Back to Authors

Kim, Ju Young

Mayo Clinic

Navigate BioPharma (United States)

Citations 1

Quantitative Spatial Profiling of PD-1/PD-L1 Interaction and HLA-DR/IDO-1 Predicts Improved Outcomes of Anti–PD-1 Therapies in Metastatic Melanoma
Johnson, Douglas B. , Bordeaux, Jennifer , Kim, Ju Young, Vaupel, Christine, Rimm, David L. , Ho, Thai H. , Joseph, Richard W. , Daud, Adil , Conry, Robert M. , Gaughan, Elizabeth , Hernandez‐Aya, Leonel F. , Funchain, Pauline , Smithy, James W. , Witte, John S. , McKee, Svetlana B., Wrangle, John M., Dabbas, Bashar , Tangri, Shabnam, Lameh, Jelveh, Hall, Jeffrey M., Markowitz, Joseph , Balko, Justin M. , Dakappagari, Naveen, Daud, Adil I , Smithy, James , Ko, Jennifer , Wrangle, John M , Ho, Thai , Funchain, Pauline , Rimm, David , Dimou, Anastasios , Ko, Jennifer S.

Clinical Cancer Research | July 18, 2018 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 5250-5260

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0309 Get It

Abstract Purpose: PD-1/L1 axis–directed therapies produce clinical responses in a subset of patients; therefore, biomarkers of response are needed. We hypothesized that quantifying key immunosuppression mechanisms within the tumor microenvironment by multiparameter algorithms would identify strong predictors of anti–PD-1 response. Experimental Design: Pretreatment tumor biopsies from 166 patients treated with anti–PD-1 across 10 academic cancer centers were fluorescently stained with multiple markers in discovery (n = 24) and validation (n = 142) cohorts. Biomarker-positive cells and their colocalization were spatially profiled in pathologist-selected tumor regions using novel Automated Quantitative Analysis algorithms. Selected biomarker signatures, PD-1/PD-L1 interaction score, and IDO-1/HLA-DR coexpression were evaluated for anti–PD-1 treatment outcomes. Results: In the discovery cohort, PD-1/PD-L1 interaction score and/or IDO-1/HLA-DR coexpression was strongly associated with anti–PD-1 response (P = 0.0005). In contrast, individual biomarkers (PD-1, PD-L1, IDO-1, HLA-DR) were not associated with response or survival. This finding was replicated in an independent validation cohort: patients with high PD-1/PD-L1 and/or IDO-1/HLA-DR were more likely to respond (P = 0.0096). These patients also experienced significantly improved progression-free survival (HR = 0.36; P = 0.0004) and overall survival (HR = 0.39; P = 0.0011). In the combined cohort, 80% of patients exhibiting higher levels of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction scores and IDO-1/HLA-DR responded to PD-1 blockers (P = 0.000004). In contrast, PD-L1 expression was not predictive of survival. Conclusions: Quantitative spatial profiling of key tumor-immune suppression pathways by novel digital pathology algorithms could help more reliably select melanoma patients for PD-1 monotherapy. Clin Cancer Res; 24(21); 5250–60. ©2018 AACR.