Ancona‐Lezama, David

Introduction: To report a case of a Hispanic girl with late-onset Retinoblastoma (Rb) who was misdiagnosed as a pars planitis prior to referral. Nearly 95% of all Rb cases are detected before age 5, and this patient was 8 years-old. Methods: Case report of a late-onset Retinoblastoma with anterior chamber (AC) involvement plus the presence of an Ahmed valve. The patient had a history of a couple of months of topical therapy comprising medication for glaucoma, systemic steroids, and a filtration surgery (Ahmed valve), after that a biopsy was performed prior to referral. Upon arrival at our clinic, we performed an examination under anesthesia (EUA) and a B-scan ultrasound (US). Results: Unilateral Retinoblastoma with an Ahmed valve in an AC filled with Rb seeds was diagnosed with the EUA and US in the left eye. An orbital exenteration with map biopsies of the left orbital cavity was performed with confirmation by histopathology of a poorly differentiated endophytic retinoblastoma with Bruch’s membrane invasion. Follow-up sessions were then arranged as well as subsequent systemic chemotherapy cycles. Conclusion: Given the rare incidence of retinoblastoma in children older than 5 years old, it can be easily mistaken for other differential diagnoses and treated with filtration surgeries that could put the patient’s life at risk. In this report, late-onset Rb diagnosis is highlighted as a differential diagnosis in children and adults with atypical uveitis, which required a multidisciplinary approach.

Purpose: To evaluate spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) features of vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL). Methods: Review of records and SD-OCT images of vitreoretinal lymphoma evaluated at Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital between July 1, 2000, and April 1, 2019. Results: There were 55 eyes of 32 patients included. At presentation, SD-OCT features included vitreous opacities (n = 36, 65%), preretinal deposits (n = 7, 13%), intraretinal deposits (n = 8, 15%), subretinal deposits (n = 20, 36%), retinal pigment epithelium abnormalities (n = 35, 64%), and subretinal pigment epithelium deposits (n = 35, 64%). Of 36 eyes with observed tumor progression, comparison (initial visit vs. time of progression) revealed more intraretinal deposits (17% vs. 50%, P = 0.005) at progression. Of 15 eyes with tumor recurrence, comparison (initial visit vs. time of recurrence) revealed more intraretinal deposits (7% vs. 47%, P = 0.04) at recurrence. At last visit, 39 eyes demonstrated tumor regression. By comparison (initial presentation vs. regression), there were less frequent vitreous opacities (67% vs. 0%, P < 0.001), intraretinal deposits (15% vs. 0%, P = 0.03), subretinal deposits (36% vs. 0%, P < 0.001), and subretinal pigment epithelium deposits (69% vs. 21%, P < 0.001) at regression. Conclusion: Using SD-OCT in patients with vitreoretinal lymphoma, local tumor regression correlated with a reduction in vitreous opacities, intraretinal deposits, subretinal deposits, and subretinal pigment epithelium deposits. SD-OCT is useful in judging vitreoretinal lymphoma response to therapy.

Background Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) for retinoblastoma (Rb) has been established as a primary treatment for the disease. To determine whether the presence of reflux into the ICA is associated with tumor response or with any other adverse events in pediatric retinoblastoma patients. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed for patients diagnosed with Rb and managed with ophthalmic artery catheterization (OAC). Results The total study cohort included 205 Rb tumors of 205 eyes in 194 consecutive patients who underwent 624 successful intra-arterial chemotherapy infusions using OAC. Of the 205 eyes, 65 eyes (32.7%) underwent 157 OAC procedures constituted group A (no reflux), 64 eyes (31.2%) underwent 236 OAC procedures constituted group B (variable pattern), and 74 eyes (36.1%) underwent 231 OAC procedures constituted group C (reflux). There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the three cohorts. Also, there was no significant difference in tumor characteristics between the three groups, except for genetic status. There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of tumor response at completion of the treatment regimen. Complete tumor response was achieved at 70.2% in Group A, at 83.3% in Group B, and at 78.5% in group C (P=0.39). Similarly, eye enucleation occurred at 38.5% in group A, 31.8% in group B, and 31.5% in group C. None of the patients in both groups had any neurological adverse events or new onset of seizures. Conclusions The presence of reflux, which may complicate the procedure and prolong it, was not associated with poor outcomes in our analysis.

Abstract BACKGROUND The introduction of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) for treatment of retinoblastoma considerably changed the paradigm by which this disease is managed, with event-free survival rates being above 70%. OBJECTIVE To analyze efficacy of IAC treatment using alternative approaches to ophthalmic artery catheterization (OAC), such as external carotid artery approach or balloon-assisted drug delivery. METHODS This is a retrospective chart review for subjects receiving IAC for retinoblastoma. The primary approach was OAC. In cases in which selective OAC was not feasible, alternative routes including catheterization of the external carotid artery or use of a balloon-assisted drug infusion were used. RESULTS This study included 197 consecutive patients with 207 retinoblastomas who underwent 658 IAC procedures overall. The mean age at diagnosis was 24 mo, and 54.5% of the study population was male. Success rate with IAC was 97% (639). Alternative approaches to OAC were, in total, 42 cases (6.4%)—external carotid artery catheterization and use of ICA balloon were performed in 22 (3.3%) and 20 (3%) cases, respectively. A mean of 3.1 IAC cycles were performed for each patient. In total, there were 23 technical failures of the primary OAC technique (3.4%). Periprocedural adverse events occurred in 4 procedures (0.6%). Use of an alternative technique for chemotherapy delivery other than selective OAC in at least one IAC cycle was not a predictor of enucleation. CONCLUSION IAC is a safe and effective treatment option for retinoblastoma. Chemotherapy delivery using alternative techniques is as effective as selective OAC.

AbstractImportanceRetinoblastoma is a life‐ and sight‐threatening malignancy.BackgroundTo assess the relationship between tumour perfusion and intra‐arterial chemotherapy (IAC) requirements to achieve retinoblastoma control.DesignRetrospective case series at the Ocular Oncology Service of Wills Eye Hospital (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania).ParticipantsFifty‐nine eyes of 55 patients.MethodsReview of medical and fluorescein angiography (FA) records for retinoblastoma treated with primary or secondary IAC from 2012 to 2017. Vascular supply of the main tumour was evaluated in the pre‐treatment FA.Main Outcome MeasuresTumour fluorescence was classified as partial <67% or complete tumour perfusion >67%. Partially vs completely perfused tumours were compared for IAC cycle requirements.ResultsThere were 59 eyes of 55 patients with pre‐treatment FA managed with IAC. Partially perfused tumours (n = 20, 34%) required fewer IAC infusions than completely perfused tumours (n = 39, 66%) (2.5 vs 3.7 infusions, P = .02), even after adjustment for confounding factors (tumour diameter, thickness and drug scheme, adjusted P = .04). Tumour perfusion correlated with number of IAC cycles required for tumour control (r = 0.46, P < .001). For primary IAC (n = 18, 31%), tumour perfusion was not associated with number of IAC cycles (P = .63). For secondary IAC (n = 41, 69%), partially perfused tumours (n = 15, 37%) required fewer IAC infusions than completely perfused tumours (n = 26, 63%) (2.1 vs 3.7 infusions, P < .01).Conclusions and RelevanceFA demonstrating partial retinoblastoma tumour perfusion is associated with fewer IAC cycle requirements for secondary but not primary IAC. FA might be useful in judging anticipated treatment cycles of retinoblastoma managed with primary or secondary IAC.

Purpose: To evaluate the outcome of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the management of extrafoveolar choroidal osteoma. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with choroidal osteoma that did not involve the foveola and were treated with standard-fluence PDT. Results: Nine eyes with extrafoveolar choroidal osteoma were studied. Mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity at initial examination was 0.07 (Snellen ∼20/25). The osteoma was treated with 1 (8/9) or 2 (1/9) PDT sessions using 50 J/cm 2 . After a mean follow-up of 49 months, the treated area of osteoma demonstrated complete (4/9) or partial (5/9) regression, with a mean of 73% regression in the PDT-treated areas. Tumor growth in the region of PDT was noted in 3 cases (3/9) (one tumor toward the foveola and two tumors at the margin away from the foveola), but in no case did the tumor reach the foveola. Therefore, PDT controlled tumor growth in 8 of 9 cases with only 1 of 9 cases showing growth through the PDT scar into foveola. Mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity at last follow-up was 0.04 (Snellen ∼20/20) ( P = 0.59). Conclusion: Photodynamic therapy is an effective modality for the management of extrafoveolar choroidal osteoma, minimizing tumor growth toward the foveola and preserving visual acuity.

Purpose: To determine whether treatment order affects ophthalmic vascular event rates after intra‐arterial chemotherapy (IAC) for retinoblastoma. Methods: Patients who received IAC as primary or secondary treatment for retinoblastoma from January 2009 to January 2018 were included. All eyes were imaged with fundus photography and fluorescein angiography. Patient characteristics and vascular event rates were compared using t-test and Fisher's exact test. Results: There were 196 patients treated with 682 infusions of IAC, divided into primary (no previous therapy, 98 eyes of 98 patients, 328 infusions) and secondary (after other therapy, 105 eyes of 98 patients, 354 infusions) treatment. Overall, ophthalmic vascular events were found after 5% of infusions (17% eyes). A comparison of ophthalmic vascular events (primary vs. secondary IAC), with mean three infusions per eye (median 3, range 1–7), revealed no difference in overall percentage of eyes affected (18% vs. 15%, P = 0.57). Adverse vascular events per eye included retinal vasculature attenuation (1% vs. 0%, P = 0.99), peripheral retinal pruning (1% vs. 0%, P = 0.99), branch retinal artery occlusion (0% vs. 1%, P = 0.99), central retinal artery occlusion (0% vs. 1%, P = 0.99), macular ischemia (0% vs. 2%, P = 0.51), vitreous hemorrhage (2% vs. 3%, P = 0.92), subretinal hemorrhage (1% vs. 0%, P = 0.99), retinal pigment epithelium atrophy (6% vs. 3% P = 0.43), choroidal atrophy (4% vs. 2%, P = 0.92), optic disk pallor (1% vs. 0%, P = 0.99), and ophthalmic artery occlusion (9% vs. 6%, P = 0.35). Conclusion: Ophthalmic vascular events after IAC for retinoblastoma affect only 5% of eyes per infusion (17% of treated eyes). Vascular event risk per eye is similar when using IAC as primary or secondary treatment.