Josephson, Michelle A.

Background: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and preterm delivery are associated with higher long-term cardiovascular, metabolic, and kidney disease risk. Their implications for living kidney donation remain uncertain. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 498 female living kidney donors (2000–2017) from the Mayo Clinic Living Donor Program with documented pregnancy histories, pre-donation CT angiography, implantation kidney biopsy, and measured GFR. Donors with prior HDP (n=45), GDM (n=18), or preterm delivery (n=65) were compared with donors without adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO; n=385). Kidney morphometry, histology, and function were analyzed with adjustment for age at donation and first pregnancy, parity, and hypertension. Post-donation kidney outcomes were assessed using surveys and medical record review. Results: Donors with prior HDP and GDM had higher BMI at donation (+7.9% and +8.9%; p=0.006 and 0.04), whereas donors with preterm delivery had lower BMI (−4.8%; p=0.03) compared with donors with no APO. After adjustment, donors with HDP showed no differences in kidney volumes, biopsy features, or kidney function at donation or during follow-up. Donors with GDM had larger total and cortical kidney volumes (9.5–10%), less arterial luminal stenosis, and higher 5-year post-donation eGFR (+15%; p=0.03). Donors with preterm delivery had a lower risk of eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (HR 0.28; p=0.03). Conclusions: Prior adverse pregnancy outcomes were not associated with adverse kidney structure at donation or accelerated kidney function decline post-donation. These findings support that APO history alone should not preclude living kidney donation when other eligibility criteria are met.

Background. Kidney transplantation confers substantial survival and quality of life benefits for many patients with end-stage kidney disease compared with dialysis, but complications and side effects of immunosuppression can impair participation in daily life activities. Life participation is a critically important patient-reported outcome for kidney transplant recipients but is infrequently and inconsistently measured in trials. We convened a consensus workshop on establishing an outcome measure for life participation for use in all trials in kidney transplantation. Methods. Twenty-five (43%) kidney transplant recipients/caregivers and 33 (57%) health professionals from 8 countries participated in 6 facilitated breakout group discussions. Transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results. Four themes were identified. Returning to normality conveyed the patients’ goals to fulfill their roles (ie, in their family, work, and community) and reestablish a normal lifestyle after transplant. Recognizing the diverse meaning and activities of “life” explicitly acknowledged life participation as a subjective concept that could refer to different activities (eg, employment, recreation, family duties) for each individual patient. Capturing vulnerability and fluctuations posttransplant (eg, due to complications and side-effects) distinguished between experiences in the first year posttransplant and the long-term impact of transplantation. Having a scientifically rigorous, feasible, and meaningful measure was expected to enable consistent and frequent assessment of life participation in trials in kidney transplantation. Conclusions. A feasible and validated core outcome measure for life participation is needed so that this critically important patient-reported outcome can be consistently and meaningfully assessed in trials in kidney transplantation to inform decision making and care of recipients.