Roszik, Jason

Patients with cholangiocarcinoma have poor clinical outcomes due to late diagnoses, poor prognoses, and limited treatment strategies. To identify drug combinations for this disease, we have conducted a genome-wide CRISPR screen anchored on the bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) PROTAC degrader ARV825, from which we identified anticancer synergy when combined with genetic ablation of members of the mTOR pathway. This combination effect was validated using multiple pharmacological BET and mTOR inhibitors, accompanied by increased levels of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. In a xenograft model, combined BET degradation and mTOR inhibition induced tumor regression. Mechanistically, the 2 inhibitor classes converged on H3K27ac-marked epigenetic suppression of the serine glycine one carbon (SGOC) metabolism pathway, including the key enzymes PHGDH and PSAT1. Knockdown of PSAT1 was sufficient to replicate synergy with single-agent inhibition of either BET or mTOR. Our results tie together epigenetic regulation, metabolism, and apoptosis induction as key therapeutic targets for further exploration in this underserved disease.

Abstract BRAF plus MEK inhibitor combinations are currently FDA-approved for melanoma, non–small cell lung cancer, and anaplastic thyroid cancer. The lack of clinical benefit with BRAF inhibition in BRAF V600–mutated colorectal cancer has prevented its tissue-agnostic drug development. We reviewed the AACR GENIE database for the prevalence of BRAF V600 mutations across tumor types. We reviewed the literature for case reports of clinical responses, outcomes in patients with BRAF V600 mutation—positive nonmelanoma malignancies who received BRAF inhibitor therapy, and data from published adult and pediatric trials. BRAF V600 mutations are prevalent across multiple nonmelanoma malignancies (>40 different tumor types), lead to oncogene addiction, and are clinically actionable in a broad range of adult and pediatric nonmelanoma rare malignancies. Continued tissue-agnostic drug development is warranted beyond the current BRAF plus MEK approved cancers.

AbstractActivating receptor-tyrosine kinase rearranged during transfection (RET) mutations and fusions are potent drivers of oncogenesis. The recent FDA approvals of highly potent and selective RET inhibitors, selpercatinib and pralsetinib, has altered the therapeutic management of RET aberrant tumors. There is ample evidence of the role of RET signaling in certain cancers. RET aberrations as fusions or mutations occur in multiple cancers, however, there is considerable phenotypic diversity. There is emerging data on the lack of responsiveness of immunotherapy in RET-altered cancers. Herein, we review the registrational data from the selective RET-inhibitor trials, and comprehensively explore RET alterations in pan-cancer adult malignancies and their co-alterations. These co-occuring alterations may define the future of RET inhibition from specific selective targeting to customized combination therapies as data are rapidly emerging on both on-target and off-target acquired resistance mechanisms. Fascinatingly, oncogenic RET fusions have been reported to mediate resistance to EGFR inhibition and KRASG12C inhibition.

Abstract Background: BRAF and MEK inhibitors are currently FDA approved for melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and anaplastic thyroid cancer. The lack of clinical benefit with BRAF inhibition in BRAF V600+ colorectal cancer (CRC) has prevented its tissue-agnostic drug development. However, updated results from Vemurafenib-Basket study (Cancer Discov. 2020 May;10(5):657-663 ) and the NCI-match trial ( J Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov 20;38(33):3895-3904) reveal that BRAF pathway inhibition is active in > 20 unique cancer types. Objective: We aimed to describe the characteristics of BRAF V600 and study real-world outcomes using a clinico-genomic analysis using the AACR Genie database and the current medical literature. Methods: We reviewed the AACR GENIE database for the prevalence of BRAF V600 mutations across tumor types. We conducted a literature search (using PubMed from 2012-2019) for case reports of clinical response and outcomes in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive non-melanoma cancers who received BRAF inhibitor therapy. Results: Among 96,324 samples, BRAF V600 mutations were seen in 43 different tumor types across 2,963 samples (3.07 %) in the AACR GENIE database. BRAF V600 was most commonly present in thyroid cancer (40.9%), parathyroid cancer (31.8%), melanoma (26.1%), histiocytosis (25.7%), and head and neck NOS (14.3%). Literature review revealed total of 178 cases across 69 tumor types. The most common cases included Erdheim-Chester disease (n = 30, 16.9%), papillary thyroid carcinoma (n=16, 8.9%), anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (n = 13, 7.3%), and hairy cell leukemia (n = 13, 7.3%). Furthermore, dabrafenib (BRAF), dabrafenib/trametinib (BRAF+MEK), trametinib(MEK), vemurafenib (BRAF), vemurafenib/trametinib (BRAF+MEK), vemurafenib/cobimetinib (BRAF+MEK) were used in 34% (n =56), 16% (n = 27), 4% (n = 6), 44% (n = 72), 1% (n = 1), 2% (n =3), respectively. Overall, median PFS was 6.5 months, and median OS was 28.5 months with a median duration of response (DOR) of 8 months. Conclusion: BRAF V600 mutations are prevalent across multiple non-melanoma cancers, lead to oncogene addiction and are clinically actionable in a broad range of non-melanoma cancers. Continued drug development is warranted beyond the current BRAF+/- MEK approved cancers. Citation Format: Jacob J. Adashek, Aakash P. Desai, Arjun K. Menta, Jason Roszik, Vivek Subbiah. Pan-cancer efficacy of BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors in BRAF V600-mutant multiple non-melanoma cancers: A clinico-genomic study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1479.

Abstract Background: Activating receptor-tyrosine kinase rearranged during transfection (RET) mutations and fusions have been recognized as potent drivers of oncogenesis in multiple malignancies. Recently, highly potent and selective RET inhibitors, selpercatinib and pralsetinib have been FDA approved for RET fusion+ NSCLC and selpercatinib for RET+ thyroid cancers. Here we present a comprehensive analysis of RET alterations in pan-cancer adult malignancies. Patients and methods: 96,324 samples from 89,754 patients available from AACR Project Genie database version 8 were analyzed for the prevalence of RET fusions, mutations, and copy number alterations in diverse cancer types accessed July 21, 2020. The races of the samples within the cohort were 69,962 (72.6%) white, 5,388 (5.6%) Black, 4,909 (5.1%) Asian, 163 (0.17%) Native American, 48 (0.05%) Pacific Islander, and 15,854 (16.5%) were unknown. Results: There were 56,382 (58.5%) samples from primary tumors, 24,204 (25.1%) samples from unspecified metastasis sites, 4,798 (5.0%) from distant organ metastasis, 1,379 (1.4%) from lymph node metastasis, 1,279 (1.3%) from local recurrence, and 8,282 (8.6%) unknown. In 96,324 tumor samples there were 2,706 (2.81%) RET alterations. This included 223 (0.23%) fusions, 1,689 RET mutations found (1.75%) in 21 tumor histologies, and 794 (0.82%) RET amplifications identified; where the most abundant tissues harboring RET fusions were NSCLC (n = 121), papillary thyroid cancer (n = 53), breast cancer (n = 8) and colorectal cancer (n = 7) and the most abundant tissues harboring RET missense mutations were NSCLC (n = 355), colorectal cancer (n = 292), melanoma (n = 236), and thyroid cancer (n = 127). NSCLC samples with RET fusions had significantly co-altered KRAS, SETD2, PVRL4, EZH1, and RRAGC. Conclusions: RET fusions represent extremely rate events in multiple cancers. RET missense mutations occur in 2% of malignancies. Most RET missense variants are described as variants of unknown significance, limiting the impact of precision oncology for the majority of patients with RET alterations. Further functional characterization of RET variants is warranted because RET is highly targetable with therapeutics. Citation Format: Jacob J. Adashek, Alexander Andreev-Drakhlin, Jason Roszik, Aakash P. Desai, Vivek Subbiah. The landscape of 2,706 RET alterations from 89,754 adult patients with cancer: Clinical implications [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1221.

60 Background: The activity of the anti-PD-1 antibody P in pts with advanced STS was evaluated in a prospective multicenter Phase II study conducted by the Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration (SARC). SARC028 enrolled 40 patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Pembro had an ORR of 19% and PFS rate at 12 weeks of 55%, suggesting clinical activity. We investigated biomarkers of response to P. Methods: The primary endpoint was Objective Response Rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and biomarkers of response in blood and tumor. Pre- and on-treatment biopsies were required and obtained from over 90% and 72% of pts respectively. Serum was obtained from all pts at baseline and at multiple time points on therapy (pre-, week 8, and every 12 weeks). Sera were examined for candidate circulating biomarkers by Affymetrix Luminex platform array, including PD-L2. To determine whether there is a statistically significant difference between different conditions, we used Mann-Whitney and two-tailed t tests. Log-rank p-values in Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were calculated using the "survival" R package. Results: Forty pts with STS were enrolled into 4 cohorts (10 each) based on histological subtype including undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (LPS), synovial sarcoma (SS), and leiomyosarcoma (LMS). 4 pts with UPS, 2 pts with LPS, and one pt with SS achieved a response. Six of seven responses were durable at the time of this analysis. Circulating levels at baseline or after therapy of PD-1, PD-L1, 4-1BB, IDO, BTLA, CTLA-4, LAG-3, and TIM-3 did not correlate with outcome. However, pre-treatment and week 8 PD-L2 levels correlated best with clinical outcome: high PD-L2 levels were associated with better PFS (p=0.019) in STS. Conclusions: P has clinical activity in specific histologic subtypes of STS, namely UPS and LPS. Pre-treatment circulating PD-L2 levels correlated with progression-free survival and is a novel and promising predictor of improved clinical outcome of PD-1 therapy in STS.

11008 Background: SARC028 is the first multicenter Phase II study of P monotherapy in patients (pts) with STS and BS. Designed to detect clinical efficacy signals in multiple histologies, the study collected blood & tissue samples on all pts. We report extended clinical follow-up and in-depth biomarker correlates of response. Methods: The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints were safety, 12 wk progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The STS arm had 10 pts in each of 4 cohorts: undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS), synovial sarcoma (SS) and leiomyosarcoma (LMS). The BS arm included 40 pts with osteosarcoma (OS), Ewing sarcoma (ES) or dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (CS). Pre- and on-P biopsies were required as well as blood at multiple time points. Tumor was assessed for PD-L1 expression (clone 22C3) and immune infiltrates by multi-color IHC (Vectra). Ongoing analyses include circulating cytokine and checkpoint levels and exome (DNA), transcriptome (RNA), and T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing. Results: 86 pts were enrolled, 80 were evaluable for response. For STS, median follow-up was 14.5 months. The ORR in the overall STS cohort was 18% and the 12-wk PFS 55% [95% CI, 42-71]). Clinical activity was variable by histologic subtype with 40% ORR in UPS (1 CR and 3PR out of 10 evaluable pts), 2 PR/10 were seen in DDLPS, 1PR/10 in SS and 0/10 in LMS. For BS, median follow-up was 12.3 months (ORR 5%; 12-wk PFS 28% [95% CI, 14-41]), with 1PR/22 OS, 1PR/5 CS and 0/13 ES. 70 pre-P tissues were analyzed (11 excluded for insufficiency), with PD-L1+ in 3/70 (4%); all 3 were UPS. Of the 2 evaluable pts, 1 had CR and 1 PR. 2 OS were PD-L1+ on multi-color IHC, 1 had PR. All PD-L1+ samples had CD8+ T-cell infiltration. There were no post-P PD-L1+ samples. Conclusions: P has clinical activity in UPS and LPS, and expansion cohorts in those subtypes are planned. Pre-treatment PD-L1 expression was infrequent, but correlated with T-cell infiltration and response in UPS & OS. Ongoing biomarker analyses that may guide combination strategies are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02301039.