Brown, Matthew A.

Abstract Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra-rare genetic condition characterized by congenital malformations of the great toes and progressive heterotopic ossification (HO) in specific anatomic patterns. Present management summarized here is focused on early diagnosis, assiduous avoidance of injury and iatrogenic harm, symptomatic amelioration of painful flare-ups, and optimization of residual function. Twenty-one members of the International Clinical Council on FOP (ICC) and seven consultants from 15 countries, chosen for their clinical expertise in FOP, developed this summary statement. Further advances in therapeutics will be based on rigorous clinical trials to assess novel and emerging treatment and prevention strategies. A detailed and updated exploration of the topics outlined in this brief perspective can be found in “The Medical Management of Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: Current Treatment Considerations” which can be found on the International Clinical Council on FOP (ICC) website (www.iccfop.org).

Abstract Background Genetic contributors to cardiac arrhythmias often found in cardiovascular conduction pathway and channel proteins. However, genes outside of these categories can contribute to cardiovascular conduction abnormalities. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a rare genetic disease characterized by large volumes heterotopic ossification caused by a highly recurrent R206H mutation in the ACVR1/Alk2 gene. This mutation produces an abnormal activation of the bone morphogenetic pathway (BMP) pathway in response to Activin A. Prior studies suggested an increased risk of cardiopulmonary complications in FOP1. We examined patients in a Natural History Study (NHS) of FOP (NCT02322255) to better understand their cardiovascular risk. Methods The NHS is an ongoing 3 year international multi-center cross-sectional study of 114 patients with FOP (ages 4–56 years) genetically verified to have the AVCR1 R206H mutation. Patients at baseline and 12 months were assessed by electrocardiogram (ECG). Abnormal lead placements were excluded. ECG readings were assessed in a central ECG laboratory. Results At baseline, 45.3% (48/106) of ECGs showed conduction abnormalities. The majority of these abnormalities were classified as nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (37.7% of all ECGs). For patients > 18 years old, 22.7% (10/44) had conduction abnormalities, which was significantly higher than previously reported in the healthy population (5.9%; n=3978)2 (proportional t-test; p<0.00001). FOP patients < 18 years of age also had an extremely high prevalence of conduction abnormalities (60.3%, 38/61). The NHS 12-month follow up data showed similar prevalence. The high frequency of conduction abnormalities did not correlate with the presence of chest wall deformities or scoliosis, abnormal pulmonary function test results, increased cumulative analog joint involvement scale (CAJIS) scores, or abnormal echocardiograms. Conclusions Our results show that some patients with FOP may have subclinical conduction abnormalities. These ECG changes appear to be independent of chest wall deformities or scoliosis, although ectopic bone may make ECG measurement in FOP patients challenging. Though there is no reported association of FOP with clinically significant heart block to date and clinical implications for cardiovascular risk remain unclear, knowledge about these ECG changes may be important for planning clinical care and clinical trials of investigational agents in patients with FOP. Further studies of how the AVCR1 R206H activating mutation and BMP signaling changes cardiac conduction are needed to better understand the mechanistic link. References (1)Hingorani et al. Indian J Med Res. 2012; 135:322–330 (2)Kussmaul et al. Clinical Orthopaedic Related Research. 1998; 346:104–109

Clinical trials for orphan diseases are critical for developing effective therapies. One such condition, fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP; MIM#135100), is characterized by progressive heterotopic ossification (HO) that leads to severe disability. Individuals with FOP are extremely sensitive to even minor traumatic events. There has been substantial recent interest in clinical trials for novel and urgently‐needed treatments for FOP. The International Clinical Council on FOP (ICC) was established in 2016 to provide consolidated and coordinated advice on the best practices for clinical care and clinical research for individuals who suffer from FOP. The Clinical Trials Committee of the ICC developed a focused list of key considerations that encompass the specific and unique needs of the FOP community – considerations that are endorsed by the entire ICC. These considerations complement established protocols for developing and executing robust clinical trials by providing a foundation for helping to ensure the safety of subjects with FOP in clinical research trials.

Background/Purpose:Genome‐wide association studies have identified susceptibility loci for many autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). About 5% of children with JIA have rheumatoid factor positive arthritis that is phenotypically similar to adult seropositive RA, thus representing childhood onset RA (CORA). To understand the genetic architecture of CORA risk relative to other autoimmune diseases, we genotyped CORA cases and controls on the Immunochip, a custom array designed by the Immunochip Consortium to fine map autoimmune disease‐associated loci shared across 11 autoimmune phenotypes.Methods:Genotyping was completed on 340 CORA cases (mean onset age: 10.2 ± 4.2 yrs) and 11624 controls. Standard SNP and sample QC was performed (e.g., removing samples with call rate <98%, admixture outliers). To test for SNP association with CORA a logistic regression model was computed with Caucasian admixture proportions (ADMIXTURE) as covariates (SNPLash). False discovery rate (FDR) adjusted p‐values (PFDR) are reported to account for the actual number of tests computed.Results:SNP rs3129769, near HLA DRB1 was the most significantly associated (PFDR <3×10‐25), and is in linkage disequilibrium with the HLA DRB1 SNP reported in RA (rs660895, PFDR <1×10‐24). Outside the HLA region, 28 regions had ≥1 SNP meeting genome‐wide significance (PFDR<0.05). The best signal of association was on 22q13 (rs9610687, OR = 0.57, PFDR < 0.0002) near IL2RB, followed by the PTPN22 locus (rs6679677, OR = 1.83, PFDR < 0.0005), an intergenic SNP on chromosome 4 (rs970036, OR = 1.78, PFDR < 0.002) and an intronic SNP (19p13, rs3787016 PFDR < 0.002) in the POLR2E gene, which encodes a subunit of RNA polymerase II. Some loci which have previously been implicated in RA had evidence of association including MMEL (rs751358 PFDR < 0.003), IRF5 (rs4731531 PFDR < 0.006) and CCR6 (rs11575078 PFDR < 0.03). In addition using the FDR‐based threshold we identified several potential SNPs (rs10918214, 1q23; rs28491312, 14q31) not previously implicated in RA.Conclusion:Immunochip analysis of the largest cohort of CORA investigated to date has confirmed the HLA DRB1 association and identified several other loci associated with CORA. Comparisons among loci associated with CORA and those identified in RA and other forms of JIA are underway and will help delineate the unique genetic factors for CORA susceptibility.