Citations

SummaryBackgroundThe appropriate location for biopsy procurement relative to an ulcer in active Crohn's disease is unknown.AimTo explore the relationship between biopsy location, histological disease activity, proinflammatory gene expression and the presence of inflammatory cells.MethodsFifty‐one patients with Crohn's disease and ulcers >0.5 cm diameter in the colon and/or ileum were prospectively enrolled at three centres. Biopsies were obtained from 0 mm, 7 to 8 mm and 21 to 24 mm from the edge of the largest ulcer. Histological activity was blindly assessed with the Global Histological Disease Activity Score, the Robarts Histopathology and Nancy Histological indices. Messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) levels for interleukins‐6, ‐8 and ‐23 (p19 and p40 subunits), CD31 and S100A9 were measured using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The number of CD3+, CD68+ and myeloperoxidase‐positive cells was quantified by immunohistochemistry. Data were analysed using mixed models with location and segment as fixed effects and patients as random effect to account for correlation among segments within a patient.ResultsHistological disease activity scores (P < 0.0001), proinflammatory gene expression levels (P < 0.005) and numbers of myeloperoxidase‐positive cells (P < 0.0001) were highest in biopsies from the ulcer edge in the colon and ileum, with decreasing gradients observed with distance from the edge (P < 0.05). No differences between colonic and ileal samples were detected for the parameters measured at any location.ConclusionsBiopsies from the ulcer edge in patients with Crohn's disease yielded the greatest histological disease activity and mRNA levels and had similar readouts in the colon and ileum. Research is needed to confirm this conclusion for other measures.

OBJECTIVES: Histologic remission is a potentially valuable means of assessing disease activity and treatment response in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the efficacy of existing therapies to achieve this outcome is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of histologic outcomes in UC randomized controlled trials and examined the relationship between histologic and endoscopic outcomes. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane IBD Register were searched for randomized controlled trials of aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunosuppressives, biologics, and small molecules. Histologic and endoscopic remission and response data were independently extracted and pooled using binomial–normal random-effect or fixed-effect models. Pooled efficacy estimates were calculated as risk ratios (RRs) using the Mantel–Haenszel method. Univariable and multivariable random-effect meta-regression models examined factors associated with histologic remission. RESULTS: Seventy-four studies (68 induction and 7 maintenance) were identified. Topical aminosalicylate enemas [37.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 29.0–46.3] and suppositories (44.9%, 95% CI, 28.9–62.3) had the highest induction of histologic remission rates. Aminosalicylate enemas (RR = 4.14, 95% CI, 2.35–7.31), aminosalicylate suppositories (RR = 3.94, 95% CI, 1.26–12.32), and budesonide multimatrix (RR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.08–1.99) had higher histologic remission rates than placebo. Data were lacking for biologics and immunosuppressives. The pooled histologic remission rate for placebo in induction studies was 10.4% (95% CI, 7.1–15.2). Histologic and endoscopic remission correlated strongly ( r = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50–0.78). In multivariate analysis of placebo-arm data, less severe clinical disease activity and corticosteroid use were associated with higher histologic remission rates. Similarly, mild clinical disease activity was associated with higher histologic remission rates when active-arm data were analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Histologic remission rates for current UC treatments ranged from 15.0% to 44.9% according to drug class and patient population with the highest rates observed for topical aminosalicylates. Placebo remission rates were low with relatively narrow CIs. These data provide benchmarks to inform future trial design. Histologic remission is a potential treatment target in clinical practice.

e15567 Background: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) prognosis is poor and there is a need to identify patients that benefit most from neoadjuvant therapy. To examine the association of various biomarkers with clinical outcomes in neoadjuvant treatment of EAC, we retrospectively evaluated the biomarker expression (TS, ERCC1, TOPO1, PD-L1, PD-1) in patient matched formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples. Methods: Immunohistochemistry of TS (TS106/4H4B1) , ERCC1 (Ab. 8F1), TOPO1 (1D6), PD-L1 (both 22c3 and SP142), PD-1 (NAT105), and chromogenic in-situ hybridization (CISH) of Her2 were performed on FFPE samples from 35 patients across 2 institutions at time of EAC diagnosis and after treatment when available. Retrospective clinical data and survival (5/2006-1/2016) was analyzed with a mean follow up of 110 months (range 22-306). Results: Overexpression (pre/post-treatment) of TS (60%/54%), ERCC1 (69%/16%), TOPO1 (74%/50%), PD-1 (54%/63%), PD-L1 (SP142) (2.9%/4%), PD-L1 (22c3) (0%/4%) and amplification of Her2 (18%/23%) were observed. Pretreatment observed PD-L1 levels were lower in our study (3%) when compared to other studies in EAC specimens (35%). Immunohistochemistry and changes observed after chemoradiation are reviewed in Table. No markers had significant correlation with prognosis however TS negative expression showed a non-significant (p=0.15) trend towards improved survival. Conclusions: Analyzing biomarkers in our neoadjuvant EAC cohort demonstrated a lower than expected PD-L1 positivity. In the largest cohort, to our knowledge, of patient matched FFPE tumor samples, we did not observe a statistically significant association between TS, ERCC1, TOPO1, PD-L1, or PD-1 with improved clinical outcomes. [Table: see text]

e15563 Background: Expression of thymidylate synthase (TS), a target of fluoropyrimidine-based (5-FU) chemotherapy, has prognostic value in colorectal adenocarcinoma. Its value as a biomarker in treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is unknown. With widespread adoption of CROSS trial protocol for treatment of EAC, 5-FU is frequently omitted from regimens. We retrospectively analyzed the association between TS protein expression and clinical outcomes in EAC. Methods: TS expression levels were measured by immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens from 35 primary EAC patients from 2 institutions (range 5/2006-1/2016); at time of diagnosis and surgical resection (33 neoadjuvant chemoradiation and 2 surgery alone). TS expression higher than 1+, 5% was read as positive. Mean follow up was 1323 days (range 263-3677). TS expression correlated with treatment response and survival in patients treated with and without 5-FU therapy (log-rank test, Kaplan-Meier method). Results: In the cohort of 35 patients, 21 patients (60%) had pretreatment positive TS expression. Overall survival (OS) for TS negative patients was 1216 days versus 974 days for TS positive (p = 0.15). In the 23 patients treated with 5-FU, TS-negative patients had a trend towards longer overall survival compared to TS-positive patients, mean OS (1272 days versus 743 days, p = 0.08). In the group of 12 patients not treated with 5-FU, 2 patients showed negative TS staining. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation was performed in 33/35 patients. Downstaging was observed in 69% (9/13) of patients with negative pre-treatment TS levels versus 55% (11/20) in pre-treatment TS positive patients (p = 0.48). In 23 patients treated with 5FU, 9/12 (75%) were downstaged in the TS-negative cohort versus 6/11 (45%) in the TS-positive cohort (p = 0.21). In the 5FU treatment group, complete response was seen in 2 patients with negative TS staining. Conclusions: Low TS expression in EAC patients trended towards improved survival and tumor downstaging, particularly in patients treated with neoadjuvant 5-FU and platinum based therapy. Prospective data and greater patient numbers may be necessary to demonstrate statistical significance.

Objective We evaluated the reliability and responsiveness of available but incompletely validated UC histological disease activity indices using standardised rules for centralised assessment. Design Disease activity was assessed in biopsies collected in a phase II placebo-controlled ozanimod trial by four blinded pathologists using the Geboes (GS) and modified Riley (MRS) scores, the Robarts Histopathology (RHI) and Nancy Histological (NHI) indices and a Visual Analogue Scale. Reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Index responsiveness was evaluated by assessing longitudinal validity (Pearson correlations of changes in index scores and other disease measures), and effect size estimates (standardised effect size (SES)) using two criteria for change (treatment assignment and >2 point decrease in total Mayo Clinic score). Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve estimates evaluated the probability of the indices to discriminate between treatment and placebo. Results Inter-rater reliability of the histological indices was substantial to almost perfect (ICC>0.61), and responsiveness was moderate to large (SES estimates>0.5); 0.81 (0.52, 1.10), 0.87 (0.58, 1.17), 0.57 (0.30, 0.84) and 0.81 (0.52, 1.09) when treatment assignment was the criterion for change and 1.05 (0.80, 1.31), 1.13 (0.87, 1.39), 0.88 (0.64, 1.12) and 1.06 (0.80, 1.31) for the change in Mayo score criterion for the GS, MRS, RHI and NHI, respectively. The indices had similar drisciminative ability based on AUROC estimates (range 0.608–0.649). Conclusion All four existing histological indices were similarly reliable and responsive based on this dataset.

Linked contentThis article is linked to Warners et al and Conner and Kirsch papers. To view these articles https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14559 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14633.

Summary Background Regulatory requirements for claims of mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis ( UC ) will require demonstration of both endoscopic and histologic healing. Quantifying these rates is essential for future drug development. Aims To meta‐analyse endoscopic and histologic placebo response and remission rates in UC randomised controlled trials ( RCT s) and identify factors influencing these rates. Methods MEDLINE , EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 2017 for placebo‐controlled trials of pharmacological interventions for UC . Endoscopic and histologic placebo rates were pooled by random effects. Mixed effects univariable and multivariable meta‐regression was used to evaluate the influence of patient, intervention and trial‐related study‐level covariates on these rates. Results Fifty‐six induction (placebo n = 4171) and 8 maintenance trials (placebo n = 1011) were included. Pooled placebo endoscopic remission and response rates for induction trials were 23% [95 confidence interval ( CI ) 19‐28%] and 35% [95% CI 27‐42%] respectively, and 20% [95% CI 16‐24%] for maintenance of remission. The pooled histologic placebo remission rate was 14% [95% CI 8‐22%] for induction trials. High heterogeneity was observed for all outcomes ( I 2 56.2%‐88.3%). On multivariable meta‐regression, central endoscopy reading was associated with significantly lower endoscopic placebo remission rates (16% vs 25%; OR = 0.52, [95% CI 0.29‐0.92], P = 0.03). On univariable meta‐regression, higher histologic placebo remission was associated with concomitant corticosteroids ( OR = 1.17 [95% CI 1.08‐1.26], P < 0.0001, per 10% increase in corticosteroid use). Conclusions Placebo endoscopic and histologic rates range from 14% to 35% in UC RCT s but are highly heterogeneous. Outcome standardisation may reduce heterogeneity and is needed in this field.