Back to Authors

Harousseau, Jean‐Luc

Mayo Clinic

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes

Citations 4

Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1
Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Harousseau, Jean‐Luc, Durie, Brian G.M. , Dimopoulos, Meletios Α. , Kyle, Robert A. , Bladé, Joan , Richardson, Paul G. , Orlowski, Robert Z. , Avet‐Loiseau, Hervé , Palumbo, Antonio , Zonder, Jeffrey A. , Vesole, David H., Sezer, Orhan , Munshi, Nikhil C. , Miguel, Jesús F. San , 1, on behalf of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel, Cavo, Michèle , García‐Sánz, Ramón , Anderson, Kenneth C. , Richardson, Paul Gerard Guy , Orlowski, Robert Z. , Siegel, David S. , Jagannath, Sundar , Facon, Thierry T.F. , Lonial, Sagar , Ludwig, Heinz , 1, on behalf of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel, Rajkumar, S Vincent , Dimopoulos, Meletios A , San-Miguel, Jesus , Garcia-Sanz, Ramon

Blood | February 4, 2011 | Volume: 117 | Issue: 18 | Pages: 4691-4695

10.1182/blood-2010-10-299487 Get It

Abstract It is essential that there be consistency in the conduct, analysis, and reporting of clinical trial results in myeloma. The goal of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1 was to develop a set of guidelines for the uniform reporting of clinical trial results in myeloma. This paper provides a summary of the current response criteria in myeloma, detailed definitions for patient populations, lines of therapy, and specific endpoints. We propose that future clinical trials in myeloma follow the guidelines for reporting results proposed in this manuscript.
Renal Impairment in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Consensus Statement on Behalf of the International Myeloma Working Group
Dimopoulos, Meletios Α. , Terpos, Evangelos , Chanan-Khan, Asher, Leung, Nelson , Niesvizky, Rubén, Fermand, Jean-Paul, Bladé, Joan , Comenzo, Raymond L. , Sezer, Orhan , Palumbo, Antonio , Harousseau, Jean‐Luc, Richardson, Paul G. , Barlogie, Bart , Sonneveld, Pieter , Tosi, Patrizia , Cavo, Michèle , Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Durie, Brian G.M. , Miguel, Jesús F. San , Ludwig, Heinz , Jagannath, Sundar , Giralt, Sergio , Richardson, Paul Gerard Guy , Anderson, Kenneth C. , Rajkumar, S Vincent , Leung, Nelson , Dimopoulos, Meletios A , Terpos, Evangelos , San-Miguel, Jesus

Journal of Clinical Oncology | October 19, 2010 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 33 | Pages: 4976-4984

10.1200/jco.2010.30.8791 Get It

Renal impairment is a common complication of multiple myeloma (MM). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula is the recommended method for the assessment of renal function in patients with MM with stabilized serum creatinine. In acute renal injury, the RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss and end-stage kidney disease) and Acute Renal Injury Network criteria seem to be appropriate to define the severity of renal impairment. Novel criteria based on eGFR measurements are recommended for the definition of the reversibility of renal impairment. Rapid intervention to reverse renal dysfunction is critical for the management of these patients, especially for those with light chain cast nephropathy. Bortezomib with high-dose dexamethasone is considered as the treatment of choice for such patients. There is limited experience with thalidomide in patients with myeloma with renal impairment. Thus, thalidomide can be carefully administered, mainly in the context of well-designed clinical trials, to evaluate if it can improve the rapidity and probability of response that is produced by the combination with bortezomib and high-dose dexamethasone. Lenalidomide is effective in this setting and can reverse renal insufficiency in a significant subset of patients, when it is given at reduced doses, according to renal function. The role of plasma exchange in patients with suspected light chain cast nephropathy and renal impairment is controversial. High-dose melphalan (140 mg/m2) and autologous stem-cell transplantation should be limited to younger patients with chemosensitive disease.
Survival and Years of Life Lost in Different Age Cohorts of Patients With Multiple Myeloma
Crowley, John, Bladé, Joan , Miguel, Jesús F. San , Kyle, Robert A. , Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Shimizu, Kazuyuki , Turesson, Ingemar , Westin, Jan, Sonneveld, Pieter , Cavo, Michèle , Boccadoro, Mario , Palumbo, Antonio , Harousseau, Jean‐Luc, Barlogie, Bart , Stewart, A. Keith , Durie, Brian G.M. , Ludwig, Heinz , Bolejack, Vanessa , Tosi, Patrizia , Attal, Michel , Rajkumar, S Vincent , San-Miguel, Jesus

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 23, 2010 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1599-1605

10.1200/jco.2009.25.2114 Get It

Purpose To assess the impact of age on outcome and to analyze the projected years of life lost in patients with multiple myeloma. Patients and Methods Ten thousand five hundred forty-nine patients were evaluated; 6,996 patients were treated with conventional chemotherapy, and 3,553 patients were treated with high-dose therapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation. Results Mean observed and relative overall survival times in the entire cohort were 3.7 and 3.9 years, respectively. Observed survival decreased steadily from 6.4 years in patients younger than age 50 years to 2.5 years in patients ≥ age 80 years. A similar decrease was noted for relative survival. Higher age correlated significantly with higher International Staging System (ISS) stage. Relative excess risk of death differed significantly between 10-year age cohorts beginning from age 40 years (P < .001 for age 50 to 59 v age 40 to 49, P < .001 for age 60 to 69 v age 50 to 59, P < .001 for age 70 to 79 v age 60 to 69, and P = .009 for age ≥ 80 v 70 to 79). The average years of life lost per patient was 16.8 years in the entire patient cohort and decreased steadily from 36.1 years in patients younger than 40 years old to 4.6 years in patients ≥ age 80 years. Conclusion Age is associated with higher ISS stage and is an important risk factor for early mortality. Survival declined continuously by each decade from age 50 to age ≥ 80 from more than 6 to less than 3 years. The average of years of life lost in patients with myeloma is higher than in many other cancers and amounts to more than 30 years in patients younger than 40 years old but decreases to less than 5 years in patients age 80 years or older.
Myeloma in patients younger than age 50 years presents with more favorable features and shows better survival: an analysis of 10 549 patients from the International Myeloma Working Group
Durie, Brian G.M. , Turesson, Ingemar , Kyle, Robert A. , Bladé, Joan , Fonseca, Rafaël , Dimopoulos, Meletios Α. , Shimizu, Kazuyuki , Miguel, Jesús F. San , Westin, Jan, Harousseau, Jean‐Luc, Beksaç, Meral , Boccadoro, Mario , Palumbo, Antonio , Barlogie, Bart , Shustik, Chaim, Cavo, Michèle , Greipp, Philip R., Joshua, Douglas, Sonneveld, Pieter , Crowley, John, Beksaç, Meral , Ludwig, Heinz , Bolejack, Vanessa , Attal, Michel , Dimopoulos, Meletios A , San-Miguel, Jesus , Beksac, Meral , Fonseca, Rafael

Blood | February 12, 2008 | Volume: 111 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 4039-4047

10.1182/blood-2007-03-081018 Get It

AbstractWe analyzed the presenting features and survival in 1689 patients with multiple myeloma aged younger than 50 years compared with 8860 patients 50 years of age and older. Of the total 10 549 patients, 7765 received conventional therapy and 2784 received high-dose therapy. Young patients were more frequently male, had more favorable features such as low International Staging System (ISS) and Durie-Salmon stage as well as less frequently adverse prognostic factors including high C-reactive protein (CRP), low hemoglobin, increased serum creatinine, and poor performance status. Survival was significantly longer in young patients (median, 5.2 years vs 3.7 years; P < .001) both after conventional (median, 4.5 years vs 3.3 years; P < .001) or high-dose therapy (median, 7.5 years vs 5.7 years; P = .04). The 10-year survival rate was 19% after conventional therapy and 43% after high-dose therapy in young patients, and 8% and 29%, respectively, in older patients. Multivariate analysis revealed age as an independent risk factor during conventional therapy, but not after autologous transplantation. A total of 5 of the 10 independent risk factors identified for conventional therapy were also relevant for autologous transplantation. After adjusting for normal mortality, lower ISS stage and other favorable prognostic features seem to account for the significantly longer survival of young patients with multiple myeloma with age remaining a risk factor during conventional therapy.