Back to Authors

Scott, Christiaan

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3874-1704

Mayo Clinic

University of Ottawa

Citations 7

Identifying global trends from case reports of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a scoping review
Scott, Christiaan, Mukaddam, Mona Al, Davis, Michelle, Cunto, Carmen L. De, Hsiao, Edward C. , Pignolo, Robert J., Schwegler, Odette , Artyomenko, Alexander, Croskery, Kim, Hanman, Kate, Sanchot, Boris, Warnants, Emma , Kaplan, Frederick S., Scott, Christiaan , Hsiao, Edward C , Scott, Christiaan, Mukaddam, Mona Al, Davis, Michelle, Cunto, Carmen L. De, Pignolo, Robert J., Schwegler, Odette , Artyomenko, Alexander, Croskery, Kim, Hanman, Kate, Sanchot, Boris, Warnants, Emma , Kaplan, Frederick S.

Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease | December 18, 2025 | Volume: 17 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/1759720x251407060 Get It

Background: Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra-rare, disabling, genetic disorder characterized by progressive heterotopic ossification (HO). FOP care pathways are complex, and there are many underrepresented patients globally. Objectives: This scoping review aimed to identify global FOP case reports and investigate real-world management practices. Evidence sources, eligibility criteria, and charting methods: International/local databases and congress proceedings were searched. Publications reporting patient-level data for ⩾1 patient with an FOP primary diagnosis, published January 2000–January 2024, were eligible. Publication details, patient demographics, disease presentation, and care pathway were extracted. Data were charted through categorization of themes and frequency analyses. Results: Of 6064 publications screened, 369 were eligible, reporting on 541 patients with FOP. Most publications (82.4% (304/369)) reported an individual case; the remaining reported 2–25 cases. Cases were from 57 countries, most commonly in the Asia/Pacific region (47.0% (254/541)). Most patients had reportedly seen a single specialist (64.8% (59/91)), and care from multidisciplinary teams was reported for only 5.5% (5/91). HO (84.7% (458/541)) and great toe malformations (66.7% (361/541)) were the most commonly reported signs, though mobility limitations (46.2% (96/208)) and growths/lesions (38.5% (80/208)) were most common before diagnosis. The predominant drug classes reported for FOP treatment were corticosteroids (52.6% (102/194)) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (39.7% (77/194)). Surgeries were reported in 35.1% (190/541) of patients. Where specified, the most common surgery types were malformation correction/bone resection (43.6% (78/179)) and biopsies (34.1% (61/179)). Conclusion: This scoping review synthesized valuable real-world insights from case reports of FOP, potentially supporting outreach initiatives in underserved regions and facilitating shared learnings on diagnosis and treatment. Although the inherent selection bias of case studies toward atypical cases limits definitive conclusions, some global trends in the clinical management practices were revealed.
Medical guidelines for fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva
Kaplan, Frederick S. , Mukaddam, Mona Al , Hidalgo‐Bravo, Alberto , Brown, Matthew A. , Cali, Amanda, Crowe, C. R., Cunto, Carmen L. De, Delai, Patricia , Diecidue, Robert J. , Friedman, Clive, Grunwald, Zvi, Haga, Nobuhiko , Kitterman, Joseph A., Levy, Charles E. , Morhart, Rolf, Netelenbos, J.C., Shore, Eileen M. , Zasloff, Michael , Pignolo, Robert J. , Al Mukaddam, Mona , Hidalgo Bravo, Alberto , Brown, Matthew , Friedlander, Lisa , Hsiao, Edward C , Shore, Eileen M , Pignolo, Robert J , Kaplan, Frederick S , Baujat, Geneviève , Cho, Tae‐Joon , Crowe, Corrie, Cunto, Carmen De , Eekhoff, Elisabeth M. W. , Hsiao, Edward C. , Keen, Richard , Madhuri, Vrisha , Scott, Christiaan , Zhang, Ke‐Qin

JBMR Plus | September 11, 2025 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 11 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jbmrpl/ziaf150 Get It

Abstract Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra-rare genetic condition characterized by congenital malformations of the great toes and progressive heterotopic ossification (HO) in specific anatomic patterns. Present management summarized here is focused on early diagnosis, assiduous avoidance of injury and iatrogenic harm, symptomatic amelioration of painful flare-ups, and optimization of residual function. Twenty-one members of the International Clinical Council on FOP (ICC) and seven consultants from 15 countries, chosen for their clinical expertise in FOP, developed this summary statement. Further advances in therapeutics will be based on rigorous clinical trials to assess novel and emerging treatment and prevention strategies. A detailed and updated exploration of the topics outlined in this brief perspective can be found in “The Medical Management of Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: Current Treatment Considerations” which can be found on the International Clinical Council on FOP (ICC) website (www.iccfop.org).
Most Fractures Treated Nonoperatively in Individuals With Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Heal With a Paucity of Flareups, Heterotopic Ossification, and Loss of Mobility
Lindborg, Carter M., Mukaddam, Mona Al , Baujat, Geneviève , Cunto, Carmen L. De, Delai, Patricia , Haga, Nobuhiko , Morhart, Rolf, Ruiter, Ruben D. de , Scott, Christiaan , Pignolo, Robert J. , Al Mukaddam, Mona, Cho, Tae‐Joon , Cunto, Carmen De , Eekhoff, Elisabeth M. W. , Hsiao, Edward C. , Seemann, Petra , Szczepanek, Małgorzata, Tabarkiewicz, Jacek , Kaplan, Frederick S.

Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research | May 8, 2023 | Volume: 481 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2447-2458

10.1097/corr.0000000000002672 Get It

Abstract Background Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultrarare genetic disorder with episodic and progressive heterotopic ossification. Tissue trauma is a major risk factor for flareups, heterotopic ossification (HO), and loss of mobility in patients with FOP. The International Clinical Council on FOP generally recommends avoiding surgery in patients with FOP unless the situation is life-threatening, because soft tissue injury can trigger an FOP flareup. Surprisingly little is known about flareups, HO formation, and loss of mobility after fractures of the normotopic (occurring in the normal place, distinct from heterotopic) skeleton when treated nonoperatively in patients with FOP. Questions/purposes (1) What proportion of fractures had radiographic evidence of union (defined as radiographic evidence of healing at 6 weeks) or nonunion (defined as the radiographic absence of a bridging callus at 3 years after the fracture)? (2) What proportion of patients had clinical symptoms of an FOP flareup because of the fracture (defined by increased pain or swelling at the fracture site within several days after closed immobilization)? (3) What proportion of patients with fractures had radiographic evidence of HO? (4) What proportion of patients lost movement after a fracture? Methods We retrospectively identified 36 patients with FOP from five continents who sustained 48 fractures of the normotopic skeleton from January 2001 to February 2021, who were treated nonoperatively, and who were followed for a minimum of 18 months after the fracture and for as long as 20 years, depending on when they sustained their fracture during the study period. Five patients (seven fractures) were excluded from the analysis to minimize cotreatment bias because these patients were enrolled in palovarotene clinical trials (NCT02190747 and NCT03312634) at the time of their fractures. Thus, we analyzed 31 patients (13 male, 18 female, median age 22 years, range 5 to 57 years) who sustained 41 fractures of the normotopic skeleton that were treated nonoperatively. Patients were analyzed at a median follow-up of 6 years (range 18 months to 20 years), and none was lost to follow-up. Clinical records for each patient were reviewed by the referring physician–author and the following data for each fracture were recorded: biological sex, ACVR1 gene pathogenic variant, age at the time of fracture, fracture mechanism, fracture location, initial treatment modality, prednisone use at the time of the fracture as indicated in the FOP Treatment Guidelines for flare prevention (2 mg/kg once daily for 4 days), patient-reported flareups (episodic inflammatory lesions of muscle and deep soft connective tissue characterized variably by swelling, escalating pain, stiffness, and immobility) after the fracture, follow-up radiographs of the fracture if available, HO formation (yes or no) as a result of the fracture determined at a minimum of 6 weeks after the fracture, and patient-reported loss of motion at least 6 months after and as long as 20 years after the fracture. Postfracture radiographs were available in 76% (31 of 41) of fractures in 25 patients and were independently reviewed by the referring physician–author and senior author for radiographic criteria of fracture healing and HO. Results Radiographic healing was noted in 97% (30 of 31) of fractures at 6 weeks after the incident fracture. Painless nonunion was noted in one patient who sustained a displaced patellar fracture and HO. In seven percent (three of 41) of fractures, patients reported increased pain or swelling at or near the fracture site within several days after fracture immobilization that likely indicated a site-specific FOP flareup. The same three patients reported a residual loss of motion 1 year after the fracture compared with their prefracture status. HO developed in 10% (three of 31) of the fractures for which follow-up radiographs were available. Patient-reported loss of motion occurred in 10% (four of 41) of fractures. Two of the four patients reported noticeable loss of motion and the other two patients reported that the joint was completely immobile (ankylosis). Conclusion Most fractures treated nonoperatively in individuals with FOP healed with few flareups, little or no HO, and preservation of mobility, suggesting an uncoupling of fracture repair and HO, which are two inflammation-induced processes of endochondral ossification. These findings underscore the importance of considering nonoperative treatment for fractures in individuals with FOP. Physicians who treat fractures in patients with FOP should consult with a member of the International Clinical Council listed in the FOP Treatment Guidelines (https://www.iccfop.org). Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study.
Gene Therapy for Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: Feasibility and Obstacles
Eekhoff, Elisabeth M. W. , Ruiter, Ruben D. de , Smilde, Bernard J. , Schoenmaker, Ton , Netelenbos, Coen , Scott, Christiaan , Haga, Nobuhiko , Grunwald, Zvi, Cunto, Carmen L. De, Rocco, Maja Di , Delai, Patricia , Diecidue, Robert J. , Morhart, Rolf, Friedman, Clive, Zasloff, Michael , Shim, Jae‐Hyuck , Gao, Guangping , Pignolo, Robert J. , Micha, Dimitra , Shim, Jae-Hyuck , Vries, Teun J. de , Hsiao, Edward C. , Cunto, Carmen De , Madhuri, Vrisha , Cho, Tae‐Joon , Pals, Gerard , Kaplan, Frederick S.

Human Gene Therapy | May 3, 2022 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 15-16 | Pages: 782-788

10.1089/hum.2022.023 Get It

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a rare and devastating genetic disease, in which soft connective tissue is converted into heterotopic bone through an endochondral ossification process. Patients succumb early as they gradually become trapped in a second skeleton of heterotopic bone. Although the underlying genetic defect is long known, the inherent complexity of the disease has hindered the discovery of effective preventions and treatments. New developments in the gene therapy field have motivated its consideration as an attractive therapeutic option for FOP. However, the immune system's role in FOP activation and the as-yet unknown primary causative cell, are crucial issues which must be taken into account in the therapy design. While gene therapy offers a potential therapeutic solution, more knowledge about FOP is needed to enable its optimal and safe application.
Special considerations for clinical trials in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP)
Hsiao, Edward C. , Rocco, Maja Di , Cali, Amanda, Zasloff, Michael , Mukaddam, Mona Al , Pignolo, Robert J. , Grunwald, Zvi, Netelenbos, Coen , Keen, Richard , Brown, Matthew A. , Cunto, Carmen De , Delai, Patricia , Haga, Nobuhiko , Morhart, Rolf, Scott, Christiaan , Zhang, Keqin , Diecidue, Robert J. , Friedman, Clive, Kaplan, Frederick S. , Eekhoff, Elisabeth M. W. , Hsiao, Edward C , Baujat, Geneviève , Cho, Tae‐Joon , Brown, Matthew , Kaplan, Frederick S

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | October 5, 2018 | Volume: 85 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1199-1207

10.1111/bcp.13777 Get It

Clinical trials for orphan diseases are critical for developing effective therapies. One such condition, fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP; MIM#135100), is characterized by progressive heterotopic ossification (HO) that leads to severe disability. Individuals with FOP are extremely sensitive to even minor traumatic events. There has been substantial recent interest in clinical trials for novel and urgently‐needed treatments for FOP. The International Clinical Council on FOP (ICC) was established in 2016 to provide consolidated and coordinated advice on the best practices for clinical care and clinical research for individuals who suffer from FOP. The Clinical Trials Committee of the ICC developed a focused list of key considerations that encompass the specific and unique needs of the FOP community – considerations that are endorsed by the entire ICC. These considerations complement established protocols for developing and executing robust clinical trials by providing a foundation for helping to ensure the safety of subjects with FOP in clinical research trials.