Citations

Abstract Background Women with benign breast disease (BBD) have an increased risk for breast cancer (BC). Almost 30% of all BCs develop in women with prior BBD. Information about the features of the expected BCs after BBD would enable individualized surveillance and prevention strategies for these women. We sought to characterize BCs developing in a large cohort of women with BBD. Methods Our cohort includes 13,485 women who underwent breast biopsy for mammographic or palpable concern between 1967-2001. Biopsy slides were reviewed and classified as nonproliferative (NP), proliferative disease without atypia (PDWA), or atypical hyperplasia (AH). BCs were identified by follow-up questionnaires, medical records, and Tumor Registry data. BC tissues were obtained and reviewed. Results With a median follow-up of 15.8 years, 1273 women developed BC. Most BCs were invasive (81%), among which 61% were ductal, 13% mixed ductal/lobular, and 14% lobular. Two thirds were intermediate or high-grade, and 29% were node positive. Cancer characteristics were similar across the three histologic categories of BBD, with similar frequency of DCIS and invasive disease, tumor size, time to invasive BC, histologic type of BC, nodal positivity and HER2 positivity. Women with AH had a higher frequency of ER+ BC (91%) vs women with PD (80%) or NP (85%), p=0.02. Conclusion A substantial proportion of all BCs develop in women with prior BBD. We show that the majority of BCs after BBD are invasive tumors of ductal type, with a substantial proportion node positive. 84% of cancers were ER-positive. Chemoprevention should be strongly encouraged in higher-risk women with BBD. Citation Format: Visscher DW, Frost MH, Hartmanan LC, Frank RD, Vierkant RA, McCullough AE, Winham SJ, Vachon C, Ghosh K, Brandt KR, Farrell AM, Tarabishy Y, Hieken TJ, Haddad TC, Kraft RA, Radisky DC, Degnim AC. Clinicopathologic features of breast cancers that develop in women with previous benign breast disease. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-19.

Abstract Background Women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) are at an approximately four-fold increased risk of subsequent breast cancer (BC). Mammographic breast density (MBD) is a well-established risk factor for BC, but its contribution to BC risk in women with AH remains an open question. We previously reported no association between MBD [measured by Wolfe's parenchymal pattern (PP)] and BC risk in a cohort of 147 women with AH. Here, we present results in an expanded cohort of 459 women diagnosed with AH between 1985 and 2001. Methods The Mayo Clinic Benign Breast Disease Cohort includes 13,485 women who had benign core and/or excisional biopsy 1967-2001. Biopsy tissues were reviewed by our study pathologist to determine presence of AH. MBD was available from clinical records starting in 1985, coded as PP (the standard for 1985-1996) or BI-RADS (1997-2001) density criteria. The original four-level PP (N1-fatty, P1-ductal prominence <25% of breast, P2-ductal prominence >25%, DY-dysplasia) and BI-RADS (fatty, scattered densities, heterogeneously dense, extremely dense) measures were re-categorized as low, moderate or high MBD by combining the middle two categories for each. BC events and clinical information were obtained by questionnaires, medical records and the Mayo Clinic Tumor Registry. Women were followed from benign biopsy to date of BC, death or last contact. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were generated overall and within subgroups defined by density measure (PP vs. BI-RADS), number of atypical foci, and BMI by dividing the observed number of BCs by population-based expected values. Cox regression was used to estimate MBD hazard ratios after adjustment for demographic and clinical variables. Results Of the 551 women diagnosed with AH between 1985 and 2001, 459 (83%) had MBD data within 1 year prior to biopsy. Of these, 68 (15%) had low, 221 (48%) had moderate, and 170 (37%) had high MBD, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 11.7 years, 80 BCs were observed. SIRs for breast cancer did not differ significantly across density categories, overall or within any subgroups examined (see Table). Cox regression adjusting for age, BMI and density measure (PP vs. BI-RADS) also failed to identify an association with MBD (p=0.55). Low MBDModerate MBDHigh MBD N / BCsSIR (95% CI)N / BCsSIR (95% CI)N / BCsSIR (95% CI)P-valueOverall68/123.5 (1.8,6.1)221/393.6 (2.5,4.9)170/293.4 (2.3,4.8)0.97MBD Measure PP59/113.6 (1.8,6.5)85/153.0 (1.7,5.0)130/243.3 (2.2,5.0)0.87BI-RADS9/12.7 (0.1,14.7)136/244.0 (2.6,6.0)40/53.4 (1.1,7.9)0.90No. Atypical Foci 147/62.3 (0.9,5.1)123/182.8 (1.7,4.4)96/163.5 (2.0,5.8)0.63214/47.5 (2.0,19.1)58/134.8 (2.6,8.3)41/62.5 (0.9,5.5)0.213+7/26.7 (0.8,24.0)40/84.4 (1.9,8.6)33/74.0 (1.0,8.2)0.83BMI <2525/21.5 (0.2,5.4)75/184.9 (2.9,7.7)101/173.4 (2.0,5.5)0.1625-2919/54.9 (1.6,11.3)68/92.8 (1.3,5.2)36/42.1 (0.6,5.4)0.4530+23/54.8 (1.6,11.2)76/123.0 (1.6,5.3)32/74.0 (1.6,8.2)0.67SIRs compare observed numer of BCs to expected using Iowa SEER data. Analyses account for the effects of age and calendar period. P-value is test of heterogeneity in SIRs across columns. Conclusions We found no evidence of an association between MBD and subsequent BC in women with AH. Citation Format: Vierkant RA, Degnim AC, Hartmann LC, Frank RD, Radisky DC, Visscher DW, Frost MH, Winham SJ, Ghosh K, Vachon CM. No evidence of association between mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer in women with atypical hyperplasia. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-09-05.

Abstract Introduction: CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are important effector cells in the adaptive immune response against cancers. In premalignant proliferative breast tissues, the role of the immune system remains relatively undefined. In this study, we sought to investigate and quantify the presence of CD4 and CD8 expressing immune cells in benign breast tissues and their association with breast cancer risk. Method: Archived breast tissue samples from women with benign breast disease (BBD) or no clinical breast disease [Komen Tissue Bank (KTB)] were obtained for this age-matched case-control study. BBD samples included BBD cases (subsequently developed breast cancer) and BBD controls). Tissue sections were characterized for non-proliferative or proliferative disease and degree of lobular involution. CD4+ and CD8+ cell densities (cells/mm2) were obtained by digital image quantitation for up to 10 individual lobules per sample and a per-sample estimate of cell density was calculated as the median cell density across lobules within a sample. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: Among 267 women (median age 52, range 35-75) comprising 89 age-matched triplets, 2417 lobules were evaluated [783 KTB, 804 BBD case, 830 BBD control]. 1372 (57%) lobules were normal and 1045 (43%) were fibrocystic. CD4+ cells were present in 1903 (79%) lobules while CD8+ cells were present in 2214 (92%) lobules. CD4 and CD8 densities showed a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.39) with each other, but overall, lobules showed a lower density of CD4+ than CD8+ cells (mean difference -54 cells/mm2, 95% CI: -68 to -39 cells/mm2). At the per sample level (see Table), BBD controls showed significantly higher levels of both CD4+ (p=0.009) and CD8+ cells (p=0.0001) compared to KTB samples. In contrast, the BBD cases only showed elevated CD8 (p=0.007) and not CD4 (p=0.21) cell infiltrates compared to KTB samples. Comparing BBD cases to BBD controls, BBD cases showed significantly lower CD8 cell density as compared to BBD controls (p=0.002) and cases had lower CD4 cell density but the difference was not significant (p=0.07). Despite these differences in the cell densities, the ratio of CD4:CD8+ cells did not differ significantly across groups (p=0.83). The CD4:CD8+ ratio also did not differ significantly by histologic impression (p=0.74), degree of involution (p=0.27), or age (p=0.32). KTBBBD ControlsBBD CasesMedian (IQR)(n=89)(n=89)(n=89)CD4+ cells/mm240 (17-95)60 (25-124)49 (21-92)CD8+ cells/mm285 (49-131)157 (84-225)134 (80-168)Ratio (CD4:CD8)*0.45 (0.14-0.96)0.41 (0.15-0.81)0.40 (0.19-0.70)*Ratio is missing for n=7 samples (3 KTB, 2 BBD control, 2 BBD case) with undefined ratio due to zero CD8+ cells for all lobules in the sample. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that BBD is associated with increased infiltration of T cells into the breast tissue. Furthermore, these immune responses appear more robust in BBD patients at lower risk of developing breast cancer. Citation Format: Pena Jimenez A, Hoskin TL, Arshad MA, Visscher DW, Brahmbhatt RD, Miller EE, Stallings Mann ML, Carter JM, Murphy LM, Winham SJ, Radisky DC, Denison LA, Knutson KA, Degnim AC. CD4 and CD8 T cell densities are increased in benign breast disease compared to normal breast tissue. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-04-09.

Abstract Basal subtype breast cancers have a particularly poor prognosis, with high invasiveness and resistance to most targeted therapies. TGFβ and MYC drive central features of basal breast cancer: TGFβ is an autocrine and paracrine signaling factor that drives cell invasion and metastasis, and MYC is a central regulator of cellular proliferation that is upregulated in many cancer types. We show here that genetic or pharmacologic inhibition of MYC in MCF10A basal breast cells results in increased sensitivity to TGFβ-stimulated invasion and metastasis and also show that this signaling loop is dependent on activation of SRC. Analysis of human breast cancer datasets and additional experiments with breast cancer cell lines further suggest the relevance of this signaling loop in basal, but not luminal, breast cancers. Our results imply precaution should be taken when utilizing therapeutic inhibitors of MYC with basal breast cancer patients as this could lead to increased metastasis; however, simultaneous pharmacologic inhibition of SRC and MYC for these patients could facilitate the antiproliferative effects of MYC inhibition while blocking the consequent promotion of metastasis. Cancer Res; 76(12); 3520–30. ©2016 AACR.

Engineered protein therapeutics offer advantages, including strong target affinity, selectivity and low toxicity, but like natural proteins can be susceptible to proteolytic degradation, thereby limiting their effectiveness. A compelling therapeutic target is mesotrypsin, a protease up-regulated with tumour progression, associated with poor prognosis, and implicated in tumour growth and progression of many cancers. However, with its unique capability for cleavage and inactivation of proteinaceous inhibitors, mesotrypsin presents a formidable challenge to the development of biological inhibitors. We used a powerful yeast display platform for directed evolution, employing a novel multi-modal library screening strategy, to engineer the human amyloid precursor protein Kunitz protease inhibitor domain (APPI) simultaneously for increased proteolytic stability, stronger binding affinity and improved selectivity for mesotrypsin inhibition. We identified a triple mutant APPIM17G/I18F/F34V, with a mesotrypsin inhibition constant (Ki) of 89 pM, as the strongest mesotrypsin inhibitor yet reported; this variant displays 1459-fold improved affinity, up to 350 000-fold greater specificity and 83-fold improved proteolytic stability compared with wild-type APPI. We demonstrated that APPIM17G/I18F/F34V acts as a functional inhibitor in cell-based models of mesotrypsin-dependent prostate cancer cellular invasiveness. Additionally, by solving the crystal structure of the APPIM17G/I18F/F34V–mesotrypsin complex, we obtained new insights into the structural and mechanistic basis for improved binding and proteolytic resistance. Our study identifies a promising mesotrypsin inhibitor as a starting point for development of anticancer protein therapeutics and establishes proof-of-principle for a novel library screening approach that will be widely applicable for simultaneously evolving proteolytic stability in tandem with desired functionality for diverse protein scaffolds.

Summary The transcription factor forkhead box protein A1 (FOXA1) plays a critical role in the proliferation of human breast cancer cells, particularly estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)‐positive luminal breast cancer cells. However, genetic studies of the requirement for Foxa1 in mammary tumor formation in mice have been hampered by the lack of a conditional gene ablation. We examined three mouse models of mammary‐specific ablation of Foxa1 in ductal epithelial cells to identify the best system for complete and mammary‐specific ablation of Foxa1. We found that MMTV‐Cre and MMTV‐rtTA;Tet‐On‐Cre led to partial deletion of Foxa1 and attenuated mammary duct formation, whereas Krt14‐Cre led to complete ablation of Foxa1 and abolished mammary duct formation, in Foxa1 loxP/loxP mice. These results demonstrate that Foxa1 is essential for mammary duct formation, and reveal a series of mouse models in which mammary expression of Foxa1 can be attenuated or completely blocked. Our study also suggests a potentially powerful model for complete ablation of Foxa1 in mammary epithelial cells using Krt14‐driven Cre expression in an inducible manner, such as Krt14‐rtTA;Tet‐On‐Cre . This model system will facilitate further in vivo functional studies of Foxa1 or other factors in mammary gland development and tumor formation and progression. genesis 54:277–285, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.