Citations

Cutaneous metastases occur in up to 20% of patients with advanced melanoma and can be difficult to manage with systemic therapy alone. Pembrolizumab is a standard therapy with limited local treatment options for cutaneous manifestations. Imiquimod has shown activity in other skin cancers but is less well studied in melanoma. We conducted a pilot trial to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of combining topical imiquimod with intravenous pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable melanoma with cutaneous metastases. This was a single-center, open-label, non-randomized interventional study (NCT03276832). Eligible patients received pembrolizumab IV every 21 days plus topical imiquimod 5% applied Monday–Friday each cycle. The primary endpoint was objective response rate per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, and safety. In this study, seven patients were enrolled, five were male and two females; one was Hispanic and six were non-Hispanic White. Median treatment exposure was 8 cycles. ORR was 57.1%, with 3 patients (42.9%) achieving complete response, 1 partial response, and 2 stable disease. The 7-month PFS rate was 57.1%. At study closure, 4 patients remained alive without progression, 2 were alive following progression, and 1 had died of disease. Toxicities were mostly grade 1, with fatigue and anemia most common with minimal grade 2 events. The combination of topical imiquimod and pembrolizumab was feasible, safe, and demonstrated promising antitumor activity in unresectable cutaneous melanoma. A 42.9% CR rate in this small elderly cohort supports further evaluation of local immune modulation with systemic PD-1 blockade for cutaneous melanoma.

OBJECTIVE Ruptured, large pediatric arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) pose a significant management challenge due to high rerupture risk and the morbidity of conventional treatments. Volume-staged stereotactic radiosurgery (VS-SRS) has emerged as an alternative; however, evidence for its use in this specific population is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of VS-SRS for ruptured, large AVMs in a dedicated pediatric cohort. METHODS This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study from 21 centers analyzed outcomes for 42 pediatric patients (age < 18 years) with previously ruptured, large AVMs treated with VS-SRS. The primary outcome was complete AVM obliteration, and secondary outcomes included post-SRS hemorrhage, radiation-induced changes (RICs), and favorable outcome. Favorable outcome in this study was defined as obliteration without post-SRS hemorrhage or permanent RIC. RESULTS At the initial SRS, the median patient age was 14.5 years, and the median AVM volume was 15.0 cm 3 ; most AVMs were high grade (Spetzler-Martin grades IV and V). With a median follow-up of 41.5 months, complete AVM obliteration was achieved in 21 patients (50.0%). The cumulative obliteration rate was 37% at 5 years and 56% at 10 years. Patients with a nidus volume of ≤ 10 cm 3 had significantly higher cumulative obliteration rates than those with a nidus volume > 10 cm 3 (log-rank test, p = 0.021). Similarly, patients treated with a prescription dose > 17 Gy showed significantly higher cumulative obliteration rates compared to those treated with a dose ≤ 17 Gy (log-rank test, p = 0.012). The cumulative 5-year incidences of hemorrhage and RICs following VS-SRS were 19% and 7%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, only larger total AVM volume was an independent predictor of a lower likelihood of favorable outcome (hazard ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.80–0.99; p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter pediatric cohort, VS-SRS for ruptured, large AVMs provides a reasonable chance of long-term obliteration, but generally acceptable risks of post-SRS hemorrhage and RICs exist. VS-SRS should be considered as an option for pediatric patients with large, ruptured AVMs.

ABSTRACT Research is important to advance the field of emergency medicine and improve patient care. As such, emergency medicine residents are required to complete a scholarly project during their training. This experience provides an opportunity to enhance their exposure to research, expanding their skillset as both producers and consumers of the medical literature. However, the process may be overwhelming to launch, especially for residents. This Educator's Blueprint will provide 10 strategies for navigating and optimizing the resident research experience. These strategies include providing structured training, creating a research‐supportive environment, selecting a project using resident‐centric FINER criteria, identifying a research mentor, creating mosaic research experiences, setting expectations, empowering residents, selecting team members for sustainability, providing scaffolding and support during the writing stage, and explaining the peer review process and normalizing rejection or revisions. These strategies will help guide faculty seeking to enhance their learners' research experience.