Citations

Purpose: Mohs micrographic surgery with immunohistochemistry allows for same-day comprehensive margin assessment of melanoma in situ prior to subspecialty reconstruction. This study describes the oncologic and reconstructive outcomes of eyelid and periorbital melanoma in situ and identifies risk factors for complex reconstructive demands. Methods: Retrospective case series of all patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery with immunohistochemistry for melanoma in situ affecting the eyelids or periorbital region from 2008 to 2018 at a single institution. Tumors were assigned to the eyelid group if the clinically visible tumor involved the skin inside the orbital rim. Reconstructive variables were compared between the eyelid and periorbital cohorts. Results: There were 24 eyelid and 141 periorbital tumors included. The initial surgical margin for all tumors was 5.34 ± 1.54 mm and multiple Mohs stages were required in 24.2% of cases. Eyelid tumors included more recurrences (p = 0.003), and the average defect size was larger (14.0 ± 13.3 cm2 vs. 7.7 ± 5.4 cm2, p = 0.03). Risk factors for complex reconstruction included: initial tumor diameter >2 cm (odds ratio [OR]: 3.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.95–7.57) and eyelid involved by initial tumor (OR: 4.88, 95% CI: 1.94–12.28). At an average follow-up of 4.8 years, there were no melanoma-related deaths and 1 local recurrence (0.6% recurrence rate). Conclusions: Mohs micrographic surgery with immunohistochemistry achieves excellent local control rates for periocular melanoma in situ. An initial surgical margin of 5 mm is frequently insufficient to achieve clear margins. The resulting defects are large, and the complexity of reconstruction can be predicted by tumor size and clinical involvement of eyelid skin.

11533 Background: After initial response to first line therapy with imatinib, GISTs commonly progress due to secondary resistance mutations in KIT. As the KIT mutation targeting profiles of bezuclastinib (type I TKI) and sunitinib are distinct, when combined they inhibit a broad spectrum of secondary KIT mutations. Herein we report extended experience of patients treated with 2nd line combination bezuclastinib and sunitinib, including response assessment and safety. Methods: Peak (NCT05208047), a global randomized Phase 3, open-label study, aims to evaluate efficacy and safety of bezuclastinib + sunitinib vs sunitinib in GIST pts with imatinib intolerance or resistance. In Part 1a of the 3-part study, the dose of an optimized formulation of bezuclastinib was escalated in serial cohorts to achieve a target exposure comparable to that achieved at the RP2D established in the prior Phase 1b/2a study. Part 1b evaluated the interaction between bezuclastinib + sunitinib. Key inclusion: adult with locally advanced, metastatic and/or unresectable GIST, ≥1 measurable lesion according to modified RECIST v1.1, and ECOG PS 0 to 2. Part 1 completed enrollment in Apr 2023. Based upon PK and safety, a dose of bezuclastinib 600 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD was selected for Part 2. All Part 1 data reported herein are as of Aug 2023; updated safety and efficacy will be presented. Results: Part 1 has completed enrollment with 19 pts in Part 1a and 23 in 1b. In Part 1a, Cohort 1 included 5 pts starting at bezuclastinib 300 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD; Cohort 2 included 14 pts at bezuclastinib 600 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD. Pt characteristics in Part 1a+1b: median age - 60 yrs (range: 33-77); 81% men; 98% ECOG PS 0-1; 98% metastatic and 2% locally advanced. The majority of TEAEs were low grade and reversible with low rate (38%) of Grade 3+ events. There were limited (24%) dose reductions and infrequent (n=2) discontinuations due to TEAEs. Three pts experienced serious AEs possibly associated with study medications. In pts evaluable for response (received ≥1 cycle of study treatment and had assessments at baseline and post-baseline [n=40]), the objective response rate (ORR) was 20% (6 confirmed PRs, 2 unconfirmed PRs). Data remain immature to estimate median PFS for Part 1 pts. In a subset of pts with prior imatinib only (n=6), the closest approximation for pts enrolling in Part 2, the ORR was 33% (2 confirmed PRs). The majority of 2nd-line pts remain on treatment past 12 months. Conclusions: Data from Peak Part 1 show an encouraging safety and tolerability profile generally consistent with published sunitinib monotherapy experience. ORR in evaluable pts from Part 1 was 20%; ORR in 2nd line pts was 33%. Part 2 of the Peak study is actively enrolling pts globally at the selected dose of bezuclastinib 600 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD versus sunitinib 37.5 mg QD. Clinical trial information: NCT05208047 .

11514 Background: The role of immunotherapy remains uncertain in most sarcomas. We recently showed significant antitumor benefit for cabozantinib (C) with N in AS previously treated with a taxane. Since chemotherapy-immunotherapy combinations may synergize, and paclitaxel remains a standard of care option for advanced AS, we hypothesized that P+N would be more effective than P alone. Methods: We report Arm 1 (P+N) and Arm 2 (P) of this open label, multi-arm, phase II study. Pts all had locally advanced/metastatic AS, and no prior taxane (including adjuvant) or checkpoint inhibitor prior to entry. Pts were randomized 1:1 (stratified scalp/face vs other) to receive P 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 every 4 weeks (wks), with (Arm 1) or without (Arm 2) N (480 mg intravenously every 4 wks). A pt could remain on study beyond disease progression (PD), after the initial 12 wk evaluation (4 wk confirmatory scan required), but responses were censored at 12 wks. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) comparing P+N to P, with an assumed improvement from a median of 4 to 7 months with N added to P (power = 85.3%, alpha = 0.148, and one interim analysis (Wieand rule) for futility planned after 30 events). Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), overall survival (OS), and pt reported outcomes (PRO). At PD, Arm 2 (P) pts were permitted to receive C+N. Results: 62 evaluable pts (P+N = 30, P = 32 pts) were balanced for age, race, ECOG PS 0 vs. 1, site of disease (including radiation related vs. not), while P+N had more females (60%) and P had more males (63%). Median PFS for P+N was 7.2 mo (5.3-17 mo), and 8.3 mo (4.0-18 mo) for P (hazard ratio (HR) 1.01 (95%CI: 0.55-1.9), p = 0.96). Median PFS for scalp/face was 16 mo (95%CI: 10-NR) for P+N and 8.3 mo (95%CI: 3.7-NR) for P. Median PFS for all others was 5.5 mo (95%CI 4.3-16) for P+N, and 6.0 mo (95%CI 4.1-NR) for P. Median OS was 18 mo (13-NR) in P+N, and 23 mo (15-NR) in P (HR 1.3 (95%CI: 0.63-2.7), p = 0.48). Overall confirmed ORR: P+N = 33% (10/30 pts, with 4 partial responses (PR) and 6 complete responses (CR) with scalp/face ORR = 73%, all others ORR = 11%). Overall ORR for P = 34% (11/32 pts, with 7 PR and 4 CR, with scalp/face ORR = 38%, all others ORR = 26%). Grade 3-4 AEs regardless of attribution occurred in 57% of P+N, and 44% of P, most commonly ( > 10%) fatigue, AST increase, and dyspnea for P+N (n = 3 each), and anemia (n = 4) for P. Conclusions: P alone can be an effective therapy in a subset of pts with AS. The combination of P+N failed to demonstrate improvement in median PFS over P alone, but may show benefit in scalp/face AS. OS trended better with P alone. No new safety signals were observed. The impact of weekly steroid premedication prior to P+N on these outcomes remains to be determined. PRO and exploratory analyses are ongoing. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24 CA196171; NCT04339738. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Clinical trial information: NCT04339738 .

11504 Background: Surgery & radiation therapy (RT) yield high local control rates for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremity and limb girdle. However, patients (pts) with high-grade stage III STS are at significant risk for developing metastasis. Median survival for pts with metastatic STS is < 2 years. SARC028 (NCT02301039) evaluated the efficacy of pembrolizumab (pembro) for metastatic STS, showing 20% and 8.7% response rates in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and pleomorphic/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (LPS), respectively. We hypothesized that neoadjuvant pembro with concurrent RT followed by surgery and adjuvant pembro for stage III UPS, including myxofibrosarcoma, or LPS would stimulate an anti-tumor immune response to eliminate micrometastatic disease & improve disease-free survival (DFS). SU2C-SARC032 (NCT03092323) is a multi-institutional, international, randomized phase 2 trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of adding pembro to standard of care (SOC) RT & surgery for pts with stage III UPS or LPS. Methods: Pts aged > 12 yo with stage III (FNCLCC grade 2 or 3) UPS or LPS of the extremity and limb girdle were enrolled. Pts were randomized (1:1, stratified by grade) to neoadjuvant RT (50 Gy/25 fx) then surgery (SOC arm) or neoadjuvant pembro and RT then surgery & adjuvant pembro (EXP arm). Pembro was given 200 mg IV Q3 wk for 3 doses (before, during & after RT) & up to 14 adjuvant cycles. The primary endpoint was 2-yr DFS. Secondary endpoints included local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), & overall survival (OS). Target enrollment of 126 evaluable patients (max 144 total) provided 80% power (1-sided α = 0.05) to distinguish between a null hypothesis of 50% 2-yr DFS rate & alternative hypothesis of 75% 2-yr DFS rate by log-rank test, with initial analysis at 45 DFS events. Cox models were stratified by grade; primary analysis was a one-sided stratified log-rank test. Results: Between July 2017-November 2023, 143 patients were enrolled, predominantly with UPS (85%) & grade 3 (64%) histology. Median follow-up for alive patients is 24.1 mo. DFS in the EXP arm is significantly higher than the SOC arm (p = 0.023; HR 0.57, 90% CI: 0.35, 0.91). Estimated 2-yr DFS is 53% (90% CI: 43, 66%) for SOC vs 70% (90% CI: 61, 81%) for EXP arm. Currently, there is no statistically significant difference in LRFS (HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.21, 1.42), DDFS (HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.32, 1.01), or OS (HR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.14, 1.12). Pts with grade 3 sarcomas had improved DFS with pembro (HR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25, 0.89), but no difference in DFS was observed in grade 2 tumors (HR 1.21, 95% CI: 0.35, 4.18). The proportion of patients with grade 3+ adverse events was significantly higher in EXP (52%) vs SOC arm (26%) (p = 0.002). Conclusions: Theaddition of neoadjuvant & adjuvant pembro to RT and surgery significantly improves DFS for pts with stage III UPS and LPS of the extremity and limb girdle. Clinical trial information: NCT03092323 .

e13156 Background: Breast Cancer (BC) patients are classified as HER2-positive (IHC3+ or IHC2+/ISH+) or HER2-negative (IHC0, IHC1+ and 2+/ISH-). Within the HER2-negative category, patients who meet HER2-low (IHC1+ or IHC2+/ISH-) criteria can benefit from HER2 targeted therapy like trastuzumab deruxtecan. Patients who meet IHC0 criteria with incomplete and faint membrane staining in >0 but ≤10% of tumor cells — defined as “HER2 Ultra-low”, may also benefit from HER2 targeted therapy. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” expression based on re-scored HER2 IHC biopsy slides. Methods: This study utilized EHR data from all three US Mayo Clinic campuses. A total of 300 patients with advanced BC (stages III-IV), and clinically documented HER2 IHC0 status between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023, were identified. One biopsy slide per patient (IHC assay: VENTANA Pathway anti-HER2/neu (4B5) rabbit monoclonal primary antibody) was digitized and scanned at 40x magnification. Two Mayo Clinic pathologists independently scored and reported HER2 status according to 2023 ASCO-CAP guidelines and included tumor stain percentage for each slide. Patients were considered “HER2 Ultra-Low” if their slide was scored as IHC0 with >0% but ≤10% staining. Cohen’s κ was used to quantify agreement between pathologists. Results: The re-scored patients (n=300) had a mean age of 57.8 years (SD=13.5), with ~97% having IHC0 documentation within 30 days of the reviewed biopsy slide. A total of 285 (95%) patients remained classified as IHC0 by at least one pathologist. Of these, 60% (n=171) were determined as “HER2 Ultra-low” by at least one pathologist. The rate of “HER2 Ultra-Low” per pathologist ranged from 43% (n=121) to 45% (n=104). The overall inter-pathologist concordance was 57%; patients with no observable HER2 IHC staining accounted for majority of the concordant patients (Table). Conclusions: About 3 in 5 advanced BC patients originally classified as HER2 IHC0 met the “HER2 Ultra-Low” criteria by at least one pathologist, implying that significant number of additional patients may benefit from HER2 targeted therapy. The relatively low concordance between HER2 expert pathologists in identifying lower levels of HER2 expression suggests the need for increased precision enabled by digital tools, leveraging AI, training for community practice pathologists, and continuing to follow best practice recommendations in determining HER2 IHC status. [Table: see text]

TPS11588 Background: Imatinib is the worldwide standard for first-line therapy of advanced KIT-mutant GIST. However, secondary resistance mutations in the KIT ATP-binding domain (exons 13, 14), activation loop (exons 17, 18), or both develop and result in loss of imatinib-sensitivity. Bezuclastinib has a highly selective inhibition profile, leading to minimal off-target toxicities and allowing for combination with sunitinib. While no single tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) inhibits all KIT mutations, the combination of bezuclastinib + sunitinib targets commonly occurring primary (exons 9, 11) and secondary (exons 13, 14, 17, and 18) KIT mutations and may provide more durable responses. The early signs of clinical activity, tolerability, and safety observed with the combination thus far in Peak Part 1 (Somaiah et al. [presentation] CTOS 2023. Paper 62) are consistent with the completed Phase 1/2 study (PLX121-01). Methods: Peak (NCT05208047) is a global, randomized, open-label, multi-part Phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of bezuclastinib + sunitinib versus sunitinib as second-line treatment in adult pts who were intolerant to imatinib or whose tumors had imatinib-resistance. Current Peak study sites are located in North America (3 countries), South America (3 countries), Europe (12 countries), and Asia-Pacific (4 countries). The lead-in portion to test a new formulation of bezuclastinib, (Part 1) completed enrollment in April 2023. Based upon PK and safety, a dose of bezuclastinib 600 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD was determined for Part 2 of the Peak study. Part 2 will enroll ~388 pts to be randomized (1:1) to bezuclastinib 600 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD or sunitinib 37.5 mg QD alone. Key inclusion: >1 measurable lesion per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) v1.1, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0-2, adequate organ function, and prior imatinib therapy (no other prior therapy). Key exclusion: known PDGFR mutations or succinate dehydrogenase deficiency, clinically significant cardiac disease, and use of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) confirmed by blinded independent central review per mRECIST v1.1. Additional efficacy (including overall survival and objective response rate) and safety endpoints will be evaluated and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) will be collected and assessed. Clinical trial information: NCT05208047 .

Abstract Although initial therapy of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is not standardized, bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) is commonly used in older patients. Rituximab (R) maintenance after induction is often used. Thus, the open-label, randomized phase 2 ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group E1411 trial was designed to test 2 questions: (1) does addition of bortezomib to BR induction (BVR) and/or (2) addition of lenalidomide to rituximab (LR) maintenance improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with treatment-naïve MCL? From 2012 to 2016, 373 previously untreated patients, 87% aged ≥60 years, were enrolled in this trial. At a median follow-up of 7.5 years, there is no difference in the median PFS of BR compared with BVR (5.5 vs 6.4 years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-1.16). There were no unexpected additional toxicities with BVR treatment compared with BR, with no impact on total dose/duration of treatment received. Independent of the induction treatment, addition of lenalidomide did not significantly improve PFS, with median PFS in R vs LR (5.9 vs 7.2 years; HR, 0.84; 90% CI, 0.62-1.15). Most patients completed the planned 24 cycles of LR at the scheduled dose. In summary, adding bortezomib to BR induction does not prolong PFS in treatment-naïve MCL, and LR maintenance was not associated with longer PFS compared with R alone after BR. Nonetheless, the &gt;5-year median PFS outcomes in this prospective cooperative group trial indicate the efficacy of BR followed by R maintenance as highly effective initial therapy for older patients with MCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01415752.

PURPOSE Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, yet their use is associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Estimating the prevalence and patient impact of these irAEs in the real-world data setting is critical for characterizing the benefit/risk profile of ICI therapies beyond the clinical trial population. Diagnosis codes, such as International Classification of Diseases codes, do not comprehensively illustrate a patient's care journey and offer no insight into drug-irAE causality. This study aims to capture the relationship between ICIs and irAEs more accurately by using augmented curation (AC), a natural language processing–based innovation, on unstructured data in electronic health records. METHODS In a cohort of 9,290 patients treated with ICIs at Mayo Clinic from 2005 to 2021, we compared the prevalence of irAEs using diagnosis codes and AC models, which classify drug-irAE pairs in clinical notes with implied textual causality. Four illustrative irAEs with high patient impact—myocarditis, encephalitis, pneumonitis, and severe cutaneous adverse reactions, abbreviated as MEPS—were analyzed using corticosteroid administration and ICI discontinuation as proxies of severity. RESULTS For MEPS, only 70% (n = 118) of patients found by AC were also identified by diagnosis codes. Using AC models, patients with MEPS received corticosteroids for their respective irAE 82% of the time and permanently discontinued the ICI because of the irAE 35.9% (n = 115) of the time. CONCLUSION Overall, AC models enabled more accurate identification and assessment of patient impact of ICI-induced irAEs not found using diagnosis codes, demonstrating a novel and more efficient strategy to assess real-world clinical outcomes in patients treated with ICIs.