Yballa, Claire

AbstractBackgroundMedial temporal lobe (MTL) atrophy is an early feature of multiple neurodegenerative diseases. In genetic frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD, i.e. individuals carrying GRN, MAPT, or C9orf72 mutations), MTL atrophy can occur 10‐15 years before symptom onset. We aimed to better characterize MTL atrophy patterns in presymptomatic and symptomatic genetic FTLD using a multi‐atlas segmentation pipeline that allows precise measurement of MTL subregions.MethodParticipants included a diagnostically mixed sample of familial FTLD mutation carriers (MAPT: N=87; C9orf72: N=117; GRN: N=65) and 142 non‐carrier family member controls from the ALLFTD study cohort (Table 1). T1‐weighted MRIs were preprocessed using a multi‐atlas automated pipeline (Automatic Segmentation of Hippocampal Subfields [ASHS]) to segment the amygdala, anterior and posterior hippocampus, and MTL cortices: entorhinal cortex (ERC), perirhinal cortex or Brodmann areas (BA) 35 and 36, and parahippocampal cortex (PHC). Following rigorous quality control and manual correction (Figure 1), we assessed bilateral volume differences in mutation carriers compared to controls, adjusted for age, sex, and total intracranial volume. Analyses were conducted separately for symptomatic (FTLD‐Clinical Dementia Rating Global Score&ge;0.5) and presymptomatic (Global Score=0) mutation carriers.ResultOut of 413 scans, 317 (76.8%) segmentations passed quality control while 94 (22.8%) needed some manual edits—this was more common in symptomatic than presymptomatic carriers (32% versus 15%, p=0.001). Three scans were excluded (<1%; 2 complete scans, 1 for selected subregions) due to insufficient landmark visibility in symptomatic GRN and MAPT carriers. In symptomatic carriers, all MTL subregions demonstrated reduced volume compared to controls, although MAPT carriers exhibited particularly marked atrophy, especially in anterior MTL subregions (Table 2; amygdala, ERC, BA35, hippocampus). Presymptomatic MAPT and C9orf72 carriers also exhibited significant atrophy of primarily anterior MTL cortices, while presymptomatic GRN carriers only exhibited significantly smaller ERC volume compared to controls.ConclusionMTL atrophy is present in genetic FTLD across mutation carriers, even at the presymptomatic stage. Anterior MTL subregions, which are also susceptible to neuropathologic accumulation in early Alzheimer’s disease and Limbic‐predominant age‐related TDP‐43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE‐NC), tend to be more vulnerable than posterior subregions. Unsurprisingly, MAPT carriers show the greatest MTL atrophy compared to controls across groups.

AbstractBackgroundMedial temporal lobe (MTL) atrophy is an early feature of multiple neurodegenerative diseases. In genetic frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD, i.e. individuals carrying GRN, MAPT, or C9orf72 mutations), MTL atrophy can occur 10‐15 years before symptom onset. We aimed to better characterize MTL atrophy patterns in presymptomatic and symptomatic genetic FTLD using a multi‐atlas segmentation pipeline that allows precise measurement of MTL subregions.MethodParticipants included a diagnostically mixed sample of familial FTLD mutation carriers (MAPT: N = 87; C9orf72: N = 117; GRN: N = 65) and 142 non‐carrier family member controls from the ALLFTD study cohort (Table 1). T1‐weighted MRIs were preprocessed using a multi‐atlas automated pipeline (Automatic Segmentation of Hippocampal Subfields [ASHS]) to segment the amygdala, anterior and posterior hippocampus, and MTL cortices: entorhinal cortex (ERC), perirhinal cortex or Brodmann areas (BA) 35 and 36, and parahippocampal cortex (PHC). Following rigorous quality control and manual correction (Figure 1), we assessed bilateral volume differences in mutation carriers compared to controls, adjusted for age, sex, and total intracranial volume. Analyses were conducted separately for symptomatic (FTLD‐Clinical Dementia Rating Global Score≥0.5) and presymptomatic (Global Score = 0) mutation carriers.ResultOut of 413 scans, 317 (76.8%) segmentations passed quality control while 94 (22.8%) needed some manual edits—this was more common in symptomatic than presymptomatic carriers (32% versus 15%, p = 0.001). Three scans were excluded (<1%; 2 complete scans, 1 for selected subregions) due to insufficient landmark visibility in symptomatic GRN and MAPT carriers. In symptomatic carriers, all MTL subregions demonstrated reduced volume compared to controls, although MAPT carriers exhibited particularly marked atrophy, especially in anterior MTL subregions (Table 2; amygdala, ERC, BA35, hippocampus). Presymptomatic MAPT and C9orf72 carriers also exhibited significant atrophy of primarily anterior MTL cortices, while presymptomatic GRN carriers only exhibited significantly smaller ERC volume compared to controls.ConclusionMTL atrophy is present in genetic FTLD across mutation carriers, even at the presymptomatic stage. Anterior MTL subregions, which are also susceptible to neuropathologic accumulation in early Alzheimer’s disease and Limbic‐predominant age‐related TDP‐43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE‐NC), tend to be more vulnerable than posterior subregions. Unsurprisingly, MAPT carriers show the greatest MTL atrophy compared to controls across groups.

AbstractBackgroundThe Uniform Data Set (UDS) neuropsychological battery, administered across Alzheimer’s Disease Centers (ADC), includes memory tests but lacks a list‐learning paradigm. ADCs often supplement the UDS with their own preferred list‐learning task. Given the importance of list‐learning for characterizing memory, we aimed to develop a harmonized memory score that incorporates UDS memory tests while allowing centers to contribute differing list‐learning tasks.MethodWe applied item‐banking confirmatory factor analysis to develop a composite memory score in 5,287 participants (mean age 67.1; SD = 12.2) recruited through 18 ADCs and four consortia (DiverseVCID, MarkVCID, ALLFTD, LEADS) who completed UDS memory tasks (used as linking‐items) and one of five list‐learning tasks. All analyses used linear regression. We tested whether memory scores were affected by which list‐learning task was administered. To assess construct validity, we tested associations of memory scores with demographics, disease severity (CDR Box Score), an independent memory task (TabCAT Favorites, n = 675), and hippocampal volume (n = 811). We compared performances between cognitively unimpaired (n = 279), AD‐biomarker+ MCI (n = 26), and AD‐biomarker+ dementia (n = 98). In a subsample with amyloid‐ and tau‐PET (n = 49), we compared memory scores from participants with positive vs negative scans determined using established quantitative cutoffs.ResultModel fit indices were excellent (e.g., CFI = 0.998) and factor loadings were strong (0.43‐0.93). Differences in list‐learning task had a negligible effect on scores (average Cohen’s d = 0.11). Higher memory scores were significantly (p’s<.001) correlated with younger age (β = ‐0.18), lower CDR Box Scores (β = ‐0.63), female sex (β = 0.12), higher education (β = 0.19), larger hippocampal volume (β = 0.42), and an independent memory task (β = 0.71, p<0.001). The memory composite declined in a stepwise fashion by diagnosis (cognitively unimpaired>MCI>AD dementia, p<0.001). On average, amyloid‐PET positivity was associated with lower composite scores, but was not statistically significant (β = ‐0.34; p = 0.25; d = 0.40). Tau‐PET positivity was associated with worse performance, demonstrating a large effect size (β = ‐0.75; p<0.002; d = 0.91).ConclusionThe harmonized memory score developed in a large national sample was stable regardless of contributing list‐learning task and its validity for cross‐cohort ADRD research is supported by expected associations with demographics, clinical measures, and Alzheimer’s biomarkers. A processing script will be made available to enhance cross‐cohort ADRD research.