Xu, Vivian

Background Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) for retinoblastoma (Rb) has been established as a primary treatment for the disease. To determine whether the presence of reflux into the ICA is associated with tumor response or with any other adverse events in pediatric retinoblastoma patients. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed for patients diagnosed with Rb and managed with ophthalmic artery catheterization (OAC). Results The total study cohort included 205 Rb tumors of 205 eyes in 194 consecutive patients who underwent 624 successful intra-arterial chemotherapy infusions using OAC. Of the 205 eyes, 65 eyes (32.7%) underwent 157 OAC procedures constituted group A (no reflux), 64 eyes (31.2%) underwent 236 OAC procedures constituted group B (variable pattern), and 74 eyes (36.1%) underwent 231 OAC procedures constituted group C (reflux). There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the three cohorts. Also, there was no significant difference in tumor characteristics between the three groups, except for genetic status. There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of tumor response at completion of the treatment regimen. Complete tumor response was achieved at 70.2% in Group A, at 83.3% in Group B, and at 78.5% in group C (P=0.39). Similarly, eye enucleation occurred at 38.5% in group A, 31.8% in group B, and 31.5% in group C. None of the patients in both groups had any neurological adverse events or new onset of seizures. Conclusions The presence of reflux, which may complicate the procedure and prolong it, was not associated with poor outcomes in our analysis.

Abstract BACKGROUND The introduction of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) for treatment of retinoblastoma considerably changed the paradigm by which this disease is managed, with event-free survival rates being above 70%. OBJECTIVE To analyze efficacy of IAC treatment using alternative approaches to ophthalmic artery catheterization (OAC), such as external carotid artery approach or balloon-assisted drug delivery. METHODS This is a retrospective chart review for subjects receiving IAC for retinoblastoma. The primary approach was OAC. In cases in which selective OAC was not feasible, alternative routes including catheterization of the external carotid artery or use of a balloon-assisted drug infusion were used. RESULTS This study included 197 consecutive patients with 207 retinoblastomas who underwent 658 IAC procedures overall. The mean age at diagnosis was 24 mo, and 54.5% of the study population was male. Success rate with IAC was 97% (639). Alternative approaches to OAC were, in total, 42 cases (6.4%)—external carotid artery catheterization and use of ICA balloon were performed in 22 (3.3%) and 20 (3%) cases, respectively. A mean of 3.1 IAC cycles were performed for each patient. In total, there were 23 technical failures of the primary OAC technique (3.4%). Periprocedural adverse events occurred in 4 procedures (0.6%). Use of an alternative technique for chemotherapy delivery other than selective OAC in at least one IAC cycle was not a predictor of enucleation. CONCLUSION IAC is a safe and effective treatment option for retinoblastoma. Chemotherapy delivery using alternative techniques is as effective as selective OAC.