Back to Authors

Kraemer, Bernhard

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0884-107X

Mayo Clinic

Universitätsklinikum Tübingen

Citations 2

Validated biomarker assays confirm that ARID1A loss is confounded with MMR deficiency, CD8
Heinze, Karolin , Nazeran, Tayyebeh M., Lee, Sandra , Krämer, Pauline , Leung, Samuel , Kang, Eun Young , Meagher, Nicola S. , Kennedy, Catherine J. , Boros, Jessica , Kommoss, Friedrich, Vollert, Hans‐Walter, Harter, Philipp , Kraemer, Bernhard , Staebler, Annette , Heublein, Sabine , Sinn, Hans‐Peter , Singh, Naveena , Laslavic, Angela , Olawaiye, Alex, Moysich, Kirsten B. , Sharma, Raghwa , Brand, Alison H. , Harnett, Paul R. , DeFazio, Anna , Fortner, Renée T. , Lener, Marcin , Tołoczko‐Grabarek, Aleksandra, Coulson, Penny , El‐Bahrawy, Mona , Jones, Michael E. , Schoemaker, Minouk J. , Gayther, Simon A. , Carney, Michael E. , Shvetsov, Yurii B. , Hernandez, Brenda Y. , Goodman, Marc T. , Mateoiu, Constantina , Linder, Anna , Kelemen, Linda E. , Widschwendter, Martin , Menon, Usha , Alsop, Jennifer , Shah, Mitul , Jimenez‐Liñan, Mercedes , Brenton, James D. , Cushing‐Haugen, Kara L. , Huntsman, David G. , Nelson, Gregg , Tinker, Anna V. , Goode, Ellen L. , Ramus, Susan J. , Kommoss, Stefan , Talhouk, Aline , Köbel, Martin , Anglesio, Michael S. , Campbell, Ian G , Gilks, C. Blake , Köbel, Martin , Anglesio, Michael S , Fazio, Anna de , Fortner, Renée T , Ramus, Susan J , Menon, Usha , Brenton, James D , Moysich, Kirsten , Kennedy, Catherine J , Sinn, Peter , Widschwendter, Martin , Jones, Michael E , Brand, Alison H , Nelson, Gregg S , El-Bahrawy, Mona A , Harnett, Paul R , Hernandez, Brenda Y , Schoemaker, Minouk J , Goodman, Marc T , Linder, Anna , Cairns, Evan S. , Chiu, Derek S , Heitz, Florian , Bois, Andreas du , Grube, Marcel , Kommoss, Felix , Elishaev, Esther , Modugno, Francesmary , Lubiński, Jan , Cybulski, Cezary , Gronwald, Helena , Gronwald, Jacek , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Gorringe, Kylie L. , Campbell, Ian , Cook, Linda S. , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Sundfeldt, Karin , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Bolton, Kelly L. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Harris, Holly R. , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Ghatage, Prafull , Lee, Cheng‐Han , Nelson, Brad H.

The Journal of Pathology | December 13, 2021 | Volume: 256 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 388-401

10.1002/path.5849 Get It

Abstract ARID1A (BAF250a) is a component of the SWI/SNF chromatin modifying complex, plays an important tumour suppressor role, and is considered prognostic in several malignancies. However, in ovarian carcinomas there are contradictory reports on its relationship to outcome, immune response, and correlation with clinicopathological features. We assembled a series of 1623 endometriosis‐associated ovarian carcinomas, including 1078 endometrioid (ENOC) and 545 clear cell (CCOC) ovarian carcinomas, through combining resources of the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) Consortium, the Canadian Ovarian Unified Experimental Resource (COEUR), local, and collaborative networks. Validated immunohistochemical surrogate assays for ARID1A mutations were applied to all samples. We investigated associations between ARID1A loss/mutation, clinical features, outcome, CD8 + tumour‐infiltrating lymphocytes (CD8 + TILs), and DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). ARID1A loss was observed in 42% of CCOCs and 25% of ENOCs. We found no associations between ARID1A loss and outcomes, stage, age, or CD8 + TIL status in CCOC. Similarly, we found no association with outcome or stage in endometrioid cases. In ENOC, ARID1A loss was more prevalent in younger patients ( p = 0.012) and was associated with MMRd ( p < 0.001) and the presence of CD8 + TILs ( p = 0.008). Consistent with MMRd being causative of ARID1A mutations, in a subset of ENOCs we also observed an association with ARID1A loss‐of‐function mutation as a result of small indels ( p = 0.035, versus single nucleotide variants). In ENOC, the association with ARID1A loss, CD8 + TILs, and age appears confounded by MMRd status. Although this observation does not explicitly rule out a role for ARID1A influence on CD8 + TIL infiltration in ENOC, given current knowledge regarding MMRd, it seems more likely that effects are dominated by the hypermutation phenotype. This large dataset with consistently applied biomarker assessment now provides a benchmark for the prevalence of ARID1A loss‐of‐function mutations in endometriosis‐associated ovarian cancers and brings clarity to the prognostic significance. © 2021 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
TRUST: Trial of radical upfront surgical therapy in advanced ovarian cancer (ENGOT ov33 / AGO‐OVAR OP7).
Mahner, Sven� , Burges, Alexander , Reuß, Alexander , Kraemer, Bernhard , Schmalfeldt, Barbara, Lampe, Bjoern, Fotopoulou, Christina , Lécuru, Fabrice , Querleu, Denis , Greggi, Stefano , Colombo, Nicoletta , Harter, Philipp , Heitz, Florian , Sehouli, Jalid , Schnelzer, Andreas , Wimberger, Pauline , Guyon, Frédéric , Aletti, Giovanni , Bois, Andreas du

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: TPS5602-TPS5602

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.tps5602 Get It

TPS5602 Background: Primary cytoreductive surgery (PDS) followed by chemotherapy has been considered as standard management for advanced ovarian cancer patients (pts) over decades. An alternative approach of interval debulking surgery (IDS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) was subsequently reported by two randomized phase III trials (EORTC‐GCG, CHORUS). Owing to important limitations of these studies, especially regarding surgical quality, optimal timing of surgical therapy in advanced ovarian cancer is still unclear. Methods: TRUST is an international open, randomized, controlled multicenter trial investigating overall survival (OS; primary endpoint) after PDS vs NACT and subsequent IDS in pts with FIGO stage IIIB‐IVB ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma. Secondary objectives are safety of complete tumor resection, progression‐free survival and quality of life (QoL) as well as surgical morbidity. In order to guarantee adequate surgical quality, participating centers need to fulfill specific quality assurance criteria (e.g. ≥50% complete resection rate in upfront surgery for FIGO IIIB-IV pts, ≥36 debulking-surgeries/year) and agree to independent audits by TRUST Quality committee delegates. A 1:1 randomization to PDS or NACT followed by IDS stratified by center and age‐ECOG combination (ECOG 0 and age ≤65 years vs ECOG > 0 or age > 65 years) is performed. Pts in the PDS arm will undergo surgery followed by 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, whereas pts in the IDS arm will be treated with 3 cycles of NACT after histologic confirmation of the disease, followed by IDS and subsequently 3 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. Intention of surgery for both groups will be complete tumor resection as per guideline recommendations. Health related QoL will be assessed using the EORTC QLQ‐C30, QLQ‐OV28, and EQ‐5D‐3L questionnaires. For sample size planning, we considered a prolongation of median OS from 45 months in the IDS arm to 60 months in the PDS arm (HR 0.75) as clinically relevant. 380 events are needed to obtain a power of 80% in two‐sided log-rank test with significance level of 0.05. The primary analysis will be done in the ITT‐population of 686 randomized pts. By Feb 3 2017, 46 pts were randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT02828618.