Carrasquillo, Minerva M.

Abstract Background: Genetic studies have shifted to sequencing-based rare variants discovery after decades of success in identifying common disease variants by Genome-Wide Association Studies using Single Nucleotide Polymorphism chips. Sequencing-based studies require large sample sizes for statistical power but often inadvertently introduce batch effects because samples are typically collected, processed, and sequenced at multiple centers. Conventionally, batch effects are first detected and visualized using Principal Components Analysis and then controlled by including batch covariates in the disease association models. For sequencing-based genetic studies, because all variants included in the association analyses have passed quality control measures, this conventional approach treats every variant as equal and ignores the substantial differences still remaining in variant qualities and characteristics such as genotype quality scores, alternative allele fractions (fraction of reads supporting alternative allele at a variant position) and sequencing depths. Results: In the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP) exome dataset of 9,904 cases and controls, we discovered hidden variant-level differences between sample batches of three sequencing centers and two exome capture kits. Although sequencing centers were included as a covariate in our association models, we observed differences at the variant level in genotype quality and alternative allele fraction between samples processed by different exome capture kits that significantly impacted both the confidence of variant detection and the identification of disease-associated variants. Furthermore, we found that the association signals of a subset of top disease risk variants came exclusively from samples processed by one exome capture kit that was more effective at capturing the alternative alleles compared to the other kit. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the importance of additional variant-level quality control for large sequencing-based genetic studies. More importantly, we demonstrate that automatically filtering out variants with batch differences may lead to false negatives if the batch discordance came largely from quality differences and if the variants from one batch had better quality scores.

AbstractIntroductionMAPT H1 haplotype is implicated as a risk factor for neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer's disease (AD).MethodsUsing Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC) genome‐wide association study (GWAS) data (n = 18,841), we conducted a MAPT H1/H2 haplotype–stratified association to discover MAPT haplotype–specific AD risk loci.ResultsWe identified 11 loci—5 in H2‐non‐carriers and 6 in H2‐carriers—although none of the MAPT haplotype–specific associations achieved genome‐wide significance. The most significant H2 non‐carrier–specific association was with a NECTIN2 intronic (P = 1.33E‐07) variant, and that for H2 carriers was near NKX6‐1 (P = 1.99E‐06). The GABRG2 locus had the strongest epistasis with MAPT H1/H2 variant rs8070723 (P = 3.91E‐06). Eight of the 12 genes at these loci had transcriptome‐wide significant differential expression in AD versus control temporal cortex (q < 0.05). Six genes were members of the brain transcriptional co‐expression network implicated in “synaptic transmission” (P = 9.85E‐59), which is also enriched for neuronal genes (P = 1.0E‐164), including MAPT.DiscussionThis stratified GWAS identified loci that may confer AD risk in a MAPT haplotype–specific manner. This approach may preferentially enrich for neuronal genes implicated in synaptic transmission.

AbstractIntroductionOur primary goal was to examine demographic and clinicopathologic differences across an ethnoracially diverse autopsy‐confirmed cohort of Alzheimer's disease cases.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted in the Florida Autopsied Multi‐Ethnic cohort on 1625 Alzheimer's disease cases, including decedents who self‐reported as Hispanic/Latino (n = 67), black/African American (n = 19), and white/European American (n = 1539).ResultsHispanic decedents had a higher frequency of family history of cognitive impairment (58%), an earlier age at onset (median age of 70 years), longer disease duration (median of 12 years), and lower MMSE proximal to death (median of 4 points) compared with the other ethnoracial groups. Black decedents had a lower Braak tangle stage (stage V) and higher frequency of coexisting hippocampal sclerosis (21%); however, only hippocampal sclerosis differences survived adjustment for sex, age at onset, and disease duration. Neither Thal amyloid phase nor coexisting Lewy body disease differed across ethnoracial groups.DiscussionDespite a smaller sample size, Hispanics demonstrated longer disease duration with Alzheimer's disease, but not greater lifespan. Neuropathologic differences across ethnoracial groups supported differences in tau pathology distribution and coexisting hippocampal sclerosis, which may impact biomarker studies.