Citations

Background: Optimal treatment for patients with severe ankle instability or failed previous ankle stabilization is not well defined, and newer techniques have limited presence in the literature. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes after modified anatomic lateral ligament reconstruction using hamstring auto- or allograft in primary cases versus revision cases. We hypothesized that patients undergoing a revision procedure would demonstrate inferior patient-reported and radiographic outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent modified anatomic lateral ligament reconstruction by a single surgeon between 2010 and 2017 were identified. Indications included failure of previous ankle stabilization or severe ankle laxity. Patients completed preoperative and minimum 1-year postoperative Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) surveys. They also underwent pre- and postoperative stress radiographs using the Telos Stress Device. Results: A total of 41 patients (42 ankles) were identified. The mean age was 32.1 years, and 36 patients (88%) were women. There were 25 primary procedures and 17 revision procedures. Hamstring autograft was utilized in 35 ankles and hamstring allograft in 7 ankles. A total of 34 patients (83%) provided postoperative patient-reported outcome scores at a mean of 26 months (range, 12-65 months). When comparing primary versus revision procedures, revision patients had significantly lower FAOS Pain (77.14 vs 90.66; P = .009), Sports (63.46 vs 82.16; P = .008), and Quality of Life (53.53 vs 76.70; P = .002) scores. In total, 34 patients (83%) had stress radiographs at a mean of 14 months (range, 3-62 months) postoperatively. Revision patients also had lower, though statistically insignificant, postoperative talar tilt measurements on average (5.73° vs 7.10°; P = .252), and pre- to postoperative change in talar tilt was not significantly different between groups (−4.94° vs −7.03°; P = .415). Conclusion: Revision procedures had significantly lower postoperative patient-reported outcome scores and lower talar tilt compared with patients undergoing a primary procedure, although the pre- to postoperative change in the talar tilt was not significantly different between groups.

Abstract Clinical trials typically collect longitudinal data, data that are collected repeated over time, such as laboratories, scans, or patient-reported outcomes. Due to a variety of reasons, this data can be missing, whether a patient stops attending clinical visits (ie, dropout) or misses assessments intermittently. Understanding the reasons for missing data as well as predictors of missing data can aid in determination of the missing data mechanism. The analysis methods used are dependent on the missing data mechanism and may make certain assumptions about the missing data itself. Methods for nonignorable missing data, which assumes that the missing data depend on the missing data itself, make stronger assumptions and include pattern-mixture models and shared parameter models. Missing data that are ignorable after adjusting for other covariates can be analyzed using methods that adjust for covariates, such as mixed-effects models or multiple imputation. Missing data that are ignorable can be analyzed using standard approaches that require complete case data, such as change from baseline or proportion of patients who declined at a specified time point. In clinical trials, truly ignorable data are rare, resulting in additional analysis methods required for proper interpretation of the results. Conducting several analyses under different assumptions, called sensitivity analyses, can determine the extent of the impact of the missing data.

Abstract Introduction Mindfulness is a promising intervention for female sexual dysfunction (FSD); however, of the mindfulness interventions studied, few treat the woman and her partner. Aim We developed a brief online mindfulness, resilience, and psychoeducation intervention, Stress Management and Resiliency Training for Sexuality (Sex SMART), for women with sexual health concerns and their partners. Methods Women with female sexual interest/arousal disorder and their partners were recruited between February 24, 2015, and October 6, 2016, and randomized to treatment or control groups (received educational pamphlets). The treatment intervention comprised of an online SMART and sexual health psychoeducation module. Main Outcome Measures The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R), Sexual Desire Inventory-2 (SDI-2), Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and other subjective measures were used to assess sexual function and sexual distress at baseline and 12 weeks. Results The study included 60 women and their partners (30 couples in each group). In both groups, sexual function by total FSFI scores and sexual distress scores significantly improved at 12 weeks compared with baseline, with no significant between-group differences (FSFI effect estimate for Sex SMART vs control = +1.4 (90% CI [–0.6 to +3.4]; P=.13). Both participants and partners randomized to the intervention reported significantly improved attitude and feelings, comfort as a sexual person, and subjective sexual functioning at 12 weeks. The findings provide preliminary evidence for efficacy of an online intervention for couples with sexual health problems. Conclusions A brief online mindfulness, resilience, and psychoeducation–based intervention showed no significant improvement in many outcomes (FSFI, FSDS-R, SDI-2, RDAS) of sexual health versus controls. Although this is the first online randomized controlled trial to evaluate a mindfulness-based therapy intervention, it was limited by its lack of population diversity and high attrition rate. Significant improvements in subjective sexual health and partner sexual function by the International Index of Erectile Function were reported only in the intervention group.

ObjectiveHistology reveals that early active multiple sclerosis lesions can be classified into 3 main interindividually heterogeneous but intraindividually stable immunopathological patterns of active demyelination (patterns I–III). In patterns I and II, a T‐cell‐ and macrophage‐associated demyelination is suggested, with pattern II only showing signs of a humoral immune response. Pattern III is characterized by inflammatory lesions with an oligodendrocyte degeneration. Patterns suggest pathogenic heterogeneity, and we postulated that they have distinct magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) correlates that may serve as biomarkers.MethodsWe evaluated in an international collaborative retrospective cohort study the MRI lesion characteristics of 789 conventional prebiopsy and follow‐up MRIs in relation to their histopathologically classified immunopathological patterns (n = 161 subjects) and lesion edge features (n = 112).ResultsA strong association of a ringlike enhancement and a hypointense T2‐weighted (T2w) rim with patterns I and II, but not pattern III, was observed. Only a fraction of pattern III patients showed a ringlike enhancement, and this was always atypical. Ringlike enhancement and T2w rims colocalized, and ringlike enhancement showed a strong association with macrophage rims as shown by histology. A strong concordance of MRI lesion characteristics, meaning that different lesions showed the same features, was found when comparing biopsied and nonbiopsied lesions at a given time point, indicating lesion homogeneity within individual patients.InterpretationWe provide robust evidence that MRI characteristics reflect specific morphological features of multiple sclerosis immunopatterns and that ringlike enhancement and T2w hypointense rims might serve as a valuable noninvasive biomarker to differentiate pathological patterns of demyelination. ANN NEUROL 2021;90:440–454

Objective To develop and implement criteria for description of post COVID syndrome based on analysis of patients presenting for evaluation at Mayo Clinic Rochester between November 2019 and August 2020. Methods A total of 465 patients with a history of testing positive for COVID-19 were identified and their medical records reviewed. After a thorough review, utilizing the DELPHI methods by an expert panel, 42 (9%) cases were identified with persistent central sensitization (CS) symptoms persisting after the resolution of acute COVID-19, herein referred to as Post COVID syndrome (PoCoS). In this report we describe the baseline characteristics of these PoCoS patients. Results Among these 42 PoCoS patients, the mean age was 46.2 years (median age was 46.5 years). Pain (90%), fatigue (74%), dyspnea (43%), and orthostatic intolerance (38%) were the most common symptoms. The characteristics of an initial 14 patients were utilized for the development of clinical criteria via a modified Delphi Method by a panel of experts in central sensitization disorders. These criteria were subsequently applied in the identification of 28 additional cases of suspected PoCoS. A 2-reviewer system was used to analyze agreement with using the criteria, with all 28 cases determined to be either probable or possible cases by the reviewers. Inter-reviewer agreement using these proposed defining criteria was high with a Cohen’s alpha of .88. Conclusions Here we present what we believe to be the first definitional criteria for Post COVID syndrome. These may be useful in clinical phenotyping of these patients for targeted treatment and future research.

Objective Persistent post-COVID symptoms are estimated to occur in up to 10% of patients who have had COVID-19. These lingering symptoms may persist for weeks to months after resolution of the acute illness. This study aimed to add insight into our understanding of certain post-acute conditions and clinical findings. The primary purpose was to determine the persistent post COVID impairments prevalence and characteristics by collecting post COVID illness data utilizing Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS ® ). The resulting measures were used to assess surveyed patients physical, mental, and social health status. Methods A cross-sectional study and 6-months Mayo Clinic COVID recovered registry data were used to evaluate continuing symptoms severity among the 817 positive tested patients surveyed between March and September 2020. The resulting PROMIS ® data set was used to analyze patients post 30 days health status. The e-mailed questionnaires focused on fatigue, sleep, ability to participate in social roles, physical function, and pain. Results The large sample size (n = 817) represented post hospitalized and other managed outpatients. Persistent post COVID impairments prevalence and characteristics were determined to be demographically young (44 years), white (87%), and female (61%). Dysfunction as measured by the PROMIS ® scales in patients recovered from acute COVID-19 was reported as significant in the following domains: ability to participate in social roles (43.2%), pain (17.8%), and fatigue (16.2%). Conclusion Patient response on the PROMIS ® scales was similar to that seen in multiple other studies which used patient reported symptoms. As a result of this experience, we recommend utilizing standardized scales such as the PROMIS ® to obtain comparable data across the patients’ clinical course and define the disease trajectory. This would further allow for effective comparison of data across studies to better define the disease process, risk factors, and assess the impact of future treatments.

Introduction: Up to 20% of outpatients receiving HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) experience treatment reluctance on the basis of side effects, leaving a large population at increased risk of CVD. We hypothesized that a practical food-based approach can be utilized to lower LDL-C in statin reluctant patients and that the lipid response can be predicted based upon CYP7A1-rs3808607 (CYP7A1) and APOE genetic isoforms. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, free-living cross-over study composed of 2 phases of 4 wk each, separated by a 4 wk washout. Participants (n=54) received an assortment of individually packaged, shelf stable snacks along with printed instructions to ingest 2 servings of the foods per day as a substitute for similar items they were eating already. No other dietary or behavior adjustments were requested. Treatment products supplied at least 1800 mg alpha-linoleic acid (ALA), 5 g of fiber and 1g of phytosterols per serving. Control products were calorie-matched like items drawn from the general grocery marketplace. Lipid parameters were measured and averaged over 2 d at baseline and at 4 wk of each phase. Ingestion of study foods was confirmed by C18:3n3 serum level assessment. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and APOE isoform were assessed by Taqman genotyping assay. Results: As compared to control, LDL-C decreased 8.8% in the treatment arm (p<0.0001, range -37.6% to +20.5%) and total cholesterol fell 5.1% (p<0.004). No significant change was seen in HDL-C, TG or fasting glucose levels. LDL-C was reduced by diet in CYP7A1 T/T homozygotes (-0.3924+0.1271mmol/l, p = 0.0033) and APOE4 carriers ( -0.3808+0.098 mmol/l, p = 0.0003). Conclusions: Significant LDL-C reductions can be affected through a simple food intervention supplying high levels of phytosterols, fiber and ALA. CYP7A1 and APOE isoforms influence the variability in LDL-C response and can help identify individual patients especially appropriate for a food-based LDL-C lowering approach. Given the large number of patients unable/unwilling to take statins, our findings have significant impact for management of this challenging population.