Citations

ABSTRACTObjectiveThere is currently not a marker of disease severity in idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS). Our objective was to characterize iSGS patients' disease severity using endoscopic surgery rates.MethodsThis was a two‐center retrospective analysis of iSGS patients with a minimum of 4 years of follow up following an initial endoscopic procedure (laser wedge excision (LWE) or endoscopic dilation (ED)). Disease severity was classified into Groups A–C, based on whether patients had fewer (Group A), the same number (Group B), or more surgeries (Group C) in years 3–5 compared to years 1 and 2. Disease severity proportions were compared across institutions using chi‐square analysis. Nonparametric testing compared clinical characteristics such as age, BMI, and GERD across severity groups.ResultsThere were 104 patients from institution 1 and 53 patients from institution 2 that were all female and predominantly Caucasian. Both institutions had clinically and statistically similar proportions of patients in Group A (64% vs. 62%), Group B (20% vs. 19%), and Group C (16% vs. 19%) disease (p > 0.05). No clinical characteristic (e.g., age, sex, race, BMI, GERD) was associated with disease severity.ConclusionAcross tertiary care institutions there is a consistent proportion of iSGS patients who either demonstrate nonrecurrent/decelerating (Group A), stable but persistent (Group B), or rapidly recurring disease (Group C). Two‐year surgery rates appear to be an important timepoint for providing expectations to patients on the likelihood of possessing severe disease.Level of Evidence4

Purpose: To develop and validate an explainable machine learning (ML) tool to help clinicians predict the risk of propofol-associated hypertriglyceridemia in critically ill patients receiving propofol sedation. Methods: Patients from 11 intensive care units (ICUs) across five Mayo Clinic hospitals were included if they met the following criteria: a) ≥ 18 years of age, b) received propofol infusion while on invasive mechanical ventilation for ≥24 h, and c) had a triglyceride level measured. The primary outcome was hypertriglyceridemia (triglyceride >400 mg/dL) onset within 10 days of propofol initiation. Both COVID-inclusive and COVID-independent modeling pipelines were developed to ensure applicability post-pandemic. Decision thresholds were chosen to maintain model sensitivity >80%. Nested leave-one-site-out cross-validation (LOSO-CV) was used to externally evaluate pipeline performance. Model explainability was assessed using permutation importance and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: Among 3922 included patients, 769 (19.6%) developed propofol-associated hypertriglyceridemia, and 879 (22.4%) had COVID-19 at ICU admission. During nested LOSO-CV, the COVID-inclusive pipeline achieved an average AUC-ROC of 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70–0.72), while the COVID-independent pipeline achieved an average AUC-ROC of 0.69 (95% CI 0.68–0.70). Age, initial propofol dose, and BMI were the top three most important features in both models. Conclusion: We developed an explainable ML-based tool with acceptable predictive performance for assessing the risk of propofol-associated hypertriglyceridemia in ICU patients. This tool can aid clinicians in identifying at-risk patients to guide triglyceride monitoring and optimize sedative selection.

Abstract Rationale: Propofol can increase the risk of hypertriglyceridemia and subsequent pancreatitis in critically ill patients. It is unclear whether modifying or continuing sedation regimens in patients experiencing hypertriglyceridemia while on propofol infusion influences the development of adverse events such as acute pancreatitis. This study compared the clinical outcomes of patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) who had their propofol regimen modified versus continued following the detection of hypertriglyceridemia. Methods: A targeted trial emulation was conducted using retrospective data from 5 Mayo Clinic hospitals between 05/05/2018 and 06/30/2023. Inclusion criteria included: 1) receiving IMV and continuous propofol infusion for >24 hours, 2) experiencing triglyceride level >400 mg/dL while on propofol, and 3) still requiring IMV at 24-hours after hypertriglyceridemia onset. Patients were then categorized based on whether they had their propofol regimen modified (i.e., dose reduction by ≥50% or any reduction with alternative sedatives started) versus continued (no reduction or <50% reduction without alternative sedative initiation). Outcomes included 30-day ventilator-free days, successful extubation, acute pancreatitis (determined by chart review, in-duplicate), ICU and hospital length of stay, 30- and 90-days alive and at home, as well as all-cause mortality. Analyses were conducted using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights with adjustments for covariates selected a priori. Sensitivity analyses, where only benzodiazepines or benzodiazepines and ketamine were considered to be eligible alternative sedatives, were done. Results: During the study period, 728 patients were included, of whom 422 had their propofol regimen modified (Image). The two groups had similar demographics, comorbidities, and illness severity. We identified 14 cases of acute pancreatitis possibly attributable to propofol, with 9 cases in the modified and 5 cases in the continued regimen group (2.1% versus 1.6%; P=0.63). Following adjustment for covariates, there were no significant differences in any outcomes of interest. After censoring for mortality, there was no significant difference in the 30-day cumulative incidence of successful extubation when comparing those with their regimen modified versus continued (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.95; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.77 to 1.18; P=0.70). There was also no significant difference in the 90-day survival rate between the two groups (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.71 to 1.11; P=0.34). These findings remained consistent upon sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: There were no differences in outcomes among patients who had their propofol regimens modified versus continued following the detection of hypertriglyceridemia. Further prospective investigations are needed to identify the optimal strategy for managing sedative regimens in this patient population.

Abstract RATIONALE Propofol is the first-line sedative for critically-ill, mechanically-ventilated patients, but it can increase serum triglyceride levels. Machine-learning (ML) offers a promising approach for individualized risk stratification of propofol-associated hypertriglyceridemia, enabling proactive triglyceride monitoring and sedation optimization. This study aims to develop and validate ML models to predict hypertriglyceridemia risks in critically-ill patients receiving propofol. METHODS We analyzed retrospective data from adult ICU patients on mechanical ventilation receiving continuous propofol infusion for ≥24 hours across four Mayo Clinic sites from May 2018 to June 2023. The primary outcome was hypertriglyceridemia, defined as serum triglycerides >400 mg/dL within 10 days of starting propofol. Ten-fold cross-validation and leave-one-site-out nested cross-validation (LOSO-CV) were used for model tuning and external validation of our modeling process, respectively. Feature selection was conducted through a union of Boruta and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). While COVID status was a strong predictor of hypertriglyceridemia, we concurrently developed non-COVID models to ensure future relevance in non-pandemic settings. Six ML algorithms (logistic regression, support vector machines, random forests, LightGBM, XGBoost, and multilayer perceptrons) were tuned using Bayesian optimization to minimize cross-entropy loss. Classification thresholds were set to target sensitivity ≥80%. Model performance was evaluated using AUC-ROC, Brier score, sensitivity, and specificity. Models with the highest Youden's Index were designated the best-performing model. Model explainability was assessed using permutation importance and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). RESULTS We included 3922 eligible patients with triglyceride measurements. Of these, 3042 patients were COVID-negative and used for non-COVID modeling. The best-performing non-COVID models achieved an average AUC-ROC of 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.70), Brier score of 0.12 (95% CI 0.09-0.14), sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI 0.75-0.83), and specificity of 0.48 (95% CI 0.44-0.52) during LOSO-CV. The best-performing models that included COVID status achieved an average AUC-ROC of 0.71 (95% CI 0.70-0.72), Brier score of 0.13 (95% CI 0.10-0.16), sensitivity of 0.78 (95% CI 0.71-0.84), and specificity of 0.51 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.56) during LOSO-CV. The permutation importance results of the final non-COVID model are shown in the figure. CONCLUSION We have developed sensitive ML models for predicting hypertriglyceridemia risks in critically-ill patients receiving propofol. Although developed during the COVID-19 pandemic, the non-COVID models are more likely to have future relevance, and they have similar performance as models including COVID status. These models will be integrated into a web-based clinical calculator and undergo further validation in prospective studies.

Abstract The Phase 2 IMPRIME 1 study evaluated the combination of the pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) Imprime with the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pembrolizumab as second or later line of treatment (2 L+) for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Eligible patients with mTNBC received weekly Imprime (4 mg/kg) intravenously in combination with pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks). Primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Exploratory endpoints included correlations between immune cell activation markers in tumor tissues and blood and response to therapy. Of the 42 evaluable patients, six had a response (one complete, five partial), with an ORR of 14.3% by RECIST v1.1. Median PFS was 2.7 months, median OS was 16.4 months, and DCR was 54.8%, with responders achieving a median DoR of 15.2 months. Therapy was generally well tolerated and resulted in an increase of immune activation markers, with higher levels of activation in peripheral blood associated with response and improved survival. The combination of Imprime and pembrolizumab was safe and demonstrated immune activation in tumor tissues and peripheral blood in patients with TNBC. Improved response rates were observed compared to historical studies of ICI monotherapy in similar patient populations. Study number (ClinicalTrials.gov trial registration): NCT02981303.

Abstract Porous nanofibrous microspheres (PNMs) present a versatile and minimally invasive strategy for tissue regeneration, combining biomimetic morphology, tunable structure, and injectability. While self‐assembly and co‐axial electrospray are explored for PNM fabrication, these methods are limited in compositional versatility and production scalability. Here, a 3D‐printed microfluidic platform is presented that enables large‐scale fabrication of PNMs with precise control over size, pore architecture, and morphology. PNMs can be functionalized with bioactive molecules through UV crosslinking, enhancing their regenerative potential by promoting osteogenesis in human bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSCs), angiogenesis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), and exerting anti‐inflammatory effects on macrophages. Subcutaneous implantation in rats demonstrates that PNMs support cell infiltration, minimize fibrosis, and facilitate tissue integration, achieving complete cell penetration and tissue incorporation within 14 days. These findings establish PNMs as versatile, scalable, and customizable platforms, ideal for applications as injectable drugs or cell carriers, as well as powders, offering promising solutions for wound healing and tissue regeneration.

SummaryFrom a historical perspective, the treatment landscape of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) has experienced a standstill in terms of new approvals by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration up until the recent 5 years. The widespread availability of comprehensive genome sequencing has shed insight into human MDS biology toward the goal of rational therapeutic design. This new knowledge has inspired the development of investigational therapies that extend beyond the scope of traditional erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents and hypomethylating agents. We describe how these contemporary treatment options are changing the management paradigms for lower‐risk and higher‐risk MDS, based on the landmark trial data. We discuss investigational therapies in the MDS pipeline, such as venetoclax, emavusertib, canakinumab and olutasidenib. We highlight challenges and solutions to the successful translation of emerging therapies based on our improved understanding of the biology of MDS, including the genomics of MDS with mutated TP53. We discuss how the identification of biomarkers of response to therapeutics may help guide clinical trial design for certain subsets of patients. Finally, we discuss how multicentre randomized trials can help facilitate the clinical rollout of emerging MDS therapeutics.

Abstract Background: Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor B2 (LILRB2) suppresses immune cell activation, particularly within myeloid cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME), while the PD-1/PD-L1 axis serves as a key immune checkpoint that inhibits T-cell function. SPX-303 is a novel bispecific antibody designed to simultaneously block LILRB2 and PD-L1, thereby revitalizing antitumor immune responses. Here, we present initial findings from the ongoing first-in-human Phase 1 trial of SPX-303 in patients with advanced solid tumors, including safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and receptor occupancy (RO). Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter Phase 1 study for patients with advanced solid malignancies with 3+3 dose-escalation design, followed by an expansion cohort at the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). SPX-303 is administered intravenously every three weeks and safety is assessed through CTCAE v5.0 criteria. Primary Objectives of this study are to determine the safety, tolerability, and RP2D of SPX-303. Secondary endpoints include antitumor activity as well as characterization of the PK and PD of SPX-303. This study is currently open and enrolling in escalation cohorts. Citation Format: Justin Moser, Hao Xie, Yujie Zhao, Yousef Zakharia, Dongdong Li, Brandon William, Dinh-Duc Nguyen, Jack Hovey, Tiffany Li, Robert Cai, Jichun Ma, Jingdong Qin, Martin Siekierzycki, Anthony Haight, Hua Jin, Weiwei Mao, Kevin Bin Li, Gui-Dong Zhu. A first-in-human phase 1 study on the safety, PK, receptor occupancy, and pharmacodynamic markers of SPX-303, a first-in-class LILRB2×PD-L1 bispecific antibody [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT116.

Abstract Cancer can recur when a subset of tumor cells, denoted here as persister cells, are able to survive therapy and re-enter the cell cycle. The precise mechanisms that confer the persister state and whether it is characteristic of a subgroup of cells or arises from multiple cellular lineages remain poorly understood. We hypothesize that an epigenetic signature underlies the drug-tolerant persister state, characterized by transcriptional and chromatin accessibility changes that promote survival of residual cancer following chemotherapy. To identify clinically relevant features of persister cells in untreated tumors and residual disease, we performed single-cell multiomic profiling (snRNA+snATAC) on a cohort of non-malignant fallopian tube, treatment-naïve, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)-treated high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) samples. We identified differences in gene expression and open chromatin between naïve and residual patient tumors following chemotherapy. Although only a small proportion of the differentially expressed genes enriched in residual HGSOC overlapped with established gene sets for chemo-response and patient prognosis, the epigenomic analysis revealed activity of several DNA-binding factors that are both enriched upon chemotherapy and also high in resistant tumors prior to treatment. From this analysis, we identified an epigenetic signature that precedes expression and defines the persister state. This epigenetic signature also correlated with chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance using patient-derived xenograft models of HGSOC. Gene regulatory networks driven by the persister signature are involved in the activation of oncogenic pathways, including changes to the cell cycle promoting quiescence and stress response. Further study of the persister cells identified by this epigenetic signature may increase understanding of the mechanisms underlying persister cell survival and reveal new vulnerabilities that could be exploited to delay or prevent cancer recurrence.

ImportanceThe safety and effectiveness of combining surgical peripheral iridectomy (SPI) with goniosynechialysis (GSL) and goniotomy (GT) vs trabeculectomy for intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction remains unknown.ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and effectiveness at 1 year of SPI + GSL + GT vs trabeculectomy in advanced primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) without cataract.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted at 8 tertiary eye centers in China. A total of 88 Chinese patients (88 eyes) with advanced PACG without cataract were enrolled from January 2022 to July 2023. Data were analyzed from August 2024 to September 2024. Mean (SD) patient age was 60.3 (7.3) years, and 52 patients (59.1%) were female. Forty-three patients were randomized to SPI + GSL + GT and 45 were randomized to trabeculectomy; 86 patients (97.7%) completed the 12-month follow-up.InterventionsParticipants were randomized 1:1 to receive SPI + GSL + GT or trabeculectomy.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was IOP at 12 months (noninferior margin: 4 mm Hg). Secondary outcomes included surgical success (IOP: 5-18 mm Hg, ≥20% reduction from baseline, with or without antiglaucoma medications); postoperative complications and interventions, including bleb massage, suture lysis, or releasable sutures; and number of antiglaucomatous medications prescribed.ResultsAt 12 months, the SPI + GSL + GT group had a mean (SD) IOP of 15.6 (4.0) mm Hg vs 14.9 (4.2) mm Hg in the trabeculectomy group (difference, 0.5 mm Hg; 95% CI, −1.2 to 2.2; P = .55), which was within the 4-mm Hg noninferiority margin. Qualified success rates were 38 of 43 participants (88.4%) for SPI + GSL + GT and 42 of 45 participants (93.3%) for trabeculectomy (difference, −5.0%; 95% CI, −19.6% to 8.5%; P = .48). However, complete success rates were lower in the SPI + GSL + GT group (26 participants [60.5%]) vs the trabeculectomy group (37 participants [82.2%]; difference, −21.8%; 95% CI, −40.2% to −2.4%; P = .03). Postoperative complications were present for 8 participants (18.6%) in the SPI + GSL + GT group vs 9 participants (20.0%) in the trabeculectomy group (difference, −1.4%; 95% CI, −17.9% to 15.1%; P = .71). Postoperative interventions were lower in the SPI + GSL + GT group (3 participants [7.0%] vs 25 participants [55.6%]; difference, 48.6%; 95% CI, 32.2%-65.0%; P < .001). Median (IQR) numbers of medications used decreased from 2 (0-3) to 0 (0-1) in the SPI + GSL + GT group and from 2 (2-3) to 0 (0-0) in the trabeculectomy group (difference, −0.81; 95% CI, −1.36 to −0.26; P = .004).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized clinical trial among patients with advanced PACG without cataract, SPI + GSL + GT demonstrated noninferiority (4-mm Hg margin) to trabeculectomy for IOP at 12 months, with fewer interventions (including bleb massage, suture lysis, or releasable sutures) but no difference in postoperative medication use. This suggests SPI + GSL + GT as a potential alternative to trabeculectomy for similar cases, pending validation in larger sample sizes with smaller noninferiority margins.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05163951