Citations

Lack of treatment fidelity can be an important source of variation affecting the credibility and utility of outcomes from behavioral intervention research. Development and implementation of a well-designed treatment fidelity plan, especially with research involving underserved populations, requires careful conceptualization of study needs in conjunction with what is feasible in the population. The purpose of this article is to review a fidelity-monitoring plan consistent with the National Institutes of Health Behavior Change Consortium guidelines (e.g., design, training, delivery, receipt, and enactment) for an intervention trial designed to improve physical activity and nutrition among immigrant and refugee families. Description of the fidelity monitoring plan is provided and challenges related to monitoring treatment fidelity in a community-based participatory intervention for immigrant and refugee families are discussed.

Purpose: The authors designed a community-based participatory research study to develop and test a family-based behavioral intervention to improve cancer literacy and promote mammography among Navajo women. Method: Using data from focus groups and discussions with a community advisory committee, they adapted an existing questionnaire to assess cancer knowledge, barriers to mammography, and cancer beliefs for use among Navajo women. Questions measuring health literacy, numeracy, self-efficacy, cancer communication, and family support were also adapted. Results: The resulting questionnaire was found to have good content validity, and to be culturally and linguistically appropriate for use among Navajo women. Conclusions: It is important to consider culture and not just language when adapting existing measures for use with AI/AN (American Indian/Alaskan Native) populations. English-language versions of existing literacy measures may not be culturally appropriate for AI/AN populations, which could lead to a lack of semantic, technical, idiomatic, and conceptual equivalence, resulting in misinterpretation of study outcomes.

Patients with lung cancer report more disease burden and lower spiritual well-being (SWB) compared with other cancer patients. Understanding variables that lessen disease burden and improve SWB is essential. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between motivational level for physical activity and SWB in patients with lung cancer. Linear regression showed increased SWB as stage of change for physical activity increased (p < 0.0001), even after adjusting for multiple demographic variables.

Abstract B24 Purpose Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States for which no recommended screening guidelines are available. An estimated 34,290 deaths related to PC is expected to occur in 2008 and the 5-year relative survival rate for this cancer is 5% for all stages combined. A person's chance of developing this cancer increases three-fold if a first-degree relative has pancreatic cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess attitudes of unaffected family members in the Mayo Clinic Pancreas Cancer Family study toward PC cancer risk and future screening options. This is the first study to report such attitudes of PC family members. Subjects and Methods At-risk family members with two or more relatives affected with pancreas cancer in the kindred and primary care controls completed a survey asking about: perceived PC risk, degree of PC worry/concern, attitude toward cancer screening in general, and intentions regarding PC screening if it were a blood test or endoscopic ultrasound. Results 386 family members in 109 PC kindreds and 1058 controls completed surveys. Forty-six percent of PC family members reported that it was likely they would develop PC during their lifetime compared to 6% of controls. Forty-one percent of family members reported having thoughts regarding the possibility of getting pancreatic cancer during the past month versus 4.6% of controls. Similarly, 74% of family members reported concern about getting PC as compared to 40.6% of controls. 94% of family members reported they would be likely to undergo a blood-based PC screening test compared to 89.7% of controls. For endoscopic ultrasound, 71% of family members would be likely to undergo screening as compared to 55% of controls. All comparisons were statistically significant. Conclusion Compared to controls, PC family members perceive their personal PC risk to be high and report a higher rate of PC-related cancer worry/concern. A high percentage of family members and controls indicate receptivity to PC screening, especially if it were a blood test. If the screening is more invasive (i.e. EUS), interest declines, particularly among controls. This information can help investigators to understand and address potential motivators and barriers to recruitment for future PC studies and indicates that there is a need to develop educational interventions among these families to reduce their actual and perceived pancreatic cancer risk. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2008;1(7 Suppl):B24.

Abstract Background: Increasing colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) is important for attaining the Healthy People 2020 goal of reducing CRC-related morbidity and mortality. Evaluating CRCS trends can help identify shifts in CRCS, and specific groups that might be targeted for CRCS. Methods: We utilized medical records to describe population-based adherence to average-risk CRCS guidelines from 1997 to 2008 in Olmsted County, MN. CRCS trends were analyzed overall and by gender, age, and adherence to screening mammography (women only). We also carried out an analysis to examine whether CRCS is being initiated at the recommended age of 50. Results: From 1997 to 2008, the size of the total eligible sample ranged from 20,585 to 21,468 people. CRCS increased from 22% to 65% for women and from 17% to 59% for men (P &lt; 0.001 for both) between 1997 and 2008. CRCS among women current with mammography screening increased from 26% to 74%, and this group was more likely to be adherent to CRCS than all other subgroups analyzed (P &lt; 0.001).The mean ages of screening initiation were stable throughout the study period, with a mean age of 55 years among both men and women in 2008. Conclusion: Although overall CRCS tripled during the study period, there is still room for improvement. Impact: Working to decrease the age at first screening, exploration of gender differences in screening behavior, and targeting women adherent to mammography but not to CRCS seem warranted. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(2); 347–50. ©2011 AACR.