the hospital‐at‐home delivery model.Designs, Settings, and ParticipantsWe conducted a retrospective review of all patients admitted to Mayo Clinic's Advanced Care at Home (ACH) program from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022.InterventionNone.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPatient information was collected via electronic health record including demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical status. The primary outcome was the of occurrence of an escalation.ResultsA total of 904 patients were included, of whom 80 (8.8%) required an escalation of care. In multivariable analysis, risk of an escalation was significantly higher for patients who were married or had a life partner (HR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.05–3.23, p = .033) for patients admitted with procedure‐related disorders (HR: 2.61, 95% CI: 1.35–5.05, p = .005) and patients with an increased mortality risk score (HR [per each 1–category increase] = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.39–2.50, p < .001).

Background The phase 2 PIONEER‐HCM (Phase 2 Open‐label Pilot Study Evaluating Mavacamten in Subjects With Symptomatic Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction) study showed that mavacamten improved left ventricular outflow tract gradients, exercise capacity, and symptoms in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but the results of longer‐term treatment are less well described. We report interim results from the PIONEER‐OLE (PIONEER Open‐Label Extension) study, the longest‐term study of mavacamten in patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM. Methods and Results Patients who previously completed PIONEER‐HCM (n=20) were eligible to enroll in PIONEER‐OLE. Patients received oral mavacamten, 5 mg once daily (starting dose), with individualized dose titration at week 6. Evaluations included serial monitoring of safety, echocardiography, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire–Overall Summary Score, and serum NT‐proBNP (N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide) levels. Thirteen patients enrolled and received mavacamten (median study duration at data cutoff, 201 weeks). Most patients (92.3%) received β‐blockers concomitantly. Treatment‐emergent adverse events were predominantly mild/moderate. One patient had an isolated reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction to 47%, which recovered and remained normal with continued treatment at a reduced dose. At week 180, mavacamten was associated with New York Heart Association class improvements from baseline (class II to I, n=9; class III to II, n=1; and unchanged, n=2), sustained reductions in left ventricular outflow tract gradients (mean [SD] change from baseline: resting, −50 [55] mm Hg; Valsalva, −70 [41] mm Hg), and serum NT‐proBNP levels (median [interquartile range] change from baseline: −498 [−2184 to −76] ng/L), and improved Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire–Overall Summary Score (mean [SD] change from baseline: +17 [16]). Conclusions This long‐term analysis supports the continued safety and effectiveness of mavacamten for >3 years in obstructive HCM. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03496168.

Abstract Adagrasib, an irreversible, selective KRASG12C inhibitor, may be an effective treatment in KRASG12C-mutated colorectal cancer, particularly when combined with an anti-EGFR antibody. In this analysis of the KRYSTAL-1 trial, patients with previously treated KRASG12C-mutated unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer received adagrasib (600 mg twice daily) plus cetuximab. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review. Ninety-four patients received adagrasib plus cetuximab. With a median follow-up of 11.9 months, ORR was 34.0%, disease control rate was 85.1%, and median duration of response was 5.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2–7.6). Median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.7–7.4) and median overall survival was 15.9 months (95% CI, 11.8–18.8). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in all patients; grade 3–4 in 27.7% and no grade 5. No TRAEs led to adagrasib discontinuation. Exploratory analyses suggest circulating tumor DNA may identify features of response and acquired resistance. Significance: Adagrasib plus cetuximab demonstrates promising clinical activity and tolerable safety in heavily pretreated patients with unresectable or metastatic KRASG12C-mutated colorectal cancer. These data support a potential new standard of care and highlight the significance of testing and identification of KRASG12C mutations in patients with colorectal cancer. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 897 See co-corresponding author Rona Yaeger discuss this research article, published simultaneously at the AACR Annual Meeting 2024: https://vimeo.com/932606282/f27a6e46f4

Abstract Introduction: Deletion in the short arm of chromosome 17 (del17p) is a strong, negative prognostic biomarker found in about eight percent of patients with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). CLL patients with del17p exhibit resistance to therapy, accelerated disease progression, and global immunodeficiency. It is unclear the extent to which global immunodeficiency impacts disease course and therapy outcomes. The goal of this study was to document the blood immune repertoire of patients with untreated CLL who have del17p and associate with clinical features, time to first treatment (TFT), and overall survival (OS). Methods: Biobanked blood samples from treatment-naïve del17p CLL patients (n = 58) and age-matched controls (n = 5) were obtained. B cells and T cells were analyzed with comprehensive, cell type-specific flow cytometry panels and visualized with unbiased dimensionality reduction. Lab values were log-transformed and compared using t-tests and one-way ANOVAs. TFT was calculated from date of sample collection to date of first CLL-directed therapy or last known untreated date; OS was calculated from date of sample collection to death or last known alive status. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses (results reported as hazard ratio [HR] and 95% confidence interval [CI]) were employed to identify associations of lab values with OS and TFT. Results: Patients with del17p CLL had increased proportions of T regulatory cells (Tregs) among total CD4+ T cells compared to controls (CLL 11.1%, control 5.7%, p = 0.05). A higher proportion of CD8+ T cells was associated with longer TFT (HR 0.57, 95%CI 0.36-0.89); in contrast, higher proportions of TIGIT+ (HR 1.83, 95%CI 1.03-3.28) and TIM3+ conventional (non-Treg) CD4+ T cells were associated with shorter TFT (HR 1.70, 95%CI 1.02-2.84). A higher proportion of PD1+ CD8+ T cells was associated with shorter OS (HR 1.79, 95%CI 1.05-3.06), in addition to PD1+ conventional CD4+ T cell proportion (HR 2.21, 95%CI 1.06-4.60). CLL B cells expressed PD-1 and inducible T cell costimulator (ICOS) at significantly lower median fluorescence intensities (MFIs) than control B cells (p &lt; 0.0001 for both). The CXCR5+ MFI (HR 1.0002, 95%CI 1.0001-1.003) and CD23+ MFI (HR 1.88, 95%CI 1.01-3.50) of CLL B cells were associated with shorter TFT. Discussion: In this cohort of treatment-naïve del17p CLL patients, we determined that patients with higher proportions of exhausted CD4+ and CD8+ T cell phenotypes had significantly shorter OS. Cytotoxic T cell proportion positively associated with TFT, whereas proportions of CD4+ T cell exhaustion phenotypes negatively associated with TFT. Higher CXCR5+ and CD23+ MFIs of CLL B cells also associated with shorter TFT. The preliminary findings from our study suggest that the blood immune repertoire has strong associations with clinically relevant outcomes such as time to first treatment and overall survival in patients with untreated del17p CLL. Citation Format: Ethan J. Katcher, Kim A. Gwin, Sameer A. Parikh, Kari G. Rabe, Petra K. Lothert, Preeti Trisal, Esteban Braggio, Susan L. Slager, Nicholas Strong, Daniel L. Van Dyke, Zhiquan Wang, C. Chris Huang, Anita K. Gandhi, Kay L. Medina, Neil E. Kay. Correlating the blood immune repertoire and clinical features of del17p CLL patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr LB345.

Abstract Background: The prognosis of patients with MM with CNS mets is poor. E6201 is an intravenous (IV) MEK inhibitor with activity against BRAF V600-mutated MM cell lines, including MAPK resistance alteration. A previous phase I trial demonstrated activity of E6201 in BRAF V600E mutated MM with a Maximal Tolerated Dose of 320mg/m2 given IV once a week x 3 weeks q 28 days. 2/23 (8.7%) of patients had a PR, 8/23 (34.8%) had SD. Two patients with MM and brain mets achieved near-CR which led to preclinical studies that demonstrated E6201 is unaffected by P-gp and BCRP transport and achieved higher brain to blood concentration (266%).In this trial, patients with BRAF mutation + MM with brain mets, single agent E6201 given at 320mg/m2 twice weekly x 3 weeks q 28 days was determined to be safe. One patient had CNS SD and a PR in lung mets, and a second patient achieved CNS stable disease and CR in a leg melanotic lesion. The drug was well-tolerated with one reversible AE thrombocytopenia (Gr 2). The final review showed intracranial response of SD in 2/4 (50%) patients and systemic SD in 3/4 (75%) patients. Methods: We are currently accruing to the dose escalation cohort of E6201 with dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily orally (n=up to 22 evaluable patients). E6201 is administered IV at 320mg/m2 twice weekly for 3 weeks every 28 days. Patients must have stage IV melanoma with BRAF mutation with at least one active lesion in the brain. Prior local therapy is allowed if done at least 3 weeks prior to cycle 1. Participants must be on a stable dose of steroids for at least 7 days and have an ECOG &lt;!–=2. The study allows one prior BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy. The primary objectives are to determine the MTD of E6201 when combined with dabrafenib and the response rate of brain mets. The secondary objectives include duration of response, extracranial response, progression free survival, overall survival, and impact of BRAF mutation subtype and safety of the combination. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05388877 References:1.Gampa G, et al. Brain distribution of a novel MEK inhibitor E6201: implications in the treatment of melanoma brain metastases. 2018. Drug Metab Dispos.2.Tibes R et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of E6201 in patients with advanced solid tumors, including melanoma: results of a phase I study. 2018. Brit J of Cancer. 3.Babiker Gm et al, E6201, an intravenous MEK1 inhibitor, achieves an exceptional response in BRAF V600E mutated metastatic malignant melanoma with brain metastases. 2018. Inv New Drugs4.Gampa G, Kim M, Cook-Rostie N, Laramy JK, Sarkaria JN, Paradiso L, DePalatis L, Elmquist WF. Brain distribution of a novel MEK inhibitor E6201: Implications in the treatment of melanoma brain metastases. 2018. Drug Met Disp.–&gt; Citation Format: Mahesh Seetharam, Roxana Dronca, Arkadiusz Z. Dudek, Garth Nelson, Matthew Block, Skylar Starling, Amber Baskin, Renee Bradshaw, Courtney Nelson, Kylee Andrews, Alisha Birgin, Cristina Watson, Yiyi Yan, Daruka Mahadevan, Svetomir Markovic, Tom Myers, Linda Paradiso, Hani Babiker. Phase 1 trial of MEK1 inhibitor E6201 plus dabrafenib in patients (pts) with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma (MM) with central nervous system (CNS) metastases (mets) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT157.

OBJECTIVE: Certifications in psychiatric-mental health nursing promote safe practice by psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioners (PMHNPs) and nurses (PMHNs) and help protect the public from harm. This protection begins with the development of an examination that meets rigorous national education, practice, and accreditation standards and reflects PMHNPs’ or PMHNs’ clinical practice. Achievement and maintenance of a certification is a journey that involves a commitment to lifelong learning and the improvement of the field of psychiatric-mental health nursing through involvement in the examination process. METHODS: This discussion paper outlines the role nurses can play in the development of certification examinations. It describes the process of developing an effective certification examination, including the role of standards, accrediting bodies, and content experts; determining necessary tasks, knowledge, and skills; surveying practitioners to validate information; writing test questions; and ongoing analysis of examination content. The Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (across the lifespan) Certification (PMHNP-BC) is presented as an example of the process. RESULTS: This discussion paper raises awareness of how certification exams are developed, PMHNPs participate in certification development, and volunteering promotes career development. CONCLUSION: The PMHNP-BC examination is based on education, practice, and certification accreditation standards and reflects current clinical practice. PMHNPs can (a) point to the rigor of certification as an indication of the quality of care they deliver, (b) volunteer to participate in the examination process to ensure examination rigor, and (c) advance their careers through the development and application of a valuable skill set.

PURPOSE To assess efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin (C) and gemcitabine (G) with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer not amenable to surgery. METHODS Patients enrolled in a single-arm phase II study. Pretreatment inguinal-femoral nodal assessment was performed. Sixty-four Gy IMRT was prescribed to the vulva, with 50-64 Gy delivered to the groins/low pelvis. Radiation therapy (RT) plans were quality-reviewed pretreatment. C 40 mg/m2 and G 50 mg/m2 were administered once per week throughout IMRT. Complete pathologic response (CPR) was the primary end point. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and adverse events were assessed with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients enrolled, of which 52 were evaluable. The median age was 58 years (range, 25-58), and 94% were White. Forty (77%) had stage II or III disease, and all had squamous histology. A median of six chemotherapy cycles (range, 1-8) were received. Eighty-five percent of RT plans were quality-reviewed with 100% compliance to protocol. Seven patients came off trial because of toxicity or patient withdrawal. Of 52 patients available for pathologic assessment, 38 (73% [90% CI, 61 to 83]) achieved CPR. No pelvic exenterations were performed. With a median follow-up of 51 months, the 12-month PFS was 74% (90% CI, 62.2 to 82.7) and the 24-month OS was 70% (90% CI, 57 to 79). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hematologic toxicity and radiation dermatitis. There was one grade 5 event unlikely related to treatment. CONCLUSION Weekly C and G concurrent with IMRT sufficiently improved CPR in women with locally advanced vulvar squamous cell carcinoma not amenable to surgical resection.