Citations

AbstractSeizure is one of the manifestations of central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating diseases, which mainly include multiple sclerosis (MS), aquaporin 4 antibody‐positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4‐NMOSD), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody‐associated disease (MOGAD). Acute symptomatic seizures secondary to MS/AQP4‐NMOSD/MOGAD occur in the acute phase of the diseases, and are more frequent in MOGAD. In contrast, recurrent nonprovoked seizures, mainly attributed to autoimmune‐associated epilepsy, occur in the nonacute phase of the diseases. Seizures in MS/AQP4‐NMOSD/MOGAD mostly have a focal onset. MS patients with concomitant systemic infections, earlier onset, and greater disease activity are more likely to have seizures, whereas factors such as greater MS severity, the presence of status epilepticus, and cortical damage indicate a greater risk of developing epilepsy. In MOGAD, cerebral cortical encephalitis and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)‐like phenotypes (predominately ADEM and multiphasic disseminated encephalomyelitis) indicate a greater seizure risk. Multiple relapses with ADEM‐like phenotypes predict epilepsy in pediatrics with MOGAD. Pathophysiologically, acute symptomatic seizures in MS are associated with neuronal hyperexcitability secondary to inflammation and demyelination. Chronic epilepsy in MS is largely due to gliosis, neuronal dysfunction, and synaptic abnormalities. The mainstay of treatment for seizures secondary to MS/AQP4‐NMOSD/MOGAD consists of immunotherapy along with antiseizure medications. This critical review discusses the most‐updated evidence on epidemiology, clinical correlates, and inflammatory mechanisms underlying seizures and epilepsy in MS/AQP4‐NMOSD/MOGAD. Treatment cautions including drug‐drug interactions and the impact of treatments on the diseases are outlined. We also highlight pitfalls and challenges in managing such patients and future research perspectives to address unsolved questions.

Background and Aims: The impact of disease progression in NAFLD on liver outcomes remains poorly understood. We aimed to investigate NAFLD progression using longitudinal liver stiffness measurements (LSM) by serial magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and the association with liver outcomes. Approach and Results: All adult patients with NAFLD who underwent at least two serial MREs for clinical evaluation at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between 2007 and 2019 were identified from the institutional database. Progression and regression were defined based on LSM change of 19% above or below 19% of initial LSM, respectively, based on Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance consensus. The association between change in LSM and liver‐related outcomes occurring after the last MRE was examined using time‐to‐event analysis. A total of 128 participants underwent serial MREs (53% female, median age 59 years). The median time between paired MREs was 3.4 (range 1–10.7) years. NAFLD progression (LSM = +0.61 kPa/year) was identified in 17 patients (13.3%). NAFLD regression (−0.40 kPa/year) occurred in 35 patients (27.3%). Stable LSM was noted in 76 participants (59.4%). In NAFLD without cirrhosis at baseline ( n = 75), cirrhosis development occurred in 14% of LSM progressors and 2.9% of non‐progressors ( p = 0.059) over a median 2.7 years of follow‐up from the last MRE. Among those with compensated cirrhosis at baseline MRE ( n = 29), decompensation or death occurred in 100% of LSM progressors and 19% of non‐progressors ( p < 0.001) over a median 2.5 years of follow‐up after the last MRE. Conclusions: Noninvasive monitoring of LSM by conventional MRE is a promising method of longitudinal NAFLD monitoring and risk estimation of liver‐related outcomes in NAFLD.

Background: Type I tibial spine fractures are non-displaced or minimally displaced (≤ 2mm displacement) fractures of the tibial eminence and ACL insertion traditionally managed nonoperatively with immobilization. Hypothesis/Purpose: We hypothesized that type I fractures do not carry significant risk of associated injuries and therefore do not require additional interventions aside from immobilization. Methods: We reviewed 52 patients classified by their treating institution with type I tibial spine fractures presenting between January 1, 2000 and January 31, 2019 at 10 institutions. Patients of age ≤ 18 years with pre-treatment plain radiographs and at least one year of follow-up were included. Data was collected on patient demographics, injury mechanism, treatment details, presence of concomitant injuries, range of motion (ROM) at final follow-up, treatment complications, and any return to the operating room for the injured knee. Pre-treatment imaging was reviewed by four authors to assess agreement of classification among the treating institutions. Patients were subclassified into two groups to ensure outcomes represented classic type I fracture patterns. Any patient with universal agreement among the four authors that the fracture did not appear consistent with a type I classification were assigned to Type 1+ Group (T1+). All other patients were assigned to the True Type I Group (TT1). We evaluated concomitant injury, need for operative intervention, and treatment outcomes overall and for each group independently. Results: 48 patients met inclusion criteria. 40/48 were TT1 fractures, while 8/48 were T1+ fractures, indicating less than universal agreement among sports specialists in classification of these fractures. Among TT1 patients, 7 of 40 (18.4%) underwent surgical treatment, though this represented 35.7% (5/14) of those who had undergone pretreatment advanced imaging. In the T1+ group, 6 of 8 (75%) underwent surgical treatment, 50% of whom (3/6) had pretreatment advanced imaging. Overall, twelve of 48 patients (25%) had concomitant injuries, nine TT1 patients and three T1+ patients (p=0.77), with 7 concomitant injuries requiring additional surgical management. Conclusions: Classification of type I fractures can be challenging. Nonetheless, a substantial percentage of patients with these fractures (>20%) were found to have concomitant injuries by advanced pretreatment imaging, with surgical management indicated in 58.3% of these patients. Contrary to traditional thought, type I tibial spine fractures do carry a risk of associated injuries. Simple cast immobilization may not be the ideal treatment in all cases. Advanced imaging would be beneficial for those whose plan of care may initially be non-operative treatment.

Background: When operative treatment is indicated, tibial spine fractures can be successfully managed with open or arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation. Hypothesis/Purpose: We hypothesized both approaches can lead to satisfactory outcomes for fracture healing, but that open treatment without preoperative advanced imaging can potentially lead to missed concomitant injuries. Methods: We performed an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved retrospective cohort study of pediatric tibial spine fractures presenting between January 1, 2000 and January 31, 2019 at 10 institutions. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on treatment: arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Surgical outcomes, the incidence of concomitant injuries, and surgeon demographics were compared between groups. Results: There were 477 patients with tibial spine fractures who met inclusion criteria, 420 of whom (88.1%) were treated with ARIF, while 57 (11.9%) were treated with ORIF. Patients treated with ARIF were more likely to have an identified concomitant injury (41.4%) compared to those treated with ORIF (24.6%, p=0.021). Patients treated with ARIF were also more likely to have pre-treatment MRI (41.7% vs. 22.8%, p =0.010). Most concomitant injuries (74.5%) required surgical intervention. The most common treatment complications included arthrofibrosis (6.9% in ARIF patients, 7.0% in ORIF patients, p=1.00) and subsequent ACL injury (2.1% in ARIF patients and 3.5% in ORIF, p=0.86). The rate of complications, return to the operating room, and failure to return to full range of motion were similar between groups. Twenty surgeons with sports subspecialty training completed 85.0% of ARIF cases; the remaining 15.0% were performed by 12 surgeons without additional sports training. The majority (56.1%) of ORIF cases were completed by 14 surgeons without sports subspecialty training. Conclusion: This is the largest study comparing ARIF to ORIF in pediatric tibial spine fractures. This study demonstrated no difference in outcomes or nonunion following ARIF or ORIF for pediatric tibial spine fractures. There were significantly higher rates of concomitant injuries in patients treated with ARIF, however, these patients also had a higher rate of pre-treatment MRI. The majority of these concomitant injuries (74.5%) required surgical intervention. Pre-treatment MRI should be considered in the workup of tibial spine fractures to increase identification of concomitant injury. Concomitant injuries may be missed in tibial spine fractures treated with an open approach, especially in cases where preoperative advanced imaging is not obtained. Surgeon preference and training may impact treatment approach and identification and treatment of concomitant injury.

PURPOSE Antitumor activity in preclinical models and a phase I study of patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DD-LPS) was observed with selinexor. We evaluated the clinical benefit of selinexor in patients with previously treated DD-LPS whose sarcoma progressed on approved agents. METHODS SEAL was a phase II-III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients age 12 years or older with advanced DD-LPS who had received two-five lines of therapy were randomly assigned (2:1) to selinexor (60 mg) or placebo twice weekly in 6-week cycles (crossover permitted). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were included for safety analysis (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02606461 ). RESULTS Two hundred eighty-five patients were enrolled (selinexor, n = 188; placebo, n = 97). PFS was significantly longer with selinexor versus placebo: hazard ratio (HR) 0.70 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.95; one-sided P = .011; medians 2.8 v 2.1 months), as was time to next treatment: HR 0.50 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.66; one-sided P < .0001; medians 5.8 v 3.2 months). With crossover, no difference was observed in overall survival. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade versus grade 3 or 4 with selinexor were nausea (151 [80.7%] v 11 [5.9]), decreased appetite (113 [60.4%] v 14 [7.5%]), and fatigue (96 [51.3%] v 12 [6.4%]). Four (2.1%) and three (3.1%) patients died in the selinexor and placebo arms, respectively. Exploratory RNA sequencing analysis identified that the absence of CALB1 expression was associated with longer PFS with selinexor compared with placebo (median 6.9 v 2.2 months; HR, 0.19; P = .001). CONCLUSION Patients with advanced, refractory DD-LPS showed improved PFS and time to next treatment with selinexor compared with placebo. Supportive care and dose reductions mitigated side effects of selinexor. Prospective validation of CALB1 expression as a predictive biomarker for selinexor in DD-LPS is warranted.

BackgroundThe feasibility and reproducibility of multifrequency MR elastography (MRE) for diagnosing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have not been reported.PurposeTo determine the feasibility and reproducibility of multifrequency MRE for assessing pancreatic stiffness in healthy and diseased pancreases.Study typeProspective.SubjectsA total of 40 healthy volunteers and 10 patients with PDAC were prospectively recruited between March 2018 and October 2021.Field strength/sequenceA 3.0‐T pancreatic MRE at frequencies in the order of 30, 40, 60, 80, and 100 Hz.AssessmentBody mass index (BMI) and wave distance of the healthy pancreas and PDAC were measured. Image quality was assessed using the image quality score (IQS: 1–4, ≥3 were considered diagnostic quality). Three readers independently performed the pancreatic stiffness and IQS assessments to evaluate reproducibility.Statistical testsLogistic regression analyses were performed to determine variables that influenced IQS. Statistical significance was set at P <0.05. Levels of inter‐ and intrarater agreement were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ). Good reproducibility was set at ICC and κ ≥ 0.8.ResultsIn logistic regression analysis, a diagnostic IQS in healthy volunteers was independently associated with a lower BMI (odds ratio [OR] = 0.89 kg/m−2), shorter wave distance (OR = 0.70 cm−1), and lower frequency (30 and 40 Hz: OR = 170.01 and 96.02). In PDAC, frequency was the only independent factor for diagnostic IQS (30–60 Hz: OR = 46.18, 46.18, and 17.20, respectively) with 100 Hz as a reference. In healthy volunteers, good reproducibility was observed at 30 and 40 Hz. In PDAC, good reproducibility was observed at 30–60 Hz.Data conclusionMRE at 30 and 40 Hz provides diagnostic wave images and reliable measurements of pancreatic stiffness in healthy volunteers. MRE at 30–60 Hz is acceptable for PDACs (IQS ≥ 3, ICC and κ ≥ 0.80).Evidence Level1Technical EfficacyStage 2

BackgroundTreatments for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are urgently needed. Hepatic fat fraction and shear stiffness quantified by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI‐HFF) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE‐SS), respectively, are biomarkers for hepatic steatosis and fibrosis.PurposeThis study assessed the longitudinal effects of fibroblast growth factor 21 variant (polyethylene glycol [PEG]‐FGF21v) on MRI‐HFF and MRE‐SS in a NASH mouse model.Study TypePreclinical.Animal ModelThis study included a choline‐deficient, amino acid‐defined, high‐fat diet (CDAHFD) model and 6‐week‐old, male C57BL/6J mice (N = 78).Field Strength/SequenceThis study was performed using: 3T: gradient‐echo two‐point Dixon and spin‐echo (SE) echo‐planar imaging elastography (200 Hz) and 7T: SE two‐point Dixon and SE elastography (200 Hz).AssessmentMRI and MRE were performed before control diet (CD) or CDAHFD (BD), before PEG‐FGF21v dosing (baseline), and after PEG‐FGF21v treatment (WK4/8). Regions of interest for MRI‐HFF and MRE‐SS were delineated by J.L. and H.T. (>5 years of experience each). Fibrosis and steatosis were measured histologically after picrosirius red and H&E staining. Alkaline phosphatase, alanine transaminase, bile acids, and triglycerides (TGs) were measured.Statistical TestsTwo‐tailed Dunnett's tests were used for statistical analysis; untreated CDAHFD or baseline was used for comparisons. Imaging and histology/biochemistry data were determined using Spearman correlations. Bayesian posterior distributions for MRE‐SS at WK8, posterior means, and 95% credible intervals were presented.ResultsCDAHFD significantly increased baseline MRI‐HFF (3T: 21.97% ± 0.29%; 7T: 40.12% ± 0.35%) and MRE‐SS (3T: 1.25 ± 0.02; 7T: 1.78 ± 0.06 kPa) vs. CD (3T: 3.45% ± 0.7%; 7T: 12.06% ± 1.4% and 3T: 1.01 ± 0.02; 7T: 0.89 ± 0.06 kPa). At 7T, PEG‐FGF21v significantly decreased MRI‐HFF (WK4: 28.97% ± 1.22%; WK8: 20.93% ± 1.15%) and MRE‐SS (WK4: 1.57 ± 0.04; WK8: 1.36 ± 0.05 kPa) vs. untreated (WK4: 36.36% ± 0.62%; WK8: 30.58% ± 0.81% and WK4: 2.03 ± 0.06; WK8: 2.01 ± 0.04 kPa); 3T trends were similar. WK8 SS posterior mean percent attenuation ratios (RDI) were −68% (−90%, −44%; 3T) and −64% (−78%, −52%; 7T). MRI‐HFF was significantly correlated with H&E (3T, r = 0.93; 7T, r = 0.94) and TGs (both, r = 0.92).Data ConclusionsMRI‐HFF and MRE‐SS showed PEG‐FGF21v effects on hepatic steatosis and fibrosis across 3 and 7T, consistent with histological and biochemical data.Level of Evidence1Technical Efficacy Stage2