Citations

Key Points In combination with cyclophosphamide, intravenous busulfan is associated with better leukemia-free and overall survival in AML than TBI.

AbstractBackgroundSurvival rates for children with medulloblastoma have risen over the past decade, in part due to the addition of cisplatin‐containing adjuvant chemotherapy. Total dose of cisplatin required for optimal treatment is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival outcomes based on cumulative cisplatin doses (CCD) in children with newly diagnosed average‐risk medulloblastoma.ProcedureCCD data were reviewed for 363 patients in a prospective study evaluating patients between 3 and 21 years with a newly diagnosed average‐risk medulloblastoma and treated with craniospinal radiation and post‐radiation cisplatin based adjuvant chemotherapy.ResultsEight‐year event‐free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates were 78.2 ± 2.6% and 83.9 ± 2.4%, respectively. Only 73 patients received the protocol specified CCD of 600 mg/m2, primarily due to mandated cisplatin toxicity‐related dose reductions. The median CCD given to those without relapse or death on treatment was 487.5 mg/m2. CCD, as a time‐dependent covariate, was not associated with EFS (P = 0.54) or OS (P = 0.11). The 343 patients who completed chemotherapy failure‐free were categorized into four groups according to CCD (n = 10; 75–150 mg/m2), (n = 26; 151–300 mg/m2), (n = 113; 301–450 mg/m2), and (n = 194; 451–600 mg/m2). There were no statistically significant differences in distributions of EFS (P = 0.53) or OS (P = 0.49) among these four groups.ConclusionCCD is not associated with EFS or OS suggesting that lower doses of cisplatin may be incorporated into future medulloblastoma trials, thereby limiting its toxicity profile without affecting survival. If ototoxicity is encountered, more stringent cisplatin dose modification/cessation rules seem warranted. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014;61:102–106. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Health care reform focuses on primary care and development of Health Care Homes to improve patient-centered chronic illness care. This pilot study evaluated a community care team intervention that linked chronically ill older patients, support persons, and nurse care coordinators from a Health Care Home with community resources using an adaptation of the Wraparound process. A pragmatic clinical trial design was used. Patient-centered chronic illness care; physical, mental, and social health; service use; and study feasibility were evaluated. Differences between groups were compared using two-sample t, Wilcoxon rank sum, chi-square, or Fisher’s exact tests. At 3 months, the intervention group reported higher patient-centered chronic illness care (mean total Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care change scores were 0.39 for the intervention group and −0.11 for the control group, p = .03). Results indicate that the integrated community care team intervention is a promising strategy to support patient-centered chronic illness care.

SummaryPatients with myelofibrosis (MF) have significant debilitating symptoms, physical disabilities, and poor health‐related quality of life (HRQoL). Here, we report post‐hoc analyses of the impact of ruxolitinib, a potent and selective JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, on disease‐related symptoms and HRQoL in MF patients from the large phase 3 COMFORT‐II study (N = 219). During the follow‐up period of 48 weeks, HRQoL and MF‐associated symptoms improved from baseline for ruxolitinib‐treated patients but remained the same or worsened for best available therapy (BAT)‐treated patients. Based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire core 30 items (EORTC QLQ‐C30), treatment‐induced differences in physical and role functioning, fatigue, and appetite loss significantly favoured ruxolitinib versus BAT from week 8 (P < 0·05) up to week 48 (P < 0·05). Ruxolitinib resulted in significantly higher response rates in global health status/QoL and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐Lymphoma (FACT‐Lym) summary scores versus BAT at most time points (P < 0·05). Significant improvements in the Lymphoma subscale (including symptoms of pain, fever, itching, fatigue, weight loss, loss of appetite, and other patient concerns), FACT‐General, FACT‐Lym trial outcome index, and FACT‐Lym total were also observed with ruxolitinib versus BAT starting at week 8 and continuing thereafter. Overall, these data demonstrated that ruxolitinib improved HRQoL in MF patients and further support the use of ruxolitinib for the treatment of symptomatic MF.

Palliative care services are not available in most outpatient oncology practices. A program training 11 mid-level providers from oncology practices on advanced directive discussions and supportive symptom assessment and management performed by palliative care specialists was completed. A follow-up session 9 months later identified barriers to implementation. Of the 11 mid-level providers, 8 participated in the follow-up session, and 9 of the 11 providers implemented advanced directive’s discussions and symptom assessment and management for patients with metastatic cancer. Main barriers included uncertainties about reimbursement, patients’ lack of knowledge about palliative care, and lack of access to supportive services. This program successfully promoted advanced directive discussions and supportive/palliative care symptom assessment and management to community oncology practices, which will hopefully translate into improved quality of life for patients with metastatic cancer.