Heckman, Michael G.

Abstract Introduction The MAPT H1 haplotype has been associated with several neurodegenerative diseases. We were interested in exploring the role of MAPT haplotypic variation in risk of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Method We genotyped six MAPT haplotype tagging SNPs and screened 431 clinical DLB cases, 347 pathologically defined high‐likelihood DLB cases, and 1049 controls. Result We performed haplotypic association tests and detected an association with the protective H2 haplotype in our combined series (odds ratio [OR] = 0.75). We fine‐mapped the locus and identified a relatively rare haplotype, H1G, that is associated with an increased risk of DLB (OR = 3.30, P = .0017). This association was replicated in our pathologically defined series (OR = 2.26, P = .035). Discussion These results support a role for H1 and specifically H1G in susceptibility to DLB. However, the exact functional variant at the locus is still unknown, and additional studies are warranted to fully explain genetic risk of DLB at the MAPT locus.

Objective To update a previously proposed prognostic scoring system that predicts risk of biochemical recurrence ( BCR ) after salvage radiation therapy ( SRT ) for recurrent prostate cancer when using additional patients and a PSA value of 0.2 ng/ mL and rising as the definition of BCR . Patients and Methods We included 577 patients who received SRT for a rising PSA after radical prostatectomy in this retrospective cohort study. Clinical, pathological, and SRT characteristics were evaluated for association with BCR using relative risks ( RR s) from multivariable Cox regression models. Results With a median follow‐up of 5.5 years after SRT , 354 patients (61%) experienced BCR . At 5 years after SRT , 40% of patients were free of BCR . Independent associations with BCR were identified for the PSA level before SRT ( RR [doubling]: 1.25, P < 0.001), pathological tumour stage ( RR [T3a vs T2] 1.21, P = 0.19; RR [T3b/T4 vs T2] 2.09, P < 0.001; overall P < 0.001), Gleason score ( RR [7 vs <7] 1.63, P < 0.001; RR [8–10 vs <7] 2.28, P < 0.001; overall P < 0.001), and surgical margin status ( RR [positive vs negative] 0.71, P = 0.003). We combined these four variables to create a prognostic scoring system that predicted BCR risk with a c ‐index of 0.66. Scores ranged from 0 to 7, and 5‐year freedom from BCR for different levels of the score was as follows: Score = 0–1: 66%, Score = 2: 46%, Score = 3: 28%, Score = 4: 19%, and Score = 5–7: 15%. Conclusion We developed a scoring system that provides an estimation of the risk of BCR after SRT . These findings will be useful for patients and physicians in decision making for radiation therapy in the salvage setting.

Background and purposeLow density lipoprotein receptor related proteins (LRPs) 1 and 6 have been implicated in cerebral ischaemia. In addition, genetic variation in LRP1 and LRP6 has been linked with various factors that are related to risk of ischaemic stroke. The aim of this study was to examine the association of LRP1 and LRP6 gene variants with risk of ischaemic stroke as part of the Ischemic Stroke Genetics Study (ISGS).MethodsA Caucasian series (434 stroke patients, 319 controls) and an African American series (161 stroke patients, 116 controls) were included. Fourteen LRP6 variants and three LRP1 variants were genotyped and assessed for association with ischaemic stroke.ResultsIn the Caucasian series, significant associations with ischaemic stroke were observed for LRP6 rs2075241 [odds ratio (OR) 0.42, P = 0.023], rs2302685 (OR 0.44, P = 0.049), rs7975614 (OR 0.07, P = 0.017), rs10492120 (OR 0.62, P = 0.036) and rs10743980 (OR 0.66, P = 0.037). Risk of ischaemic stroke was significantly lower for carriers of any of these five protective LRP6 variants (24.0% of subjects) compared to non‐carriers (OR 0.57, P = 0.003). The protective association for LRP6 rs2075241 was observed at a similar magnitude across ischaemic stroke subtypes, whilst the effects of rs23022685, rs10492120 and rs10743980 were most apparent for cardioembolic and large vessel stroke. In the African American series, LRP1 rs11172113 was associated with an increased risk of stroke (OR 1.89, P = 0.006).ConclusionsThe results of our preliminary study provide evidence that LRP6 and LRP1 variants may be associated with risk of ischaemic stroke. Validation in larger studies is warranted.

AbstractBackgroundConcomitant administration of the triazole antifungals, voriconazole or itraconazole, with tacrolimus can result in significant drug interaction in the transplant recipient. Limited published information exists regarding tacrolimus dosing when transitioning from voriconazole to itraconazole. The objective of this study was to evaluate the extent of the drug interaction with antifungal prophylaxis using voriconazole followed by a change to itraconazole in lung transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus.MethodsThis prospective study included lung transplant recipients receiving antifungal prophylaxis with voriconazole followed by a switch to itraconazole. Patients were followed from the time of transplant until two months after converting to itraconazole. All patients received standard immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and a corticosteroid. Tacrolimus dose normalized concentrations using concentration/dose ratio were compared while receiving voriconazole versus itraconazole.ResultsTwenty lung transplant recipients were included in the final analysis. No difference was found with the tacrolimus dose normalized concentrations on voriconazole 254 ± 28 (ng/mL)/(mg/kg) compared with itraconazole 234 ± 34 (ng/mL)/(mg/kg), p = 0.65.ConclusionTacrolimus dosage adjustments were not necessary when converting from voriconazole to itraconazole. Validation in a larger population is needed to confirm these findings.