Menta, Arjun K.

Abstract BRAF plus MEK inhibitor combinations are currently FDA-approved for melanoma, non–small cell lung cancer, and anaplastic thyroid cancer. The lack of clinical benefit with BRAF inhibition in BRAF V600–mutated colorectal cancer has prevented its tissue-agnostic drug development. We reviewed the AACR GENIE database for the prevalence of BRAF V600 mutations across tumor types. We reviewed the literature for case reports of clinical responses, outcomes in patients with BRAF V600 mutation—positive nonmelanoma malignancies who received BRAF inhibitor therapy, and data from published adult and pediatric trials. BRAF V600 mutations are prevalent across multiple nonmelanoma malignancies (>40 different tumor types), lead to oncogene addiction, and are clinically actionable in a broad range of adult and pediatric nonmelanoma rare malignancies. Continued tissue-agnostic drug development is warranted beyond the current BRAF plus MEK approved cancers.

Abstract Background: BRAF and MEK inhibitors are currently FDA approved for melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and anaplastic thyroid cancer. The lack of clinical benefit with BRAF inhibition in BRAF V600+ colorectal cancer (CRC) has prevented its tissue-agnostic drug development. However, updated results from Vemurafenib-Basket study (Cancer Discov. 2020 May;10(5):657-663 ) and the NCI-match trial ( J Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov 20;38(33):3895-3904) reveal that BRAF pathway inhibition is active in > 20 unique cancer types. Objective: We aimed to describe the characteristics of BRAF V600 and study real-world outcomes using a clinico-genomic analysis using the AACR Genie database and the current medical literature. Methods: We reviewed the AACR GENIE database for the prevalence of BRAF V600 mutations across tumor types. We conducted a literature search (using PubMed from 2012-2019) for case reports of clinical response and outcomes in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive non-melanoma cancers who received BRAF inhibitor therapy. Results: Among 96,324 samples, BRAF V600 mutations were seen in 43 different tumor types across 2,963 samples (3.07 %) in the AACR GENIE database. BRAF V600 was most commonly present in thyroid cancer (40.9%), parathyroid cancer (31.8%), melanoma (26.1%), histiocytosis (25.7%), and head and neck NOS (14.3%). Literature review revealed total of 178 cases across 69 tumor types. The most common cases included Erdheim-Chester disease (n = 30, 16.9%), papillary thyroid carcinoma (n=16, 8.9%), anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (n = 13, 7.3%), and hairy cell leukemia (n = 13, 7.3%). Furthermore, dabrafenib (BRAF), dabrafenib/trametinib (BRAF+MEK), trametinib(MEK), vemurafenib (BRAF), vemurafenib/trametinib (BRAF+MEK), vemurafenib/cobimetinib (BRAF+MEK) were used in 34% (n =56), 16% (n = 27), 4% (n = 6), 44% (n = 72), 1% (n = 1), 2% (n =3), respectively. Overall, median PFS was 6.5 months, and median OS was 28.5 months with a median duration of response (DOR) of 8 months. Conclusion: BRAF V600 mutations are prevalent across multiple non-melanoma cancers, lead to oncogene addiction and are clinically actionable in a broad range of non-melanoma cancers. Continued drug development is warranted beyond the current BRAF+/- MEK approved cancers. Citation Format: Jacob J. Adashek, Aakash P. Desai, Arjun K. Menta, Jason Roszik, Vivek Subbiah. Pan-cancer efficacy of BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors in BRAF V600-mutant multiple non-melanoma cancers: A clinico-genomic study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1479.