Citations

Abstract Abstract 3014 Background: Proteasome inhibitors have proven particularly effective in treatment of multiple myeloma, the second most frequent hematologic malignancy in the western world. Bortezomib, the first in class proteasome inhibitor in clinical use, was first approved in 2003 via fast FDA track, given the remarkable activity shown during phase II clinical trials. Nevertheless, more than 50% of multiple myeloma patients did not respond to single agent bortezomib when administered as second line agent. Moreover, bortezomib is only available for intravenous administration, representing a cumbersome therapy for patients, and its use is limited by significant toxicities (especially peripheral neuropathy). MLN9708 (Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.), an investigational orally available, small molecule, is a potent, specific and reversible inhibitor of the 20S proteasome. It is currently under clinical investigation for the treatment of hematologic and non-hematologic malignancies. Upon exposure to aqueous solutions or plasma, MLN9708 rapidly hydrolyzes to MLN2238, the biologically active form, and MLN2238 was used for all of the preclinical studies reported here. In vitro biochemistry studies have shown that MLN2238 has a faster dissociation rate from the proteasome compared to bortezomib, and in vivo studies of MLN2238 have shown antitumor activity in a broader range of tumor xenografts when compared to bortezomib. Given these encouraging preclinical results, we set to investigate the anti-myeloma activity of MLN2238 in vitro. Results: MLN2238 proved to have anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activity against a broad range of MM cell lines with EC50 at 24 hours ranging between 10 and 50 nM, even in relatively resistant MM cell lines (OPM2, DOX6, RPMI, etc.). In MM.1S cells, induction of apoptosis was time and dose dependent and related to activation of both caspase 8 and 9. When compared to MM.1S treated for 24 hours with EC50 dose of bortezomib, treatment with EC50 dose of MLN2238 resulted in the same extent of caspases cleavage occurring at an earlier time point (8-12 hours), possibly suggesting more rapid onset and/or irreversibility of apoptosis in cells treated with MLN2238. Treatment with MLN2238 was associated with early, but persistent induction of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress with BiP being induced 2–4 hours after treatment with EC50 dose and gradually increasing over time. While bortezomib has been associated with early induction and late decrease in proteins involved in ER stress, MLN2238 appears to induce a persistent rise in these factors, suggesting either more sustained proteasome blockade with stabilization of proteasome substrates or de-novo induction of unfolded protein response (UPR) genes. MLN2238 also proved effective in reducing phosphorylation of ERK1-2 with no overall alteration in the total ERK level, thus accounting for the observed reduction in proliferation upon treatment. Preliminary data indicate potential for additive and synergistic combination with widely used drugs, including doxorubicin and dexamethasone. Conclusion: While further clinical data are needed to establish the effectiveness of MLN2238 in the treatment of multiple myeloma, these preliminary nonclinical data, together with the favorable biochemical and pharmacokinetic properties, including oral bioavailability, make the investigational agent MLN9708 an appealing candidate for treatment of multiple myeloma. Further in vitro data could help establish whether a difference in the apoptotic mechanisms exist between MLN2238 and other proteasome inhibitors, primarily bortezomib, and could also help inform combination treatment approaches aimed at increasing effectiveness, overcoming bortezomib resistance and decreasing toxicity. Disclosures: Kumar: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 2463 The treatment of relapsed/refractory B-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is difficult in terms of both inducing meaningful responses and being able to predict clinical outcome. In an attempt to address the latter aspect, we analyzed a battery of prognostic parameters obtained from a cohort of relapsed/refractory CLL patients entered onto ECOG trial E2903. This protocol included 2 steps: an induction phase (step 1) with pentostatin (4 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), and rituximab (375 mg/m2) given every 3 weeks for 6 cycles and a consolidation phase (step 2) where complete responders (CR) were given 4 weeks of subcutaneous (sc) alemtuzumab (30 mg/m2, 3 times a week) or patients attaining partial response (PR), stable or progressive disease were given 18 weeks of sc alemtuzumab. Sixty-five eligible patients were enrolled; median age was 63 yr; male to female ratio of 4:1; median (range) number of prior therapies was 3 (1–7); and there were 16, 7, and 40 patients in Rai 0–1, Rai 2; and Rai 3–4 stages respectively. The median serum β-2 microglobulin was 4 (1–28). The overall response rate for step 1 in this cohort was 46% with 1 complete and 29 partial responses and 38.5% judged as having stable disease. Strict CR criteria, including CT imaging were utilized, demonstrating the infrequency of total response using CT scans. For traditional prognostic parameters, we found that age over 70 yr and high Rai risk stage (3–4) did not preclude a clinical response, but there was a significant difference between responders and non-responders in serum β-2 microglobulin levels (p=0.03). For molecular prognostic parameters, we found that the immunoglobulin variable heavy chain region (IGVH) mutational status did not preclude a lack of clinical response. However, for patients who were ZAP70 negative (−) or CD38 negative (−) these factors were positively associated with clinical response (p=0.046, 0.0005, respectively). The sensitivity in predicting a clinical response was 82% in ZAP70- and 73% in CD38-. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, only CD38 was significantly associated with response (Odds Ratio: 41, p=0.002). When patients were segregated into low (13q- or normal), intermediate (Trisomy 12) and high risk FISH (17p-,) there was no association with clinical outcome. In addition, if patients' CLL cells were unmutated and high risk FISH, there was no reduced clinical response. Of 65 patients included in this analysis, the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 55% (±7%) and the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) is 25% (± 6.6%). The median follow-up time amongst survivors was 23 (range 6–60) months. The univariable analysis for PFS revealed that the IGVH mutated (2-yr PFS 53% for mutated vs. 18% for unmutated, p=0.037, Figure) and low risk FISH (2-yr PFS 42% for low risk vs. 23% for high risk, p=0.04) were significant. However, only IGVH mutated was significant (HR 0.33, p=0.027) for PFS in multivariable Cox model. In univariable analysis for OS, the combination of age <70 yr and β-2 microglobulin<2 upper limits [UL] was significant (2-yr OS: 68% vs. 39%, p=0.048), whereas only β-2 microglobulin was significant (HR 3.45 for >=2UL vs. <2UL, p=0.02) in multivariable Cox model. A total of 24 patients entered onto step 2 of the consolidation phase, receiving alemtuzumab; 17 patients who were responders from step 1 entered onto the 4 weeks of step 2; and 7 of the non-responders went onto the 18 weeks of step 2. The 2-year OS of these 24 patients was 62% from the date of consolidation phase: 61% for 17 responding patients to PCR and 60% for non responders to PCR (p=0.87). Current conclusions of this study are: (1) heavily pretreated high risk CLL patients may still have a respectable survival with the PCR combination; (2) β-2 microglobulin, ZAP70, and CD38 were important factors associated with response to PCR; (3) both IGVH mutated and FISH were prognostic markers associated with PFS; (4) addition of alemtuzumab may confer comparable survival rates for PCR non responders to the responders; (5) β-2 microglobulin was the only prognostic factor significant for OS. In total this study shows that both traditional and molecular markers can be used to predict clinical outcome for high risk relapsed/ refractory CLL patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy. We anticipate further valuable prognostic information to come from this still accruing study. Progression Free Survival post PCR for IGVH patients as separated by Unmutated (UM) or Mutated cohorts Progression Free Survival post PCR for IGVH patients as separated by Unmutated (UM) or Mutated cohorts Disclosures: Rosen: Genentech: Speakers Bureau.

Abstract Abstract 1892 Background: Primary or light chain amyloidosis (AL) is a clonal plasma cell disorder characterized by a relatively low plasma cell burden and multi-organ deposition of immunoglobulin light chain derived amyloid fibrils. The survival of patients with amyloidosis is quite variable with median survival of 12–18 months in different series, and largely dependent on the number and severity of organs involved. In addition to new drugs, the combination of melphalan and dexamethasone is an effective regimen for AL and risk adapted approaches to SCT has decreased treatment related mortality. It is not clear if the recent progress in risk stratification and treatment approaches have translated into improved survival for these patients. Methods: We studied two separate cohorts of patients; the first cohort consisting of 2118 patients with AL seen at Mayo Clinic over a 40-year period between November 1967 and August 2006 was used to examine the trends in overall survival from diagnosis during this time period. The second cohort of 443 patients seen between September 2006 and August 2009 were examined only for the changes in early mortality and for validation of a model for predicting early mortality developed using the first cohort of patients. Results: The estimated median follow up for the entire group was 7.8 years (95% CI; 7.1, 8.5). The patients were divided into 4 cohorts based on date of diagnosis; 1966–1976 (n=121), 1977–1986 (n=343), 1987–1996 (n=636) and 1997–2006 (n=1017). The median OS from diagnosis for the four cohorts were 0.9, 1.2, 1.2 and 1.5 years respectively, P < 0.001 (Figure 1). More importantly there was steady improvement in the long-term survival among these patients with 4-year survival estimates of 16%, 21%, 24% and 33% respectively. Next, we specifically looked at the survival trends within the last cohort (1996-2006), dividing the patients into three time periods; 1996–1999 (n=263), 2000–2003 (n=291) and 2003–2006 (n=463). While the OS from diagnosis was relatively unchanged between the first and second time periods (28 vs. 30% 4 year survival), there was significant improvement in the last three year period (42% survival at 4 years); P =0.02. Given the high early mortality in this disease, we specifically examined the one-year mortality among the entire patient cohort and found no clear improvement in terms of one-year mortality. Using logistic regression analysis, we identified cTnT > 0.01, NT-ProBNP > 4200 and Uric Acid > 8.0 mg/dL to be the best predictors of death within one year of diagnosis. The probability of death within one year for those with none, 1, 2, and 3 risk factors was 19, 38, 61, and 78% respectively, P < 0.01 (Figure 2). This model was further validated among patients seen during the most recent three years, September 2006 and August 2009. Conclusion: Survival in AL amyloidosis has improved over time, particularly in the recent years and likely reflects the recent improvements in therapy. However, early mortality remains a problem and baseline factors can be used to identify patients at risk for early mortality, who then can be targeted for risk adapted therapy approaches in clinical trials. Disclosures: Kumar: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide for treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma. Dispenzieri:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Binding Site: Honoraria.

Abstract Abstract 1964 Background: Thalidomide (thal), lenalidomide (len) and pomalidomide (pom) have been shown to have considerable efficacy in patients with newly diagnosed as well as relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). They are often used as initial therapy in patients proceeding to stem cell transplant (SCT), and based on the initial response, are usually considered for salvage therapy during their disease course. However, the retreatment efficacy of these compounds is unknown. We conducted this study to ascertain the degree of response that can be obtained by retreatment with immunomodulatory compounds. Patients and Method: 410 patients with newly diagnosed MM who received either thalidomide-dexamethasone or lenalidomide-dexamethasone were studied. Of these, 183 patients received thalidomide, lenalidomide or pomalidomide (with or without dexamethasone) as one of the salvage regimens following relapse, and form the study group. We included all patients who received the repeat immunomodulatory therapy as salvage treatment at any time during the MM disease course. Results: The median (range) age of the MM patient group was 60 (29-80) years; 117 (64%) were male. Thalidomide and lenalidomide were used as initial therapy in 106 (58%) and 77 (42%) patients, respectively. Patients received a median of 2 treatments (range, 1–6) prior to salvage therapy; bortezomib was used as one of the salvage treatment (prior to the repeat immunomodulatory therapy) in 41 (22%) patients. An autologous stem cell transplant was performed in 118 (64%) patients after the initial immunomodulatory therapy. Almost one half (89; 49%) of the patients went off the first line therapy to undergo a SCT; whereas drug toxicity (26; 14%) and disease progression (21; 11%) were other causes requiring a treatment change. The compound used for salvage therapy was thalidomide, lenalidomide or pomalidomide in 40 (22%), 129 (70%) and 14 (8%) patients, respectively. The responses to salvage therapy based on the initial therapy and the salvage regimen are as shown in Table 1. Overall, 67 (37%) patients achieved a partial response or better and 73 (40%) patients achieved less than a partial response (stable and progressive disease) to repeat immunomodulatory therapy, while the remaining 43 (23%) had non evaluable disease response. Conclusions: Retreatment with an immunomodulatory therapy, especially a different compound, was associated with excellent response rates. Lowest response rates were seen in patients retreated with thalidomide after having received lenalidomide as their initial therapy after the diagnosis of MM. This information is valuable in deciding on the choice of repeat therapy with immunomodulatory compounds in patients with relapsed disease. Disclosures: Dispenzieri: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Binding Site: Honoraria. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 2878 Poster Board II-854 Background: Significant advances have been made in the treatment of myeloma with the introduction of thalidomide, its analogue, lenalidomide, and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. While these new drugs have improved the outcome of patients with myeloma, the disease still remains incurable. Effectiveness of upcoming new therapies will need to be assessed in the context of anticipated outcome with the currently available therapies. However, given the rapid pace of development over the past decade, outcome of patients who have relapsed on the new therapies remain unclear. Methods: In order to further study this group of patients, we undertook a study of patients who have relapsed on or are refractory to one of the IMiDs (thalidomide or lenalidomide) as well as bortezomib. A total of 300 cases from 8 sites in the US, 5 sites in Europe and one site in Asia were identified for this study. Enrolled patients had relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, per the EBMT or IMWG response criteria, after at least 2 prior treatments. Patients were refractory to bortezomib, defined as having no response on a prior bortezomib-containing regimen or experiencing disease progression within 60 days of a bortezomib-containing regimen. Patients also should have relapsed, refractory, intolerant, and/or ineligible in the opinion of the investigator, to other therapies, including an IMiD (thalidomide or lenalidomide). Clinical and laboratory data pertaining to the time of diagnosis and from the time of individual relapses were obtained from the clinical records. The date patients satisfied the above entry criteria was defined as time zero. Results: The current analysis includes the first 119 patients with complete data available. The median age at initial diagnosis was 59 years (range, 31-86 yr); 71% were males. The ISS stage distribution at diagnosis was 33%, 39% and 28% for stages 1, 2, and 3 respectively. 19 patients (37%) had high risk disease by FISH [t(4;14), t(14;16), del17p] or by cytogenetics [del 13, hypodiploidy]. The median time from diagnosis to time zero was 3.8 yrs (range 0.2-18.7 yr) and the median reported lines of therapy before time zero was 2. 74% patients had at least 1 autologous stem cell transplant prior to becoming eligible for the study. Following time zero, 77 (65%) pts had a treatment recorded, including an autologous SCT in 21 (18%), with the treatment regimen starting at a median of 1 month after time zero. A variety of treatment regimens were utilized beyond time zero (median=1; range 0-7). Thirty-two (27%) patients had a response any time following time zero, and only 8 had a subsequent response. Response to the first treatment, or supportive care for patients not treated, recorded following time zero included minor response or stable disease (n=14; 12%), PR (n=17, 14%), and VGPR or better (n=6, 5%). Patients treated with SCT had a higher rate of PR or better compared to patients receiving other treatments (85%; 17/20 vs. 26%; 15/57). In a multivariate analysis, the only significant predictor of a PR or better after time zero was younger age (<60 yrs). The median overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were 6 mos (95% CI, 4-7 mos) and 1 month (95% CI,1-2 mos) respectively. In a multivariate analysis normal creatinine predicted for a better overall survival and having an IgG M protein type predicted for better EFS. A complete analysis from all 300 patients will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: This study confirms the poor outcome of patients once they become relapsed and refractory to agents that have become the mainstay of myeloma therapy. The findings highlight the incurable nature of the disease and urgent need to develop newer effective therapeutic agents for this group of patients, who currently do not have effective treatment options. Disclosures: Kumar: CELGENE: Research Funding; MILLENNIUM: Research Funding; BAYER: Research Funding; GENZYME: Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Research Funding. Jagannath:Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Laubach:Novartis: . Palumbo:Ortho Biotech, Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Richardson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Keryx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. San Miguel:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Sonneveld:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Durie:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Abstract 2803 Poster Board II-779 Background. The rate of asymptomatic amyloidosis (asym-amyloidosis) detected in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) or smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is unknown. This topic is significant because unrecognized AL may be associated with increased mortality may change the patient's management. The objective of the present investigation was to evaluate the number and clinical significance of asym-amyloidosis in MM and SM patients at the time of the diagnostic bone marrow (BM) biopsy for MM. Materials and Methods. The study population was selected from the Mayo Clinic Dysproteinemia database and consisted of consecutive patients with an established diagnosis of MM or SMM without recognition of symptomatic AL. Bone marrow biopsies at diagnosis of MM or SMM were retrospectively stained with Congo Red and reviewed by a single pathologist. A patient was considered to have asym-amyloid if Congo Red staining with apple green birefringence was found. Results. Biopsies from 144 (M 84, F 59) patients were evaluated: 77 had a diagnosis of MM and 67 of SMM. The median age was 59 (range 26-84) years. No differences were found regarding hemoglobin, platelets, prothrombin time, serum and urine proteins, serum albumin, alkaline phosphate, creatinine and β2-microglobulin among MM and SMM patients. At a median follow-up 76 months (range 0-216), 32% patients were alive, 65% dead and 2.7% lost to follow-up. Immunoglobulin isotypes were as follows: 96/144 (67%) had IgG 23/144 (16%) IgA, 12/144 (8%) had light chain only, 1/77 (1%) had IgD, none had IgM and 12/144 (8%) had biclonal or indeterminate; 84/144 (58%) were κ restricted. The presence of amyloid was found in only 2 cases (1%, 95% CI – 0.6 to 3.2), 1 in MM and 1 in SMM group. Neither of these patients had or developed signs or symptoms suggestive of organ involvement by amyloid. Among the 142 other patients without amyloid deposition in their index bone marrow, 1 (0.7%, 95% CI -0.6 to 2.0) developed symptomatic AL after 119 months of follow-up. Characteristics of these three patients are shown in table 1. Conclusions. We found only 2 cases (1%) of amyloidosis in the 144 cases of MM or SMM. Our estimates are lower than the rates which have been reported by others, perhaps because of our high level of suspicion for amyloid at our Amyloidosis Center. These data do not support the need for searching for asym-amyloidosis in patients with newly diagnosed MM or SMM as long as they have no clinical features of AL. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Hydroxyurea use in myelofibrosis. Gertz:celgene: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Witzig:Novartis: Research Funding. Kumar:celgene: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Background: A phase III trial comparing thalidomide plus dexamethasone (Thal/Dex) versus dexamethasone alone (Dex) as first line therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). The results of an interim analysis on 109 of 207 enrolled patients (pts) were reported earlier (Rajkumar et al, Proc ASCO 2004). This report provides results from 198 of 202 eligible pts entered on this study. Methods: Pts with newly diagnosed, untreated, symptomatic MM were eligible. Pts in the Thal/Dex arm (Arm A) received Thal 200 mg/day PO with Dex 40 mg on days 1–4, 9–12, and 17–20 PO. Pts in the Dex arm (Arm B) received Dex alone, at the same dose as Arm A. Therapy was repeated monthly. The primary endpoint was best response at 4 months on intent to treat basis. At 4 months pts could go off study for stem cell transplant or elect to continue therapy. Response was defined as a decrease in serum and urine monoclonal (M) protein by 50% or higher. If serum M protein was unmeasurable, a 90% or higher decrease in urine M protein was required. Responses had to be verified on 2 consecutive determinations separated by at least 2 weeks. Results: 207 pts were enrolled as planned: 103 randomized to Thal/Dex and 104 to Dex alone. Median age was 65 yrs. 6 pts were ineligble for failing to meet eligibility criteria for study entry and are excluded from response analysis. Response to therapy could be assessed at this time on 198 of 202 eligible pts. Response rate with Thal/Dex was significantly higher than with Dex: 58% versus 42%, respectively, (p=0.0164; one-sided Fisher’s exact test). The corrected response rate allowing for use of serum M protein levels in pts in whom a measurable urine M protein was unavailable at follow-up was 69% with Thal/Dex versus 51% with Dex. Median time to response was rapid, and similar in both arms (1.1 months). 3% of pts in the Thal/Dex arm and 5% in the Dex arm met criteria for disease progression within the first 4 months. Toxicity data are available on 204 pts. Grade 3 or greater non-hematologic toxicities occurred within the first 4 months/cycles in 68% of pts on the Thal/Dex arm and 43% in the Dex arm. Grade 3 or higher cardiac ischemia occurred in 3 (2 prior to 4 months, 1 approx. 1 wk after 4 months) pts in Arm A and 2 pts (both prior to 4 months) in Arm B. As a planned analysis, incidence rates of grade 3 or higher deep vein thrombosis (DVT), rash, bradycardia, and neuropathy and any grade 4–5 toxicity in the first 4 months were compared (see Table). The p-value (one-sided Fisher’s exact test) for increased toxicity (of the specified types) is <0.0001. In this period, 18 pts died, 7 in arm A and 11 in Arm B. Conclusions: Thal/Dex demonstrates superior response rates in newly diagnosed MM compared to Dex, comparable to historical results with VAD. The use of Thal/Dex must be weighed in each pt given the higher toxicities compared to Dex alone. Both regimens have low progression rates as pre-transplant induction therapy, and negate the need for intravenous VAD. Major Grade 3–4 toxicities Toxicity Arm A (n=102) Arm B (n=102) DVT (Grade>=3) 18% 3% Rash (Grade>=3) 4% 0% Sinus Bradycardia (Grade>=3) 1% 0% Neuropathy (Grade>=3) 7% 4% Toxicity of Any Type (Grade>=4) 34% 17% Total 46% 20%

Abstract Background: FLC is a valuable diagnostic tool to monitor response in patients with AL and oligosecretory MM. It is also prognostic in patients with MGUS. Its value in patients with non-oligosecretory myeloma has not been defined. Because of the short half-life of free-light chains, an early drop in free-light chain might be predictive for long term outcome post PBSCT. Methods: Between 8/1/03 and 12/10/04, 45 patients with multiple myeloma and abnormal FLC ratios (less than 02.6 or greater 1.65), who were undergoing PBSCT consented to have waste serum from routine post-transplant daily blood draws collected and frozen for future FLC analysis. The immunoglobulin FLC assay (Binding Site, U.K.) was run on samples collected from day +1 until patients were dismissed from our transplant center. Hematologic response was coded according to standard IBMTR criteria at approximately 3 months status post transplant (BJH 1998). Two types of immunoglobulin FLC response were coded: 50% reduction (FLC50) and 90% reduction (FLC90) of the difference of the involved and uninvolved FLC (Leukemia 2006). Two time periods of FLC response were analyzed: early (day 7); and delayed (day 19, range 13 to 24). Endpoints analyzed were overall response (>=PR), complete response rate (CR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: The median age of the myeloma group was 59 years, and 53% were male. Thirty-three patients were monoclonal kappa, and 12 lambda. Forty-two percent were transplanted in response/plateau, 22% were primary refractory, and 36% relapsed disease. The overall hematologic response rate was 93% with a CR rate of 33%. Twenty-five patients have relapsed at a median of 14.2 months. Twelve patients have died, and median overall survival for the group has not been reached at a median follow-up of 24.6 months. Forty-nine and 58 percent of patients had early and delayed FLC90, respectively. Early FLC90, but not delayed FLC90, predicted for complete response (p<0.001). Neither early nor delayed FLC90 predicted for either PFS or OS. In addition, 89% and 96% of patients had an early and delayed FLC50, respectively. FLC50 at either time point did not predict for overall response, CR, PFS, or OS. Conclusion: Immunoglobulin free light chain responses are seen within the first weeks post high dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell transplant. A 90% reduction in FLC seen within the first seven days predicts for complete response. However, this does not yet translate into prolonged PFS or OS, but with longer follow-up separation of the survival curves may be seen.

Abstract Abstract 2877 Poster Board II-853 Background and Objective: In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, treatment with lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone (RD) was superior to high-dose dexamethasone in terms of both response rates and 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) (Zonder JA et al, Blood 2007;110:77). Preliminary results suggest that the combination lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) compared to the RD regimen yields significantly better 2-year overall survival (OS) (Rajkumar SV et al, J Clin Oncol 2008;26:8504). The combination of melphalan, prednisone, and lenalidomide (MPR) has been investigated in a phase I/II study showing promising results (Palumbo A et al, J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:4459-4465). The goal of this case –control study was to compare the efficacy and the toxicity of the lenalidomide/dexamethasone (len/dex) combination vs MPR as primary therapy for newly diagnosed elderly MM patients, to determine the additive value of melphalan compared to a regimen of lenalidomide plus corticosteroid. Patients and methods: Data from 51 newly diagnosed MM patients enrolled in Italy in a phase I/II dose-escalating trial, from January to October 2005, with MPR, were analyzed. For comparison of their outcome, 37 patients were identified among newly diagnosed patients seen at the Mayo Clinic from March 2005 to December 2008 who received len/dex as primary therapy and were enrolled in phase II or III trials. Patients treated with MPR received 9 monthly cycles of oral melphalan (doses ranging from 0.18 to 0.25 mg/kg on days 1-4), prednisone (2 mg/kg on days 1-4) and lenalidomide (doses ranging from 5 to 10 mg/day on days 1-21). After 9 cycles, patients started maintenance with lenalidomide alone (10 mg, days 1-21) until relapse or progression. Patients treated with len/dex received oral lenalidomide (25 mg/day, days 1-21) plus dexamethasone, either at low-dose (n=17) (40 mg orally days 1, 8, 15, 22) or at high-dose (n=21) (40 mg orally on days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20). Treatment was continued until progression, relapse or unacceptable toxicity, or could be stopped at the physician's discretion. Patients (n=13) were allowed to receive transplant if they wished and were deemed eligible. Outcome was analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The Chi-square or the rank sum tests were used to compare variables. Time-to-event analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons were determined by the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: On intention-to-treat analysis, 15.7% versus 23.7% patients, respectively in the MPR and in the len/dex group, (p=0.342) achieved a complete response, and 43.2% vs 47.4%, (p=0.691) achieved at least a very good partial response. Time-to-progression (TTP) (median: 24.7 vs 27.5 in MPR and len/dex groups, respectively; HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.55-1.98; p=0.903), PFS (median: 24.7 vs 27.5 in MPR and len/dex groups, respectively; HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.55-1.92; p=0.926) and OS (2-year OS: 86.2% in MPR group vs 89.1% in len/dex, HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.38-1.98; p=0.730) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. No significant differences in TTP, PFS and OS were reported when MPR patients were compared with the subgroup of patients treated with low-dose dexamethasone plus lenalidomide. Similar results were found when the analysis was restricted to MPR patients and len/dex pair mates receiving lenalidomide plus low/dose dexamethasone, matched according to age and sex, and who did not received transplant. The toxicity profile was different in the two groups. Hematologic grade 3-4 toxicities were more common with MPR compared with len/dex, in particular neutropenia (66.7% vs 21.1%, p < 0.001) and thrombocytopenia (31.4% vs 2.6%, p < 0.001), respectively. Grade 3-4 gastrointestinal events (13.2% vs 2.0%, p= 0.080), thrombotic events (13.2 vs 5.9, p= 0.279) and fatigue (10.5% vs 3.9%, p= 0.395) were more common with len/dex compared with MPR. Conclusion: Results of this case-control study show that both MPR and Rd are efficacious regimens for elderly MM patients. Data need however to be carefully evaluated and randomized control trials are needed to confirm these results. Disclosures: Off Label Use: research drug in combination to standard of care. Kumar:celgene: Research Funding; millenium: Research Funding; bayer: Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; genzyme: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:celgene: Research Funding. Gertz:celgene: Honoraria; genzyme: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria; amgen: Honoraria. Lacy:celgene: Research Funding. Musto:celgene: Honoraria. Fonseca:medtronic: Consultancy; genzyme: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; otsuka: Consultancy. Petrucci:celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. Greipp:celgene: Research Funding. Boccadoro:jansen Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; pharmion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Palumbo:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

Abstract Abstract 2848 Poster Board II-824 Background: Multiple myeloma remains incurable with current therapies and novel approaches based on disease biology are needed. IL-6 is a critical cytokine involved in myeloma cell proliferation and survival and exerts its activity primarily through the JAK/STAT pathway. In addition to IL6, other cytokines are also believed to cross talk with the JAK/STAT pathway, making it a crucial interface for survival signals. It has been implicated in myeloma cell interaction with the microenvironment and resistance to apoptotic stimuli from different drugs, and represents a potential therapeutic target. We examined the pre-clinical activity of a novel JAK2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor TG101209. Methods: TG101209 (N-tert-butyl-3-(5-methyl-2-[4-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-yl)-phenylamino]-pyrimidin-4-ylamino)-benzenesulfonamide) was synthesized by TargeGen Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA). Stock solutions were made in DMSO, and subsequently diluted in RPMI-1640 medium for use. MM cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum (20% serum for primary patient cells) supplemented with L-Glutamine, penicillin, and streptomycin. Cytotoxicity was measured using the MTT viability assay and proliferation using thymidine uptake. Apoptosis was measured using flow cytometry upon cell staining with Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI) for cell lines and using Apo2.7 in primary patient cells. CD45 expression was estimated using flow cytometry and cells were gated by their CD45 expression to assess differential effects of the drug. Immunoblotting was done on cell extracts at various time points following incubation with the drug in order to study the cell signaling pathways. Results: TG101209 resulted in a dose and time dependent inhibition of cell growth in the MM cell lines tested. Most of the cytotoxicity was evident by 48 hours, with minimal increase seen up to 96 hours of incubation. At 48 hours of incubation, the median inhibitory concentration was between 2 and 4uM with similar IC50 seen for myeloma cell lines sensitive or resistant to conventional therapies. The IC50s were maintained when the cells were treated in co-culture with stromal cells or in the presence of IL6, IGF or VEGF. Increasing doses of IL6 was not able to rescue the cells from the drug. Dose dependent decrease in proliferation of the cell lines was evidenced by decreased thymidine incorporation. Apoptotic changes in cells following drug treatment was confirmed by flow cytometry for Annexin and PI. Cleavage of caspases 3, 8 and 9 were confirmed on flow cytometry. Addition of the pan-caspase inhibitor zvad-fmk did not prevent drug-induced apoptosis confirming non-caspase mediated mechanisms of cell death as well. Primary myeloma cells from several patients were treated with increasing doses of the drug and IC50 similar to cell lines were seen in 8/10 patient samples tested. Interestingly, evaluation of U266 cell lines, which have a mix of CD45+ and negative cells as well as primary patient cells demonstrated more profound cytotoxicity and anti-proliferative activity of the drug on the CD45+ population relative to the CD45- cells. Immunoblotting studies demonstrated significant down regulation of IL-6 induced pSTAT3 with minor effects on the pERK and pAkt. The effect on pSAT3 was sustained compared to that on pERK and pAkt. This was accompanied by significant down regulation of Bcl-xL. Studies in a mouse model of myeloma are planned. Conclusion: These studies demonstrate significant in-vitro activity of JAK2 inhibition in multiple myeloma. In particular, the preferential targeting of CD45 cells, considered to reflect the proliferative compartment in myeloma holds out the promise for more sustained impact on the disease from a therapeutic standpoint. This is likely explained by the increased sensitivity of the CD45 cells to cytokines as a result of higher expression of different cytokine receptors as has been previously shown. This leads to increased activity of and dependence of the cells on the JAK-STAT pathway and likely explains the increased effect of the pathway inhibition. These studies form the framework for clinical evaluation of the drug in the setting of myeloma. Disclosures: Kumar: CELGENE: Research Funding; MILLENNIUM: Research Funding; BAYER: Research Funding; GENZYME: Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Research Funding.