AbstractNew onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), including its subtype with a preceding febrile illness known as febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), is one of the most severe forms of status epilepticus. The exact causes of NORSE are currently unknown, and there is so far no disease‐specific therapy. Identifying the underlying pathophysiology and discovering specific biomarkers, whether immunologic, infectious, genetic, or other, may help physicians in the management of patients with NORSE. A broad spectrum of biomarkers has been proposed for status epilepticus patients, some of which were evaluated for patients with NORSE. Nonetheless, none has been validated, due to significant variabilities in study cohorts, collected biospecimens, applied analytical methods, and defined outcome endpoints, and to small sample sizes. The NORSE Institute established an open NORSE/FIRES biorepository for health‐related data and biological samples allowing the collection of biospecimens worldwide, promoting multicenter research and sharing of data and specimens. Here, we suggest standard operating procedures for biospecimen collection and biobanking in this rare condition. We also propose criteria for the appropriate use of previously collected biospecimens. We predict that the widespread use of standardized procedures will reduce heterogeneity, facilitate the future identification of validated biomarkers for NORSE, and provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology and best clinical management for these patients.
Toward a better definition of focal cortical dysplasia: An iterative histopathological and genetic agreement trial
Abstract Objective Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is a major cause of difficult‐to‐treat epilepsy in children and young adults, and the diagnosis is currently based on microscopic review of surgical brain tissue using the International League Against Epilepsy classification scheme of 2011. We developed an iterative histopathological agreement trial with genetic testing to identify areas of diagnostic challenges in this widely used classification scheme. Methods Four web‐based digital pathology trials were completed by 20 neuropathologists from 15 countries using a consecutive series of 196 surgical tissue blocks obtained from 22 epilepsy patients at a single center. Five independent genetic laboratories performed screening or validation sequencing of FCD‐relevant genes in paired brain and blood samples from the same 22 epilepsy patients. Results Histopathology agreement based solely on hematoxylin and eosin stainings was low in Round 1, and gradually increased by adding a panel of immunostainings in Round 2 and the Delphi consensus method in Round 3. Interobserver agreement was good in Round 4 (kappa = .65), when the results of genetic tests were disclosed, namely, MTOR , AKT3 , and SLC35A2 brain somatic mutations in five cases and germline mutations in DEPDC5 and NPRL3 in two cases. Significance The diagnoses of FCD 1 and 3 subtypes remained most challenging and were often difficult to differentiate from a normal homotypic or heterotypic cortical architecture. Immunohistochemistry was helpful, however, to confirm the diagnosis of FCD or no lesion. We observed a genotype–phenotype association for brain somatic mutations in SLC35A2 in two cases with mild malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia in epilepsy. Our results suggest that the current FCD classification should recognize a panel of immunohistochemical stainings for a better histopathological workup and definition of FCD subtypes. We also propose adding the level of genetic findings to obtain a comprehensive, reliable, and integrative genotype–phenotype diagnosis in the near future.
Can we use intraoperative high‐frequency oscillations to guide tumor‐related epilepsy surgery?
AbstractObjectiveIn people with low‐grade intrinsic brain tumors, an epileptic focus is often located close to the lesion. High‐frequency oscillations (HFOs) in electrocorticography (ECoG) might help to delineate this focus. We investigated the relationship between HFOs and low‐grade brain tumors and their potential value for tumor‐related epilepsy surgery.MethodsWe analyzed pre‐ and postresection intraoperative ECoG in 41 patients with refractory epilepsy and a low‐grade lesion. Electrodes were designated as overlying the tumor, adjacent resected tissue (peritumoral), or outside the resection bed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative photographs. We then used a semiautomated approach to detect HFOs as either ripples (80–250 Hz) or fast ripples (250–500 Hz).ResultsThe rate of fast ripples was higher in electrodes covering tumor and peritumoral tissue than outside the resection (p = .04). Mesiotemporal tumors showed more ripples (p = .002), but not more fast ripples (p = .07), than superficial tumors. Rates of fast ripples were higher in glioma and extraventricular neurocytoma than in ganglioglioma or dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNET). The rate of ripples and fast ripples in postresection ECoG was not higher in patients with residual tumor tissue on MRI than those without. The rate of ripples in postresection ECoG was higher in patients with good than bad seizure outcome (p = .03). Fast ripples outside the resection and in post‐ECoG seem related to seizure recurrence.SignificanceFast ripples in intraoperative ECoG can be used to help guide resection in tumor‐related epilepsy surgery. Preresection fast ripples occur predominantly in epileptogenic tumor and peritumoral tissue. Fast ripple rates are higher in glioma and extraventricular neurocytoma than in ganglioglioma and DNET.
Adult-onset epilepsy in focal cortical dysplasia of Taylor type