Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

1312 citation(s) found for "Wu, Kyle C".

The utility of plasma vascular endothelial growth factor levels in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with POEMS syndrome
D’Souza, Anita , Hayman, Suzanne R. , Mauermann, Michelle L. , Lacy, Martha Q. , Kyle, Robert A. , Kumar, Shaji , Greipp, Philip R., Lust, John A., Russell, Stephen J. , Zeldenrust, Steven R., Dingli, David , Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Dispenzieri, Angela , Buadi, Francis K. , Gertz, Morie A. , Witzig, Thomas E. , Rajkumar, S Vincent , D'Souza, Anita , Dispenzieri, Angela , Russell, Stephen J , Dingli, David , Mauermann, Michelle L

Blood | September 1, 2011 | Volume: 118 | Issue: 17 | Pages: 4663-4665

10.1182/blood-2011-06-362392 | PMID 21881050 Get It

Abstract The POEMS syndrome is associated with elevated vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels. Several studies have compared serum VEGF levels between POEMS patients and other disease entities showing higher serum VEGF in POEMS syndrome; however, it is unknown whether serum levels are reliable and reproducible given variable platelet release of VEGF. We therefore compared plasma levels of VEGF in 29 patients with POEMS syndrome with those of other disorders (n = 76). We demonstrated that plasma VEGF levels are useful in differentiating POEMS from other plasma cell dyscrasias, neuropathic processes, and multisystem illnesses. Plasma VEGF is also useful in monitoring disease activity after treatment and correlates with clinical improvements better than hematologic response.
P1‐252: Evaluation of Cognitive Endophenotypes for Association with CLU, CR1 and PICALM LOAD Risk Genes
Pedraza, Otto , Allen, Mariet , Jennette, Kyle J. , Carrasquillo, Minerva M. , Palusak, Ryan, Nguyen, Thuy , Malphrus, Kimberly G., Ivnik, Robert J., Pankratz, Shane, Graff‐Radford, Neill, Roberts, Rosebud O., Petersen, Ronald C. , Younkin, Steven G., Ertekin‐Taner, Nilüfer , Crook, Julia E. , Carrasquillo, Minerva M. , Smith, Glenn E. , Knopman, David S. , Graff‐Radford, Neill

Alzheimer's & Dementia | August 1, 2011 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4S_Part_6 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.532 Get It

P1‐372: Greater impact of white matter hyperintensities on cognition in aPOE carriers
Purcell, Michael, Liu, Seban, steinke, Kyle, Caselli, Richard J., Baxter, Leslie C.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | August 1, 2011 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4S_Part_7 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.652 Get It

Incidence, clinical course, and prognosis of secondary monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in patients with multiple myeloma
Wadhera, Rishi K. , Kyle, Robert A. , Dispenzieri, Angela , Kumar, Shaji , Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Larson, Dirk R. , Lazarus, Hillard M. , Rajkumar, S Vincent , Dispenzieri, Angela , Wadhera, Rishi K

Blood | July 16, 2011 | Volume: 118 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2985-2987

10.1182/blood-2011-04-349175 | PMID 21765020 Get It

Abstract During the course of multiple myeloma (MM), new monoclonal proteins of an isotype distinct from the original clone, referred to as secondary monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), have been described. We report on the frequency, characteristics, and outcome of secondary MGUS. Of the 1942 patients with MM, 128 (6.6%) developed a secondary MGUS, at a median of 12 months from the diagnosis of MM. The median duration of secondary MGUS was 5.9 months. Secondary MGUS was more common in patients after stem cell transplantation than in those who had not undergone such treatment (22.7% vs 1.6%, P < .001). Overall survival was significantly superior in MM patients who developed secondary MGUS compared with the rest of the cohort (73 vs 38 months, respectively; P < .001). The time of onset and the duration of secondary MGUS, as well as failure to resolve spontaneously, had an effect on overall survival and require further study.
Trends in allogeneic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: a CIBMTR analysis
Kumar, Shaji , Zhang, Mei-Jie , Li, Peigang , Dispenzieri, Angela , Krishnan, Amrita , Wirk, Baldeep , Weiss, Brendan M. , Freytes, César O. , Vogl, Dan T. , Vesole, David H. , Meehan, Kenneth R., Hamadani, Mehdi , Lill, Michael, Majhail, Navneet S. , Wiernik, Peter H. , Nath, Rajneesh , Kamble, Rammurti T., Vij, Ravi , Kyle, Robert A. , Hari, Parameswaran , Milone, Giuseppe , Lonial, Sagar , Maiolino, Ângelo , Lazarus, Hillard M. , Callander, Natalie S. , Gale, Robert Peter , Dispenzieri, Angela , Hamadani, Mehdi , Majhail, Navneet S , Hari, Parameswaran

Blood | June 21, 2011 | Volume: 118 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1979-1988

10.1182/blood-2011-02-337329 | PMID 21690560 Get It

Abstract Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in multiple myeloma is limited by prior reports of high treatment-related mortality. We analyzed outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma in 1207 recipients in 3 cohorts based on the year of transplantation: 1989-1994 (n = 343), 1995-2000 (n = 376), and 2001-2005 (n = 488). The most recent cohort was significantly older (53% > 50 years) and had more recipients after prior autotransplantation. Use of unrelated donors, reduced-intensity conditioning and the blood cell grafts increased over time. Rates of acute graft-versus-host (GVHD) were similar, but chronic GVHD rates were highest in the most recent cohort. Overall survival (OS) at 1-year increased over time, reflecting a decrease in treatment-related mortality, but 5-year relapse rates increased from 39% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33%-44%) in 1989-1994 to 58% (95% CI, 51%-64%; P < .001) in the 2001-2005 cohort. Projected 5-year progression-free survival and OS are 14% (95% CI, 9%-20%) and 29% (95% CI, 23%-35%), respectively, in the latest cohort. Increasing age, longer interval from diagnosis to transplantation, and unrelated donor grafts adversely affected OS in multivariate analysis. Survival at 5 years for subjects with none, 1, 2, or 3 of these risk factors were 41% (range, 36%-47%), 32% (range, 27%-37%), 25% (range, 19%-31%), and 3% (range, 0%-11%), respectively (P < .0001).
From Myeloma Precursor Disease to Multiple Myeloma: New Diagnostic Concepts and Opportunities for Early Intervention
Kyle, Robert A. , Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Landgren, Ola , Rajkumar, S Vincent

Clinical Cancer Research | March 16, 2011 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1243-1252

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-1822 | PMID 21411440 Get It

Abstract Since monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) was first described more than 30 years ago, the definition of the entity has evolved. Today, 3 distinct clinical MGUS subtypes have been defined: non–immunoglobulin M (IgM; IgG or IgA) MGUS, IgM MGUS, and light chain MGUS. Each clinical MGUS subtype is characterized by unique intermediate stages and progression events. Although we now have strong evidence that multiple myeloma is consistently preceded by a precursor state at the molecular level, there is urgent need to better understand mechanisms that regulate transformation from precursor to full-blown multiple myeloma. In the future, if such knowledge was available, it would allow clinicians to define high-risk and low-risk precursor patients for a more tailored clinical management. Also, it would provide insights on the individual patient's disease biology, which, in turn, can be used for targeted and more individualized treatment strategies. On the basis of current clinical guidelines, patients diagnosed with MGUS and smoldering myeloma should not be treated outside of clinical trials. In the near future, it seems reasonable to believe that high-risk precursor patients will likely become candidates for early treatment strategies. In this review, we discuss novel insights from recent studies and propose future directions of relevance for clinical management and research studies. Clin Cancer Res; 17(6); 1243–52. ©2011 AACR.
Consensus recommendations for risk stratification in multiple myeloma: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 2
Munshi, Nikhil C. , Bergsagel, P. Leif , Shaughnessy, John D. , Palumbo, Antonio , Durie, Brian G.M. , Fonseca, Rafaël , Stewart, A. Keith, Harousseau, Jean‐Luc, Dimopoulos, Meletios Α. , Hájek, Roman , Sezer, Orhan , Kyle, Robert A. , Sonneveld, Pieter , Cavo, Michèle , Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Miguel, Jesús F. San , Crowley, John, Avet‐Loiseau, Hervé , 2, on behalf of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel, Bergsagel, P. Leif , García‐Sánz, Ramón , Moreau, Philippe , Anderson, Kenneth C. , Stewart, A. Keith, Jagannath, Sundar , 2, on behalf of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel, Hajek, Roman , Rajkumar, S Vincent , Dimopoulos, Meletios A , Moreau, Philippe , San-Miguel, Jesus , Garcia-Sanz, Ramon , Fonseca, Rafael

Blood | February 4, 2011 | Volume: 117 | Issue: 18 | Pages: 4696-4700

10.1182/blood-2010-10-300970 | PMID 21292777 Get It

AbstractA panel of members of the 2009 International Myeloma Workshop developed guidelines for risk stratification in multiple myeloma. The purpose of risk stratification is not to decide time of therapy but to prognosticate. There is general consensus that risk stratification is applicable to newly diagnosed patients; however, some genetic abnormalities characteristic of poor outcome at diagnosis may suggest poor outcome if only detected at the time of relapse. Thus, in good-risk patients, it is necessary to evaluate for high-risk features at relapse. Although detection of any cytogenetic abnormality is considered to suggest higher-risk disease, the specific abnormalities considered as poor risk are cytogenetically detected chromosomal 13 or 13q deletion, t(4;14) and del17p, and detection by fluorescence in situ hybridization of t(4;14), t(14;16), and del17p. Detection of 13q deletion by fluorescence in situ hybridization only, in absence of other abnormalities, is not considered a high-risk feature. High serum β2-microglobulin level and International Staging System stages II and III, incorporating high β2-microglobulin and low albumin, are considered to predict higher risk disease. There was a consensus that the high-risk features will change in the future, with introduction of other new agents or possibly new combinations.
Consensus recommendations for standard investigative workup: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 3
Dimopoulos, Meletios Α. , Kyle, Robert A. , Fermand, Jean-Paul, Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Miguel, Jesús F. San , Chanan‐Khan, Asher , Joshua, Douglas, Mehta, Jayesh, Avet‐Loiseau, Hervé , Beksaç, Meral , Moreau, Philippe , Goldschmidt, Hartmut , Boccadoro, Mario , Kumar, Shaji , Munshi, Nikhil C. , 3, on behalf of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel, Ludwig, Heinz , Gertz, Morie A. , Anderson, Kenneth C. , Singhal, Seema , Giralt, Sergio , Jagannath, Sundar , 3, on behalf of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel, Rajkumar, S Vincent , Dimopoulos, Meletios A , Moreau, Philippe , San-Miguel, Jesus , Beksac, Meral

Blood | February 4, 2011 | Volume: 117 | Issue: 18 | Pages: 4701-4705

10.1182/blood-2010-10-299529 | PMID 21292778 Get It

AbstractA panel of members of the 2009 International Myeloma Workshop developed guidelines for standard investigative workup of patients with suspected multiple myeloma. Both serum and urine should be assessed for monoclonal protein. Measurement of monoclonal protein both by densitometer tracing and/by nephelometric quantitation is recommended, and immunofixation is required for confirmation. The serum-free light chain assay is recommended in all newly diagnosed patients with plasma cell dyscrasias. Bone marrow aspiration and/or biopsy along with demonstration of clonality of plasma cells are necessary. Serum β2-microglobulin, albumin, and lactate dehydrogenase are necessary for prognostic purposes. Standard metaphase cytogenetics and fluorescent in situ hybridization for 17p, t(4;14), and t(14;16) are recommended. The skeletal survey remains the standard method for imaging screening, but magnetic resonance imaging frequently provides valuable diagnostic and prognostic information. Most of these tests are repeated during follow-up or at relapse.
Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1
Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Harousseau, Jean‐Luc, Durie, Brian G.M. , Dimopoulos, Meletios Α. , Kyle, Robert A. , Bladé, Joan , Richardson, Paul G. , Orlowski, Robert Z. , Avet‐Loiseau, Hervé , Palumbo, Antonio , Zonder, Jeffrey A. , Vesole, David H., Sezer, Orhan , Munshi, Nikhil C. , Miguel, Jesús F. San , 1, on behalf of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel, Cavo, Michèle , García‐Sánz, Ramón , Anderson, Kenneth C. , Richardson, Paul Gerard Guy , Orlowski, Robert Z. , Siegel, David S. , Jagannath, Sundar , Facon, Thierry T.F. , Lonial, Sagar , Ludwig, Heinz , 1, on behalf of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel, Rajkumar, S Vincent , Dimopoulos, Meletios A , San-Miguel, Jesus , Garcia-Sanz, Ramon

Blood | February 4, 2011 | Volume: 117 | Issue: 18 | Pages: 4691-4695

10.1182/blood-2010-10-299487 | PMID 21292775 Get It

Abstract It is essential that there be consistency in the conduct, analysis, and reporting of clinical trial results in myeloma. The goal of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1 was to develop a set of guidelines for the uniform reporting of clinical trial results in myeloma. This paper provides a summary of the current response criteria in myeloma, detailed definitions for patient populations, lines of therapy, and specific endpoints. We propose that future clinical trials in myeloma follow the guidelines for reporting results proposed in this manuscript.
Prognosis and Outcome of Small (≤1 cm), Node-Negative Breast Cancer on the Basis of Hormonal and HER-2 Status
Amar, Surabhi, McCullough, Ann E. , Tan, Winston , Geiger, Xochiquetzal J., McNeil, Rebecca B. , Coppola, Kyle , McLaughlin, Sarah A. , Palmieri, Frances M., Perez, Edith A. , Boughey, Judy C.

The Oncologist | October 8, 2010 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1043-1049

10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0036 | PMID 20930097 Get It

Abstract Long-term outcomes and hence the role of adjuvant therapy in patients with small (≤1 cm), node-negative breast cancer remain unclear. This study's objective was to evaluate whether human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2 status is an independent, poor prognostic marker in patients with these tumors and to identify a subgroup of patients with these small tumors who might benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy. All patients with a diagnosis of a node-negative breast tumor measuring ≤1 cm and available HER-2 test results between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2005, at the three Mayo Clinic sites were identified. Clinicopathologic data were compared in three groups: HER-2−, HER-2+, and triple-negative (TN) tumors. Of the 421 tumors identified, 364 (86.5%) were HER-2−, 28 (6.7%) were HER-2+, and 29 (6.9%) were TN. The median follow-up time was 1,015 days (range, 1–2,549 days). Groups were balanced in terms of patient age and tumor histology. Eleven patients with HER-2− tumors (3.0%), seven with HER-2+ tumors (25.0%), and eight with TN tumors (27.6%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Follow-up data were available for 357, 28, and 28 patients in the three groups, respectively. Death rates in the three groups were 6.4% (23 of 357) (one recurrence-related death), 0% (0 of 28), and 7.1% (2 of 28) (one recurrence-related death), respectively. During follow-up, the tumor recurred in nine patients: four were HER-2− tumors (1.1%), two were HER-2+ tumors (7.1%), and three were TN tumors (10.7%). Patients with small, node-negative breast tumors have an excellent prognosis, but HER-2+ and TN tumors appear to have a higher recurrence rate, warranting consideration for broad use and optimization of systemic adjuvant treatments.