Krahn, Lois

Abstract Introduction Sodium oxybate is strongly recommended by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine for the treatment of narcolepsy, a chronic sleep disorder characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). This study was conducted to characterize demographic characteristics and concomitant medication use of patients with narcolepsy treated or not treated with oxybates (OXB). Methods An electronic health record–based search identified first-time patients from Mayo Clinic and Duke Health between 2002-2024 and 2012-2024, respectively. Patients had ≥1 narcolepsy-specific ICD-9/10 code and ≥1 diagnostic mention of narcolepsy in clinical notes (via natural language processing algorithm). Patients from both Mayo Clinic and Duke Health who were or were not treated with OXB were identified. Data were analyzed descriptively. Results Of 4722 patients, 654 (Mayo Clinic, n=378; Duke Health, n=276) received OXB, and 4068 (Mayo Clinic, n=2800; Duke Health, n=1268) received non-OXB treatments. The majority of patients were white (OXB-treated: 92.1%, 73.6%; non–OXB-treated: 91.1%, 69.2%) and female (OXB-treated: 68.3%, 76.8%; non–OXB-treated: 61.7%, 68.1%). Most OXB-treated patients (65.3%; 63.4%) had narcolepsy type 1 (NT1); the majority of non–OXB-treated patients (78.1%; 64.0%) had narcolepsy type 2 (NT2). The mean (SD) age of the OXB-treated cohort was younger than the non–OXB-treated cohort at the time of diagnosis (OXB-treated: 33.9 [15.3] years, 35.7 [13.2] years; non–OXB-treated: 45.5 [19.2] years, 42.5 [17.8] years). For both cohorts, the most common concomitant medications were stimulants (OXB-treated: 50.3%, 42.8%; non–OXB-treated: 41.8%, 35.2%). Conclusion In this retrospective analysis of nearly 5000 patients from Mayo Clinic and Duke Health, approximately 1 in 8 received OXB. While sodium oxybate has been approved for >2 decades and is strongly recommended for treatment of both EDS and cataplexy in narcolepsy, substantially greater OXB utilization was observed in patients with NT1. As both patients with NT1 and NT2 can experience other narcolepsy symptoms, further OXB-related education remains critical—particularly on the efficacy of sodium oxybate in the treatment of NT2. Support (if any) Avadel Pharmaceuticals

Abstract Introduction As targeted treatments for narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) emerge, timely diagnosis and care planning are essential to optimize outcomes. This ongoing initiative aims to identify and address barriers to NT1 recognition and treatment to support practice improvements and patient-centered care. Methods Patient surveys (N=38) were collected in August 2025 through collaboration with the Hypersomnia Foundation to inform an ongoing initiative at five US sleep centers. Results from patient surveys are reviewed at expert-led clinic-based sessions to identify patient needs in care, and case-based discussions challenge participants to apply the latest evidence into practice scenarios. Pre- and post-session surveys are designed to measure the impact on knowledge, confidence, and self-reported performance. Additionally, clinicians will develop strategies for care improvement. Results The top patient-reported barriers to NT1 diagnosis were finding a provider familiar with sleep disorders (42%) and limited appointments/referrals (26%). Ninety-five percent waited over 1 year for formal diagnosis (1-5 years, 71%; 5-10 years, 19%; >10 years, 5%). Narcolepsy symptoms had a significant impact on daily living (82%; 4 or 5 on a 5-point Likert scale), with many patients reporting fatigue (63%), excessive daytime sleepiness (58%), disrupted nighttime sleep (53%), sleep paralysis (50%), and cataplexy (37%) despite treatment. Patients’ top treatment goals were finding a treatment that is effective for their symptoms/type of narcolepsy (61%) and that improves daily functioning/quality of life (55%). However, 19% (1, 2, or 3 on a 5-point Likert scale) reported their care team had not discussed treatment options and 37% (1, 2, or 3 on a 5-point Likert scale) were not routinely asked about treatment goals. Patients were interested in discussing the cause of narcolepsy (63%) and their preferences for treatment (61%). Preliminary findings from the clinic-based sessions have generated practical strategies to address identified gaps in NT1 care. Conclusion Patient surveys uncovered persistent challenges in NT1 diagnosis, communication, and treatment planning. Incorporating these perspectives and case-based scenarios into clinic-based sessions have the potential to improve focused approaches to care and can provide a foundation for integrating evidence into practice as the NT1 landscape evolves. Support (if any) This program was supported by an educational grant from Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.

Abstract Introduction AXS-12 (reboxetine) is a highly selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and cortical dopamine modulator under development for the treatment of narcolepsy. Long-term efficacy and safety of AXS-12 in participants with narcolepsy with cataplexy (NT1) were previously reported from the Phase 3 ENCORE trial. To better understand the impact of AXS-12 on overall functional burden in NT1, we evaluated changes in cognition and functional outcomes during the ENCORE trial. Methods ENCORE included a 24-week open-label extension (OLE) period, followed by a 3-week double-blind randomized-withdrawal (DBRW) period. During the OLE, participants received AXS-12 (5 mg once-daily for 1 week, twice-daily for 23 weeks). Following this, participants were randomized 1:1 to continue twice-daily AXS-12 for 3 weeks or switch to once-daily AXS-12 plus placebo for 1 week, then placebo twice-daily for 2 weeks. P-values reported are nominal. Results ENCORE enrolled 68 participants; 42 completed the OLE and entered the DBRW (AXS-12, n=22; placebo, n=20). In the OLE, participants treated with AXS-12 reported improvement in the NSAQ Ability to Concentrate item at 1 (54.8%) and 6 (58.5%) months. Participants reported improvement in concentration, assessed by PGI-C, at 1 (66.7%) and 6 (70.0%) months. Narcolepsy overall, assessed by the CGI-C, improved at 1 (90.3%) and 6 (90.2%) months; and improved at 1 (77.8%) and 6 (80.0%) months, assessed by the PGI-C. Functional impairment, assessed by the WPAI, was reduced from 53.0% at baseline to 34.0% at 1 month and 24.3% at 6 months. In the DBRW, a greater proportion of participants switched to placebo experienced worsening on the NSAQ Ability to Concentrate item (52.6% vs 14.3%; P=0.011), and PGI-C for ability to concentrate (57.9% vs 22.2%; P=0.029) at 3 weeks compared with those continuing AXS-12. A greater proportion switched to placebo also reported worsening of their narcolepsy overall (PGI-C) at 3 weeks compared with those continuing AXS-12 (52.6% vs 16.7%; P=0.024). Treatment with AXS-12 was generally well tolerated. Conclusion Long-term, open-label treatment with AXS-12 was associated with improvements in cognitive/functional domains and productivity. Randomized withdrawal to placebo led to worsening cognition and narcolepsy overall. These results further support the long-term therapeutic benefit of AXS-12 for narcolepsy. Support (if any) Axsome Therapeutics Inc.