Citations

ABSTRACTIntroductionThe incidence of mortality late in the pandemic, particularly after widespread vaccine availability, is not well understood. Herein, we elucidate the effect of this impact of the COVID pandemic as well as risk factors for mortality during it.MethodsThe primary end point was death with a functioning graft with secondary endpoints of mortality rates in subgroups and at different time intervals during the pandemic.ResultsDespite widespread vaccination, mortality rates for kidney transplant (KTx) recipients almost doubled during the COVID‐19 era (6.40 deaths per 100 person years vs. 3.54 pre‐COVID). Mortality increased in all racial/ethnic groups but increased more in Native Americans, Hispanics, and African Americans compared to non‐Hispanic Caucasians. The highest mortality rate occurred during the Delta and Omicron time frames. In contrast to the general population, mortality was more evenly spread across age groups in KTx recipients.ConclusionsMortality rates during the COVID‐19 era were extremely high, more than doubling in some racial/ethnic groups. We conclude that the KTx population was a particularly vulnerable group during the COVID‐19 era and suggests the need for further research into the management of variants in the future.

OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate local control (LC) of tumors, patient overall survival (OS), and the safety of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for esophageal cancer brain metastases (EBMs). METHODS This retrospective cohort study used data from 15 International Radiosurgery Research Foundation facilities encompassing 67 patients with 185 EBMs managed using SRS between January 2000 and May 2022. The median patient age was 63 years, with a male predominance (92.5%). Most patients (64.2%) had a single brain metastasis, while 7.5% had more than 5 metastases. The median tumor volume was 0.9 cm 3 , and the median margin dose delivered to the tumor was 20 Gy. RESULTS The median OS post-SRS was 15.2 months, with 1- and 2-year OS rates of 65.7% and 32.3%, respectively. A significant inverse correlation was found between the number of EBMs and OS in the univariable analysis. LC rates at 1 and 2 years were 89% and 76%, respectively. Adverse radiation effects (AREs) were observed in 17.9% of patients, with 13.4% being mild and transient and 4.5% severely symptomatic (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3). New intracranial disease developed in 58.2% of patients, with 1- and 2-year rates of 58% and 73%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS SRS for EBMs demonstrated high survival rates and effective tumor control, with a low incidence of severe AREs. These findings highlight the potential role of SRS in the multidisciplinary multimodality management paradigm of EBM.

Introduction Patients (pts) with progressive disease after ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy are unlikely to derive additional benefit from current salvage immunochemotherapies, and survival declines significantly with each subsequent treatment. Pts with refractory disease following second-line therapy have worse outcomes, with reported overall response rates (ORRs) of 1% to 14% and overall survival (OS) of 5 months (Blood. 2017;130[16]:1800-1808). While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has become a preferred strategy in the second- and third-line settings, pts with R/R disease following CAR-T experience dismal survival, with progression-free survival (PFS) and OS as low as 3 and 5 months, respectively, and no agreed standard of care post CAR-T (Blood. 2022;140[24]:2527-2529). The randomized, global, phase 3 ECHELON-3 study (NCT04404283) was conducted in pts with R/R DLBCL after ≥2 prior therapies who were ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant and/or CAR-T. Here, we present subgroup analyses in pts with 2 prior lines of therapy, refractory disease, or prior CAR-T. Methods In these subgroup analyses of ECHELON-3, eligible pts had 2 prior lines of systemic therapy, disease refractory to the last prior therapy, or prior exposure to CAR-T. Pts could qualify for ≥1 subgroup and were analyzed separately. Refractory disease was defined as stable or progressive disease as best overall response to last line of treatment or relapse ≤6 months from the end of treatment. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive brentuximab vedotin (BV; 1.2 mg/kg) or placebo every 3 weeks (q3w), in combination with rituximab (R; 375 mg/m2) q3w and lenalidomide (Len; 20 mg) once daily. Efficacy was assessed by investigators per Lugano 2014 classification. The primary endpoint was OS, with key secondary endpoints of PFS and ORR. P values are descriptive. Results In total, 230 pts were enrolled in ECHELON-3 from April 2021 to November 2023, with a median follow-up of 16.4 months (range, 0.1-31.5 months). Overall, 94 pts with 2 prior lines of systemic therapy were enrolled and randomized to BV+Len+R (n=48) or placebo+Len+R (n=46). Median OS was 16.3 months (95% CI, 12.6 months-not estimable) with BV+Len+R vs 8.5 months (95% CI, 4.1-15.8 months) with placebo+Len+R (hazard ratio [HR], 0.557; 95% CI, 0.317-0.977; P=.0388). Median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI, 3.6-12.6 months) with BV+Len+R vs 2.7 months (95% CI, 1.4-4.0 months) with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.462; 95% CI, 0.279-0.764; P=.0020). ORR was 68.8% (95% CI, 53.7%-81.3%) with BV+Len+R vs 43.5% with placebo+Len+R (95% CI, 28.9%-58.9%; P=.0216); complete response (CR) rate was 52.1% vs 13.0%, respectively. Additional data for pts by lines of therapy received will be presented. In total, 194 pts with disease refractory to the most recent systemic therapy were enrolled and randomized to BV+Len+R (n=98) and placebo+Len+R (n=96). Median OS was 11.7 months (95% CI, 8.8-16.3 months) with BV+Len+R vs 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.7-8.5 months) with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.566; 95% CI, 0.396-0.808; P=.0015). Median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.8-5.4 months) with BV+Len+R vs 1.5 months (95% CI, 1.4-2.6 months) with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.508; 95% CI, 0.363-0.712; P<.0001). ORR was 59.2% (95% CI, 48.8%-69.0%) with BV+Len+R vs 29.2% (95% CI, 20.3%-39.3%) with placebo+Len+R (P<.0001); CR rate was 34.7% vs 11.5%, respectively. Overall, 67 pts who received prior CAR-T were enrolled and randomized to BV+Len+R (n=32) and placebo+Len+R (n=35). Median OS was 15.6 months with BV+Len+R vs 4.4 months with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.2-0.75). Median PFS was 3.0 months with BV+Len+R vs 1.4 months with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.76). ORR was 65.6% (95% CI, 46.8%-81.4%) with BV+Len+R vs 25.7% (95% CI, 12.5%-43.3%) with placebo+Len+R (P=.0014); CR rate was 37.5% vs 11.4%, respectively. Conclusions BV+Len+R demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in all key efficacy outcomes, including CR and OS, in pts with 2 prior lines of therapy, disease refractory to prior treatment, or prior CAR-T. This treatment benefit was generally consistent with that observed in the overall ECHELON-3 study population. Therefore, BV+Len+R has the potential to address an unmet need for effective and tolerable therapy in heavily pretreated pts, as described above.

Despite the high initial responses to chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell therapy, most patients relapse within the first 1-2 years. T cell quality influences the success of CART cell therapies greatly, and T cells from cancer patients are prone to transition into dysfunctional states, such as exhaustion or senescence. The role of exhaustion in CART cell failures has been studied extensively; however, the role of T cell senescence has remained mostly unexplored. In this study, we aimed to determine the development of CART cell senescence and its impact on CART therapeutic efficacy. First, we studied the development of CART cell senescence using an in vitro model to induce CART cell dysfunction. Here, we cyclically activated CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T (CART19) cells (either costimulated via 4-1BB (BBζ) or CD28 (28ζ)). Activation cycles are designed to mimic recurrent activation of CART cells to study the impact of T cell activation on CART cell fates throughout treatment. We added a rest time in between activation cycles to focus on senesced CART cell populations since, unlike exhaustion, senescence is irreversible even after rest. We examined CART immunophenotype, cell cycle regulators, transcriptomic profile, senescence marker gene expressions and T cell effector functions on days 0 (D0-T cell), 8 (D8-baseline CART), and 15 (D15-CART cell after one activation/rest cycles). Following an activation/rest cycle, T cell exhaustion markers CTLA4, LAG3, and PD1 returned to basal levels after an initial increase due to activation, while only TIM-3 levels remained elevated (BBζ: p=0.0090, 28ζ: p=0.0394). Increased TIM-3 expression is associated with T cell senescence, which prompted us to further investigate the development of a senescence phenotype. We found a prominent T cell senescence phenotype in BBζ compared to 28ζ, as evident by increased expression of p53 (BBζ: p=0.0248), p21 (BBζ: p=0.0483), CD27 (BBζ: p=0.0080), CD28 (BBζ: p=0.0327), uPAR (BBζ vs. 28ζ: p<0.0001), and KLRG1 (BBζ vs. 28ζ: p=0.0029) in recurrently activated-rested CART cells. Next, we evaluated the transcriptomic signature of recurrently activated-rested CART cells. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) indicated enrichment of gene sets related to senescent T cells as well as senMayo, a novel gene set which is reported to be selectively enriched in senescing cells or tissues, in BBζ, but not in 28ζ, compared to T cell D0 or in BBζ D15 compared to 28ζ D15 (p=0.00014 and p=0.089, respectively). MYC-related gene sets were found to be significantly enriched in recurrently activated/rested BBζ and depleted in 28ζ (p<0.1). MYC expression is increased in BBζ (p= 0.0010) while decreased in 28ζ (p=0.0036) upon recurrent activation and is higher in BBζ (D8: p=0.0018, D15: p= 0.0022) compared to 28ζ at indicated time points by qPCR. Given these results, we induced senescence in CART cells using two alternative strategies: MYC-T58A activation (oncogene-induced senescence) and irradiation. Senescence induced by MYC-T58A overexpression ameliorated only BBζ killing (p=0.0057), whereas senescence induced by irradiation improved 28ζ killing (p= 0.0086), indicating versatile impact of senescence on treatment outcome diverse CART cell therapies. Finally, analysis with two independent patient data sets correlated the emergence of senescence with contradicting clinical outcomes to BBζ and 28ζ treatments. The presence of senescent 28ζ cells in the peripheral blood of 28ζ-treated patients was reported to be associated with complete response in the clinic in an independent analysis. In another cohort, 28ζ-treated patients with higher senescence score were correlated with longer disease-free survival (p=0.0029), while senMayo gene set enrichment in BBζ-treated patients was associated with non-response in the clinic (p=0.014). In the same cohort, MYC-related gene sets-the same genes sets enriched in our recurrently activated/rested BBζ-are also enriched in nonresponsive BBζ-treated patients. In summary, our study indicates that (i) CART cells are susceptible to a state of senescence, as demonstrated using three independent approaches (repeated activation/rest, irradiation, and MYC modulation), (ii) CART senescence is more prominent in BBζ than 28ζ, and (iii) senescence is associated with worse outcomes following BBζ but not 28ζ treatment.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematological malignancies. However, CAR T-cell therapy still has low durable response rates and common associated toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS). We recently reported that sequential therapy with the CD19 monoclonal antibody tafasitamab and CD19-directed CAR T (CART19, 41BBζ costimulated) cells significantly ameliorated CAR T-cell apoptosis and tumor cell pyroptosis, improving CAR T safety and efficacy (PMID: 37879074). Building on these findings, we hypothesized that controlling massive initial CAR T-cell stimulation by diminishing extensive tumor cell pyroptosis is critical to improve CAR T safety and durability. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated several caspase (Casp) inhibitors, including Casp1, Casp3, Casp7, and Casp11, in combination with CAR T cells. We found that the Casp1 inhibitor VX765 did not inhibit CAR T antigen-specific cytotoxicity and thus focused on VX765 in subsequent assays. We first assessed CAR T proliferation upon stimulation with the CD19+ JeKo-1 mantle cell lymphoma cell line in the presence of VX765. CAR T with vehicle control showed greater proliferation at day 3, but CAR T with VX765 showed higher proliferation at day 5 (p=0.03, absolute CD3+ counts by flow cytometry). We then co-cultured CAR T and JeKo-1 for 24 hours and observed a significant reduction in apoptotic CAR T (Annexin V+ and 7-AAD- via flow cytometry) in VX765-treated conditions (p=0.05). Additionally, there was significantly reduced pyroptosis (Annexin V+ 7-AAD+) (p=0.02) but higher apoptosis (Annexin V+ 7-AAD-) in JeKo-1 in VX765-treated conditions (p=0.04). VX765-treated CAR T showed higher Bcl2 expression via flow cytometry (p=0.03). We also studied tumor cell pyroptosis by measuring the level of HMGB-1. CART19, JeKo-1, and VX765 or vehicle control were co-cultured for 24 hours, and the level of HMGB-1 was found to be significantly reduced in VX765-treated conditions, indicating reduced tumor pyroptosis (p=0.006). We then assessed the impact of Casp1 inhibition in our in vitro model of CAR T exhaustion. We stimulated CAR T with CD19+ JeKo-1 every other day for 2 weeks and then assessed CCR7 and CD45RA expression on CAR T. VX765-treated CAR T showed higher central memory (p=0.08) and naïve (p=0.02) and lower terminally differentiated effector memory phenotypes (p=0.03). We next studied the effect of Casp1 inhibition with VX765 in vivo. To recapitulate CAR T-cell toxicities, including CRS, we utilized an immunocompetent mouse model. First, we generated murine CART19 (mCART19, CD28ζ costimulated) cells. Recipient mice were then engrafted with luciferase+ murine CD19+ TBL12 cells, a murine lymphoma cell line. Mice were treated 12 days later with cyclophosphamide (300 mg/kg, ip) and 24 hours after mice were imaged and randomized to receive 1 x 107, 1) untransduced T cell control (UTD), 2) mCART19 + vehicle control, or 3) mCART19 + VX765 (25 mg/kg). VX765 was given immediately before the CART19 injection and on day 2 post-CAR T injection. Mice were serially monitored and weighed to assess CAR T-cell toxicity. Tumor burden was assessed via weekly bioluminescent imaging. Mice treated with vehicle control showed a significant reduction in weight compared to the UTD control (p=0.02), while mice treated with VX765 maintained their weight and remained active without signs of CRS, including motor weakness and hunched body. UTD mice reached humane endpoints within 3 weeks after T-cell injection. Three satellite mice from each group were euthanized and spleens were harvested. Flow cytometric analysis showed a significant reduction in apoptotic CAR T (p=) and pyroptotic tumor cells in mice treated with VX765 (p=0.03). Western blot showed lower cleaved GSDME and GSDMD in mice treated with VX765. VX765-treated mice demonstrated prolonged CAR T persistence with durable anti-tumor activity. In summary, Casp1 inhibition with VX765 significantly reduced CAR T apoptosis, improved memory phenotype, and increased delayed CAR T proliferation. VX765 also reduced tumor cell pyroptosis and CRS incidence without impacting CAR T anti-tumor activity in vivo. Given the favorable preclinical outcomes and existing clinical data on VX765, this approach holds substantial translational potential for enhancing the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with large B-cell lymphoma.

Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel), a CD28-costimulated CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART19) product, was FDA-approved in 2020 after demonstrating remarkable efficacy in the pivotal ZUMA-2 trial of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, despite the impressive initial activity of CART19 cell therapy in MCL, most patients relapse within the first 3 years following treatment. Myeloid cells, such as monocytes and macrophages, have been demonstrated to be major inhibitors of other immune cells, including T cells. Growing evidence shows that monocytes and macrophages contribute to CART cell failure, although the exact mechanisms are not fully understood. To better understand the mechanisms contributing to CART treatment resistance in MCL, we first utilized brexu-cel products from patients with MCL on the ZUMA-2 trial to uncover their transcriptomic features by single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) analysis. To understand if myeloid cells had negative impacts on clinical outcomes, we then analyzed autologous baseline peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples by scRNAseq. Our analyses of the brexu-cel samples revealed reduced response to IL-1β and its downstream signaling pathway as well as impaired T cell functions in non-responders. Transcriptomic analyses of the autologous baseline monocyte populations showed downregulation of IL-1β production and its associated pathways as well as upregulation of M2 phenotype-associated genes and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) in non-responder monocytes, implying a potential role of myeloid cells in CART resistance through impairment of IL-1 signaling in brexu-cel products. To validate our findings from the ZUMA-2 samples, we further studied the interactions between macrophages, MCL cells, and CART19 cells in preclinical models. First, CD28-costimulated CART19 cells generated from healthy donors were cocultured with JeKo-1, a CD19+ MCL cell line, and freshly isolated monocytes or ex vivo differentiated M2-like macrophages. M2-like macrophages were generated by incubating fresh monocytes with rhGM-CSF followed by coculturing with JeKo-1. CART19 antigen-specific proliferation was significantly inhibited by M2-like macrophages but not fresh monocytes (JeKo-1+CART19 vs JeKo-1+M2+CART19, p=0.00503). Transwell assays indicated that suppression by M2-like macrophages was contact-independent. Cytokine profile analysis of coculture supernatants showed significant elevation of IL-1ra in M2-like macrophage cocultures (JeKo-1+Mono+CART19 vs JeKo-1+M2+CART19, p=0.0292). This led us to hypothesize that M2-like macrophages inhibit CART19 by secreting IL-1ra to block IL-1 signaling in CART19. To test this hypothesis, we interrogated the role of IL-1ra in CART19. CART19 + JeKo-1 cocultures were supplemented with IL-1β + IL-1ra or IL-1β + IL-1ra + IL-1ra neutralizing antibody (neuAb). CART19 proliferation was improved by IL-1β (vehicle control vs IL-1β, p<0.0001). IL-1ra inhibited IL-1β-dependent CART19 proliferation (IL-1β vs IL-1β+IL1ra, p=0.0006), which was restored by IL-1ra neutralization (IL-1β+IL-1ra vs IL-1β+IL-1ra+IL-1ra neuAb, p=0.0215). Next, we assessed the impact of IL-1ra on CART functions in mouse MCL xenografts in the presence of M2-like macrophages. NOD-SCID-γ-/- (NSG) mice were subcutaneously injected with 0.5 million of human macrophages and 1 million of luciferase+ JeKo-1. Mice were then randomized once tumor engraftment was confirmed by bioluminescence imaging (BLI), followed by treatment with 2 million CART19 with 10 mg/kg IL-1ra neuAb or control IgG for 3 weeks. Combination of CART19 cells and IL-1ra neuAb led to improved antitumor activity based on BLI measurements compared to control IgG (IL-1ra neuAb vs control IgG, p=0.0058). Additionally, expression of IL-1RI, receptor of IL-1β and IL-1ra, was measured on T cells after coculturing CART19, JeKo-1, and M2-like macrophages. M2-like macrophages downregulated IL-1RI expression on CART cells, which might potentially desensitize CART response to IL-1β, resulting in further suppression in CART proliferation (JeKo-1+M2+CART19 vs JeKo-1+CART19, p=0.001). Overall, our study elucidates a potential mechanism of IL-1 pathway modulation mediated by myeloid cells in contributing to CART19 failure in MCL.

Introduction: Adults older than 60 years constitute 20-25% of newly diagnosed classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and have inferior outcomes compared to younger patients (pts). Salvage therapy followed by an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is a potentially curative option for pts with relapsed/refractory (R/R cHL). There is limited data regarding outcomes of older adults with R/R cHL who undergo ASCT in the current era where novel agents are employed in the R/R setting, in comparison with younger patients. Methods: This multicenter, international, retrospective study of 18 participating institutions included adults with R/R cHL who underwent ASCT from January 1, 2010 through December 31 2020. Retrospective chart review was performed to collect data on patient and disease characteristics at relapse, including lines and type of salvage therapy, pre-ASCT response by PET, and use of brentuximab vedotin (BV) as consolidation post-ASCT. Study objectives were to assess progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the probability of non-relapse mortality (NRM) with relapse as a competing event. NRM was defined as death without preceding relapse. Results: Of the total 1172 adults with R/R cHL enrolled in the parent cohort, 96 (8.1%) were age 60 years or older at the time of ASCT. In this older cohort, the median age was 66 years (range: 60-72). 54 (56%) were age 60-64, 31 (32%) were of age 65-69 and 11 (11%) were of age 70-72. 59 (61%) were male, 63 (66%) had advanced stage disease, 17 (18%) had bulky disease, 37 (39%) had B symptoms and 38 (40%) had extranodal disease. All patients (pts) received ABVD or ABVD-like frontline therapy. The median time to relapse was 6 months (range: 0-174). 48 pts (50%) relapsed within a year after completion of frontline treatment and 25 (26%) had primary refractory disease. Salvage therapy prior to ASCT included platinum-based chemotherapy (65%), BV-based regimen (34%), and PD-1 inhibitor-based regimens (3%). 16 pts (16%) underwent ASCT after >1 line of salvage therapy and 75 (78%) underwent ASCT after achieving a complete metabolic response (CMR). 14 pts (14.6%) received BV consolidation. Median follow-up for entire population was 53.4 months (range: 0.3-199.0). In older adults, the 5-year PFS was 54.2% (CI95: 43.4-67.6) not statistically different compared to pts <60 years (67.7% (CI95: 64.3-71.3), p=0.2). However, 5-year OS was inferior in older adults: 71.9% (CI95: 43.4-67.6) vs. 82.6% (CI95: 43.4-67.6) in pts <60 years (p <0.0001)). In pts ≥60, 26 (27%) died including 12 (12.5%) without preceding relapse. Older adults had 3-month, 1-year and 5-year probability of NRM of 5.2% (CI95: 2.2-12.2), 7.5% (CI95: 3.6-15.3), and 10.9% (CI95: 5.8-20.8), respectively. NRM was significantly higher in older adults compared to pts <60 who had 3-month, 1-year and 5-year probability of NRM of 0.3% (CI95: 0.1-1.0), 0.9% (CI95: 0.5-1.7), and 2.5% (CI95: 1.6-3.9), respectively (p<0.0001). Older adults had 3-month, 1-year and 5-year probability of relapse of 1% (CI95: 0.2-7.3), 7.5% (CI95: 3.6-15.3), and 28.6% (CI95: 19.1-42.1), respectively, which did not differ significantly from younger pts (p=0.3) who had 3-month, 1-year and 5-year probability of relapse of 0.6% (CI95: 0.3-1.3), 5.1% (CI95: 3.8-6.6), and 29.9% (CI95: 26.6-33.5), respectively. Conclusions: Although older adults with cHL are more likely to relapse after frontline treatment, only a minority of pts (<10%) in this large multicenter cohort underwent ASCT at age ≥60. In select older adults who underwent ASCT, the risk of relapse was similar to younger pts, but NRM was significantly higher, especially in the early post-ASCT period. Detailed assessment of comorbidity scores, toxicities of salvage therapies, and prognostic factors will be presented at the conference.

CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T (CART19) cell therapy has shown outstanding clinical success. However, patients can develop CART-induced toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. Studies have found that activation of myeloid cells by granulocyte monocyte-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) can contribute to toxicity development. GM-CSF depletion leads to reduced myeloid activation, prevention of CART-induced toxicities, and improved CART efficacy. CART cells upregulate cytokine receptors upon activation, and our results indicate that CART19 cells significantly upregulate GMCSFR upon antigen-specific stimulation (<10% vs >30%, p<0.01). This led us to hypothesize that GMCSFR signaling contributes to CART cell activity. To understand the role of GM-CSFR upregulation on CART cell functions, we compared the impacts of neutralizing GM-CSF or blocking GM-CSF receptor alpha (GM-CSFRα) on CART19. First, 4-1BB-costimulated CART19 cells generated from healthy donors were stimulated with CD3/CD28 beads at a 1:3 ratio for 6 days. CART cells were maintained at 1 x 106/mL throughout the culture and supplemented with IgG isotype control, GM-CSF neutralizing antibody, or GM-CSFRα blockade at 10 μg/mL, 20 μg/mL, or 100 μg/mL. On day 6, cells were debeaded and rested for 2 days. Then, CART cells were cocultured with NALM6, a CD19+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line, at a ratio of 1:1 for 3 days. The cocultures were supplemented with the same doses of antibodies listed above. Antigen-specific proliferation of CART cells was measured by flow cytometry. Our data suggested that CART19 proliferated is not impacted by GM-CSF neutralization but is inhibited by GM-CSFRα blockade (IgG isotype vs 10 μg/mL GM-CSFRα blockade, p<0.0001; IgG isotype vs 20 μg/mL GM-CSFRα blockade, p<0.0001; IgG isotype vs 100 μg/mL GM-CSFRα blockade, p=0.009). CART cells were assessed in a cytotoxicity assay with NALM6 luciferase+ cells as well, which did not show significant impacts from GM-CSF neutralization or GM-CSFRα blockade. To evaluate the impacts of GM-CSF neutralization and GM-CSFRα blockade in a mouse model, we engrafted NSG mice with 1 million NALM6 luciferase+ cells intravenously. Mice were then treated with 1.4 million CART19 plus 10 mg/kg IgG isotype control, GM-CSF neutralizing antibody, or GM-CSFRα blockade intraperitoneally. GM-CSFRα blockade drastically suppressed antitumor activities of CART (CART19+GM-CSFRα blockade vs CART19+IgG isotype control, p<0.0001; CART19+GM-CSFRα blockade vs CART19+GM-CSF neutralizing antibody, p<0.0001; CART19+ GM-CSFRα blockade vs untransduced T cell, n.s.). Serum cytokines were analyzed 2 days after CART treatment, showing that mice with GM-CSFRα blockade had significantly lower levels of human IFNγ (p=0.0189) and IL-2 (p=0.0121) compared to IgG isotype control group, while GM-CSF neutralization did not show significant impacts. Mice treated with CART plus IgG isotype control or GM-CSF neutralizing antibody showed prolonged survival compared to mice treated with GM-CSFRα blockade or untransduced T cells (p=0.0285). To unravel the mechanisms behind functional differences between GM-CSFRα blockade and GM-CSF neutralization, CART cells (n = 3 biological replicates) were cocultured with NALM6 at a 1:1 ratio supplemented with 10 μg/mL GM-CSF neutralizing antibody, GM-CSFRα blockade, or IgG isotype control overnight, followed by T cell isolation, bulk RNA isolation, and RNA sequencing (RNAseq) analysis. Our RNAseq data indicated significant upregulation (Log2FC>0.5, padj. <0.05) of T cell exhaustion- and dysfunction-associated genes (RGS16, PDCD1, CTLA4, NR4A3, CD101, LAG3) as well as negative regulators of T cell functions (G0S2, PIK3IP1, LGALS3) in the GM-CSFRα blockade group compared to GM-CSF neutralizing antibody or IgG isotype control groups. T cell activation-associated pathways were enriched in the GM-CSFRα blockade group. Overall, our data show that GM-CSFRα blockade impacts CART functions differently from GM-CSF neutralization. Specifically, GM-CSFRα blockade inhibits CART proliferation in vitro and antitumor activity in vivo. Interestingly, GM-CSFRα blockade leads to enrichment of T cell exhaustion- and dysfunction-associated genes in CART19, which is worth further investigation. These findings may be applicable to other cytokine receptors upregulated on activated CART cells.

Introduction: Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) epcoritamab (Epco) and glofitamab (Glofit) are approved in the US for the treatment of patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs) based upon high response rates and manageable toxicity profiles reported in pivotal trials. However, data on outcomes for pts treated with BsAbs outside of clinical trials are limited. As such, we sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of Epco and Glofit for the treatment of pts with r/r LBCLs in real-world settings. Methods: We performed a retrospective study including 19 US centers evaluating pts with r/r LBCLs receiving commercially available Epco or Glofit between 2023 and 2024. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were extracted from medical records. Efficacy outcomes included overall response rate (ORR), complete and partial response (CR, PR) rates, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method. Key safety outcomes included cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Results: As of May 31, 2024, a total of 209 pts with r/r LBCLs were treated with Epco (n=139) or Glofit (n=70). Median age at BsAb start was 67 years (interquartile range [IQR] 58-76). Most were male (62.2%), and the most common histology was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=155 [74.2%]). Of pts with molecular testing (n=168), 34 (20.2%) had double/triple hit lymphoma. Most (78.9%) had Ann Arbor stage III-IV disease and 91% had an ECOG performance status of ≤1. Median number of lines of treatment before BsAb was 3 (range 1-12). Of pts with known response assessment following front-line therapy, 54 (32.1%) had primary refractory disease, defined as failure to achieve PR or CR to front-line therapy. Most pts (n=126 [60.3%]) received prior chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and 21 (10.0%) received prior autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplant. CD20 expression was assessed in 106 biopsies (50.7%) prior to BsAb and was positive in 90 (84.9%). A total of 172 pts were response-evaluable. The best ORR was 50.6%, with CR in 41 (23.8%), PR in 46 (26.7%), stable disease in 10 (5.8%), and progressive disease in 75 (43.6%). The ORR and CR rates were 49% and 23% for Epco, and 53% and 25% for Glofit, respectively. With a median follow-up of 5 months, the median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI 2.0, 3.9) and median OS was 7.2 months (95% CI 6.1, not reached [NR]). The estimated PFS and OS at six months were 35% (95% CI 29%-43%) and 59% (95% CI 52%-67%), respectively. For pts who relapsed after CAR T-cell therapy, the median PFS and OS were 2.5 (95% CI 1.8, 4.7) and 7.8 (95% CI 6.2, NR) months, respectively. Pts without detectable CD20 expression via immunohistochemistry or flow cytometry prior to BsAb therapy had significantly inferior outcomes (PFS 1.1 vs 3.4 months, P < 0.001 and OS 1.3 vs 13 months, P < 0.001) compared to pts with detectable CD20. CRS of any grade occurred in 82 pts (39.2%), corresponding to 51.1% and 28.6% of pts treated with Epco and Glofit, respectively. Grade ≥3 CRS occurred in 9 (4.3%), all of whom received Epco. CRS was treated with tocilizumab in 43 pts (53.1%). ICANS occurred in 24 (11.5%) pts; any grade ICANS occurred in 13.7% and 7.1% of pts treated with Epco and Glofit, respectively. Grade ≥3 ICANS occurred in 6 pts (2.9%), 5 of which received Epco (3.6%). Of those experiencing ICANS, 66.0% were treated with corticosteroids. Two pts had deaths attributed to ICANS and one to CRS. A total of 122 (58.4%) pts discontinued therapy after a median of 3 cycles (range 0-48), 91 (74.6%) due to disease progression and 31 (25.4%) due to adverse events (15 due to infection, 3 due to ICANS, 2 due to CRS, and 11 for other reasons). Conclusions: In this heavily pretreated group with adverse disease features and high rate of CAR T exposure, the response rates, PFS, and OS following BsAb therapy were lower compared to pivotal trials. Poor outcomes were observed for those without detectable CD20. Rates of ICANS and grade ≥3 CRS were higher than reported in pivotal trials, as was the rate of discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events. Future efforts to improve outcomes may include intensified dose escalation protocols to more rapidly achieve disease control, combination therapies, and characterization of clinicopathologic factors that predict response to BsAb to identify subgroups of pts who can derive maximal benefit from these agents.

Background/Objectives: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes symptoms similar to a mild cold for adults, but in case of infants, it causes bronchitis and/or pneumonia, and in some cases, mortality. Mucosal immunity within the respiratory tract includes tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells and tissue-resident memory B (BRM) cells, which provides rapid and efficient protection against RSV re-infection. Therefore, vaccine strategies should aim to generate mucosal immune responses. However, the interactions between RSV vaccines and mucosal immune responses within the respiratory tract are poorly understood. We evaluated a mucosal immune system following immunization by RSV vaccine with poly-sorbitol transporter (RSV-PST), a nanoparticle adjuvant. Methods: We intranasally immunized the RSV-PST and identified the systemic and mucosal immune responses. Furthermore, we challenged with RSV A2 strain after immunization and investigated the protective effects. Results: Consequently, antigen-specific CD8+ TRM cells were markedly elevated in the lung parenchyma, yet exhibited impaired cytokine expression. In contrast, humoral immunity, with systemic antibody production from serum, but not in the respiratory tract, was significantly increased by RSV-PST immunization. Interestingly, the production of respiratory mucosal antigen-specific IgG after RSV A2 challenge dramatically increased in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of the RSV-PST immunized group in the presence of FTY720, and the lung-infected RSV titer was significantly lower in this group. Furthermore, after RSV A2 challenge, CD69+ IgG+ BRM cells were significantly increased in lung tissues in the RSV-PST group. Conclusions: The RSV-PST vaccine has protective effects against RSV infection by promoting both systemic and local humoral immunity rather than cellular immunity.