Casaletto, Kaitlin B.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONHigher male prevalence in sporadic behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) has been reported. We hypothesized differences in phenotypes between genetic and sporadic bvFTD females resulting in underdiagnosis of sporadic bvFTD females.METHODSWe included genetic and sporadic bvFTD patients from two multicenter cohorts. We compared behavioral and cognitive symptoms, and gray matter volumes, between genetic and sporadic cases in each sex.RESULTSFemales with sporadic bvFTD showed worse compulsive behavior (p = 0.026) and language impairments (p = 0.024) compared to females with genetic bvFTD (n = 152). Genetic bvFTD females had smaller gray matter volumes than sporadic bvFTD females, particularly in the parietal lobe.DISCUSSIONFemales with sporadic bvFTD exhibit a distinct clinical phenotype compared to females with genetic bvFTD. This difference may explain the discrepancy in prevalence between genetic and sporadic cases, as some females without genetic mutations may be misdiagnosed due to atypical bvFTD symptom presentation.Highlights Sex ratio is equal in genetic behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), whereas more males are present in sporadic bvFTD. Distinct neuropsychiatric phenotypes exist between sporadic and genetic bvFTD in females. Phenotype might explain the sex ratio difference between sporadic and genetic cases.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Sex differences are apparent in neurodegenerative diseases but have not been comprehensively characterized in frontotemporal dementia (FTD). METHODS Participants included 337 adults with autosomal dominant FTD enrolled in the ALLFTD Consortium. Clinical assessments and plasma were collected annually for up to 6 years. Linear mixed‐effects models investigated how sex and disease stage are associated with longitudinal trajectories of cognition, function, and neurofilament light chain (NfL). RESULTS While sex differences were not apparent at asymptomatic stages, females showed more rapid declines across all outcomes in symptomatic stages compared to males. In asymptomatic participants, the association between baseline NfL and clinical trajectories was weaker in females versus males, a difference that was not present in symptomatic participants. DISCUSSION In genetic FTD, females show cognitive resilience in early disease stages followed by steeper clinical declines later in the disease. Baseline NfL may be a less sensitive prognostic tool for clinical progression in females with FTD‐causing mutations. Highlights Females with genetic FTD exhibit overall steeper increases in plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) than males. Females with genetic FTD outperform NfL levels in asymptomatic stages compared to males. Once symptomatic, females with genetic FTD decline more rapidly than males. Plasma NfL is a stronger prognostic marker in asymptomatic males than females.

AbstractBackgroundGrowth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF15) is a TGF‐beta superfamily protein upregulated during immune‐mediated stress responses. Peripheral GDF15 is linked to adverse aging across organ systems including the brain. Immune dysregulation is implicated in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) pathogenesis. We examined how plasma GDF15 levels associated with longitudinal cognitive and neurofilament light chain (NfL) trajectories in adults with FTD and controls. Furthermore, we tested the utility of GDF15 as a prognostic biomarker against common inflammatory proteins (CRP and IL6).Method231 adults with FTD (24.35% sporadic FTD syndromes; 19.19% MAPT; 19.56% GRN; 22.14% C9orf72 pathogenic carriers) and 40 normal controls from the ALLFTD Consortium completed longitudinal neuropsychological testing and a blood draw with plasma analyzed on SomaScan V4.0 (baseline only: GDF15, CRP, and IL6) and Simoa (longitudinal: NfL). CRP and IL6 were selected as control markers to test the specificity of GDF15. Linear mixed effects models separately examined longitudinal cognition (global, executive functioning, memory, and language z‐scores) and plasma NfL levels as a function of baseline plasma GDF15, time, and their interaction, controlling for baseline age, sex, and education. Parallel models were conducted for CRP and IL6.ResultIn the whole cohort, higher baseline plasma GDF15 levels associated with steeper global cognitive decline (b = ‐3.91, p = 0.0092) and NfL accumulation (b = 3.88, p = 0.00088) over time. When examining cognitive domains, we found GDF15 only associated with worse executive functioning trajectories (b = ‐3.19, p = 0.0021). In contrast, baseline levels of CRP and IL6 did not display statistically significant relationships with cognitive or NfL trajectories. Prognostic effects of GDF15 remained statistically significant when restricting analyses to those with FTD pathogenic variants (b = ‐2.98, p = 0.0054 [global cognition], b = 2.69, p = 0.0098 [NfL]).ConclusionAdults with FTD and higher baseline peripheral GDF15 levels exhibit accelerated cognitive decline and neurodegeneration. Our results support GDF15 as a potential prognosticator of adverse clinical outcomes in FTD and highlight the relevance of GDF15‐specific pathways in FTD progression. Plasma GDF15 may provide utility over commonly examined inflammatory proteins and further work to explore its clinical value is indicated.

AbstractBackgroundAccumulating evidence indicates that biological sex may influence clinical manifestation within the spectrum of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), implying differences in cognitive reserve. Nonetheless, investigations into the impact of biological sex during the preclinical and minimally symptomatic stages of FTLD are lacking.MethodWe included 275 mutation carriers (158 females; 127 with C9orf72, 68 with GRN, and 80 with MAPT mutations) and 161 non‐carrier familial controls (97 females) from the ALLFTD Consortium (Staffaroni et al., Nat Medicine 2022). Participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; 348 baseline, 338 longitudinal) and neuropsychological evaluations (394 baseline, 507 longitudinal). Behavioral symptoms were characterized with the Revised Self‐Monitoring Scale (RSMS) and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI severity scores). MRI‐derived regional volume estimates (RVE) were computed. Cognitive measures and RVE were normalized against sex‐matched controls. Cognitive composites (language, executive function, and visuospatial function) were calculated by averaging raw scores for each domain. Clinical characteristics and RVE comparisons were made between male and female participants. We adopted the residuals approach to explore behavioral and cognitive reserve by fitting a linear regression model for executive z‐scores as the response value and age, education, and RVE as explanatory variables.ResultIn mutation carriers, sex was not a significant differentiator in age, education level, disease severity, or mutation frequency. Most mutation carriers (188, 68%) were asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic at baseline. However, female mutation carriers exhibited significantly lower visuospatial performance at baseline (Cohen's d = ‐0.34, 95% CI[‐0.58, ‐0.09], p=.001). This difference remained significant among asymptomatic GRN mutation carriers (Cohen’s d = ‐0.73, 95% CI[‐1.22, ‐0.23], p=0.003) but not in other mutations. Following the residuals approach, female mutation carriers showed higher executive performance than males for the same amount of both frontotemporal and global atrophy as quantified by RVE (Cohen's d=0.45, 95 % CI[0.22, 0.67], p<.001). The observed higher executive reserve in women was particularly pronounced in C9orf72 carriers (Cohen's d=0.77, 95% CI[0.35, 1.20], p<.001) but not significant in GRN (p=0.48) and MAPT carriers (p=0.07). No differences in behavioral reserve reached statistical significance.ConclusionFemale sex might modulate early cognitive performance and confer higher executive reserve in FTLD mutation carriers.

AbstractBackgroundThe earliest cognitive manifestations of asymptomatic and prodromal familial frontotemporal dementia (f‐FTD) mutation carriers are still being characterized. Patients with symptomatic FTD are known to be error prone, particularly on tasks of executive function, but little is known about the frequency or predictive utility of these errors in the earliest stages of f‐FTD. The current study compared error rates on executive functioning tasks in controls and asymptomatic and prodromal mutation carriers and investigated whether errors predict worsening clinical status as follow up.MethodThis study included 90 participants (mean age = 48.57, SD = 13.30; 51.1% female; 86.67% white) with pathogenic FTD mutations (C9orf72, n = 45; GRN, n = 30; or MAPT, n = 15) who were asymptomatic or prodromal (Clinical Dementia Rating plus FTLD; CDR®+NACC‐FTLD ≤ 0.5). Propensity score matching identified (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0) who did not carry pathogenic mutation but were matched on age, education, and sex. Regressions were used to compare controls and mutation carriers on error scores (rule violations and/or repetitions) from three executive functioning tasks: design fluency, lexical fluency, and Stroop inhibition. Mutation carriers with longitudinal data within 1.5 years were binarized as stable (n = 35) or progressors (n = 13) based on whether their CDR®+NACC‐FTLD sum of boxes score was worse at follow up (mean follow up = 1.07 years). Regressions were fit to evaluate the relationship between baseline error scores and group (i.e., stable vs. progressor).ResultMutation carriers committed significantly more errors than controls on the Stroop task (β = 0.67, p = 0.03) and lexical fluency (repetitions: β = 0.27, p = 0.02). The groups did not significantly differ in errors on the remaining tasks. A greater number of Stroop errors predicted mutation carriers who progressed at follow up (β = 1.04, p<0.001). When introducing the primary outcome from each task as a covariate (e.g., correct responses), the fluency task (repetitions: β = 0.10, p = 0.03) and Stroop task (errors: β = 0.82, p<0.001) were significantly associated with progression.ConclusionErrors on executive tasks may be early cognitive features in familial FTD. Importantly, errors were uniquely predictive above and beyond total scores. Research in larger samples will enable investigations of genetic differences in error rates.

AbstractBackgroundMany treatments targeting frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) are in the developmental pipeline, but the rarity of the disease, coupled with the behavioral and motor features of FTLD, make it challenging to identify sufficient trial participants who can attend frequent in‐person visits. Decentralized clinical trial designs with remote evaluations are attractive alternatives but require validated tools for symptom tracking. Our previous cross‐sectional analyses showed that cognitive tasks deployed via the ALLFTD Mobile App are reliable and sensitive to early stages of disease. The current study seeks to evaluate whether unsupervised smartphone cognitive tests are sensitive to longitudinal changes that occur with increasing FTLD disease stage.MethodThe study included 194 participants (mean baseline age 54.30, SD = 15.66; mean education = 16.52, SD = 2.31; 55.2% women) who were asymptomatic (Clinical Dementia Rating plus FTLD (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD) = 0 [n = 109; 43 carriers of FTLD‐associated genetic variants]), prodromal (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0.5 [n = 39]), or symptomatic (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD>0.5 [n = 46]) at baseline. Participants completed ALLFTD Mobile App smartphone versions of Stroop, flanker, and 2‐back tasks, as well as an adaptive associative memory task, every six months for up to two years. Linear‐mixed effects models investigated the effect of disease severity on cognitive trajectories by testing the interaction of baseline CDR®+NACC‐FTLD box score and time on smartphone test scores. Analyses were repeated in the subsample of asymptomatic/prodromal CDR®+NACC‐FTLD<1) familial FTLD mutation carriers (C9orf72, n = 27; MAPT, n = 16). All models controlled for age, education, and sex.ResultGreater baseline disease severity was associated with lower cognitive scores across all tasks (β range: ‐0.28 to ‐0.13; p’s < 0.001), and faster rates of decline on the memory and 2‐back tasks (β range: ‐0.15 to ‐0.07; p’s<0.04). When the sample was restricted to asymptomatic and prodromal individuals (CDR®+NACC FTLD<1), greater baseline disease severity was still associated with lower scores across most tasks (β range: ‐0.48 to ‐0.27; p’s<0.002; 2‐back: β = ‐0.19, p = 0.26). When the sample was restricted to asymptomatic/prodromal mutation carriers, disease severity remained associated with the memory and flanker tasks (β range: ‐0.85 to ‐0.45; p’s<0.01).ConclusionThis study provides initial evidence that longitudinal smartphone‐based cognitive measurements capture the accelerated cognitive worsening that accompanies increasing disease progression in FTLD.

AbstractBackgroundThe Uniform Data Set (UDS) neuropsychological battery, administered across Alzheimer’s Disease Centers (ADC), includes memory tests but lacks a list‐learning paradigm. ADCs often supplement the UDS with their own preferred list‐learning task. Given the importance of list‐learning for characterizing memory, we aimed to develop a harmonized memory score that incorporates UDS memory tests while allowing centers to contribute differing list‐learning tasks.MethodWe applied item‐banking confirmatory factor analysis to develop a composite memory score in 5,287 participants (mean age 67.1; SD = 12.2) recruited through 18 ADCs and four consortia (DiverseVCID, MarkVCID, ALLFTD, LEADS) who completed UDS memory tasks (used as linking‐items) and one of five list‐learning tasks. All analyses used linear regression. We tested whether memory scores were affected by which list‐learning task was administered. To assess construct validity, we tested associations of memory scores with demographics, disease severity (CDR Box Score), an independent memory task (TabCAT Favorites, n = 675), and hippocampal volume (n = 811). We compared performances between cognitively unimpaired (n = 279), AD‐biomarker+ MCI (n = 26), and AD‐biomarker+ dementia (n = 98). In a subsample with amyloid‐ and tau‐PET (n = 49), we compared memory scores from participants with positive vs negative scans determined using established quantitative cutoffs.ResultModel fit indices were excellent (e.g., CFI = 0.998) and factor loadings were strong (0.43‐0.93). Differences in list‐learning task had a negligible effect on scores (average Cohen’s d = 0.11). Higher memory scores were significantly (p’s<.001) correlated with younger age (β = ‐0.18), lower CDR Box Scores (β = ‐0.63), female sex (β = 0.12), higher education (β = 0.19), larger hippocampal volume (β = 0.42), and an independent memory task (β = 0.71, p<0.001). The memory composite declined in a stepwise fashion by diagnosis (cognitively unimpaired>MCI>AD dementia, p<0.001). On average, amyloid‐PET positivity was associated with lower composite scores, but was not statistically significant (β = ‐0.34; p = 0.25; d = 0.40). Tau‐PET positivity was associated with worse performance, demonstrating a large effect size (β = ‐0.75; p<0.002; d = 0.91).ConclusionThe harmonized memory score developed in a large national sample was stable regardless of contributing list‐learning task and its validity for cross‐cohort ADRD research is supported by expected associations with demographics, clinical measures, and Alzheimer’s biomarkers. A processing script will be made available to enhance cross‐cohort ADRD research.

AbstractBackgroundSex differences in neurodegenerative diseases can impact accurate diagnosis and management. Emerging data suggest there may be sex differences in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) prevalence and clinical manifestation. However, prior studies lacked longitudinal assessment and were limited in capturing sex differences in earliest stages of disease (e.g., preclinical). We evaluated how sex impacts longitudinal clinical outcomes in individuals carrying autosomal dominant variants for FTD.Method337 participants carrying pathogenic variants in MAPT, GRN, or C9orf72 completed longitudinal evaluations (2.4 average visits, range = 1‐6), including neuropsychological and functional assessments, and plasma analyzed for neurofilament light chain (NfL). FTLD Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (FTLD‐CDR) classified disease stage at study entry (FTLD‐CDR = 0: asymptomatic; FTLD‐CDR = 0.5: MCI; FTLD‐CDR> 0.5: Dementia). Linear mixed‐effects models evaluated the effect of sex on longitudinal clinical trajectories, including the effect of disease stage at study entry.ResultMale and female carriers were similarly distributed with respect to baseline demographics and most clinical outcomes. However, women exhibited higher baseline NfL than men. Not accounting for disease stage, men and women did not show statistical differences on cognitive, functional, or NfL trajectories. However, when accounting for disease stage, there was a significant interaction between baseline disease stage, sex, and time on cognitive, NfL, and functional trajectories. While sex differences were not statistically significant among asymptomatic carriers, women with MCI/dementia evidenced more rapid cognitive, NfL and functional decline over time compared to men. To evaluate the role of pathology burden, we tested the interaction between baseline NfL, sex, and time on clinical outcomes stratified by disease stage. In asymptomatic participants, women showed an attenuated adverse relationship between baseline NfL and clinical trajectories compared to men. No statistically significant sex differences were evident in the relationship between baseline NfL and clinical outcomes in participants with MCI/dementia.ConclusionIn familial FTD, women evidenced steeper clinical declines than men after symptom onset. Accounting for pathology, baseline NfL was a stronger predictor of clinical decline in asymptomatic men compared to women. NfL may be a less sensitive prognostic tool for clinical progression in women with FTD, particularly early in disease. This may reflect early “cognitive resilience” to neurodegeneration in women.

AbstractBackgroundFrontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a common young‐onset dementia. Challenges to in‐person FTD evaluations (e.g., behavioral symptoms, disease rarity), highlight the need to develop remote, low‐burden assessment techniques. A growing literature supports passive digital phenotyping for monitoring neurobehavioral change. Thus, we examined the utility of passively collected data from smartphones to detect prodromal or symptomatic FTD compared to that of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a common cognitive screener.Method199 adults enrolled in the ALLFTD Mobile App study (mean age = 53.4 [SD = 15.2]; 58% women) completed up to 6 months of passive smartphone monitoring via the ALLFTD Mobile App. 55% were unimpaired [CDR®+NACC FTLD = 0], 22% had prodromal FTD [CDR®+NACC FTLD = 0.5], and 23% had symptomatic FTD [CDR®+NACC FTLD≥1] with a variety of syndromic presentations. Battery percentage was collected frequently (median interval = 45 min), and total daily battery usage was calculated as a proxy for smartphone use (higher battery usage = more smartphone use). Daily step counts were also passively collected. Logistic regression classified prodromal or symptomatic FTD vs. unimpaired as a function of: MoCA score [Model 1]; 7 passive features characterizing average, inter‐day variability, and changes over time in smartphone use and movement [Model 2]; or passive smartphone features and MoCA [Model 3]. Analyses were repeated excluding participants with symptomatic FTD to detect prodromal FTD vs. unimpaired.ResultThe area under the curves (AUCs) for detecting prodromal or symptomatic FTD (vs. unimpaired) from the MoCA alone [Model 1] and passive smartphone features alone [Model 2] were 0.77 (95%CI: 0.70‐0.85) and 0.77 (95%CI: 0.70‐0.84), respectively. Their combination [Model 3] resulted in a significantly improved AUC of 0.86 (95%CI: 0.80‐0.92) compared to Model 1 (p = 0.001). Significant Model 3 predictors included average daily battery usage (p = 0.02), slopes of change in step count (p = 0.04), and MoCA score (p<0.01). When distinguishing prodromal FTD from unimpaired, passive smartphone features alone (AUC = 0.75) were significantly better than the MoCA alone (AUC = 0.66; p<0.01), and their combination had the largest AUC (0.80).ConclusionResults support the utility of novel passively collected information from smartphones for detecting and monitoring FTD without contributing to assessment burden. With continued validation, passive digital monitoring methodologies have potential to increase access to dementia care.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONCardiovascular health is important for brain aging, yet its role in the clinical manifestation of autosomal dominant or atypical forms of dementia has not been fully elucidated. We examined relationships between Life's Simple 7 (LS7) and clinical trajectories in individuals with autosomal dominant frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD).METHODSTwo hundred forty‐seven adults carrying FTLD pathogenic genetic variants (53% asymptomatic) and 189 non‐carrier controls completed baseline LS7, and longitudinal neuroimaging and neuropsychological testing.RESULTSAmong variant carriers, higher baseline LS7 is associated with slower accumulation of frontal white matter hyperintensities (WMHs), as well as slower memory and language declines. Higher baseline LS7 associated with larger baseline frontotemporal volume, but not frontotemporal volume trajectories.DISCUSSIONBetter baseline cardiovascular health related to slower cognitive decline and accumulation of frontal WMHs in autosomal dominant FTLD. Optimizing cardiovascular health may be an important modifiable approach to bolster cognitive health and brain integrity in FTLD.Highlights Better cardiovascular health associates with slower cognitive decline in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Lifestyle relates to the accumulation of frontal white matter hyperintensities in FTLD. More optimal cardiovascular health associates with greater baseline frontotemporal lobe volume. Optimized cardiovascular health relates to more favorable outcomes in genetic dementia.