Citations

Abstract Background: Aberrant B-cell receptor (BCR) and MYD88 signaling cooperatively drive Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) tumor cell survival. To sustain BCR-driven growth and maintain optimal cellular homeostasis, WM cells upregulate proteasome function. We have recently described the role of two distinct 19S proteasome-associated deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs), USP14 and UCHL5, in maintaining WM-cell viability. Pharmacologic inhibition with b-AP15 (commercial compound) results in WM-cell death and accumulation of high molecular weight ubiquitinated protein conjugates; an event that is phenocopied by siRNA knockdown of USP14 and UCHL5. VLX1570 is a lead-optimized clinical grade analog of b-AP15 with enhanced solubility, stability and target residence time. We investigated the effect of VLX1570 on BCR components, WM cell survival proteins and its in vivo activity in a human xenograft model of WM. Materials: VLX1570 was obtained from Vivolux AB and bortezomib from Sellekchem. Human WM cell lines (BCWM.1, MWCL-1 and RPCI-WM1) and their drug-resistant derivatives were used (total n=12). Bone marrow aspirates from WM-patients and from healthy donors were obtained from the Mayo Clinic biospecimens core. PBMCs from healthy donors were used as comparators where needed. NOD/SCID mice were obtained from Taconic Labs and used for profiling the in vivo properties of VLX1570. Results: We first examined for USP14/UCHL5 protein expression by immunohistochemical analysis in primary tumor tissue from WM patients and compared it to healthy donor cells. WM patient-derived cells exhibited greater staining intensity of both DUBs. Preferential binding of VLX1570 to USP14 and UCHL5 in WM cells was probed in a WM cell using an enzyme-based competition assay (HA-Ub-Vs), which demonstrated time-dependent decrease in labeled USP14 and UCHL5 after treatment with VLX1570. In drug-resistant (bortezomib or ibrutinib-resistant) WM cells, VLX1570 induced >50% tumor-specific apoptosis and displayed synergistic activity with ibrutinib (median CI: 0.5). In addition to ER stress markers, we had previously observed that gene expression of BCR-signalosome components were reduced in VLX1570-treated WM cells (NanoString platform) and this was substantiated at the protein level where p-SYK, SYK and BTK decreased in a time-dependent manner. BCR end-effectors were probed in response to VLX1570 and a decrease in nuclear translocation of NFkB (p65) was noted. USP14 has been shown to control the availability of the chemokine receptor CXCR4, which regulates homing of WM cells to bone marrow. After VLX1570 treatment, we noted a significant decrease in CXCR4 surface receptor expression in all WM cell lines tested and primary WM cells. Lastly, to determine the in vivo anti-WM effects of VLX1570, we injected NOD/SCID mice (xenotransplanted with RPCI-WM1-Luc cells) with VLX1570 (I.P. route, 4.4mg/kg every other day) and measured tumor burden along with pharmacodynamic indicators. VLX1570-treated mice (n=7) demonstrated significantly lower tumor volumes by caliper measurement and bioluminescent signal (p=0.01 - 0.003) as well as reduced serum human-IgM, compared to vehicle-treated mice (n=7). Importantly, mice treated with VLX1570 survived longer vs. vehicle-treated mice (median survival, 62 vs. 44 days, respectively, p=0.0008). No unforeseen toxicities were noted and weight of the mice in vehicle vs. VLX1570-treated mice did not significantly change. IHC analysis in mice tumor tissues demonstrated reduced CXCR4, human-IgM, Ki67 and increased cleaved caspase-3 and ubiquitinated (k48-linked) protein level, the latter serving as a more specific indicator of USP14/UCHL5 inhibition. Conclusions: We provide substantial in vitro and in vivo evidence on the anti-WM effects of a novel first-in-class clinical grade USP14/UCHL5 inhibitor, VLX1570. In addition to anticipated induction of ER stress machinery, we describe for the first time VLX1570-mediated modulation of BCR components and WM cell survival proteins as well as demonstrate its robust activity in an aggressive human xenograft model of WM. These data provide the rationale for a clinical trial of single agent VLX1570 in patients with symptomatic WM. Disclosures Martin: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acerta: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Gullbo:Vivolux AB: Other: Shareholder. Linder:Vivolux AB: Other: Shareholder.

Abstract Background: The clinical impact of ibrutinib is irrefutable and has been hailed as a revolutionary treatment for several cancers, including mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Despite high response rates noted with ibrutinib therapy in MCL (ORR, 68%), complete responses are low and durability of remission is suboptimal in MCL vs. CLL or Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) patients (Cheah et al Ann Oncol 2015). This relative lack of efficacy may be due to MCL cells having a higher proliferation rate and being less indolent in nature than CLL or WM cells. Tumor cells with a high proliferation index rely on optimally functioning protein metabolism/homeostasis systems. In MCL, this observation has been fortuitously exploited with the use of bortezomib, a 20S proteasome inhibitor. Indeed the ubiquitin proteasome system is a validated target and consists of several individual components whose function in MCL has yet to be mapped out. We have recently reported that inhibition of the 19S proteasomal deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs), USP14 and UCHL5; with the small molecule inhibitor b-AP15 is lethal to drug-resistant WM tumor cells. This intriguing observation, prompted us to define the role of USP14/UCHL5 and their inhibition in a diverse panel of B-cell lymphoma cell lines, including MCL models as well as ibrutinib-resistant MCL cells. Materials: b-AP15 (and its clinical grade analog, VLX1570) was obtained from Vivolux AB and bortezomib from Sellekchem. Human NHL (DLBCL, MCL, Burkitt), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), multiple myeloma (MM) cell lines as well as established drug-resistant subclones were used in drug-sensitivity screening experiments (total n=25). Results: USP14 and UCHL5 mRNA expression was queried in the CCLE database (Broad-Novartis) and showed highest expression in plasma cell and B-lymphoid tumor cell types. This was also observed at the protein level, wherein analysis of The Human Protein Atlas database revealed moderate to high intensity staining for USP14 and UCHL5 localizing to the cytoplasmic/membranous and nuclear compartments in high-grade NHL tissues. Next, we examined B-lymphoid tumor cell sensitivity to pharmacologic inhibition of USP14/UCHL5 with either b-AP15 or VLX1570 (72hr fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis assay or CellTiter Glo). We observed that MCL cells, including those resistant to ibrutinib (Jeko/IR cell line) were highly sensitive to VLX1570 (median IC50 12 - 25nM). In contrast, MM cells were not as sensitive (IC50's ranging between 58 - 90nM). Nine DLBCL cell lines exposed to equivalent time/concentrations of b-AP15 showed a median IC50 of 311nM (range, 70 - 910nM) and 3 HL models exhibited an IC50 of 531nM (range, 420 - 783nM). No difference in sensitivity to VLX1570 was noted between ABC-type vs. GCB-type DLBCL models. These functional results aligned with prior genomic inquiry where USP14 and UCHL5 gene expression was noted to be higher in MCL cell lines compared to DLBCL and non-hematologic cancer models analyzed (FDR=0.0019, p=0.001), suggesting their more central role in maintaining MCL tumor viability. Indeed MCL tumor survival (particularly ibrutinib-resistant cells) appears linked to USP14/UCHL5 function as treatment of Jeko/IR cells with VLX1570 (250nM, 12hrs) caused marked apoptosis (71.8% annexin-V+ staining) and cleavage of PARP-1. Moreover, the combination of ibrutinib and VLX1570 synergistically induced MCL cell death (median CI: 0.3). Mechanistic studies demonstrated that VLX1570 modulates several proteins critical for MCL survival including cyclin-D1, Myc and CXCR4/CD184. Reduction in cyclin-D1 was also noted to coincide with cell cycle arrest of VLX1570-treated MCL cells. Altogether, these findings suggest that VLX1570 modulates critical cellular signaling pathways utilized by MCL tumor cells, particularly those that are involved in resistance to ibrutinib. Conclusions: MCL remains a challenging malignancy to treat with no effective treatments for ibrutinib-relapsed disease. Our data supports the role of the proteasome-associated DUBs, USP14 and UCHL5, as critical factors involved in ibrutinib-resistant MCL tumor survival. VLX1570 is a potentially effective agent for the treatment of ibrutinib-resistant MCL. Disclosures Gullbo: Vivolux AB: Other: Shareholder. Linder:Vivolux AB: Other: Shareholder.

Abstract Background: Lenalidomide (Len) is clinically active in CLL patients (pts). Robust anti-leukemic immune response from Len is truncated by dysfunctional immune system in CLL and anti-apoptotic bcl-2 protein. We hypothesized that therapeutic downregulation of Bcl-2 may help enhance the killing potential of immune effector cells that are activated by Len. AT-101 is a novel, orally active BH3-mimetic that binds to antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins (Bcl-2, Mcl-1 and Bcl-xL) and induces CLL cell death ex vivo (Masood et al British Journal of Haematology 2012). Encouraging efficacy and safety results of AT-101 alone or in combination with rituximab in CLL have been reported in Phase I/II studies. We have previously demonstrated that bcl-2 downregulation in CLL cells enhanced the killing potential of Len-activated immune cells. Conversely, pretreatment of CLL cells with Len enhanced AT-101 cytotoxicity in an immune cell independent manner (Masood et al British Journal of Haematology 2012). These preclinical findings formed the basis of a phase I/II clinical trial testing the combination of AT-101 and lenalidomide in relapsed B-CLL patients. Methods: The phase I portion of this study (NCT 01003769) utilizes a standard cohort of three design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination regimen. The MTD is defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in at least one-third of patients. Following the MTD determination, the phase 2 portion will assess the efficacy of this combination using a one-stage design with an interim analysis. Key inclusion criteria include adult CLL pts with relapsed disease who have received 1-4 prior lines of treatment (Rx) (phase I) or 1-2 lines of Rx (phase II), last dose > 4 weeks from enrollment, ECOG performance status 0-2, good renal/liver function, acceptable blood counts. Patients with known hypersensitivity to thalidomide/Len or prior use of gossypol/AT-101 were excluded. Cycle 1 Rx includes Len alone and cycles 2-12 includes Len and AT-101. Starting doses of Len and AT-101 are 5mg oral daily on days 1-21 and 40 mg oral twice daily (b.i.d) on days 1-3 of a 28-day cycle. Planned dose escalation is shown in Table 1. Three pts will be treated at each dose level and observed during the first cycle of the combination Rx. Dose limiting toxicity is defined as grade 4 anemia unrelated to disease, thrombocytopenia-grade 4 or grade 3 with bleeding/requiring platelets, ANC <500 for >14 days, febrile neutropenia , Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity. Dose from Phase II will be based on MTD from phase I. Peripheral blood and bone marrow will be collected and analyzed for immune cellular microenvironment and effect of Len and AT-101 on molecular targets. Optional lymph node biopsy will be done at baseline and if tumor-flare reaction occurs. This study is expected to accrue a maximum of 26 pts in phase I and 34 pts in phase II, overall maximum sample size of 60 pts. Five pts in phase I have been accrued to date. Table 1 (* starting dose level) Table 1. (* starting dose level) Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: Treatment of multiple myeloma has evolved considerably in the past few years with availability of several news drugs as well as increasing use of multidrug combinations. These changes have no doubt led to the improved survival seen among patients with MM. We have previously shown that outcomes of patients intolerant or refractory to one of the IMiDs and bortezomib had a poor outcome. Since that time, other drugs of the same class as well as new classes of drugs have been introduced for the treatment of MM. We designed this retrospective study to estimate the outcomes in patients with relapsed myeloma, who have become refractory to the current generation IMiDs and proteasome inhibitors. Patients and Methods: Patients with relapsed multiple myeloma who have received at least 3 prior lines of therapy, is refractory to both an IMiD (lenalidomide or pomalidomide) AND a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib or carfilzomib), and has been exposed to an alkylating agent were identified from multiple centers. The time patients met the above criteria was defined as T0, and details of all treatment regimens before and after T0 were collected using electronic CRFs. The study was approved by the IRB at the respective centers. Results: 543 patients were enrolled in this study; median age was 62 years (31-87) and 61% were males. Patients were enrolled from centers in North America (n=181), Europe (n=318), and Asia Pacific (n=44). Patients were diagnosed between 2006 and 2014, the median duration between diagnosis of myeloma and study entry (T0) was 3.1 years (0.3 to 9). The median (95% CI) estimated follow up from diagnosis and from T0 were 61 (57, 66) months and 13 (11, 15) months respectively. The median number of lines of therapy prior to T0 was 4 (3-13), 48% had a prior transplant. The median OS from T0 for the entire cohort was 13 (11, 15) months. For these 462 patients, the median number of recorded regimens was 2 (1-9). The overall response and the depth of response to each line of treatment following T0 are as shown in the table. The median (95% CI) PFS and OS from T0 was 5 (4, 6), and 15.2 (13, 17), respectively. The overall survival for the 81 patients with no treatment post T0 was only 2.1 months. In a multivariate analysis, duration from diagnosis to T0, ISS stage III and number of lines of therapy were all associated with inferior PFS, as well as OS, and in addition, serum creatinine>2 mg/dL at T0 also predicted inferior OS. Conclusions: The study provides the expected outcome following development of myeloma that is refractory to a PI and an IMiD. The outcomes of these patients appear to be better than we had seen historically in patients refractory/ intolerant to bortezomib and IMiDs, highlighting the increased treatment options available for these patients. However, there is decreasing response rate to sequential regimens highlighting the development of drug resistance. The data provides a bench mark for comparison of new therapies that are being evaluated in this disease. Table Table. Disclosures Dimopoulos: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kastritis:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Terpos:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Hillengass:Sanofi: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria. Leleu:TEVA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; LeoPharma: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Pierre Fabre: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Oriol:Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Expert board committee; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Expert board committee. Cavo:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mateos:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vij:Shire: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy; Karyopharma: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lokhorst:Genmab: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. van de Donk:Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Mark:Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ludwig:Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Jagannath:Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy. Usmani:Array: Research Funding; Britsol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Skyline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BioPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Dytfeld:Janssen Poland: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Lee:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shustik:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. de la Rubia:Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol Myers: Consultancy; Amgen,: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Durie:Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy.

Abstract Background: Cost of cancer care is projected to reach $173 billion by 2020, a 39% increase from 2010. Several factors including psychiatric (psych) comorbidities contribute to this increase. Within the oncology setting, 29-38% of the patients (pts) are reported to have mood disorders and 15% have major depression. Depression alone is associated with increased healthcare utilization in pts with breast, colon, lung and prostate cancers. A 2015 report noted that the presence of at least one psychiatric comorbidity in 300 Leukemia pts was associated with an extra $55,000 per pt in just one year. Similarly, in pts treated with systemic steroids, the incidence of neuropsychiatric disorders can be as high as 75%. However, no such data is available for MM, where more than 90% of pts are treated with steroids, likely increasing risk for mood problems and impacting treatment cost. As such, the aim of our study was to analyze the SEER-Medicare database for healthcare utilization trends and acute cost of care (cost incurred during 6 months after MM diagnosis) in MM pts with or without psych comorbidities. Methods: Pts diagnosed with MM between 1991-2010 with continuous Medicare coverage (1 year prior to diagnosis-date of death/end of 2012) were included. Pts were categorized as: MM with any psych disorder (MM+P), MM with depression (MM+D) and MM only. Presence of ³1 inpatient (ipt) or ³2 outpatient (opt) ICD9 diagnosis codes were used to assign pts to the psych categories. Within MM+P and MM+D groups were subdivided by presence of psych or depression diagnosis prior to MM (MM+P PRE or MM+D PRE). Medicare claims adjusted for inflation (2013) within the first 6 months (mth)/total MM care were summed by drug and total charges. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models (adjusted for age, year, sex, race, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index; CCI) were performed to determine associations with ipt, opt, and any emergency department (ED) charges after MM diagnosis. Associations between psych conditions prior to MM diagnosis and costs of care after MM diagnosis were assessed using univariate and multivariate proportional odds models. Results: The study population included 36,007 eligible MM pts with a median follow-up of 1.8 years. 15168 (42%) pts had a psych condition at any time (MM+P), while 9355 (26%) were diagnosed prior to MM diagnosis (MM+P PRE). Depression was present in 8421 pts (23%), 4546 (13%) of those occurring prior to MM diagnosis. In comparison to MM pts, MM+P and MM+D pts tended to be female, White, and had a higher CCI (all p<0.001). When compared to MM pts, those with MM+P PRE and MM+D PRE had significantly higher incidence of MM-related complications (hypercalcemia, renal dysfunction, anemia, fractures and dialysis) at the time of or after MM diagnosis and also required increased overall care (all p<0.001). Both, MM+P and MM+D had higher odds of ipt visits (OR 1.48 and 1.41, resp., p<0.001), ED care (OR 1.48 and 1.37, resp., p<0.001) and opt visits (OR 1.25 and 1.22, resp., p<0.001) as compared to MM only pts. Cost of care analysis showed that MM+P and MM+D pts had a significantly higher cost of opt (OR 1.36 and 1.39, resp., p<0.001), ipt (OR 1.49 and 1.54, resp., p<0.001) and total care (OR 1.52 and 1.55, resp., p<0.001) as compared to MM only pts during first 6 mth after MM diagnosis (Figure 1). Total costs of care for MM+P and MM+D were also higher than MM only but the differences were less significant. Cost of care differences existed within first 6 mth of MM diagnosis by pt race as well with MM+P among Hispanic and Asian pts being more strongly associated with higher costs than Whites and African-Americans (AA) (p<0.001). MM+D had similar trends but not significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons. Conclusion: Psych comorbidities are associated with significant increase in healthcare utilization and cost of care in MM pts and may contribute to higher MM-related complications. More research is needed to study whether a multidisciplinary approach to identify and manage MM pts with psych conditions may help mitigate these trends. Disclosures Ailawadhi: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen Inc: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy.

Abstract Background: Patient (Pt) outcomes have improved significantly in multiple myeloma (MM) due to widespread use of novel therapeutic agents and stem cell transplant (SCT) butoutcome disparities among racial/ethnic groups exist. Differences in access to and utilization of novel therapeutics are likely contributing factors. We performed an analysis of the SEER-Medicare database to explore such differences. Methods: Pts with a confirmed MM diagnosis between 2007-2009 and continuous Medicare coverage from 1 year prior to diagnosis through end of 2012 were included. Medicare Part D data (oral medications) is not available prior to 2007 so utilization analysis of lenalidomide (LEN), thalidomide (THAL) and bortezomib (BORT) was performed from 2007-2009. Demographic/survival data (PEDSAF files) and drug/SCT utilization (NCH, OUTSAF, PDESAF files) were obtained (HCPCS/NCH codes). Categorical and continuous variables were compared using /Fisher tests and Wilcoxon tests, respectively. Gender, age, and year-adjusted p-values were calculated using logistic regression. A proportional odds model was used to detect time-dependent trends in drug usage within 12 months of MM diagnosis across year of diagnosis by race. Separate multivariate models were fit for each drug adjusting for gender, age, drug use and race. Associations between drug use and overall survival (OS) were examined using a time dependent proportional hazards model. Results: A total of 5358 MM pts were included (any Medicare claims) with 2733 (51%) males. Mutually exclusive race categories were White (W; 67%), African-American (AA; 18%), Hispanic (H; 10%) and Asian (A; 5%). Median follow up was 2.4 yrs. Baseline pt characteristics were significantly different for age with AA being the youngest at diagnosis (p<0.001) and for gender (p<0.001) with W having the largest (53.4%) and AA the smallest (45.2%) proportion of males. Medicare claims capture only pts without any supplemental insurance and so drug utilization in this database was much lower than expected for all subgroups. Year-wise comparison showed that LEN use within the first year of MM diagnosis increased from 2007 to 2009 (16.5% to 27.7%; p<0.001) and there was a significant decrease in median days to first dose (p=0.002). Over the same period, use of THAL decreased (26.6% to 14.6%; p<0.001) while use of BORT (7.8% to 15.4%; p<0.001), SCT (3.3% to 6.2%; p<0.001) and more than 1 novel agent (2.5% to 5.7%; p<0.001) increased significantly. Utilization patterns within first year of MM diagnosis were significantly different among racial subgroups for LEN, THAL, BORT, SCT and >1 novel agent use. (Figure 1) No significant difference was seen for days to first dose of LEN/THAL for any race but for BORT, H got first dose in median 117 days after diagnosis as compared to median 46-51 days for other races (p=0.025). During the first year after diagnosis, W and AA had higher BORT only usage while H and A had a higher LEN/THAL only usage (p<0.001). For drug use by year and race, a significant increase in LEN use was seen from 2007 to 2009 in W (p<0.001), AA (p=0.001) and A (p<0.001) but not H (p=0.26) while THAL use decreased significantly for all races. BORT use increased significantly for all except A (p=0.602) and SCT use increased significantly for all except AA (p=0.068). Inferior OS was significantly associated with older age (p<0.001) and males (p<0.001). LEN/THAL use within the first year of diagnosis did not affect OS while BORT use within the first year of diagnosis increased mortality risk (HR 1.18, p=0.021). SCT use improved OS (HR 0.52, p<0.001). Conclusions: In this comprehensive analysis of MM therapeutics utilization, we noted significant variability among different racial groups. The use of LEN, BORT and SCT has increased while THAL has decreased over time but disparities exist in utilization among different races, with lower use of LEN in AA, lower use of BORT in A and significantly delayed use of BORT in H, which are all notable since racial/ethnic minorities are fast growing in the US population mix and seem to have inequitable utilization and/or access. Inferior survival with early BORT use may represent selection bias of pts with more advanced/aggressive disease. These trends need to be examined in larger sample sizes especially from commercial payers to eliminate drug access and utilization disparities and achieve equitable benefit of therapeutic advances across all racial subgroups. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Ailawadhi: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen Inc: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy.

Abstract Background: The proteasome is an established and druggable target for the treatment of plasma cell-related malignancies including Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM). WM cells as a consequence of high immunoglobulin production and increased B-cell receptor (BCR) mediated proliferation upregulate proteasome activity. Additionally, microenvironmental influence mediated through BCR signaling directly influences Bcl-2 and its BH3 family members, supporting tumor cell survival. Indeed, WM patients derive significant clinical benefit from proteasome-inhibitor (PI) based therapy with agents such as bortezomib and carfilzomib. However, resistance to PI develops over time and for these patients the optimal choice and sequence of therapy has yet to be determined. Using our WM models of PI-resistance we interrogated molecular events within the BCR and Bcl-2 pathways to determine therapeutic potential of targeting these crucial pathway in PI-resistance. Materials & Methods: WM cell lines (BCWM.1 and MWCL-1) and carfilzomib-resistant (CR) subclones (BCWM.1/CR and MWCL-1/CR) were used in experiments. Gene-expression and long-noncoding (LNC) RNA analysis was performed (Arraystar) and validated by real-time PCR. Bortezomib, carfilzomib, ABT199 and ibrutinib were purchased from Sellekchem. Results: To determine the functional impact of BCR and Bcl-2 signaling in PI-resistance, as well as therapeutic sensitivity of PI-resistant cells to their inhibitors (ibrutinib, ABT-199, respectively), we established and characterized WM cell lines resistant to carfilzomib. BCWM.1/CR cells showed approximately 20-fold resistance to carfilzomib (IC50 = 92.75nM) and MWCL-1/CR cells approximately 10-fold resistance (Fig. 1A). Both CR clones also displayed some cross-resistance to bortezomib. Gene expression and LNC-RNA profiling demonstrated several changes between carfilzomib-resistant vs. sensitive WM cells. Analysis of proteasome-related mRNA revealed downregulation of PSMB5, PSMB1, PSMB2 and PSMB8. Similarly, profiling of BCR-associated genes demonstrated decreased expression of several components, including BTK and SPI1. This observation functionally manifested as reduced sensitivity to the BTK-inhibitor ibrutinib, wherein CR cells displayed 1.5 - 2 fold growth resistance to ibrutinib on 72hr MTS assay. Next we examined the expression of Bcl-2 family members in CR cells. Intriguingly, we observed that Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 were significantly downregulated but XIAP (inhibitor of apoptosis) was significantly increased in CR cells vs. wildtype WM cells- both at transcriptional and translational levels. This suggested that upon acquisition of CR, a transcriptional shift towards XIAP occurs to accommodate sustained therapeutic stress from carfilzomib and maintain steady antiapoptotic composure. To test if the PI-resistant cells have moved away from their survival dependence on Bcl-2, we treated CR cells to increasing concentrations of the Bcl-2-specific inhibitor, ABT199, and as anticipated, CR cells displayed reduced apoptosis in presence of ABT199 compared to wildtype WM cells (32% annexin-V staining vs. 50%, respectively) (Fig. 1B). Conclusions: Our study sheds insight into the differential drivers of PI-resistance particularly towards carfilzomib, in WM cells. We demonstrate that acquisition of CR is associated with downregulation of Bcl-2 and Mcl-1, which is countered by upregulation of XIAP- an event that renders CR cells resistant to ABT199 (as it targets only Bcl-2). Likewise, downregulation of BCR-related components in CR cells was associated with reduced sensitivity towards ibrutinib. These observations suggest that acquisition of resistance to PI such as carfilzomib can impact future treatment with agents such as ibrutinib or ABT199. Our preclinical models provide rationale or early sequencing of ibrutinib or ABT199 in therapeutic planning of WM patients prior to induction of PI resistance. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: Outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM) have significantly improved, leading to higher prevalence of this disease. Increasing efforts have been made by various agencies to educate patients (pts), manage quality of life (QoL) and survivorship. A global impact of these efforts including pt awareness, disease knowledge and participation in their care, as well as the physical and emotional impact of MM and its treatments (Rx) has not been assessed. We undertook an international, pt-reported survey to investigate these factors and understand any underlying disparities. Methods: A 61-question patient-reported questionnaire (MM-Q), addressing global aspects of MM pts care (components in Figure 1) was used. MM-Q was administered in collaboration with the International Myeloma Foundation (IMF). To limit responses by MM pt only, “SmartPatient” MM community members and IMF Support Group Leader list were invited to complete the survey. Some of the questions were mandatory, and those with missing responses were withdrawn from the final analysis of that pts MM-Q. Categorical and continuous variables were compared among groups using the Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests, respectively using SAS software (v9.3) with a two-sided significance level of 0.05. Results: Survey responses are available from 894/1240 (72%) individuals thus far. Average survey completion time was 16 minutes. Data from 746 MM-Q was included in this analysis with 466 (62.5%) complete responses. Pts from United States (US) represented 85.7% of the responders (majority from New York State). Ethnicity (n=590) was reported as non-Latino by 97%, race (n=580) was reported as White by 95%, family history of MM was reported by 19 pts and 81 reported prior history of a primary malignancy (most common, 37% non-melanoma skin cancer). Living situation questions (n=538) revealed majority were in a household of 2 (62%), were unemployed/on public assistance (53.5%), travelled alone to medical appointments (74%), with travel times varying from <30 min (55%) to >1 hr (17%). Majority (83%) had no prior knowledge of MM, 63% were patient support group members, and 92% did MM-related research on internet. With respect to MM Rx (n=524), 70% had been on Rx within 3 months and 12% reported non-compliance. Prior Rx included thalidomide (30%), lenalidomide (66%), pomalidomide (11.5%), bortezomib (63.5%), carfilzomib (11%), steroids (100%), and clinical trial participation in 25% pts. Side effects from Rx/QoL in prior 3 months (n=403) are summarized in figure 2. Pts satisfaction with Rx/treating staff (n=378) revealed majority felt their Rx to be effective (92%), right for them (87%) and side effects were as expected (84%). In general, pts acknowledged positive attributes of the Rx staff (worked towards same goal; 91%, participated in decisions; 81%, honesty 89%, confidence; 92%), and their doctor's explanations regarding Rx (benefits; 84%, side effects; 74%, test results; 83%), with the exception of emotional effects of Rx (48%). 94% pts rated their care as good/excellent and 95% were willing to participate in a follow-up survey. Stratification of statistically significant responses by geographical categories, age and time since diagnosis are shown in table 1 and analysis by occupation and educational status is ongoing. Conclusions: We conducted a large patient-reported survey to understand the current state of awareness among MM pts and a global impact of the diagnosis and its Rx on them. We showed that majority of pts who accessed the survey responded (72%), which may be a product of literacy, education and access to technology. Majority of the pts were White and non-Latino, highlighting the possible role of access and awareness in ethnic minorities. We report the large prevalence of psychophysical burden of MM and its Rx in MM pts. In general, MM pts had a high rate of satisfaction related to the Rx and their healthcare providers, but the frequency of discussion regarding emotional effects of Rx between doctors and pts was conspicuously low (48%) and the more recently diagnosed pts were less likely to be satisfied with their treating staff. We also demonstrated significant behavioral pattern differences in geographical, age and time-since-diagnosis subgroups, some of which may be sociocultural, while others may be a result of more patient awareness and understanding of the disease. This knowledge will be very helpful in devising MM survivorship strategies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.