Citations

Background Randomized trials have shown equivocal outcomes between a direct aspiration as first-pass technique (ADAPT) and stent retriever (SR) stroke thrombectomy, yet whether specific patient subgroups benefit differentially from one technique over the other remains unknown. Methods In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, patients with large vessel occlusion were included, and those who underwent ADAPT versus SR first-pass thrombectomy (either as standalone or combined with aspiration) were compared. The primary outcome was a composite of first-pass effect (FPE, modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2c or better with one attempt) with no symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). A causal forest model was used to estimate the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) for each patient, with larger CATEs indicating that ADAPT is expected to be more advantageous. Patients were stratified by CATEs, and outcomes were compared between treatment groups. Results Among 6700 included patients, ADAPT (n=3695, 55%) was associated with a higher rate of FPE with no sICH (39.9% vs 26.9%; adjusted OR (aOR) 2.07, 95% CI 1.77 to 2.41, P<0.001). The causal forest identified significant treatment effect heterogeneity (interaction P<0.001), where ADAPT was more advantageous in more recent years and among patients with M1 occlusions presenting in earlier time windows. Low-CATE patients showed no statistically significant difference between techniques (aOR 0.91, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.45, P=0.70), while medium- and high-CATE patients demonstrated progressively larger ADAPT advantages (aOR 2.06, 95% CI 1.67 to 2.55, and aOR 2.99, 95% CI 2.24 to 3.98, respectively, both P<0.001). Conclusions ADAPT may be superior to SR for a majority of patients, particularly in recent years, and among patients with M1 occlusions presenting in earlier time windows.

OBJECTIVE Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute large-vessel occlusion stroke is well established, yet its role in patients presenting with minor stroke symptoms (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score < 6) remains unclear. Prior studies have not accounted for intraprocedural factors that may influence outcomes in this subgroup. METHODS The authors analyzed 5693 patients from the STAR (Stroke and Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry), including 398 with low NIHSS scores, to evaluate the association between procedure time (PT) and outcomes. Among patients with low NIHSS scores, propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes between those with PT ≤ 35 versus > 35 minutes, a cutoff defined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The authors performed a meta-analysis of studies reporting best medical management (BMM) outcomes in patients with low NIHSS scores. To compare these with EVT-treated patients, a matched BMM comparator cohort using stratification on pooled baseline characteristics was constructed. Outcomes included 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores 0–2), intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality. RESULTS PT had a stronger negative effect on outcomes in patients with low NIHSS scores compared with those with high scores, with a steeper decline in functional independence per minute of PT (slope: –0.45% vs –0.21%; p = 0.03 for interaction). Among patients with low scores, PT ≤ 35 minutes was associated with higher 90-day functional independence compared with the propensity score–matching cohort with PT > 35 minutes (82.6% vs 59.0%, p < 0.001). When benchmarked against BMM (75.2% mRS scores 0–2), patients undergoing EVT within 35 minutes had superior outcomes (85.1%, p = 0.047). In contrast, EVT with PT > 35 minutes resulted in worse outcomes than BMM (mRS scores 0–2: 59.8%, p = 0.008). The number needed to treat for PT ≤ 35 minutes was 10, whereas PT > 35 minutes yielded a number needed to harm of 6. CONCLUSIONS PT critically modulates the benefit of EVT in minor stroke. While efficient EVT yields better outcomes than BMM, prolonged procedures are associated with harm. These findings may explain prior inconsistent evidence on EVT in patients with low NIHSS scores and underscore the need to individualize procedural thresholds in this population.

Lay Summary This meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials compares the effectiveness of using high-definition scopes with virtual chromoendoscopy vs dye chromoendoscopy for detecting dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Overall, the odds of dysplasia detection were not significantly different between dye chromoendoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy.

Abstract Background Recent trials have furthered uncertainty regarding the endovascular benefit for medium vessel occlusions (MeVO). Stent retrievers (SR) were employed in the first attempt in most interventional arm participants. We sought to compare outcomes in acute MCA M2 occlusions between frontline aspiration and SR, and to delineate procedural and anatomical covariates associated with differential treatment effect. Methods Retrospective analysis of a multicenter stroke thrombectomy cohort identified cases of MT for M2 occlusions. Unmatched and propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts were generated comparing frontline aspiration to standalone and combined SR. The primary outcome was functional independence (mRS 0–2) at 90 days. Recanalization, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), mortality, and the effect of M2 laterality, division occlusion and procedure time were assessed. Results About 1734 patients with M2 occlusions underwent either frontline aspiration (n = 711) or SR/combined (n = 958) thrombectomy between 2013 and 2024. PSM analysis favored aspiration for functional independence (49.9% vs 44.0%, OR 1.27 (1.03–1.57)), complete recanalization (61.2% vs 48.7%, OR 1.66 (1.34–2.05)), complete first pass effect (35.0% vs 27.6%, OR 1.42 (1.13–1.78)), and sICH (3.5% vs 6.2%, OR 0.55 (0.33–0.91)), with no difference in mortality. Frontline aspiration had significantly shorter procedural times (median 28 [IQR 15–49.5] vs 51 [IQR 35–78] minutes; p &lt; 0.001). For every minute increase in procedure time, the probability of functional independence decreased significantly (p &lt; 0.001) less with frontline aspiration (0.35%) compared to SR/combined (1.61%). Conclusion Frontline aspiration for M2 occlusions resulted in better clinical and angiographic outcomes compared to SRs. Future trials for MeVO with a focus on contact aspiration thrombectomy may succeed where recent trials have failed.

Background Contact aspiration remains a frontline approach for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Early evidence correlates catheter size with procedural efficiency and clinical outcomes. Larger‐bore (LB) aspiration catheters may enhance clot ingestion, increase aspiration force, and facilitate faster and more complete recanalization. However, the transition from standard LB catheters (0.068‐0.072″) to super‐large‐bore (SLB, ≥0.080″) devices has raised questions regarding both safety and clinical benefit. Although the use of SLB catheters is increasing, comparative data on their performance versus LB catheters remain limited. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SLB compared with LB catheters including data from a large multicenter international registry. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients with AIS due to LVO treated at 46 international stroke centers between January 2013 and June 2025. Among eligible patients, propensity score matching (PSM) at a 5:1 ratio was used to balance baseline characteristics between those treated with standard LB catheters and those treated with SLB catheters. Safety endpoints included intraprocedural complications, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), distal embolization, and 90‐day mortality. Efficacy endpoints included functional independence at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0‐2), successful recanalization (TICI ≥2b), first‐pass effect (TICI ≥2b on the first aspiration attempt), and procedural timing to TICI2b. Results A total of 3,100 patients were included (LB n=3,024; SLB n=67). After PSM (LB n=335; SLB n=67), safety outcomes were comparable between groups in terms of intraprocedural complications occurred (p=0.5), sICH (p>0.9), embolization to new territory (p=0.2), and 90‐day mortality (p>0.9). Efficacy outcomes were similarly consistent for functional independence (mRS 0‐2) (p>0.9), successful recanalization (p>0.9), first‐pass effect (p=0.5), and time to TICI ≥2b (27.6 vs. 24.5 minutes; p=0.9). These findings remained consistent in the subgroup with ICA and M1 occlusions, with no significant differences in safety (intraprocedural complications [p=0.4], sICH [p>0.9], embolization to new territory [p=0.6], or 90‐day mortality [p>0.9], nor in efficacy outcomes (functional independence at 90 days [p>0.9], successful recanalization [p=0.9], first‐pass effect [p=0.6], and time to TICI ≥2b [p=0.9]). Conclusion In this large multicenter analysis, the use of SLB aspiration catheters demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy to standard LB catheters for MT in AIS. Despite theoretical advantages in aspiration dynamics, SLB devices did not confer significant procedural or clinical benefit over LB catheters. These findings suggest that while SLB catheters are a feasible alternative, technical and clinical outcomes remain comparable to LB catheters. Further prospective studies are warranted to clarify potential clinical advantages. image