Wendt, Randy

Abstract Abstract 3903 INTRODUCTION: Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis is an asymptomatic hematologic condition characterized by the presence of small populations of clonal B-cells in the blood or bone marrow occurring in 3–5% of the general population over age 40. Although MBL is considered the precursor state to CLL and other sub-types of indolent non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, most individuals with MBL will not develop a B-cell malignancy. It is unknown, however, whether individuals with MBL may be at risk for other adverse outcomes associated with CLL, such as increased risk of infection. To explore this aspect, we evaluated the risk of hospitalization for infection among patients with clinically recognized MBL and compared this to a cohort of general medicine patients and a cohort of CLL patients. METHODS: The Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR), a tertiary referral center in rural southeastern Minnesota, is also the primary hematology center for southeastern Minnesota, northern Iowa, and western Wisconsin. There are no metropolitan areas or hematology specialty centers within a 50 mile radius. To explore the natural history of infection in a local, community dwelling cohort of individuals with clinically identified, CLL-phenotype MBL, we used the Mayo Clinic CLL database to identify all patients with newly diagnosed MBL seen in the MCR Hematology Division between January 1999 and December 2009. Analysis was limited to MBL cases who resided within 50 miles of MCR. The comparison cohort consisted of 689 adult patients also resided within 50 miles of MCR who were seen for a general medical examination between September 2002 and December 2009 and who were enrolled as controls in a case-control study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Rates of infection among individuals with MBL were also compared to a cohort of 174 patients with newly diagnosed CLL diagnosed in the same time interval and who resided within 50 miles of MCR. All hospitalizations in these 3 groups were audited to document hospitalization with infection including cross-referenced with the electronic Mayo Clinic infection database, which contains all culture results obtained from hospitalized patients at MCR. Serologies and viral assays (e.g. CMV viral load) were also reviewed. Patients whose cultures were negative but who were given a clinical diagnosis of infection (e.g. pneumonia) and who were treated with a full course of antibiotics were considered to have a culture negative infection. Among the cases, only hospitalizations after CLL or MBL diagnosis were considered. RESULTS: In May 2010, there were 524 individuals in the Mayo Clinic MBL/CLL Database with the diagnosis of CLL-phenotype MBL made between January 1999 – December 2009. Of these, 154 (29%) patients resided within a 50 mile radius of Mayo Clinic and were considered a local, community-based cohort of MBL patients. Median age at MBL diagnosis for these 154 patients was 70 years (range 45–94). After median follow-up of 4.2 years (range 0.3–10.6 years), 25 (16%) individuals with MBL were hospitalized with infection as compared to 20/689 (3%) individuals in the control population (odds ratio MBL relative to control=6.5; p<0.001) and 32/174 (18%) in the cohort of patients with newly diagnosed CLL (OR MBL relative to CLL=0.9; p=0.61) (Figure 1). The 25 MBL patients hospitalized for infection were hospitalized a total of 39 times (median 1 hospitalization for infection per individual). A specific infectious organism was identified by cultures or serologies in 8/39 (21%) hospitalizations among individuals with MBL, 10/27 (37%) hospitalizations for infection among controls, and 60 (63%) of the 89 hospitalizations for infection in CLL cases. Finally we performed a pooled multivariable analysis of all patients (n=1017) adjusting for age, sex, presence of MBL, diagnosis of CLL, and whether patients with CLL or MBL received treatment for CLL during follow-up. All factors were independently associated with risk of hospitalization for infection [Age (per year, OR=1.02, p=0.02), sex (male, OR=2.6, p=0.001), presence of MBL (OR=3.3, p<0.001), diagnosis of CLL (OR=3.0, p=0.002), and treatment for CLL (OR=3.3, p<0.001)]. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, patients with newly diagnosed clinical-MBL had a 6.5 fold risk of hospitalization for infection relative to the control cohort. MBL was an independent risk factor for hospitalization for infection after controlling for age, sex, and treatment. Disclosures: Zent: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Kay:Biothera: Research Funding; Clegene: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Supergen: Research Funding; Calistoga: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent Biosolutions (Formerly Trubion): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Abstract 4610 Introduction: Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Up to 50% of patients with CLL will develop infectious complications during the course of their disease, and 30–50% of all deaths from CLL are attributed to infections and infectious complications. The risk of infection in CLL is related to immune deficiencies associated with the primary disease process, as well as immunosuppression secondary to treatment. Available research on infectious complications of CLL has focused on patients in clinical trials receiving chemotherapy. Little is known about the natural history of infection in community dwelling patients with newly diagnosed CLL. Method: To explore the natural history of infection in a local, community dwelling cohort of patients diagnosed with CLL, we used the Mayo Clinic CLL database to identify all patients with newly diagnosed CLL seen in the Mayo Clinic Division of Hematology after January 1, 1999 and who resided within 50 mi of Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). All patient hospitalizations were reviewed to document infection including cross-referencing with the electronic Mayo Clinic infection database which includes all culture and serology results obtained from hospitalized Mayo Clinic patients. Patients who had positive blood, sputum, cerebrospinal fluid, pleural fluid, or paracentesis fluid culture results were identified. Patients whose cultures were negative were considered to have culture negative infection. Serologies and viral assays (e.g. CMV viral load) were also reviewed to identify infections. Results: In May 2010, there were 2022 patients in the Mayo Clinic CLL Database with the diagnosis of CLL/SLL made between Jan 1999 – Dec 2009. Of these, 336 (17%) patients resided within a 50 mi radius of Mayo Clinic and were considered non-referred, community-based CLL patients. Median age at diagnosis for these 336 patients was 69 yrs (range 27–97) and most had early stage CLL (57% stage 0; 34% stage I-II). With respect to prognostic markers, 206 (70%) patients were CD38 negative, 125 (64%) ZAP-70 negative, 85 (53%) IgVH mutated, and 101 (63%) had either no abnormality or 13q14- as a sole abnormality on FISH analysis. Consistent with being a community dwelling cohort, ~90% (152/165) of patients had co-morbid health problems and ~50% (86/165) had a major comorbidity (e.g. coronary artery disease, cerebral vascular disease, CHF, diabetes, COPD, other malignancy). Although ~17% (43/249) of patients had gamma-globulin levels below the reference range at diagnosis, only 2% (6/249) had an IgG level <500 mg/dL. Median follow-up for all patients was 49 months (range 0–121) and 104 (31%) patients progressed to require treatment for CLL. Although 222 (66%) patients required hospitalization during follow-up, only 38 (11.3%) were hospitalized with infection. Collectively, these 38 patients were hospitalized for infection 139 times (median 2 hospitalizations for infection per patient). Among these 38 patients, 13 had no organism identified on cultures (culture negative infection) while the remaining 25 (66%) had an organism identified during at least hospitalization for infection. Of the 38 patients hospitalized with infection, 18/38 (47%) had a gram positive organism (8 strep pneumonia, 11 staphylococcus Aureus, 2 nocardia), 11/38 (29%) had a gram negative organism (3 E.Coli, 4 Pseudomonas, 4 Hemophilus influenzae), 5/38 (13%) a mycobacterial infection (4 MAC, 1 M. gordonae), 15/38 (40%) a cytomegalovirus infection, 19/38 (50%), cryptococcus and/or cryptosporidium (18 cryptococcus AG, 4 cryptosporidium), and 12/38 (32%) a filamentous fungi infections (12 aspergillous). In aggregate, hospitalization for an opportunistic infection (e.g. cytomegalovirus, cryptococcus, filamentous fungi, myocobacteria, pneumocystis) occurred in 26/336 (8%) CLL patients during follow-up. Being male (OR 2.7; p=0.02), ZAP-70+ (OR 3.9; p=0.004), IGHV unmutated (OR 5.5; p=0.002), and receiving treatment (OR 4.7, p<0.001; Figure) were associated with increased risk of hospitalization for infection. Conclusions: Approximately 8% of newly diagnosed, community dwelling CLL patients will require hospitalization for opportunistic infection at some point during the course of their disease. Gender, disease factors (e.g. ZAP-70, IGHV status), and treatment characteristics are associated with infection risk. Disclosures: Zent: Genzyme: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; G.S.K.: Research Funding. Shanafelt:Celgene: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 4610 Introduction Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Up to 50% of CLL patients develop infectious complications, and 30–50% of all deaths in CLL patients are attributed to infections. Despite these data, the available research on infectious complications in CLL is primarily limited to patients participating in clinical trials of chemotherapy, obscuring the distinction between the risk of infection due to the disease’s natural history relative to the risk associated with therapy related immune suppression. METHODS: The Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR), a tertiary referral center in rural southeastern Minnesota, is also the primary hematology center for southeastern Minnesota, northern Iowa, and western Wisconsin. There are no metropolitan areas or hematology specialty centers within a ∼50 mile radius. To explore the natural history of infection in a community-based cohort of CLL patients, we used the Mayo Clinic CLL database to identify all patients with newly diagnosed CLL who resided within 50 miles of MCR and diagnosed between January, 1999 and December, 2009. The comparison cohort consisted of 689 adult patients who also resided within 50 miles of MCR who were seen for a general medical examination between September, 2002 and December, 2009 and who were enrolled as controls in a case-control study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. All hospitalizations at MCR among both cohorts were audited to document hospitalization with infection and cross-referenced with the Mayo Clinic infection database, which includes all culture results obtained from hospitalized MCR patients. Serologies and viral assays were also reviewed. Patients whose cultures were negative but who were given a clinical diagnosis of infection (e.g. pneumonia) and who were treated with a full course of antibiotic therapy were considered to have a culture negative infection. RESULTS: In May 2010, there were 2022 CLL patients in the Mayo Clinic CLL Database diagnosed between 1999 and 2009. Of these, 174 (9%) were local CLL patients residing within 50 miles of MCR. Median age at diagnosis for these non-referred CLL patients was 69 years (range 27–97). Most had early stage disease (60% stage 0; 32% stage I-II). On prognostic evaluation, 121 (75%) patients were CD38 negative, 66 (61%) ZAP-70 negative, 47 (50%) IGHV mutated, and 56 (62%) had either no abnormality or 13q14- as a sole abnormality on FISH analysis. 64 (37%) patients progressed to require treatment for CLL during follow-up. After median follow-up of 4.0 years (range 0–11), 32 (18.4%) CLL patients were hospitalized with infection at least once as compared to 20/689 (2.9%) individuals in the control cohort (odds ratio=7.5; p<0.0001) Figure 1A. Even prior to receiving treatment for CLL, the rate of hospitalization for infection remained higher than the control cohort (p=0.002; Figure 1B). The 32 CLL patients hospitalized with infection were admitted with infection a total of 89 times (median 1 hospitalization for infection per patient). A specific infectious organism was identified by cultures or serologies in 60 (63%) of the 89 infections in CLL cases and 10/27 (37%) infections among controls. Hospitalization for an opportunistic infection (e.g. cytomegalovirus, cryptococcus, filamentous fungi, mycobacteria, Pneumocystis) occurred in 5/174 (3%) CLL patients during follow-up compared to 0/689 controls (p<0.001). Finally, we performed a pooled multivariable analysis of all patients (n=863) to identify factors (age, sex, CLL diagnosis, CLL treatment) associated with infection risk. Most factors were independently associated with hospitalization for infection [Age (per year, OR=1.03, p=0.02), sex (male, OR=4.0, p<0.001), diagnosis of CLL (OR=2.1, p=0.09), and treatment for CLL (OR=5.9, p<0.001)]. In univariate analysis of CLL patients [sex (OR=4.2, p=0.01), higher Rai stage (p=0.046), unfavorable (del 17p13; del 11q23) FISH [OR=4.6, p=0.02] and unmutated IGHV [OR=2.8, p=0.07]) were associated with risk of infection. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, patients with newly diagnosed CLL had a 7.5-fold risk of hospitalization for infection relative to the control cohort. After 4 year follow-up, ∼1 in 5 CLL patients required hospitalization for infection. Although CLL treatment was a substantial risk factor for infection, the risk of infection among untreated patients remained higher than controls. Disclosures: Kay: Biothera: Research Funding; Clegene: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Supergen: Research Funding; Calistoga: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent Biosolutions (Formerly Trubion): Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zent:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding.