Citations

Abstract BACKGROUND Remote, smartphone‐based cognitive testing may improve access to cognitive assessments for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. We evaluated the feasibility, reliability, and validity of unsupervised smartphone‐based cognitive tests in a registry‐based cohort. METHODS Adults without a record of cognitive impairment ( N = 1815; ages 18–92) were recruited from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Brain Health Registry to complete three unsupervised smartphone cognitive testing sessions within 2 weeks. Reliability was assessed with correlations between sessions. Linear regression models tested associations of smartphone tasks with demographics, self‐ and informant‐rated cognitive concerns, and web‐based cognitive testing (Cogstate Brief Battery). RESULTS Adherence was high (82.2%) and usability favorable. Test–retest reliability was moderate to strong ( ρ ’s = 0.61–0.85, all p ’s < 0.001). Lower smartphone scores were associated with older age, lower education, cognitive concerns, and worse Cogstate performance. DISCUSSION Findings support the feasibility, reliability, and validity of remote digital assessments in adults without a record of cognitive impairment.

Background: The rapid adoption of digital pathology and artificial intelligence (AI) in oncology creates multiple opportunities for precision diagnostics but also creates an urgent need for evidence-based standards to ensure safe and effective implementation. Goal: This article, developed by the Digital Pathology Association, presents recommendations for digital pathology as well as the validation and clinical utility of AI-enabled digital pathology tools in clinical practice. This guidance addresses analytical and clinical validation, algorithm reliability, and criteria for establishing clinical utility attributed to test use. Key recommendations emphasize separate validation of scanning processes and AI algorithms, concordance studies to support interscanner generalizability, rigorous assessment of accuracy and reliability in real-world settings, and clear description of algorithmic use limitations. These recommendations further provide frameworks for when AI may replace or augment existing diagnostic approaches, such as biomarker scoring, cancer diagnosis, and prognostic risk assessment. Conclusions: By considering payer, regulatory, and clinical perspectives, the recommendations promote transparency, trust, and reproducibility in digital pathology while encouraging value-based care delivery. We support responsible innovation in computational pathology, ensuring that AI applications achieve not only technical performance goals but also deliver measurable clinical benefit to patients.

Abstract Background World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension (WSPH) Group 2 pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a clinically integrated phenotype attributed to left heart disease, whereas pre- versus post-capillary classification is operationalized primarily by pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). Although current recommendations emphasize contextual interpretation and provocative testing for intermediate PCWP values, the relationship between PCWP-based classification and underlying phenotype has not been systematically evaluated. We aim to quantify phenotype–hemodynamic discordance across the PCWP spectrum and evaluate a staged physiology-guided framework incorporating inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), ventricular geometry, and provocative testing. Methods We studied 1,032 participants from the NHLBI-sponsored PVDOMICS cohort with multidisciplinary adjudicated phenotypes integrating clinical, imaging, physiologic, and hemodynamic data. Stage-specific PCWP thresholds classified pre- versus post-capillary physiology at rest, during iNO, and during provocation (fluid challenge or invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing [iCPET]). Echocardiographic right ventricular-to-left ventricular (RV/LV) ratio was evaluated as a marker of ventricular interdependence. Restricted cubic spline and staged concordance analyses defined certainty-based PCWP ranges and incremental diagnostic yield. Results Adjudicated Group 2 PH was present in 37.0% of participants. Resting PCWP demonstrated good discrimination (AUC 0.86), but substantial bidirectional phenotype–hemodynamic discordance persisted across intermediate PCWP ranges. At a resting PCWP of 12 mmHg, 25% of participants classified as pre-capillary had adjudicated Group 2 PH, whereas at 18 mmHg, 35% classified as post-capillary remained discordant non–Group 2. Concordance did not approach 90% until PCWP values were <9 mmHg or >24 mmHg. Dynamic testing incrementally improved concordance within these overlap zones. Nearly half of adjudicated Group 2 PH participants (46.5%) were not identified by resting PCWP alone; incorporation of iNO and provocative testing increased cumulative Group 2 identification by 63.4% and improved sensitivity from 79.9% to 83.7%. Model discrimination improved from an AUC of 0.863 to 0.908 (likelihood-ratio P<0.001). iNO increased PCWP in discordant Pre/G2 participants, unmasking latent left-sided limitation, while lowering PCWP in discordant Post/NonG2 participants, consistent with ventricular interdependence. RV/LV ratio ≥0.94 reduced discordant Post/NonG2 classification by 70.5%, and incorporation of PCWP/cardiac output slope improved physiologic specificity during exercise. Conclusions Group 2 PH is a dynamic, load-dependent phenotype inadequately characterized by resting PCWP alone. Intermediate PCWP values represent continuous probabilities of bidirectional discordance rather than discrete diagnostic states. A staged physiology-guided approach integrating iNO, ventricular geometry, and provocative testing improves concordance between hemodynamic classification and clinically integrated phenotype assignment. Clinical Perspective What Is New? In the deeply phenotyped PVDOMICS cohort, resting pulmonary capillary wedge pressure demonstrated good overall discrimination for adjudicated Group 2 (left heart disease) pulmonary hypertension, yet intermediate values frequently either concealed latent left-heart disease or overclassified patients without intrinsic left-heart disease Resting pulmonary capillary wedge pressure should be viewed as a continuous probability signal rather than a binary threshold, allowing additional physiologic testing to be targeted according to the degree of diagnostic uncertainty a clinician is willing to accept. A staged physiology-guided approach incorporating inhaled nitric oxide, ventricular geometry, and provocative testing improved concordance with adjudicated PH category and pre or post-capillary classification. What Are the Clinical Implications? Pre- versus post-capillary classification should be interpreted within the broader clinical and physiologic context rather than relying on a single resting pulmonary capillary wedge pressure threshold. Intermediate pulmonary capillary wedge pressure values should prompt consideration of additional physiologic evaluation, with inhaled nitric oxide providing a practical intermediate step and provocative testing providing the greatest incremental diagnostic yield. Exercise pulmonary capillary wedge pressure/cardiac output slope and markers of ventricular interdependence may provide complementary information for resolving uncertainty when resting and dynamic hemodynamics are discordant.