Citations

Abstract Abstract 3881 Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is largely incurable neoplasm of the blood and has one of the highest familial risks of disease among cancers. Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) with a CLL immunophenotypic profile (i.e., CLL-like MBL) is a precursor state to CLL. In the general adult population, the prevalence rate of MBL is 5–9% and increases with age. This is in contrast to the 13–18% rate of MBL in first-degree relatives of CLL patients from high-risk families (defined here as families with at least two confirmed living cases of CLL). Few longitudinal studies of MBL incidence exists. One study evaluated MBL status over time in a cohort of individuals with MBL from a rural valley in Northern Italy. Our work herein will be the first to evaluate the status of MBL over time in relatives of CLL patients from high-risk families. Methods: Using a cohort of 41 high-risk CLL families, we evaluated the MBL status and clonal blood B-cell counts in 94 relatives of CLL patients at two time points at least 1 year a part. High sensitivity, multi-color flow cytometry was performed on fresh or previously frozen blood samples in three laboratories: Duke University, the US Food and Drug Administration, and Mayo Clinic. The number of cell events collected for flow cytometry evaluation varied from 1 to 5 x105 cells. To assure concordance across flow cytometry laboratories, 15 samples were evaluated at multiple labs. The concordance of MBL calling was a 100%. We defined three monotypic B-cell subsets as CLL-like MBL (CD5+ CD20dim), atypical MBL (CD5+ CD20+), and non-CLL like MBL (CD5−CD20+). Results: Of the 94 relatives, the median age at consent was 57 years (range 42–93) and 39% were male. At the initial MBL screening, 70 (74%) relatives had normal immunophenotype (NIPT) and 24 (26%) had MBL (1 atypical MBL, 3 non-CLL like MBL, and 20 CLL-like MBL). Seven of the 24 individuals with MBL had monoclonal B-cell counts available at baseline screening; median = 147.4 cells/uL (range 22.7–1663). The 94 relatives underwent repeat evaluation with a median follow up time of 1.8 years (range 1–6). At the second evaluation, we found an increase in the prevalence of MBL, with 11 of the 70 (12%) initially NIPT relatives developing a new MBL clone (10 CLL-like, 1 non-CLL like). These 11 incident MBL cases were from 9 families with 2 families each having 2 relatives changing MBL status. The median number of monoclonal B-cells in these 11 incident MBL cases was 0.58 cells/uL (range 0.38–60.3). The 23 out of the 24 relatives with baseline MBL (20 CLL-like MBL and 3 non-CLL like MBL) had a persistent MBL clone. Only 6 of these 23 individuals had monoclonal B-cell counts available at both time points, and among these 6, the clonal B-cell counts decreased at follow-up screening; median difference −64.1 cells/uL (range −1204.3– 10.5). The second evaluation of the initial atypical MBL relative had too few clonal cells for flow assessment. Conclusion: We found that our CLL-like MBL clones persisted over the period of observation in relatives from high-risk CLL families; this finding is similar to that previously reported using a population-based study conducted in Northern Italy. Notably, 12% of relatives from high-risk CLL families developed incident MBL during just 2 years of follow up. Although these MBL clones are all low count (< 1500 cells/uL), these data provide further evidence that MBL is a marker of inherited predisposition to CLL. It will be important to see how our rate of change of MBL status compares to that of the general population as we continue to follow our cohort of CLL families. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background U2AF1 mutations occur in approximately 16% of patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and were significantly associated with anemia, thrombocytopenia, older age, JAK2V617F, ASXL1 mutations and normal karyotype (Leukemia 2014;28:431); furthermore, U2AF1 mutations were associated with inferior survival in univariate but not multivariable analysis. In the current study, we looked for the possibility of a differential effect from U2AF1 mutation variants on these observations in PMF. Methods Study patients fulfilled the 2016 WHO criteria for the diagnosis of PMF (Blood. 2016;127:2391). Additional selection criteria included the availability of U2AF1 mutational status. Previously published methods (Leukemia 2014;28:431), including targeted next generation sequencing (Blood 2015 126:354), were used to screen for U2AF1 and other prognostically-relevant mutations. Statistical analyses considered clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at time of initial referral to the Mayo Clinic. Results Patient characteristics: U2AF1 mutational status was available for 457 patients and 72 (16%) harbored one of several mutation variants: these mutations affected residue Q157 in 44 (10%) patients, S34 in 24 (5%) and the remaining 1% displayed other variants. The 44 patients with U2AF1Q157 mutations included 23 with Q157P, 18 with Q157R and 3 with Q157-Y158insYE. The 24 patients with U2AF1S34 included 16 with S34F and 8 with S34Y. Only one patient harbored both Q157 and S34 mutations (Q157R, S34Y). Among all 457 study patients, median age was 63 years, 64% were males, dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS)-plus (JCO 2011;29:392) risk distributions were 13% low, 18% intermediate-1, 38% intermediate-2 and 32% high and driver mutation distributions were 54% JAK2, 22% CALR type 1/ type1-like, 4% CALR type 2/type 2-like, 7% MPL and 13% triple-negative. Cytogenetic studies were available in 449 patients: 39% abnormal and 10% unfavorable. All 457 patients were screened for ASXL1 mutations with 37% mutated, 450 for SRSF2 mutations with 15% mutated, 403 for SF3B1 with 8% mutated, 366 for IDH1/2 with 5% mutated and 369 for EZH2 with 4% mutated. Median follow-up was 4.4 years and during this period, 318 (70%) deaths and 53 (12%) leukemic transformations were documented. Phenotypic correlates of U2AF1 mutation variants: Because of the relatively small number of informative cases with specific mutations, we classified all patients into Q157 (n=44) and S34 (n=24) mutation variants and compared them with the 385 U2AF1 un-mutated cases. First, we confirmed our previous observations regarding the association between U2AF1 mutations in general and older age (p=0.0003), JAK2V617F (p<0.0001), ASXL1 mutations (p=0.0002), normal karyotype (p=0.03), hemoglobin <10 g/dL (p<0.0001) and platelet count <100 x 10(9)/L (p<0.0001); when the two U2AF1 mutation categories were analyzed separately, the corresponding p values for Q157 were 0.0005, 0.001, <0.0001, 0.04, <0.0001 and <0.0001 and for S34 were 0.12, 0.001, 0.41, 0.41, <0.0001 and 0.67. Phenotypic correlates of U2AF1 mutation variants: In univariate analysis, survival was adversely affected by U2AF1Q157 (p<0.0001; HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.6-3.1) but not by U2AF1S34 (p=0.8; HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.6-1.8) mutations (Figure 1a). Furthermore, the negative survival effect of U2AF1Q157 mutations was independent of anemia, thrombocytopenia, ASXL1, SRSF2, IDH1/2 and EZH2 mutations, as well as driver mutational status; multivariable analysis that included all molecular alterations identified U2AF1Q157 (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3), ASXL1 (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.8-3.5), SRSF2 (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.2) and absence of CALR type-1/like (HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.8-3.5) mutations as independent risk factors for survival. Finally, the survival effect of U2AF1Q157 mutations was independent of DIPSS-plus in patients with hemoglobin ≥10 g/dL (HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.3-5.3; p=0.007) (Figure 1c) but not in those with hemoglobin <10 g/dL (p=0.98) (Figure 1b). Conclusion Both U2AF1Q157 and U2AF1S34 mutation variants in PMF are associated with JAK2V617F and severe anemia whereas only the former is associated with ASXL1 mutations and thrombocytopenia. More importantly, U2AF1Q157, but not U2AF1S34, mutation variants in PMF are predictive of inferior survival, independent of other adverse mutations, and, in the absence of severe anemia, independent of DIPSS-plus. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 3903 INTRODUCTION: Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis is an asymptomatic hematologic condition characterized by the presence of small populations of clonal B-cells in the blood or bone marrow occurring in 3–5% of the general population over age 40. Although MBL is considered the precursor state to CLL and other sub-types of indolent non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, most individuals with MBL will not develop a B-cell malignancy. It is unknown, however, whether individuals with MBL may be at risk for other adverse outcomes associated with CLL, such as increased risk of infection. To explore this aspect, we evaluated the risk of hospitalization for infection among patients with clinically recognized MBL and compared this to a cohort of general medicine patients and a cohort of CLL patients. METHODS: The Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR), a tertiary referral center in rural southeastern Minnesota, is also the primary hematology center for southeastern Minnesota, northern Iowa, and western Wisconsin. There are no metropolitan areas or hematology specialty centers within a 50 mile radius. To explore the natural history of infection in a local, community dwelling cohort of individuals with clinically identified, CLL-phenotype MBL, we used the Mayo Clinic CLL database to identify all patients with newly diagnosed MBL seen in the MCR Hematology Division between January 1999 and December 2009. Analysis was limited to MBL cases who resided within 50 miles of MCR. The comparison cohort consisted of 689 adult patients also resided within 50 miles of MCR who were seen for a general medical examination between September 2002 and December 2009 and who were enrolled as controls in a case-control study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Rates of infection among individuals with MBL were also compared to a cohort of 174 patients with newly diagnosed CLL diagnosed in the same time interval and who resided within 50 miles of MCR. All hospitalizations in these 3 groups were audited to document hospitalization with infection including cross-referenced with the electronic Mayo Clinic infection database, which contains all culture results obtained from hospitalized patients at MCR. Serologies and viral assays (e.g. CMV viral load) were also reviewed. Patients whose cultures were negative but who were given a clinical diagnosis of infection (e.g. pneumonia) and who were treated with a full course of antibiotics were considered to have a culture negative infection. Among the cases, only hospitalizations after CLL or MBL diagnosis were considered. RESULTS: In May 2010, there were 524 individuals in the Mayo Clinic MBL/CLL Database with the diagnosis of CLL-phenotype MBL made between January 1999 – December 2009. Of these, 154 (29%) patients resided within a 50 mile radius of Mayo Clinic and were considered a local, community-based cohort of MBL patients. Median age at MBL diagnosis for these 154 patients was 70 years (range 45–94). After median follow-up of 4.2 years (range 0.3–10.6 years), 25 (16%) individuals with MBL were hospitalized with infection as compared to 20/689 (3%) individuals in the control population (odds ratio MBL relative to control=6.5; p<0.001) and 32/174 (18%) in the cohort of patients with newly diagnosed CLL (OR MBL relative to CLL=0.9; p=0.61) (Figure 1). The 25 MBL patients hospitalized for infection were hospitalized a total of 39 times (median 1 hospitalization for infection per individual). A specific infectious organism was identified by cultures or serologies in 8/39 (21%) hospitalizations among individuals with MBL, 10/27 (37%) hospitalizations for infection among controls, and 60 (63%) of the 89 hospitalizations for infection in CLL cases. Finally we performed a pooled multivariable analysis of all patients (n=1017) adjusting for age, sex, presence of MBL, diagnosis of CLL, and whether patients with CLL or MBL received treatment for CLL during follow-up. All factors were independently associated with risk of hospitalization for infection [Age (per year, OR=1.02, p=0.02), sex (male, OR=2.6, p=0.001), presence of MBL (OR=3.3, p<0.001), diagnosis of CLL (OR=3.0, p=0.002), and treatment for CLL (OR=3.3, p<0.001)]. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, patients with newly diagnosed clinical-MBL had a 6.5 fold risk of hospitalization for infection relative to the control cohort. MBL was an independent risk factor for hospitalization for infection after controlling for age, sex, and treatment. Disclosures: Zent: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Kay:Biothera: Research Funding; Clegene: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Supergen: Research Funding; Calistoga: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent Biosolutions (Formerly Trubion): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Background The Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS)-plus currently provides the most comprehensive prognostic model for primary myelofibrosis (PMF) (JCO 2011;29:392). DIPSS-pluse uses eight independent predictors of inferior survival: age >65 years, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, leukocyte count >25 x 109/L, circulating blasts ³1%, constitutional symptoms, unfavorable karyotype, red cell transfusion need and platelet count <100 x 109/L. More recently, type 1/type 1-like CALR driver mutational status and ASXL1 andSRSF2 mutations were identified as additional DIPSS-plus-independent risk factors for survival in PMF (JAMAOncol. 2015;1:97). Based on our earlier preliminary observation (Leuk Res. 2007;31:1503), we conducted the current study to fully examine the additional prognostic relevance of monocytosis (absolute monocyte count ≥1 x 10(9)/L) in PMF. Methods Study patients fulfilled the 2016 WHO criteria for the diagnosis of PMF, including both pre-PMF and overt PMF (Blood. 2016;127:2391). Additional selection criteria included the availability of absolute monocyte count (AMC) and percentage at time of referral. Targeted next generation sequencing was used to screen for prognostically-relevant mutations (Blood 2015 126:354). Statistical analyses considered clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at time of initial referral to the Mayo Clinic. Results Patient characteristics: The study population included 454 patients (median age 64 years; 62% males); 293 (64%) patients harbored JAK2 mutations, 74 (16%) type 1/like CALR, 16 (3%) type 2/like CALR, 24 (5%) MPL and 47 (10%) were "triple-negative". DIPSS-plus risk distribution was 29% high, 38% intermediate-2, 17% intermediate-1 and 15% low; 27% displayed red cell transfusion-dependency, 29% constitutional symptoms, 70% palpable splenomegaly and 36% abnormal karyotype, including 13% with unfavorable karyotype. 301 patients were screened for ASXL1 mutations with 39% mutated, 297 for SRSF2 mutations with 15% mutated, 286 for U2AF1 with 18% mutated, 253 for SF3B1 with 6% mutated, 229 for EZH2 with 5% mutated and 110 for IDH1/2 with 7% mutated. Clinical, cytogenetic and molecular comparisons between PMF patients with and without monocytosis: Among all study patients, 376 (83%) displayed AMC <1 x 10(9)/L; the remaining had either moderate (AMC between 1 and 3 x 10(9)/L; n=65) or marked (AMC >3 x 10(9)/L; n=13) monocytosis. Comparison of these three groups revealed that monocytosis was significantly associated with older age (p=0.0001), higher leukocyte count (p<0.0001), lower platelet count (p=0.01), higher circulating blast percentage (p=0.0002) and higher DIPSS-plus risk distribution (p=0.01). There were no significant differences in the distribution of driver mutations, ASXL1, SRSF2, U2AF, SF3B1, EZH2 or IDH1/2 mutations or incidence of unfavorable karyotype. Survival analysis: After a median follow up of 3.2 years, 265 (58%) deaths and 38 (8%) leukemic transformations were documented. In univariate analysis, all 8 variables included in DIPSS-plus were significantly associated with shortened survival (p<0.001 in all instances). Significant risk factors in univariate analysis also included AMC >3 x 10(9)/L (p<0.0001; HR 5.6, 95% CI 3.1-10.0), AMC 1 to 3 x 10(9)/L (p<0.0001; HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.5-2.9), absence of CALR type 1/type 1-like (p<0.0001) and presence of ASXL1 (p<0.0001) or SRSF2 (p<0.0001) mutations. The significant difference in survival between the three AMC categories (i.e. <1, 1-3 and >3 x 10(9)L) was independent of each one of the eight DIPSS-plus variables, DIPSS-plus, driver mutational status, ASXL1 and SRSF2 mutations (p<0.0001 in all instances). The survival difference between patients with and without monocytosis was evident in both high/intermediate-2 and low/intermediate-1 DIPSS-plus risk groups (Figure). Patients with monocytosis were also more likely to undergo leukemic transformation (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.4-6.5) and this effect was also independent of karyotype, driver mutational status, ASXL1 or SRSF2 mutations. Conclusion The current study identifies monocytosis as a powerful risk factor for both overall and leukemia-free survival in PMF and the effect was independent of currently established prognostic models and genetic risk factors. It was particularly noteworthy to document similar distribution of driver mutations among the three monocyte categories. Figure Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 3899 BACKGROUND: Although chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) has substantially improved response rates, treatment free survival, and overall survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), only 40–50% of patients achieve a complete remission and the majority have residual disease when evaluated using sensitive assays for minimal residual disease (MRD). While these facts generated interest in consolidation strategies for patients with residual disease, previous trials of alemtuzumab-based consolidation found excess morbidity/mortality. In 2008 we began a trial of lenalidomide-based consolidation for patients with previously untreated CLL who had received 6 cycles of CIT induction. Preliminary analysis suggested that lenalidomide consolidation may improve the quality of response and prolong time to retreatment (Shanafelt; ASH 2010), although follow-up was short (median 16 months). METHODS: Eligible patients were previously untreated and had CLL in need of treatment according to the NCI-WG criteria (Blood 111:5446). Treatment schema consisted of 6 cycles of pentostatin (2 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) and rituximab (375 mg/m2) given every 21 days (Blood 109:405). All patients completing 6 cycles of PCR induction, underwent complete restaging including evaluation for MRD using sensitive flow cytometry. Patients subsequently received 6 months of lenalidomide consolidation by daily administration with a starting lenalidomide dose of 5 mg/day and escalation to 10 mg/day after the first cycle as tolerated. Patients again underwent complete restaging including MRD evaluation after 6 months of lenalidomide. At the time of restaging, MRD negative patients entered observation. Those with residual disease continued on lenalidomide and underwent repeat MRD assessment every 3 months until an MRD negative state was achieved. RESULTS: 45 patients were enrolled at Mayo Clinic between 3/2008 and 12/2009 of whom 44 were eligible. Median age was 65 (range: 44–78) and 71% of patients were male. 61% of patients had intermediate Rai risk and 39% high Rai risk. On prognostic testing 32% were CD38+, 52% Zap-70+, 52% IGHV unmutated, and 16% had high risk FISH (del 17p13; del 11q22). Of the 38 eligible patients who completed 6 cycles of PCR induction, 34 (89%) initiated lenalidomide consolidation. Thus by intent to treat analysis, 34/44 (77%) patients starting CIT with PCR were able to receive consolidation therapy. Among the 34 patients who initiated consolidation, the median number of cycles of lenalidomide received was 6 (range: 1–29). Nine of 34 (26%) patients had the lenalidomide dose increased to 10 mg daily while 18 (53%) required a reduction to 5 mg every other day. Five patients are still on lenalidomide at the time of this report. No cases of tumor lysis syndrome or tumor flare reaction were observed. Adverse events deemed at least possibly related to lenalidomide consolidation included 23 (68%) patients with grade 3+ hematologic toxicity and 5 (15%) with grade 3+ non-hematologic toxicity. Among the 34 patients who received at least 1 cycle of lendalidomide, 6 patients have improved the quality of their response including 3 patients who converted from having residual disease to a MRD- state. After a median follow-up of 29 months, 39/44 patients are alive and the median duration of response has not been reached. To date 8/44 (18%) patients have progressed to require additional treatment. Finally, since the eligibility criteria were nearly identical to our historic trial of PCR without lenalidomide consolidation, we conducted an intent to treat analysis that compared all 44 patients in the present trial (i.e. regardless of whether they received lenalidomide consolidation) to the 64 patients previously treated on our PCR trial (Blood 109:405). The demographic and prognostic characteristics of patients in the two studies were similar. With the caveat it represents a comparison across phase II trials, the proportion of patients free of retreatment at 30 months was 79% (95% CI:67–93) for PCR followed by lenalidomide consolidation vs 66% (95% CI: 54–80) for PCR alone (Figure 1). CONCLUSION: Lenalidomide-based consolidation for CLL patients receiving first-line CIT induction appears to improve the quality of response and prolong time to retreatment. Randomized clinical testing of lenalidomide-based consolidation appears warranted. Disclosures: Shanafelt: Celgene: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Off Label Use: PCR-Lenalidomide (off label use of pentostatin and lenalidomide). Tun:Celgene: Research Funding. Kay:Biothera: Research Funding; Clegene: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Supergen: Research Funding; Calistoga: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent Biosolutions (Formerly Trubion): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Background: The cytoreductive treatment options for myeloproliferative neoplasms, in those who have indications, may be limited to hydroxyurea and interferon. Busulfan has been reported to have some activity, but used less frequently in the management of BCR/ABL negative MPNs (Haanen CM et al Br J Cancer 1981; Brodsky American J of clinical oncology 1998). One study has shown significant JAK2V617F allele burden reduction with busulfan (Kuriakose ET et al; Haematologica 2013). Ruxolitinib was approved by the FDA for intermediate and high risk myelofibrosis; and as second line therapy for polycythemia vera in those who are intolerant or develop side effect to hydroxyurea. Objective: To assess the utility of busulfan, an old drug, in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms who are intolerant to other forms of therapy. Methods: The mayo clinic data base from 1970 to 2014 was interrogated using the terms myeloproliferative disorder, polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), myelofibrosis (MF) and busulfan. Patients' follow up information was collected till July 2015. Results : Seventy five patients with full demographic, diagnostic and therapeutic information were identified, and those included 37 patients with ET, 22 with PV, 12 with MF, and 4 with myeloproliferative neoplasms unclassifiable. The median age was 64 (range 31-91) years. After a median follow up of 17 years, 40 patients (53 %) died, and leukemic transformation was documented in 4 (5%). The median time for leukemic transformation was 86 months (12-229). 1. Essential Thrombocytopenia (n=37): Twenty nine (79%) were females, and the median (range) age was 67 (33-90) years. At diagnosis the median (range) hemoglobin (Hgb) (gm/dL), white blood cell count (WBC) (X109/L), and platelet count (X109/L) were 13.6 (9.8-16.9), 10.2 (5-231), 1113 (593-2062) respectively. After a median follow up time of 230 months, 15 patients (41%) died, and leukemic transformation was documented in 1 patient who was also treated with radioactive phosphorous (P32). Leukemic transformation was documented 230 months from date of diagnosis. Follow up complete blood count was available in 20 patients and the median (range) Hgb, WBC and platelet count was 12 (9.9-16), 7.4 (3.1-25), and 267 (126-573) respectively. 2. Polycythemia Vera (n=22): Fourteen (61%) were females, and the median (range) age was 64 (46-91) years. At diagnosis the median (range) Hgb, WBC, and platelet count were 17.5 (15.1-20.8), 11.5 (1.2-26.6), and 669 (185-2370) respectively. After a median follow up time of 188 months 13 (57%) patients died, and leukemic transformation was documented in 2 patients and one of them was given P32. Follow up complete blood count was available in 21 patients and their median (range) Hgb, WBC and platelet count was 12.9 (10-15.2), 7.2 (2.8-20), and 303 (124-833) respectively. 3. Myelofibrosis (Primary and Post-PV and Post-ET myelofibrosis) (n=12) : The median age was 52 (31-75) and 5 were females. The median Hgb, WBC, and platelet count were 13.6, 14.5, and 472. Six (50 %) patients did have splenomegaly (and 5 of them have splenic size reduction after busulfan), 3 underwent splenectomy, and 3 have no palpable spleen. At a median follow up of 208 months, and 39 months (range 78-401) from the start of busulfan, 10 (84%) patients died and no leukemic transformation was documented. Conclusion: Busulfan should be considered as alternative therapy in myeloproliferative neoplasms especially in ET and PV that are intolerant to other forms of cytoreductive therapy. Busulfan may be given as pulse therapy in controlling cell counts. Disclosures Off Label Use: Busulfan as alternative therapy in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Abstract Background Polycythemia Vera (PV) constitutes one of the three BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms and is characterized by clonal erythrocytosis and the almost invariable presence of JAK2 mutation. An absolute monocyte count (AMC) of ≥1 x 10(9)/L defines chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) but can also be seen in other myeloid disorders including myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). The presence or development of monocytosis has previously been shown to confer poor prognosis in both primary myelofibrosis (PMF), which is one of the three BCR-ABL1-negative MPN (Leukemia Research 2007;31:1503, Mod Pathol. 2013 Feb;26(2):204) and MDS (Haematologica. 1997;82:25). In the current study, we examined the clinical, prognostic and molecular correlates of monocytosis in PV. Methods Study patients were selected from our institutional database of MPN and fulfilled the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for the diagnosis of PV (Blood. 2009;114:937). Cytogenetic and mutational analyses were performed according to conventional methods (Leukemia. 2014;28:2206) any assignment as unfavorable karyotype was per PMF criteria (Leukemia. 2011;25:82). Mutation screening included TET2, ASXL1 and SRSF2 because of their known association with CMML (Leukemia. 2014;28:2206) Statistical analyses considered clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at time of diagnosis. Results Patient characteristics: Analysis was conducted on 587 patients (median age 60 years; 48% males) who met WHO criteria for diagnosis of PV. Amongst them, accurate documentation of AMC was available in 237 patients, cytogenetic information in 239, and ASXL1, TET2 and SRSF2 mutational status in 133 patients. Median (range) values were for AMC 0.6 x 10(9)/L (0-4.7) and leukocytes 11.6 x 10(9)/L (3.8-171.6). 31% of 506 informative patients had palpable splenomegaly, 34% of 551 had microcirculatory symptoms, 30% of 566 had pruritus, 8% of 504 had erythromelalgia, 42% of 581 had hypertension, 9% of 584 had diabetes and 11% of 575 were active tobacco users. 25% of the patients presented with history of thrombosis and 22% developed thrombosis after diagnosis. Cytogenetic findings were abnormal in 19%, of whom 20% were unfavorable. TET2, ASXL1 and SRSF2 mutations were documented in 18%, 11% and 3%, respectively. During follow-up, 224 (38%) patients died and median follow-up for living patients was 109 months. Median survival was 16 years and leukemic or fibrotic transformations were documented in 4% and 14%, respectively. Comparison of patients with and without monocytosis: Among 237 informative patients, 32 (14%) displayed monocytosis (AMC ≥1 x 10(9)/L) at time of diagnosis. PV patients with monocytosis were older (p=0.006) and displayed higher leukocyte count (p<0.0001) and higher incidences of leukocytosis (p=0.024) and unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities (p=0.02). There was no association between monocytosis and mutations for TET2 (p=0.1), ASXL1 (p=0.7) and SRSF2 (p=0.3) or thrombosis before (p=0.9) or after (p=0.5) diagnosis (p=0.5), palpable splenomegaly (p=0.6), pruritus (p=0.7) or microcirculatory symptoms (p=0.1). Among the 237 PV patients in whom information regarding AMC was available, 70 (30%) died during follow-up and 49 (21%), 23 (10%), 9 (4%) developed thrombosis, leukemic transformation or fibrotic progression, respectively. In univariate analysis, overall (p=0.009; HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.4) but not leukemia-free (p=0.79), myelofibrosis-free (p=0.13) or thrombosis-free (p=0.48) survivals were different between patients with or without monocytosis. Furthermore, the significant difference in survival was no longer apparent when analysis was adjusted for age (p=0.13), unfavorable karyotype (0.17) or leukocytosis (p=0.06). Conclusions Monocytosis (AMC ≥1 x 10(9)/L) is not infrequent in PV (14%). However, the presence of monocytosis does not appear to represent a significantly different phenotype in terms of molecular characteristics although it is associated with older age, leukocytosis and unfavorable karyotype. The latter associations account for the inferior survival seen in patients with monocytosis. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 1756 Background: We hypothesized that surrogate markers of host immune response to clonal myeloproliferation predict survival in myeloid malignancies. Because of immediate applicability to current practice, we chose plasma immunoglobulin free light chain (FLC) concentration (B-cell activation marker) as the biomarker of interest. Patients and Methods: Two independent cohorts of patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) were studied. Both groups were fully annotated for karyotype. Kappa (κ) and lambda (λ) FLC were measured by a quantitative nephelometric assay. Patients with monoclonal FLC were excluded. Results: Above upper normal-limit values for κ or λ FLC was documented in 33% of 240 study patients with PMF and 46% of 74 patients with MDS. Multivariable analysis revealed significant associations between increased FLC and elevated creatinine, as well as advanced age in PMF (p=0.0004) and hemoglobin <10 g/dL in MDS (p=0.005). Increased FLC predicted shortened survival in both PMF and MDS, independent of age, creatinine, and other conventional risk factors. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis-based cutoff levels for κ plus λ total FLC delineated risk groups with highly significant differences in overall survival (Figure); International Prognostic Scoring System-adjusted HR (95% CI) in PMF was 1.9 (1.3-2.7) and in MDS 6.3 (2.7-16.6). No correlations were seen with leukemia-free survival, karyotype or JAK2, MPL or IDH mutations. Conclusions: Elevated plasma FLC concentration predicts inferior survival in both PMF and MDS. Its lack of correlation with leukemia-free survival and tumor-specific genetic markers suggests a primarily host-driven biological phenomenon that might be applicable to other malignant and non-malignant conditions. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: Myeloid sarcoma is a tumor mass consisting of myeloid blasts occurring at anatomical site other than the bone marrow (Arber et al. Blood 2016;127(20):2391-2405). It is a subgroup of acute myeloid leukemia, which can be localized or disseminated and may involve multiple organs. It can present with or without a positive bone marrow. It may precede or follow bone marrow involvement. It may be identified at diagnosis or relapse, and is not uncommon after stem cell transplantation (Koc et al. Cancer 1999;85(3):608-615; Yoshihara et al. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant 2012;18(12):1800-1807). Objective: To describe the clinical characteristics, cytogenetics, prognosis and outcome of patients with myeloid sarcoma with or without bone marrow involvement. Methods: The Mayo Clinic database was interrogated using the ICD-9 codes 205.0, 205.2, 205.3, as well as terms "myeloid sarcoma," "chloroma," and "extramedullary sarcoma" in clinical notes and pathology reports. Patients' follow up information was collected until July 2016. Results: Ninety six patients with a diagnosis myeloid sarcoma were identified. The diagnosis was based on biopsy results and in some cases imaging studies in addition to bone marrow biopsy. The median age was 53 (range 17-83) years, and 64 (67%) patients were males. Myeloid sarcoma with de novo (primary) and secondary acute myeloid leukemia (with antecedent hematologic malignancy and therapy related) accounted for 64% (61) and 36% of the cases respectively. The sites involved based on their frequency of occurrence included integumentary system (skin and soft tissues) in 37 (38%), lymphatic system in 17 (18%), the gastrointestinal and genitourinary system in 14 (15%), the nervous system in 9 (9%), the breast in 3 (3%) and multiple and other single sites in 16 (17 %). Bone marrow cytogenetics findings were documented in 74 (77%) patients; favorable, intermediate, and poor cytogenetic abnormalities account for 7 (9%), 45 (61%), and 22 (30%) cases respectively. After a median follow up of 135 weeks, 57 (59%) patients died. The median survival of primary and secondary acute myeloid leukemia with myeloid sarcoma was 52 and 11.5 months (P<0.0001); and that of favorable, intermediate and unfavorable cytogenetics abnormalities was 169, 52 and 17.5 months (P=0.04) respectively. Twenty six (27%) patients had no bone marrow involvement; and 18 (69%) of them were primary myeloid sarcoma (without antecedent malignancy or therapy). The median (range) age of those with and without bone marrow involvement was 53 (17-83) and 56 (17-81) years (P=0.6). At diagnosis patients with and without bone marrow involvement have a median (range) hemoglobin (gm/dL) (10.3 (6.2-15.4) vs 13.1 (9.9-15.2) P=0.0002), white blood cell count (X109/L) (21.4 (1.1-182.5) vs 5.8 (2.4-23.2) P<0.0001), and platelet count (X109/L) (71 (8-437) vs 250 (17-561) respectively. Aggressive chemotherapy therapy was given to 58 (83%) and 20 (77%) of patients with and without bone marrow involvement (P=0.6). The median survival was 17 and 20 months with and without bone marrow involvement (P=0.4). Of those with bone marrow involvement, 49 (70%) achieved complete remission, and 26 (53%) of those individuals subsequently relapsed. Conclusion: The treatment outcome of patients with myeloid sarcoma with or without bone marrow involvement seems the same. The conventional risk factors, antecedent hematological neoplasms and cytogenetic findings, have significant impact on survival. Disclosures Al-Kali: Celgene: Research Funding; Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding.

Abstract Background : Refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (RARS-T) is a provisional entity in the MDS/MPN overlap syndromes, with diagnostic features of RARS, along with a platelet count > 450 x 10(9)/L and large atypical megakaryocytes. Mutations involving SF3B1 (~80%), JAK2 (~60%), TET2 (~25%) and ASXL1 (~15%) have been reported. The frequency of thrombotic events in RARS-T is thought to be similar to that of essential thrombocytosis (ET) (3.6 vs 3.9/100 patient years; Hematologica 2012; 1036-41). However, unlike in ET, it remains unclear as to whether thrombotic events in RARS-T impact overall (OS) or thrombosis-free (TFS) survival. Methods : 82 patients with WHO-defined RARS-T were included in the study. All patients had bone marrow (BM) biopsies, iron stains for detection of BM ring sideroblasts (RS) and cytogenetics performed at diagnosis. Mutational analysis for JAK2, CALR, MPL, SF3B1, SRSF2 and ASXL1 was carried out on BM DNA obtained at the time of diagnosis. Details of type of thrombotic event and cardiovascular (CV) risk factors including; hypertension, diabetes, smoking and dyslipidemia were obtained by careful review of the medical record. OS was calculated from time of initial diagnosis to the time of last follow-up or death. TFS was calculated from the time of diagnosis of RARS-T to development of thrombosis in uncensored patients and date of last follow up or death in patients censored for thrombosis. Conventional statistics were utilized for all analyses. Results: Among the 82 study patients, 46 (56%) were males and median age was 72 years (range, 48-93). At a median follow-up of 26.5 months; 48 (59%) deaths and 2 leukemic transformations were documented. Median OS was 44 months. Karyotype was diploid in 61 (74%) and analyzed mutational frequencies were; SF3B1 67% (28/42), JAK2 V617F 40% (25/61), ASXL1 21% (9/41), SRSF2 6% (2/31), MPL 1% (2/41) and CALR 0, respectively. Cardiovascular risk factors were present in 52 (63%). a) Thrombotic events and their impact on thrombosis free survival: Eight (10%) patients had a thrombotic event prior to or at the time of diagnosis of RARS-T (venous-8, arterial-0). Nine (11%) patients developed subsequent thrombotic events (venous-7, arterial-2), with no fatalities. In univariate analysis, lower hemoglobin level (p=0.008), lower BM RS % (p=0.04), history of thrombosis (p=0.02), and absence of SF3B1 mutations (p=0.017) were associated with an inferior TFS. Age (p=0.07), JAK2 mutation status (p=0.56) and CV risk factors (p=0.95) did not have prognostic impact. Given the association between SF3B1 mutations and BM RS, in a multivariable model that included these two as covariates, only the absence of SF3B1 mutations retained prognostic significance (p=0.02). Absence of SF3B1 mutation remained significant when history of thrombosis or lower hemoglobin level were introduced into the multivariable model. b) Risk factors for overall survival: In univariate analysis, hemoglobin <10 gm/dl (p=0.007), presence of circulating blasts (p=0.002) and presence of CV risk factors (p=0.04) were associated with an inferior OS. Neither history of thrombosis (p=0.59) nor SF3B1 (p=0.12) mutations affected OS. In multivariable analysis, hemoglobin <10 gm/dl (p=0.03) [HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.5] and circulating blasts (p=0.002) [HR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.6] remained significant. Conclusions: In contrast to what is observed in ET, thrombosis history does not appear to affect either overall or thrombosis-free survival in RARS-T. The current study suggests a lower thrombosis risk in SF3B1 -mutated patients with RARS-T, compared to their SF3B1 wild-type counterparts. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.