Citations

ABSTRACTPharmacogenetics is a promising strategy to facilitate individualized care for patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Research is ongoing to identify the optimal genetic markers for predicting outcomes to antidepressant therapies. The primary aim of this systematic review was to summarize antidepressant pharmacogenetic studies to enhance understanding of the genes, variants, datatypes/methodologies, and outcomes investigated in the context of MDD. The secondary aim was to identify clinical genetic panels indicated for antidepressant prescribing and summarize their genes and variants. Screening of N = 5793 articles yielded N = 390 for inclusion, largely comprising adult (≥ 18 years) populations. Top‐studied variants identified in the search were discussed and compared with those represented on the N = 34 clinical genetic panels that were identified. Summarization of articles revealed sources of heterogeneity across studies and low rates of replicability of pharmacogenetic associations. Heterogeneity was present in outcome definitions, treatment regimens, and differential inclusion of mediating variables in analyses. Efficacy outcomes (i.e., response, remission) were studied at greater frequency than adverse‐event outcomes. Studies that used advanced analytical approaches, such as machine learning, to integrate variants with complimentary biological datatypes were fewer in number but achieved higher rates of significant associations with treatment outcomes than candidate variant approaches. As large biological datasets become more prevalent, machine learning will be an increasingly valuable tool for parsing the complexity of antidepressant response. This review provides valuable context and considerations surrounding pharmacogenetic associations in MDD which will help inform future research and translation efforts for guiding antidepressant care.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a major global health problem with no disease-modifying therapies. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) is a critical cytokine associated with the pathophysiology of OA and can be inhibited by IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra). Here, we tested the delivery of a gene therapeutic encoding the human IL-1Ra to the knee in a phase 1, open-label clinical trial that enrolled nine patients with radiographic knee OA. The IL-1Ra gene was delivered by a self-complementary (sc)–recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) serotype 2.5 (sc-rAAV2.5IL-1Ra) by intra-articular injection into an index knee at one of three doses: low [1 × 10 11 viral genomes (vg)], mid (1 × 10 12 vg), or high (1 × 10 13 vg). The primary outcome was safety. There were no serious adverse events (AEs) related to sc-rAAV2.5IL-1Ra. Two AEs occurred that were possibly related to the vector. Both were effusions with increased pain and resolved with conservative treatment. sc-rAAV2.5IL-1Ra did not cause changes in vital signs, physical findings, or clinical laboratory measures. Less than 1% of the injected dose of sc-rAAV2.5IL-1Ra vg was detected in circulation after 1 day and was cleared within a week. Titers of neutralizing antibodies to AAV2.5 rose in serum and synovial fluid. In all cases, IL-1Ra concentration increased in the synovial fluid, and IL-1Ra concentrations remained elevated after 1 year. Baseline pain and function scores improved during the study. Therefore, we found that intra-articular gene therapy with sc-rAAV2.5IL-1Ra was safe. The sustained increase in local IL-1Ra in human knee joints supports the further clinical examination of this therapy to provide therapeutic benefit in OA.

LBA4005 Background: To date, no phase 3 clinical trial has demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit in patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LA-PAC). TTFields are electric fields that disrupt cancer cell division. TTFields therapy is approved for glioblastoma, pleural mesothelioma, and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. A phase 2 trial in PAC demonstrated the safety and preliminary efficacy of TTFields therapy with gemcitabine with or without nab-paclitaxel. We report final data from PANOVA-3 (NCT03377491), the largest global, phase 3, randomized, open-label trial in LA-PAC to date. Methods: Adult patients with newly diagnosed unresectable LA-PAC were randomized 1:1 to receive TTFields therapy (150 kHz) with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GnP) or GnP. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), local PFS, objective response rate (ORR), and pain-free survival. Distant PFS (metastases beyond the pancreas and regional lymph nodes) was assessed post hoc. Survival data were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and a log-rank test. Results: 571 patients were randomized. Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced between the study arms. OS was significantly longer with TTFields/GnP than with GnP (median 16.2 [95% CI: 15.0, 18.0] vs 14.2 months [95% CI: 12.8, 15.4]; HR 0.82 [95% CI: 0.68, 0.99], p=0.039). One-year survival rate was also significantly improved with TTFields/GnP vs GnP (68.1% [95% CI: 62.0-73.5] vs 60.2% [95% CI: 54.2-65.7], p=0.029). There was no significant difference in PFS or local PFS between arms. Pain-free survival was significantly longer with TTFields/GnP vs GnP (median 15.2 [95% CI: 10.3, 22.8] vs 9.1 months [95% CI: 7.4, 12.7]; HR 0.74 [95% CI: 0.56, 0.97], p=0.027). Post-hoc analysis showed significant distant PFS benefit (median 13.9 [95% CI: 12.2, 16.8] vs 11.5 months [95% CI: 10.4, 12.9], HR 0.74 [95% CI: 0.57, 0.96], p=0.022) with TTFields/GnP vs GnP. ORR was similar between arms (36.1% [95% CI: 30.0, 42.4] vs 30.0% [95% CI: 24.3, 36.2], p=0.094). 97.8% and 98.9% of patients who received TTFields/GnP and GnP, respectively, had adverse events (AEs) and 88.6% and 84.3% had grade ≥3 AEs. The most frequent grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (47.8% and 47.6%) and anemia (21.9% and 22.3). 81% of patients receiving TTFields/GnP had device-related AEs, mostly grade 1/2 skin AEs, e.g., dermatitis (27.7%), rash (17.5%), and pruritus (15.0%); grade 3 and grade 4 device-related AEs occurred in 9.1% and 0.4% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: PANOVA-3 is the largest phase 3 trial exclusively performed in patients with LA-PAC and the first to show a statistically significant OS benefit. With no additive systemic toxicity and a statistically significant pain-free survival benefit, TTFields therapy is a potential new standard treatment for LA-PAC. Clinical trial information: NCT03377491 .

LBA3509 Background: Systemic inflammation has been implicated in colon cancer progression. We examined whether intake of a proinflammatory diet is associated with survival among patients (pts) with stage III colon cancer. Methods: This prospective cohort study was nested within a randomized phase III trial of adjuvant therapy in pts with stage III colon cancer who had undergone curative-intent resection. EDIP score – a validated tool to classify the inflammatory nature of diets – was derived as a cumulative exposure using data from food-frequency questionnaires completed within 6 weeks of randomization and 14-16 months (mo) after randomization. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the associations of EDIP with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 1625 included pts, the mean (SD) age was 60.9 (10.5) years (yrs). Compared to pts in the lowest EDIP quintile, pts in the highest quintile (a more inflammatory diet) were younger (58.7 ± 10.8 vs 61.3 ± 9.5 yrs old) and more likely to be female (64.0% vs 48.9%) and have worse performance status (ECOG 1-2: 35.7% vs 19.4%). Pts in the highest quintile were less likely to be White (76.6% vs 92.0 %) and more likely to be Black (15.4% vs 3.7%). Baseline aspirin use, assigned chemotherapy (3 mo vs 6 mo), and assigned pharmacotherapy (celecoxib vs placebo) were not significantly different across EDIP quintiles. Compared with pts in the lowest EDIP quintile, pts in the highest quintile had significantly worse OS (multivariable hazard ratio [HR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-2.77, P trend =0.01), but not DFS (HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.99-1.86, P trend =0.22). Diet and physical activity jointly influenced OS. Those with lower EDIP scores (quintiles 1-4, 80% of the study population) and higher physical activity (≥9 MET-h/wk) had the best OS (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.25-0.53) compared with pts in the highest EDIP quintile (20% of the study population) and lower physical activity (<9 MET-h/wk) ( P interaction <0.001). The association between higher EDIP and OS was consistent when analyzed by celecoxib and placebo treatment arms ( P interaction 0.54). The relationship between EDIP and OS did not differ significantly according to aspirin use, with HR 1.60 (95% CI 0.71-3.60) among aspirin users and HR 2.01 (95% CI 1.27-3.16) among aspirin non-users ( P interaction 0.06). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that greater intake of a proinflammatory dietary pattern is associated with worse OS in pts with stage III colon cancer. Regular physical activity may attenuate the association, and further investigation of diet and physical activity intervention is warranted. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, U10CA180863, CCS 707213, UG1CA233234, U10CA180820, U10CA180868, U10CA180888; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01150045.

LBA3500 Background: BREAKWATER (NCT04607421) is an open-label, global, randomized, phase 3 study evaluating first-line (1L) encorafenib + cetuximab (EC) ± chemotherapy (chemo) vs standard of care (SOC; chemo ± bevacizumab) in BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The study previously met one of its dual primary endpoints (EPs) demonstrating clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (BICR) in the ORR subset. These results were the basis for the FDA accelerated approval of EC+mFOLFOX6 for BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC, including in the 1L, under Project Frontrunner. Here, we report the primary analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) by BICR, updated interim analysis of OS, updated safety, and other analyses. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) with untreated BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC were randomized 1:1:1 to receive EC, EC+mFOLFOX6, or SOC; EC arm enrollment was closed after a protocol amendment. Dual primary EPs: ORR and PFS by BICR (EC+mFOLFOX6 vs SOC); key secondary EP: OS (EC+mFOLFOX6 vs SOC). Results: 637 pts were randomized to EC, EC+mFOLFOX6, or SOC. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally balanced between arms. EC+mFOLFOX6 (data cutoff: Jan 6, 2025) demonstrated a clinically meaningful and statistically significant PFS improvement vs SOC, meeting the other dual primary EP; HR=0.53 (95% CI 0.407, 0.677; P<0.0001); median PFS 12.8 vs 7.1 mo. OS was clinically meaningful and statistically significant vs SOC; HR=0.49 (95% CI 0.375, 0.632; P<0.0001); median OS 30.3 vs 15.1 mo. Median PFS and OS in the EC arm were 6.8 and 19.5 mo. These data and response data for all randomized pts are shown in the table. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 30%, 46%, and 39% of pts in the safety analysis set. Safety was consistent with that known for each agent. Conclusions: BREAKWATER demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant PFS and OS improvements with EC+mFOLFOX6 vs SOC and manageable toxicities. EC+mFOLFOX6 is potentially practice changing as the new SOC. Clinical trial information: NCT04607421 . ECn=158 EC+mFOLFOX6n=236 SOCn=243 EC+mFOLFOX6vs SOCHR (95% CI)P-value a Median PFS b , mo (95% CI) 6.8(5.7, 8.3) 12.8(11.2, 15.9) 7.1(6.8, 8.5) 0.53 (0.407, 0.677) <0.0001 Median OS, mo (95% CI) 19.5(17.6, 22.5) 30.3(21.7, NE) 15.1(13.7, 17.7) 0.49 (0.375, 0.632)<0.0001 ORR, b % (95% CI) 45.6(38.0, 53.3) 65.7(59.4, 71.4) 37.4(31.6, 43.7) Median DOR b , mo (95% CI) c 7.0 (4.2, 11.6) 13.9 (10.9, 18.5) 10.8 (7.6, 13.4) DOR b ≥6 mo, n (%) c 29 (40.3) 110 (71.0) 38 (41.8) DOR b ≥12 mo, n (%) c 15 (20.8) 54 (34.8) 16 (17.6) Median time to response, b wk (range) c 6.6(4.3-86.4) 7.0(5.1-103.6) 7.3 (5.4-48.0) a 1-sided stratified log rank test. b By BICR. c Responders: n=72, n=155, and n=91. DOR, duration of response.

LBA1551 Background: Traditional cancer therapy is primarily delivered in clinical settings, imposing logistical, emotional, and financial burdens, particularly on rural and underserved patients. While international studies have demonstrated the safety of home-based chemotherapy, no randomized U.S. trials have evaluated this approach. Mayo Clinic’s CCBW program aims to expand access to high-quality cancer care by providing in-home cancer treatment, lab testing, telemedicine, remote patient monitoring, command center and paramedic support. This pragmatic randomized controlled trial evaluates feasibility and impact of home-based versus in-clinic cancer directed therapy on patient preference, acceptability, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. Methods: Adult patients (ECOG 0-2) receiving chemotherapy or hormonal therapy at Mayo Clinic Florida were randomized 1:1 after confirmation of treatment tolerance in clinic to receive (1) home-based care for 24 weeks or (2) in-clinic care for 8 weeks followed by home-based care for 16 weeks. Target accrual is 200 patients. A planned interim analysis after 50 enrollments assessed accrual, data completeness, technical challenges, safety, and study outcomes. The primary endpoint is patient ratings of their overall cancer care experience (0–10 scale, CAHPS Cancer Care Survey) at 8 weeks. 200 patients provide 80% power to detect a 0.45 standard deviation difference in mean ratings between arms with a 2-sided 2-sample t-test (α=0.05) and 20% missing data rate. Secondary endpoints are patient preference, comfort with home infusions, treatment worthwhileness, functional/symptom assessments (EORTC QLQ-F17, PRO-CTCAE, GP5), grade ≥3 AEs, hospitalizations, and overall survival. Cost is a tertiary endpoint. The trial is IRB-approved (#23001719) and registered (NCT05969860). Results: Enrollment began 8/23/23. As of 2/21/25, 52 patients (26 per arm) were enrolled and 36 started protocol treatment. Common cancers were breast (38%), colorectal (21%), prostate (19%), and multiple myeloma (14%). 64% (28/44) of patients were female; 84% identified as White, 14% as Black, and 2% as multiple races. Median distance to clinic was 20 miles (range 2-66). After 8 weeks, patients in both arms rated their overall cancer care experience highly (mean [SD]=9.69 [0.85] versus 9.54 [0.66] for home-based vs. in-clinic care, n=26). After 24 weeks, 73% preferred home-based care, 18% had no preference, and 9% preferred in-clinic care; 100% felt comfortable with home infusions. No grade ≥3 AEs related to location of care have occurred. Conclusions: Early findings support the feasibility, safety, and high patient acceptability of home-based cancer therapy. No safety concerns related to care location were observed and most patients preferred home-based treatment. Ongoing accrual and analysis will assess clinical outcomes and cost implications. Clinical trial information: NCT05969860 .

Tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH) is a rate-limiting enzyme for serotonin or 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) synthesis. Previously, adipocyte TPH1 has been linked to increased adipose 5-HT, reduced brown adipose tissue (BAT) thermogenesis, and obesity. However, the role of TPH2, a neural isoform highly expressed in obese adipose tissue, is unknown. Here, we report that adipose tissue expression of TPH2 is dramatically elevated in mice with diet-induced obesity (DIO) and ob/ob mice, as well as in obese humans. In mice fed a high-fat diet, adipocyte TPH2 deficiency improved DIO-induced metabolic complications, enhanced BAT thermogenesis, and increased intestinal energy-harvesting efficiency without affecting adiposity. Conversely, TPH2 overexpression in epididymal adipocytes of chow-fed mice raised adipose and plasma 5-HT levels, suppressed BAT thermogenesis, and exacerbated obesity and metabolic dysfunction. We found that obesity-induced hyperinsulinemia upregulated adipocyte TPH2 expression via activation of mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 and SREBP1. In humans, TPH2 mRNA levels in subcutaneous adipose tissue, but not those of TPH1 , are positively correlated with fasting plasma insulin concentrations. In summary, our study demonstrates that obesity-associated increases in adipocyte TPH2 can regulate distal tissue physiology and energy metabolism, suggesting that TPH2 could be a potential therapeutic target for obesity and its associated complications.