Citations

AbstractObjectives: To determine the usefulness of social media for rapid communication with experts to discuss strategies for prioritization and safety of deferred treatment for urologic malignancies during COVID‐19 pandemic, and to determine whether the discourse and recommendations made through discussions on social media (Twitter) were consistent with the current peer‐reviewed literature regarding the safety of delayed treatment. Methods: We reviewed and compiled the responses to our questions on Twitter regarding the management and safety of deferred treatment in the setting of COVID‐19 related constraints on non‐urgent care. We chronicled the guidance published on this subject by various health authorities and professional organizations. Further, we analyzed peerreviewed literature on the safety of deferred treatment (surgery or systemic therapy) to make made evidence‐based recommendations. Results: Due to the rapidly changing information about epidemiology and infectious characteristics of COVID‐19, the health authorities and professional societies guidance required frequent revisions which by design take days or weeks to produce. Several active discussions on Twitter provided real‐time updates on the changing landscape of the restrictions being placed on non‐urgent care. For separate discussion threads on prostate cancer and bladder cancer, dozens of specialists with expertise in treating urologic cancers could be engaged in providing their expert opinions as well as share evidence to support their recommendations. Our analysis of published studies addressing the safety and extent to which delayed cancer care does not compromise oncological outcome revealed that most prostate cancer care and certain aspects of the bladder and kidney cancer care can be safely deferred for 2‐6 months. Urothelial bladder cancer and advanced kidney cancer require a higher priority for timely surgical care. We did not find evidence to support the idea of using nonsurgical therapies, such as hormone therapy for prostate cancer or chemotherapy for bladder cancer for safer deferment of previously planned surgery. We noted that the comments and recommendations made by the participants in the Twitter discussions were generally consistent with our evidence‐based recommendations for safely postponing cancer care for certain types of urologic cancers. Conclusion: The use of social media platforms, such as Twitter, where the comments and recommendations are subject to review and critique by other specialists is not only feasible but quite useful in addressing the situations requiring urgent resolution, often supported by published evidence. In circumstances such as natural disasters, this may be a preferable approach than the traditional expert panels due to its ability to harness the collective intellect to available experts to provide responses and solutions in real‐time. These real‐time communications via Twitter provided sound guidance which was readily available to the public and participants, and was generally in concordance with the peerreviewed data on safety of deferred treatment.

7044 Background: There is growing interest to implement electronic patient-reported outcomes in oncology practices for symptom monitoring. It is not well known what nurse, physician, and patient impressions of benefits, acceptability, and challenges are in routine care use. Methods: PRO-TECT is an ongoing U.S. national trial including 26 community oncology practices across 15 states that implemented PRO symptom monitoring [NCT03249090]. Patients complete weekly PROs between visits, nurses receive alerts for severe/worsening symptoms, and oncologists review PROs at office visits. Interviews were conducted with 147 stakeholders including nurses (N = 46), oncologists (N = 27), data managers (N = 15), and patients (N = 59). Each stakeholder group had different interview guides with overlapping topics to explore experiences with the PRO system. Interviews lasted 15-60 minutes, were digitally recorded, transcribed, and entered into a qualitative analysis software program. A codebook was developed from the research questions, interview guides, and discussions with the project team. Standardized coding methods were applied, with transcripts double coded for thematic analysis. Feedback surveys were also completed by nurses (N = 57), oncologists (N = 38), and patients (N = 435). Results: Key benefits perceived across stakeholder groups included increased patient self-awareness of symptoms; improved direct communication of patients with care teams; more open and honest conveying of symptom experiences; ability to track symptoms over time; and increased involvement of patients in their own care. Most stakeholders felt PRO symptom monitoring had a positive impact on quality of care delivery, and believed benefits of PROs outweighed necessary staff efforts. Challenges included additional work by nurses to review and respond to alerts, staff turnover requiring retraining, and limited time of oncologists. In the survey, 39/56 (70%) nurses felt the PRO system improved quality of care; 27/33 (82%) oncologists noted PROs were useful for team discussions and care delivery; and 320/434 (74%) patients agreed that weekly PRO reporting improved discussions with their care team. Conclusions: Clinicians and patients perceived weekly PRO symptom monitoring between visits to be valuable despite added staff effort. Results of additional analyses are forthcoming. Clinical trial information: NCT03249090 .

Abstract Background: The salivary gland is one of the most common sites of involvement by non-gastric extranodal marginal zone lymphomas of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT). This multicenter, international trial sought to characterize the clinical course, treatment and outcome of patients with salivary gland MALT lymphoma. Methods: Patients were identified from multiple international sites including the Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Database (n=89), three International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group (IELSG) cohorts (n=138), and the University of Athens (n=21). All patients had biopsy-confirmed MALT lymphoma of the salivary gland by WHO criteria. Clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were obtained from the respective patient databases. Survival probability was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups with the Wilcoxon or log-rank. The impact of variables on survival was assessed by the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Patients and clinical features: From 1983 to 2012, 247 patients with MALT lymphoma were included. Clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. The median age at diagnosis was 59, and the male-to-female ratio was 1:3. The majority of patients (76%) presented with limited stage disease, and the parotid gland was the most common site of involvement (78%). There was a history of antecedent autoimmune disease in 41% of patients, and Sjögren’s disease was the most common (83%). Treatment: Information on initial treatment was available on 242 patients. 137/242 patients (57%) initially received local therapy with either surgery (n=81), radiation (n=26), or both (n=30). Of these, 25 received adjuvant systemic therapy. 90/242 patients (37%) were treated initially with systemic therapy, of whom 54% had localized and 46% had stage IV disease. Rituximab was used alone (n=16) or in combination with chemotherapy (n=26) in 42 of the 90. 15/242 patients (6%) were initially observed. Survival: The median OS for all patients was 18.3 years. PFS following primary therapy was 9.3 years. There was no difference in the outcomes between patients receiving local or systemic therapy in first line for all patients, or for those with stage I or II disease. On univariate analysis age <60, stage, IPI, normal LDH, the presence of Sjögren’s disease, and treatment with rituximab were associated with improved overall survival. Age <60, low to intermediate IPI and normal LDH were associated with improved PFS. On multivariate analysis, age<60, and IPI were associated with improved OS and PFS and Sjögren’s disease was associated with improved OS. Relapse/progression: The site of progression was known in 51 of 76 patients who progressed. 15 (29%) patients progressed in the same salivary gland or regional nodes; in 16 (21%) recurrence involved the contralateral salivary gland; 20 (31%) had distant progression. Relapse histology was identified in 30. The most common pathology at relapse was MALT (n=28), with one patient progressing to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. A second patient developed a mantle cell lymphoma. Conclusions: Salivary gland MALT lymphoma commonly presents at an early stage, and has a favorable prognosis with a median OS of 18 years. Surgical or radiation therapy does not appear to have benefit over systemic therapy. Patients with Sjögren’s disease appear to have a better survival. The role of rituximab and optimal first-line therapy should be evaluated further in prospective trials. Table 1: Characteristics of 247 patients with salivary MALT Characteristic N (%) Age, median; range 59; 18-93 Sex, Male: Female 62: 185 (25: 75) Primary site of involvement Parotid 193 (78) Submandibular 12 (5) Other/not specified 42 (17) Extent (unilateral: bilateral) 89:21 Missing data 137 Autoimmune disorder* 101(41) Sjögren’s 84 (33) Rheumatoid arthritis 9 (4) Raynaud’s phenomenon 8 (3) Scleroderma 5 (2) Other 19 (8) Stage IE 147 (59) IIE 42 (17) IV 56 (23) Missing data 2 (1) IPI Score Low (0-1) 126 (51) Low-Intermediate (2) 20 (8) High-intermediate (3) 21 (8) High (4-5) 5 (2) Missing data 75 (31) Elevated LDH 17 (7) ECOG PS 0-1 246 2 1 Extranodal sites 1 58 (23) 2 187 (76) Missing data 2 (1) B symptoms 9 (4) * Percents may not equal 100 as some patients had more than one disorder. Figure One: Overall survival of patients with and without Sjögren’s disease Figure One:. Overall survival of patients with and without Sjögren’s disease Disclosures Nowakowski: Celgene, Morphosis: Consultancy. Zucca:Roche, Mundipharma, Novartis, Jannsen, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Objective: To determine the impact of histology on pathologic response, survival outcomes, and recurrence patterns in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Summary of Background Data: There is a paucity of data regarding comparative outcomes after neoadjuvant CRT between esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma. Methods: Between 2002 and 2015, 895 EC patients who underwent neoadjuvant CRT followed by esophagectomy at 3 academic institutions were retrospectively reviewed, including 207 patients with SCC (23.1%) and 688 patients with adenocarcinoma (76.9%). Pathologic response, survival, recurrence pattern, and potential prognostic factors were compared. Results: Pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was significantly higher for SCC compared with adenocarcinoma (44.9% vs 25.9%, P < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 52.9 months, 71 patients (34.3%) with SCC versus 297 patients (43.2%) with adenocarcinoma had recurrent disease (P = 0.023). For patients who achieved a pCR, no significant differences were found in recurrence pattern, sites, or survival end-points between the 2 histology groups. For non-pCR patients, the SCC group demonstrated significantly higher regional and supraclavicular recurrence rates but a lower hematogenous metastasis rate than adenocarcinoma patients, whereas the adenocarcinoma patients had a more favorable locoregional failure-free survival (P = 0.005) and worse distant metastasis-free survival (P = 0.024). No differences were found in overall survival (P = 0.772) or recurrence-free survival (P = 0.696) between groups. Conclusions: SCC was associated with a significantly higher pCR rate than adenocarcinoma. Recurrence pattern and survival outcomes were significantly different between the 2 histology subtypes in non-pCR patients.

Objective: To discern recurrence risk stratification and investigate its influence on postoperative surveillance in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Background: Reports documenting recurrence risk stratification in EAC after neoadjuvant CRT are scarce. Methods: Between 1998 and 2014, 601 patients with EAC who underwent neoadjuvant CRT followed by esophagectomy were included for analysis. The pattern, site, timing, and frequency of the first recurrence and potential prognostic factors for developing recurrences were analyzed. This cohort was used as the training set to propose a recurrence risk stratification system, and the stratification was further validated in another cohort of 172 patients. Results: A total of 150 patients (25.0%) achieved pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant CRT and the rest were defined as the non-pCR group (n = 451) in the training cohort. After a median follow-up of 63.6 months, the pCR group demonstrated a significantly lower locoregional (4.7% vs 19.1%) and distant recurrence rate (22.0% vs.44.6%) than the non-pCR group (P < 0.001). Based on independent prognostic factors, patients were stratified into 4 recurrence risk categories: pCR with clinical stage I/II, pCR with clinical stage III, non-pCR with pN0, and non-pCR with pN+, with corresponding 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of 88.7%, 65.8%, 55.3%, and 33.0%, respectively (P < 0.001). The risk stratification was reproducible in the validation cohort. Conclusions: We proposed a recurrence risk stratification system for EAC patients based on pathologic response and pretreatment clinical stage. Risk-based postoperative surveillance strategies could be developed for different risk categories.

Abstract Background. The salivary gland is one of the most common sites involved by nongastric, extranodal marginal zone lymphomas of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT). A large series of patients with long-term follow-up has not been documented. This multicenter, international study sought to characterize the clinical characteristics, treatment, and natural history of salivary gland MALT lymphoma. Methods. Patients with biopsy-confirmed salivary gland MALT lymphoma were identified from multiple international sites. Risk factors, treatment, and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Results. A total of 247 patients were evaluated; 76% presented with limited-stage disease. There was a history of autoimmune disorder in 41%, with Sjögren disease being the most common (83%). Fifty-seven percent of patients were initially treated with local therapy with surgery, radiation, or both; 37 of patients were treated with systemic therapy initially, with 47% of those receiving rituximab; and 6% of patients were observed. The median overall survival (OS) was 18.3 years. The median progression-free survival (PFS) following primary therapy was 9.3 years. There was no difference in the outcomes between patients receiving local or systemic therapy in first-line management. On multivariate analysis, age &lt;60 years and low to intermediate international prognostic index were associated with improved OS and PFS; Sjögren disease was associated with improved OS. Conclusion. Salivary gland MALT lymphoma has an excellent prognosis regardless of initial treatment, and patients with Sjögren disease have improved survival. Risks for long-term complications must be weighed when determining initial therapy. Implications for Practice: Patients with salivary gland extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) have an excellent prognosis, particularly those with associated Sjögren's disease. A wide range of available therapies may provide similar durable rates of disease control and survival. Therefore, an important goal in selection of therapy should be to minimize morbidity from treatment. When determining initial therapy for these patients, practitioners should consider the potential side effects and long-term toxicities of treatment.