Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

237 citation(s) found for "Illés, Árpád".

Transfusion-Associated Immunomodulation in Critically Ill Patients: More Than Just Red Cells?*
Applefeld, Willard N. , Athale, Janhavi, Wang, Jeffrey

Critical Care Medicine | May 19, 2021 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 993-995

10.1097/ccm.0000000000004929 | PMID 34011833 Get It

Abstract 13910: Importance of Non-invasive Estimates of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures in Critically Ill Patients
Anavekar, Nandan S., Jaffe, Allan S. , Ahmed, Abdelrahman , Wiley, Brandon M. , Jentzer, Jacob C. , Jaffe, Allan S.

Circulation | May 10, 2021 | Volume: 142 | Issue: Suppl_3 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circ.142.suppl_3.13910 Get It

Introduction: The presence of cardiac dysfunction predicts adverse outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU). We explored the relationship of cardiac injury and left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) to outcomes in critically ill patients. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of adult medical ICU admissions from May, 2018 through October 2019. Patients with elevated high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT) and an echocardiogram performed within 72 hours of admission were included. Patients were classified as having normal LV diastolic function, isolated LVDD, concomitant LV diastolic and systolic dysfunction (LVDDSD) or indeterminate LV diastolic function based on American Society of Echocardiography 2016 guidelines. LV systolic dysfunction was defined as an ejection fraction (EF) < 50%. Results: Overall, 222 patients were included. LVDD was seen in 123 patients (55.4%). Thirty patients (13.5%) were classified with indeterminate diastolic function and 56 normal diastolic function (25.2%). Of those with LVDD , 59.3% had LVDDSD while isolated LVDD was seen in 40.7%.Patients with LVDDSD had a higher median hs-cTnT at baseline compared to patients with isolated LVDD [102ng/L IQR (50-257) vs. 77 ng/L (33.5-166); p=0.047]. Medial e’ velocity and tricuspid valve systolic regurgitant velocity were often associated with LV systolic dysfunction (p=0.0172 and 0.0013, respectively). LVDDSD was associated with a longer length of stay than patients with isolated LVDD [2.9 (1.6-4.0) vs.1.8 (1.1-3.3); p-value 0.03].Twenty-nine patients died during their ICU stay (13%). Patients with LVDDSD had 9.6-fold higher odds of dying in the ICU than patients with isolated LVDD (p=0.0048). Reduced medial e’ velocity (OR 0.63, CI 0.4-1.0, p=0.0285) and increased E/e’ (OR 1.08, CI 1.01-1.15, p=0.0192) were associated with ICU mortality. The association between LVEF<50% and ICU mortality was less pronounced (OR 0.95, CI 0.01-0.98; p=0.0023). Conclusions: Concomitant LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction and measures of increased cardiac filling pressures are strong predictors of mortality.
Clinical Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients Using Inhaled Nitric Oxide (iNO) during Intrahospital Transport
Koyfman, Leonid, Simchon, Omri, Koyfman, Anna , Mushaev, Shoshana, Gruenbaum, Benjamin F. , Gal, Ron, Friger, Michael , Arotsker, Natan, Klein, Moti, Brotfain, Evgeni , Brotfain, Evgeni , Gruenbaum, Benjamin Fredrick , Zlotnik, Alexander Anatolievich

Critical Care Research and Practice | May 6, 2021 | Volume: 2021 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-6

10.1155/2021/6633210 | PMID 34035958 Get It

Critically ill patients with severe hypoxemia are often treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) with inhaled nitric oxide (iNO). These patients are at higher risk when they require intrahospital transportation. In this study, we collected clinical and laboratory data from 221 patients who were hospitalized in the general ICU and treated with iNO at Soroka Medical Center, Israel, between January 2010 and December 2019. We retrospectively compared the 65 patients who received iNO during intrahospital transportation to the 156 patients who received iNO without transportation. Among critically ill patients who were transported while being administered iNO, only one patient had an adverse event (atrial fibrillation) on transport. We found that maximal iNO dosage during ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and percent of vasopressor support were the only independent risk factors for ICU mortality in both study groups. No difference in primary outcome of ICU mortality rate was found between the critically ill patients treated with iNO during intrahospital transportation and those who were treated with iNO but not transported during the ICU stay. We anticipate that this study will advise clinical decision-making in the ICU, especially when treating patients who are administered iNO.
Clarity on the Use of Glucose Meters for Critically Ill Hospitalized Patients, But One Big Question Remains to be Answered
Karon, Brad S.

The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine | May 1, 2021 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 813-815

10.1093/jalm/jfab050 | PMID 34089609 Get It

System of Psychological Support Based on Positive Suggestions to the Critically Ill Using ICU Doulas
Karnatovskaia, Lioudmila V. , Schultz, Jason, Steele, Amanda J., Baker, Brittany A., Philbrick, Kemuel L. , Valle, Kathryn T. del , Johnson, Kimberly R. , Gajić, Ognjen, Varga, Katalin , Schultz, Jason M, Del Valle, Kathryn T, Del Valle, Kathryn T , Niven, Alexander S. , Baker, Brittany A., Gajic, Ognjen

Critical Care Explorations | April 27, 2021 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 4 | Pages: e0403

10.1097/cce.0000000000000403 | PMID 33912833 Get It

Background: Surviving critical illness often creates a lasting psychological impact, including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress. Memories of frightening and delusional experiences are the largest potentially modifiable risk factor, but currently, there is no proven intervention to improve these inciting factors. Psychological support based on positive suggestion is a psychotherapeutic approach that can be provided even to patients in altered cognitive states and is therefore a viable psychotherapy intervention throughout the ICU stay. Traditional ICU care team members have limited time and training to provide such psychological support to patients. Doulas are trained supportive companions who have been effectively used to provide patient advocacy and emotional support in other clinical settings and may address this need. Our aim was to train and implement a psychological support based on positive suggestion program for the critically ill using doulas, and measure acceptance of this intervention through stakeholder feedback. Methods: Doula training included three objectives: an introduction to ICU practice structure and policies; education about fundamental aspects of critical care conditions and procedures; and didactic and hands-on learning experiences in effective use of psychological support based on positive suggestion in the critically ill. Doulas were evaluated at the end of their training and during subsequent clinical activities using competency-based assessments as well as through survey-based questions and interviews with key stakeholders. Results: The ICU doulas performed psychological support based on positive suggestion on 43 critically ill patients in the ICU setting. Stakeholder feedback from nurses, patients, and patient families was positive. The majority (28/32) of surveyed bedside ICU nurses reported that the doulas’ involvement was helpful for both patients and nurses alike. All interviewed family members offered positive comments about the ICU doula presence and of the 40 patients who recalled the intervention 37 found it comforting. Conclusions: Our program successfully trained two doulas to work effectively in the ICU setting performing patient-centered psychological support based on positive suggestion interventions. Their training improved their skill sets and was reported as beneficial by patients, families, and critical care nursing. This training program offers a proof of concept that could be applied in other medical centers, bringing doulas more commonly into the ICU practice to help humanize the experience for patients, families, and medical teams.
Bedside Clinicians’ Perceptions on the Contributing Role of Diagnostic Errors in Acutely Ill Patient Presentation: A Survey of Academic and Community Practice
Huang, Chanyan, Barwise, Amelia, Soleimani, Jalal, Dong, Yue, Svetlana, Herasevich, Khan, Syed Anjum, Gavin, Anne, Helgeson, Scott A., Moreno-Franco, Pablo, Pinevich, Yuliya, Kashyap, Rahul, Herasevich, Vitaly, Gajic, Ognjen, Pickering, Brian W., Barwise, Amelia , Huang, Chanyan , Barwise, Amelia K , Huang, Chanyan, Soleimani, Jalal, Dong, Yue, Svetlana, Herasevich, Khan, Syed Anjum, Gavin, Anne, Helgeson, Scott A., Moreno-Franco, Pablo, Pinevich, Yuliya, Kashyap, Rahul, Herasevich, Vitaly, Gajic, Ognjen, Pickering, Brian W.

Journal of Patient Safety | April 2, 2021 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 2 | Pages: e454-e462

10.1097/pts.0000000000000840 | PMID 35188935 Get It

Objectives This study aimed to explore clinicians’ perceptions of the occurrence of and factors associated with diagnostic errors in patients evaluated during a rapid response team (RRT) activation or unplanned admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods A multicenter prospective survey study was conducted among multiprofessional clinicians involved in the care of patients with RRT activations and/or unplanned ICU admissions (UIAs) at 2 academic hospitals and 1 community-based hospital between April 2019 and March 2020. A study investigator screened eligible patients every day. Within 24 hours of the event, a research coordinator administered the survey to clinicians, who were asked the following: whether diagnostic errors contributed to the reason for RRT/UIA, whether any new diagnosis was made after RRT/UIA, if there were any failures to communicate the diagnosis, and if involvement of specialists earlier would have benefited that patient. Patient clinical data were extracted from the electronic health record. Results A total of 1815 patients experienced RRT activations, and 1024 patients experienced UIA. Clinicians reported that 18.2% (95/522) of patients experienced diagnostic errors, 8.0% (42/522) experienced a failure of communication, and 16.7% (87/522) may have benefitted from earlier involvement of specialists. Compared with academic settings, clinicians in the community hospital were less likely to report diagnostic errors (7.0% versus 22.8%, P = 0.002). Conclusions Clinicians report a high rate of diagnostic errors in patients they evaluate during RRT or UIAs.
Intubation Practices and Adverse Peri-intubation Events in Critically Ill Patients From 29 Countries
Russotto, Vincenzo , Laffey, John G. , Tassistro, Elena , Camporota, Luigi , Higgs, A. , Putensen, Christian , Agvald‐Öhman, Christina, Bokums, Kristaps, Brewster, David , Rossi, Emanuela , Fumagalli, Roberto , Pesenti, Antonio, Investigators, INTUBE Study, Ahmed, Hazem , Adhikari, Neill K. J. , Agrawal, Kehari, Agrawal, Nipun , Aguirre-Bermeo, Hernán , Agvald-Öhman, Christina, Ahmad, Meraj, Ajami, Samareh, Akhtar, Shazia N., Alghamdi, Adnan, Alhadi, Abdulmueti , Ali, Syed Muhammad Adnan , Ali, Mohd N., Alias, Anita, Alonso, Julio, Montenegro, Diana Alvarez, Aman, Rubina, Anstey, Matthew , Αrnaoutoglou, Eleni , Baccari, Laura, Baliga, Nishanth, Manjunath, Ramya Ballekatte, Bamane, Shrirang, Bandert, Anna , Bartholdy, Roland, Baturova, Vera , Bellissima, Agrippino , Belsky, Vladislav, Bendre, Prashant, Benini, Annalisa, Besset, Sébastien , Bhattacharyya, Mahuya , Bielański, Piotr, Bigatello, Luca M., Boissier, Florence , Bonney, Iwona, Bowen, David , Boyer, Alexandre, Broman, Lina , Bruel, Cédric , Brunin, Yannick, Bugedo, Guillermo , Calamai, Italo , Campos, Patricia , Canavosio, Federico Giovanni , Cascella, Marco , Catorze, Nuno , Champigneulle, Benoît , Chandwani, Juhi, Chaurasia, Satish, Chawla, Rajesh , Chawla, Aakanksha, Cheetham, Olivia, Chemouni, Frank , Kiok, Lee Chew, Chimunda, Timothy , Chiu, Ching‐Tang , Chiumiento, Fernando, Chudeau, Nicolas , Colica, Sandra, Colin, Gwenhaël , Constantin, Jean‐Michel , Contou, Damien , Costa, Paulo F., Costa, Vasco , Cracchiolo, Andrea, Crone, Petra, Cunha, Rui Pedro, Radivojević, Renata Curić , Dash, Sampat, Pascale, Gennaro De , Torre, Valentina Della, Caprio, Barbara Di, Dimitropoulou, Aikaterini, Edmunds, Christopher , El-Fellah, Nadia, Elhadi, Ahmed , Escudero-Acha, P. , Espinoza, Missael, Esposito, Clelia, Fabretti, Fabrizio, Fein, Daniel , Ferluga, Massimo, Ferré, Alexis , Ferrier, Janet, Flaksa, Marek, Flores, Fernando , Gonzalez, Jesus Flores, Fuentes, Xavier Fonseca , Francis, Roland C. E. , Franco, Daniela G., Franczyk, Pawel, Furman, Mikhail, Gałkin, Piotr, Aguilera, Maria F. García, Garofalo, Eugenio , Gatward, Jonathan, Ghula, Mohamed , Giacomucci, Angelo , Giovannini, Ilaria , Gnanadurai, Kingsly Robert, Godet, Thomas, Fernandez, Gemma Goma , González, María del Carmen Martín, González, Daira, Gopalakrishna, Kadarapura Nanjundaiah , Gottesman, Eric , Gros, Alexandre, Gupta, Manish , Gupta, Kulbhusahn, Hamid, Tarikul , Hamzaoui, Olfa, Hannesdottir, Katrin, Hasan, Shahnaz, Hossain, Mozaffer, Hossein, Sazzad, Hraiech, Sami , Hypes, Cameron, Alkhumsi, Soad Imhmed R., Islam, Motiul, Ismail, Muhamad A., Ivančan, Višnja , Jacquier, Sophie , Jagiasi, Bharat, Jain, Nikhilesh , Jamaluddin, Muhamad Fadhil Hadi, Jeswani, Deepak , Jeswani, Deepti, Jha, Simant , Jones, Benjamin , Jozwiak, Mathieu , Jumić, Aleksandra, Kamp, Oliver , Karametos, Ilias, Karelov, Alexey, Kaufman, David A. , Kaushik, Shuchi, Kesavarapu, Subba R., Khaled, Ala , Khalidah, Hapiz, Khunteta, Sudhir , Kindgen‐Milles, Detlef , Korula, Sara , Kothekar, Amol , Koul, Salman S., Krog, Ditte, Kuellmar, Mira, Kuragayala, Swarna Deepak , Kyparissi, Aikaterini, Labarca, Gonzalo , Lalwani, Jaya, Landaverde, Antonio, Lehr, Andrew , Leonor, Tiago, Licciardi, A, Nava, Claudia L. Lopez, Gallardo, Luis R. Loza, Lungu, Ramona , Luzi, Annalisa, Ma, Wuhua , Μakris, Alexandros , Maheshwarappa, Harish Mallapura , Maraffi, Tommaso , Marcelli, Maria Elena, Mariano, Karim, Marin, Nathalie, Martin, Maëlle, Gonzalez, Mayra Martinez, Matas, Marijana , Matos, Dubier, Maugeri, Jessica Giuseppina , Mazlan, Mohd Zulfakar , Meersch, Melanie , Meher, Ranjan, Mehesry, Tasneem H., Meirik, Maria, Dessap, Armand Mekontso , Mensah, Kwabena , Mercier, Emmanuelle, Midya, Abhirup, Mihaljević, Slobodan , Mirouse, Adrien , Mishra, Prasanna K. , Mistry, Ravi , Moguš, Mate, Nordin, Norbaniza Mohd, Samat, Noryani Mohd, Montini, Luca, Moro, Valeria, Tutillo, Diego Morocho , Mrinal, Sircar, Mudyna, Wojciech, Munta, Kartik, Munusamy, Satheesh , Musso, Stefania, Muttini, Stefano , Irtiza, Ismail Nahla, Nakou, Evi, Narkhede, Amit , Nates, Joseph, Nespoli, M, Nespoli, Francesca, Nikitenko, Artem, Nogueira, Carla, O'Grady, Ross, Odeyemi, Yewande , Ohlsson, Annika , Orsello, Alberto, Palaniswamy, Vijayanand , Palma, Daniela Maria , Palmese, Salvatore , Leal, Jesus N. Pantoja, Papandreou, E., Papanikolaou, Metaxia, Patel, Mayur , Pavlek, Mario , Pedrotti, Niccolò , Hwa, Ngu Pei, Pelagalli, Lorella, Ruiz, Miryam Pérez, Persson, Elin, Petsiou, Athanasia, Philippard, Francois, Piegat, Mariusz, Pili‐Floury, Sébastien, Pinto, Márcia , Piton, Gaël , Plantefève, Gaëtan , Pouplet, Caroline, Pouriki, Sofia, Pradella, Andrea , Prashant, Kumar , Quayle, Alice, Rahmani, Lua S. , Randall, Ian , Ray, Banambar , Reza, Syed T., Ricard, Jean Damien, Riva, Ivano, Rona, Roberto , Rosell, Jon, Rowley, Rebecca, Rumschuessel, Kay, Rundo, Annalisa, Russo, Pierpaolo, Sahu, Samir, Salmon-Gandonnière, Charlotte, Roman, Nandyelly San Juan, Sandefur, Benjamin J. , Santoro, Lida, Sanyal, Rhik, Saravanabavan, Lakshmikanthcharan , Shah, Bhagyesh, Shah, Mehul , Shin, Ming-Hann, Simpson, Shannon, Sinah, Ayush, Singh, D. K., Singh, Nitesh , Singh, Lalit, Skowronski, Lukasz , Sosa, Miguel A. Gama , Spadaro, Savino , Spångfors, Martin , Sperber, Jesper , Spina, Rosario, Srivastava, Anand , Steel, Andrew, Suárez-de-la-Rica, Alejandro , Kumar, Singh Sujeet, Sundrani, Omprakash, Sunil, Nilu, Suparna, Bharadwaj, Surath, Manimala R., Syed, Yadullah, Sztrymf, Benjamin , Tarantino, Stefano, Tileli, Maria, Castro, Hugo Arturo Tirapé , Toledo-Salinas, Otoniel , Tramarin, Jacopo, Tsiftsis, D , Tucić, Iva , León, Jose A. Tutillo, Tutino, Lorenzo, Tyagi, Vijay, Vagdatli, Kyriaki, Varkey, Sneha, Vera, Magdalena , Seth, Magnus Von, Wahlström, C.-G., Ismail, Wan Nasrudin Wan, Winiszewski, Hadrien , Wu, Lun , Zani, Gianluca , Zarka, Jonathan , Zhao, Dawn, Zlotnik, Diane , Bauer, Philippe, Laffey, John G , Labarca, Gonzalo , Alhadi, Abdulmueti , Myatra, Sheila Nainan , Antolini, Laura , Bauer, Philippe R. , Lascarrou, Jean-Baptiste , Szuldrzynski, Konstanty S. , Pelosi, Paolo , Sorbello, Massimiliano , Greif, Robert , Chalkias, Athanasios F. , Pesenti, Antonio, Foti, Giuseppe , Bellani, Giacomo , Investigators, INTUBE Study, Agvald-Öhman, Christina, Ahmad, Meraj, Almekhlafi, Ghaleb A. , Aragão, Irene , Azoulay, Élie , Basto, Marta Lima , Besset, Sebastien, Boni, Elisa, Brazzi, Luca , Broman, Lina, Browne, Alexander, Cappellini, Iacopo , Chao, Anne , Chien, Jung‐Yien , Chou, Nai‐Kuan , Cortegiani, Andrea , Costamagna, Andrea , Cotoia, Antonella , Cracchiolo, Andrea N., Das, Amit, Rosa, Silvia De , Sorbo, Lorenzo Del , Fenza, Raffaele Di , Giacinto, Ida Di , Dudda, Marcel , Ehrentraut, Stefan , Elhadi, Muhammed , Fernandes, Marco, Flores, Fernando, Frat, Jean-Pierre , Fusari, Maurizio , Moraes, Alice Gallo de , Gammaldi, Renato , Gaszynski, Tomasz M , Godet, Thomas , Goffi, Alberto , González-Castro, A. , Guervilly, Christophe , Guitton, Christophe , Huang, Chun‐Kai , Jankowski, Miłosz , Jones, Laura, Karelov, Alexey, Katsoulis, P. , Kaye, Callum T. , Khalidah, Hapiz, Khan, Akram , Ku, Shih‐Chi , Kuo, Lu-Cheng , Lalwani, Jaya, Laserna, Andrés , Lee, Chien‐Chang , Legriel, Stéphane , Li, Yongxing , Licciardi, Anna Lisa, Litton, Edward , Ломиворотов, В. В. , Longhini, Federico , Магомедов, М. А. , Геннадьевна, Марова Надежда , Maseda, Emilio , Mastroianni, Fiore , Michálek, Pavel , Mishra, Prasanna, Mistry, Ravi, Montini, Luca , Montrucchio, Giorgia Giuseppina , Mosier, Jarrod , Mudyna, Wojciech, Müller, Grégoire , Munta, Kartik, Musso, Stefania, Nakou, Evi, Nates, Joseph L. , Nogueira, Carla, Leal, Jesús Nicolás Pantoja, Papandreou, Eleni, Parotto, Matteo , Persson, Elin, Pezzi, Angelo , Philip, Sam, Pinciroli, Riccardo , Pinto, Marcia, Pouplet, Caroline, Regli, Adrian , Roca, Oriol , Rosell, Jon, Ruan, Sheng‐Yuan , Sahu, Samir, Sales, Gabriele , Roman, Nandyelly San Juan, Sánchez‐Hurtado, Luis Alejandro , Santafe, Manel, Sanyal, Rhik, Shah, Bhagyesh, Silva, Monica, Simpson, Shannon, Singh, Atul Kumar , Singh, Lalit, Sosa, Miguel A., Srivastava, Anand, Szakmány, Tamás , Tabah, Alexis , León, José Andrés Tutillo , Wahlstrom, Carl, Hassan, Wan Mohd Nazaruddin Wan , Wang, Kuo‐Chuan , Wu, Jiayan , Yeh, Yu‐Chang , Young, Paul J.

JAMA | March 23, 2021 | Volume: 325 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1164

10.1001/jama.2021.1727 | PMID 33755076 Get It

Terminal Delirium in Hospice: The Experiences and Perspectives of Caregivers Providing Care to Terminally Ill Patients in Home Settings
Soroka, Jacek T. , Fling, Krista J., Heibel, Jennifer M., Kutcher, Gregory R., Ward, Sarah , Ward, Sarah J

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® | March 9, 2021 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 27-33

10.1177/10499091211000729 | PMID 33685252 Get It

Objectives: Little is known about the experiences of caregivers who provide care to persons with terminal delirium (TD) in home settings. This scarcity of information is suggestive that further research is needed about care for hospice patients with delirium in the home and community. Aim: To elicit views, feelings, and end-of-life care experiences of primary caregivers assisting dying persons with TD in hospice at home. Design: Qualitative, exploratory, cross-sectional study design was chosen. In-depth semistructured interviews explored caregiver experiences in caring for persons with TD. Qualitative thematic framework analysis was used. Participants: Fifteen bereaved adult primary caregivers who received services from a hospice care program affiliated with a large nonprofit health system in the US Midwest. Results: Caregiver experiences were broad and reflected 4 major themes: symptomology, coping, effective and noneffective interventions, and support. The most distressing factors for caregivers were behaviors and symptomology of TD. They did not know what to say, how to respond, and how best to behave with someone who had delirium. Many caregivers had the impression that medication does not lessen delirium symptoms and that nonpharmacologic interventions are effective and beneficial only when they were important and meaningful to patients before delirium onset. Conclusions: This study added new knowledge from direct and personal perspectives of caregivers providing end-of-life care to patients at home. Understanding developed about provision of care to someone with TD in home hospice. Improved comprehension of caregiver experiences can help professional hospice and palliative care staff better prepare caregivers for when patients have TD.
C19TM: A nurse practitioner and physician assistant–led telemonitoring initiative ensures timely transfer of critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients
Santos, Christan D. , Grek, Ami , Ojard, Michelle, Propst, Joshua, Hastings, Jacquelyn J., Krider, Tina L., Villar, Dolores, Sanghavi, Devang , Siegel, Jason , Siegel, Jason L, Freeman, William D.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners | February 21, 2021 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1120-1124

10.1097/jxx.0000000000000558 | PMID 33560753 Get It

ABSTRACT The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has required swift implementation of innovative practices in health care across the globe. We describe a nurse practitioner (NP) and physician assistant (PA)–led initiative to implement telemonitoring (TM) of noncritical patients with COVID-19 by critical care NPs and PAs (C19TM) for early detection of decompensation and early transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU). Every hospitalized patient with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 received an initial telemedicine consult with a critical care NP or PA. Patients were subsequently monitored via electronic health record once every 12-hour shift for the following indicators: oxygen modality and flow, increase in oxygen requirements, sustained tachypnea, and hemodynamic instability. If signs of decompensation were noted, the NP/PA would remotely reassess the patient, provide recommendations to the hospital internal medicine team, and transfer the patient to the ICU. The primary goal was to avoid cardiopulmonary deterioration requiring aerosol-generating procedures outside of the ICU. Over 65 days, 113 patients (86 suspected and 27 confirmed) were enrolled in C19TM. As a result, there were 13 transfers to the ICU, none of which required an aerosol-generating procedure outside of the ICU.
460: Neurotoxicity in Critically Ill Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) Patients: The CAR-ICU Experience
Hensley, Matthew K. , Ghosh, Monalisa , Dharshan, Ananda, Rajendram, Prabalini , Hill, Brian T. , Arias, Alejandro , Nates, Joseph, Gutiérrez, Cristina , Mead, Elena, Herr, Megan M. , Duggal, Abhijit , Lin, Yi , May, Heather P. , Moraes, Alice Gallo de , Feng, Lei , Beitinjaneh, Amer , Nates, Joseph L. , Westin, Jason R. , Brown, Anne Rain , Pastores, Stephen M.

Critical Care Medicine | December 18, 2020 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 221-221

10.1097/01.ccm.0000727728.96909.0e Get It