Shipman, Justin

AbstractBackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD) are commonly associated. Cotreatment with multiple antithrombotic agents can increase the risk of bleeding. We sought to evaluate patient‐centered outcomes in patients with AF on double therapy with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to patients with standard triple therapy, [a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) plus dual antiplatelet therapy].MethodsWe performed a literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting outcomes of patients receiving double therapy with DOACs compared to triple therapy with VKAs in patients with AF undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patient‐centered outcomes were the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNB), all‐cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and stroke.ResultsFour RCTs (9602 patients) met our inclusion criteria. Compared to VKAs, DOACs were associated with significantly lower ISTH major bleeding/ CRNB (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.67‐0.82, P < .00001, I2 = 11%). There were no statistically significant differences in the efficacy outcomes, including myocardial infarction (RR: 0.99, 95% CI :0.79‐1.25, P = .96), stent thrombosis (RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.6‐1.55, P = .89), ischemic stroke (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.5‐1.15, P = .19), all‐cause mortality (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.85‐1.31, P = .61), and MACE (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.91‐1.22, P = .97).ConclusionCompared with triple therapy with VKAS, double therapy with DOACs is associated with a reduced risk of bleeding and is as effective in patients with AF undergoing PCI.

Abstract Introduction Lower extremity physiologic studies are an important non-invasive diagnostic tool in peripheral arterial disease (PAD). PAD and atrial fibrillation (AF) are associated with increased cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Purpose To evaluate the association between PAD and new-onset AF and the risk of stroke. Methods We performed a study of all patients without AF undergoing ankle-brachial index (ABI) for any indication between January 1996 to June 2018. The ABI cut-off were as follows: abnormal ABI (0–0.99), normal ABI (1.00–1.39) and poor vessel compressibility (PC) (1.40+). Demographic, comorbidity, and outcome variables were extracted using the electronic medical record. Results Overall, 34,441 patients (mean age 66.8±14.3, 57.3% male, 88.2% white) were included in the study with a median follow-up of 7.2 years (interquartile range, 3.0–12.9 years). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis showed increased risk of new-onset AF for male sex, older age, hypertension, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, chronic kidney disease stage III or greater, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer (all p<0.0001). After adjustment, ABI results were significantly associated with new-onset AF, particularly poorly-compressible vessels (adjusted HR: 1.42 (1.30–1.55), p<0.0001) compared to abnormal ABI (adjusted HR: 1.12 (1.05–1.20), p=0.0012). Patients with atrial fibrillation were more likely to experience ischemic stroke (39.2% versus 16.1%, p<0.0001). Conclusion Abnormalities in ABI results, particularly poorly-compressible vessels, are independently associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation in a large ambulatory cohort. While the mechanism cannot be assessed, common inflammatory mechanisms and increased vascular stiffness may play an important role. Identification of AF in these at-risk patients may improve cardiovascular outcomes.

Introduction: Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is frequently used to screen for obstructive coronary artery disease in the pre-liver transplant evaluation. Although atropine is a commonly used adjunctive medication, no study has evaluated its side effect profile in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Research Question: What is the safety of atropine in candidates undergoing pre-liver transplant evaluation when atropine is used in stress testing? Design: This multicenter, prospective study enrolled patients over a 6-month period undergoing pre-liver transplant evaluation. Each patient completed a questionnaire assessing anticholinergic-related symptoms within 24 hours of testing and 48 hours following. Comparisons were made among patients receiving any atropine dose versus those who did not and among patients receiving at least 1 mg atropine and those receiving less/none. Results: Forty patients were evaluated, and 32 (80%) had adjunctive atropine administered. No differences in clinical characteristics were noted. In comparisons among patients receiving any dose of atropine with those who did not, questionnaire results indicated a higher rate of nausea prior to testing and higher overall symptom severity following testing in patients not receiving atropine. In comparisons among patients receiving less than 1 mg atropine with those receiving at least 1 mg atropine, no difference in pre- or posttesting questionnaire responses was present. No patient in the study required reversal agents or hospitalization within 7 days of testing. Conclusions: Atropine, a hepatically metabolized medication, did not predispose patients with ESLD to an increased symptom burden, and clinical outcomes related to DSE were unaffected.