Joshi, Vidhu B.

ABSTRACTBackgroundCommercial biomarkers and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) have been utilized to triage men with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) and determine patients most likely to harbor clinically‐significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We studied combinations of mpMRI, PSA‐based and novel extracellular vesicle (EV)‐based biomarkers to determine the optimal pre‐biopsy testing to predict csPCa at biopsy.MethodsMen presenting with elevated PSA (≥ 2 ng/mL) were prospectively enrolled and all men underwent clinically indicated mpMRI and blinded study blood draws to determine PSA, prostate health index (PHI) scoring, and EV serum levels. MRI‐fusion transperineal prostate biopsy was performed in all patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed. Bootstrapping analysis was performed to provide more accurate assessment of predictive abilities.ResultsUltimately, 175 consecutive men were prospectively enrolled. Median age in the study population was 65 years. Combinations of biomarkers and MRI demonstrated better predictive ability for csPCa on biopsy than individual modalities. Predictive ability was greatest for PHI density (PHID)‐mpMRI with an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80–0.92) while combinations of PSA density ‐mpMRI (AUC: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.73–0.89) and STEAP1‐mpMRI (AUC: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.70–0.86) demonstrated similar ability to predict csPCa. The study is limited by small, predominantly white patient cohort and requires external validation.ConclusionsInclusion of prostate density with biomarkers increases prognostic ability for detecting csPCa. EV density can refine prediction of csPCa and in combination with PHID‐mpMRI leads to superior specificity, thereby decreasing unnecessary biopsies.

337 Background: Prostate cancer remains the most common solid organ malignancy among males in the United States. Commercial biomarkers and multiparametric MRI have been utilized to better triage men with elevated PSA and determine patients most likely to have clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) upon prostate biopsy. We studied the combination of MRI with PSA-based and novel extracellular vesicle (EV)-based biomarkers to determine the optimal pre-biopsy testing to reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies. Methods: Men presenting to our clinic with elevated PSA (≥ 2 ng/ml) were prospectively enrolled from October 2019 to March 2022. All men underwent multiparametric MRI and blood draws to determine prostate health index (PHI) scoring, EV density, and PSA density. MRI-fusion biopsy was performed with both systematic and targeted prostate sampling, with clinicians blinded to prior blood testing results. Blood concentrations of prostate EV (ProsEVs) were measured by nanoscale flow cytometry using antibodies against PSMA and STEAP1. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed separately for all patients, those without prior diagnosis of PCa, and biopsy-naïve patients. Bootstrapping analysis was performed to provide more accurate assessment of the predictive ability of all combinations. Results: Ultimately, 175 men enrolled and underwent MRI, blood testing, and prostate biopsy. Among the 175 patients included, 101 (58%) had never undergone biopsy, 38 (22%) had a previous negative biopsy, and 36 (21%) were on active surveillance (AS) for GS6 disease. AUC of mpMRI (PI-RADS≥3) to predict clinically significant PCa was 0.66 with a sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV of 95.2%, 37.6%, 76.0% and 79.26%. MRI combined with STEAP1-EV density had an AUC of 0.77 with a sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV of 90.1%, 46.7%, 64.4% and 80.9%. A multivariable model including MRI, STEAP1-EV density, PSA density and PHI density outperformed other combinations with an AUC, sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV of 0.90, 89.2%, 68.7%, 72.8% and 88.1%. Conclusions: Combination of mpMRI with ProsEV and PSA derivatives demonstrated better predictive ability for csPCa on biopsy compared to imaging or serum testing alone. Inclusion of prostate volume with biomarkers further increased predictive ability which could lead to a decrease in number of unnecessary biopsies for men with benign conditions and indolent cancer.

334 Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) screening has relied on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels to screen patients for biopsy. However, the limited specificity of serum PSA leads to high rates of negative biopsies and detection of clinically insignificant cancers. Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles, microscopic particles released by tumor cells and ubiquitously found in all bodily fluids, have emerged as novel biomarkers for a diverse set of malignancies. This study explored the utility of urine prostate-specific extracellular vesicles (ProsEVs) identified by unique surface protein markers with novel flow cytometry-based techniques as biomarkers for PCa screening. Methods: This prospective study recruited at a tertiary care center between Oct 2019 and Mar 2022. Patients with PSA≥2 ng/ml underwent prebiopsy mpMRI followed by transperineal prostate biopsy (PI-RADS 1-2) or combined MRI-guided biopsy (PI-RADS ≥ 3). Patients with metastatic PCa or prior systemic therapy were excluded. Urine samples were collected at MRI using Colli-Pee. ProsEVs were labeled using monoclonal antibodies for PSMA and STEAP1 and ProsEV concentrations were determined using nanoscale flow cytometry. EV densities were calculated by normalizing EV counts to prostate volume. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed and model performance was compared used ROC curve analysis. Results: This study had a total of 179 patients prospectively recruited, 95 were diagnosed with Gleason score (GS) ≥ 7 prostate cancer (csPCa), while the remaining had GS <7 or benign disease. Analysis of urinary ProsEV densities revealed a significant dose-response relationship between benign, GS <7 PCa and GS ≥ 7 PCa groups and ProsEV densities (p=0.01 for PSMA, and <0.001 for STEAP1). The log sum of the PSMA and STEAP1 EV densities exhibited the strongest correlation with other ProsEV variables and was selected for model development. ROC curve analysis showed that the final model including Log Sum ProsEVs, PSA, and PI-RADS outperformed one including PSA and PI-RADS (0.733 vs 0.651, p=0.02). Specificity for detecting csPCa at a sensitivity of 90% was 39.5% in the final model compared to 37% for PSA and PI-RADS (Table). Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of urine ProsEVs as novel biomarkers for improving screening specificity for csPCa detection. Future works should explore analysis of intra-ProsEV content to further improve specificity and advance liquid biopsy techniques. [Table: see text]

Abstract Background The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of early PSA decline following initiation of second-generation hormone therapy (2nd HT), namely abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide, in patients with taxane-refractory metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and evaluate utility of this metric in informing intensified surveillance/imaging protocols. Methods We retrospectively identified 75 mCRPC patients treated with 2nd HT following docetaxel failure (defined as PSA rise and radiographic progression). Patients were categorized patients into two cohorts based on the first PSA within 3 months after initiation of therapy: PSA reduction ≥ 50% (Group A) and PSA reduction < 50% (Group B). The primary endpoint was cancer-specific mortality (CSM). The secondary endpoint was radiographic disease progression (rDP) on 2nd HT. In univariate and multivariate analyses, we investigated factors associated with rPD and CSM. Results We included 75 patients (52 in Group A, 23 in Group B) in the analytic cohort. Baseline clinico-demographic characteristics, including median age, primary Gleason score risk group, median pre-treatment PSA, disease burden, site of metastases, and pre-treatment ECOG score were not statistically different between the two groups. Median follow up time was 30 months and the median time to radiographic disease progression was 28.1 and 12.5 months (p = 0.002) in cohorts A and B, respectively. On univariate and multivariate analyses, both PSA reduction ≥ 50% and volume of metastatic disease were significantly associated with a decreased risk of radiographic disease progression (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21–0.80, p = 0.0113) as well as a decreased risk of cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09–0.87, p = 0.0325). Conclusion PSA reduction ≥ 50% within 3 months of starting 2nd HT was associated with significantly improved radiographic disease progression-free survival and 3-year cancer-specific mortality. This suggests using PSA 50%-decline metric in surveillance patients with on 2nd HT and identifies patients who require further evaluation with imaging.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. This is largely due to the lack of routine screening protocols, an absence of symptoms in early-stage disease leading to late detection, and a paucity of effective treatment options. Critically, the majority of patients either present with metastatic disease or rapidly develop metastatic disease. Thus, there is an urgent need to deepen our understanding of metastasis in PDAC. During metastasis, tumor cells escape from the primary tumor, enter the circulation, and travel to a distant site to form a secondary tumor. In order to accomplish this relatively rare event, tumor cells develop an enhanced ability to detach from the primary tumor, migrate into the surrounding matrix, and invade across the basement membrane. In addition, cancer cells interact with the various cell types and matrix proteins that comprise the tumor microenvironment, with some of these factors working to promote metastasis and others working to suppress it. In PDAC, many of these processes are not well understood. The purpose of this review is to highlight recent advances in the cell biology of the early steps of the metastatic cascade in pancreatic cancer. Specifically, we will examine the regulation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in PDAC and its requirement for metastasis, summarize our understanding of how PDAC cells invade and degrade the surrounding matrix, and discuss how migration and adhesion dynamics are regulated in PDAC to optimize cancer cell motility. In addition, the role of the tumor microenvironment in PDAC will also be discussed for each of these invasive processes.

The demand for genetic testing (GT) for prostate cancer (PCa) is expanding, but there is limited knowledge about the genetic counseling (GC) needs of men. A strong-to-moderate inherited genetic predisposition causes approximately 5–20% of prostate cancer (PCa). In men with prostate cancer, germline testing may benefit the patient by informing treatment options, and if a mutation is noticed, it may also guide screening for other cancers and have family implications for cascade genetic testing (testing of close relatives for the same germline mutation). Relatives with the same germline mutations may be eligible for early cancer detection strategies and preventive measures. Cascade family testing can be favorable for family members, but it is currently unutilized, and strategies to overcome obstacles like knowledge deficiency, family communication, lack of access to genetic services, and testing expenses are needed. In this review, we will look at the genetic factors that have been linked to prostate cancer, as well as the role of genetic counseling and testing in the early detection of advanced prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer (PCa), which is among the most prevalent types of cancer in men, is a prominent topic in imaging research. The primary aim of PCa imaging is to acquire more accurate characterizations of the disease. More precise imaging of the local stage progression, early discovery of metastatic cancers, reliable diagnosis of oligometastatic cancer, and optimum treatment response evaluation are areas in which contemporary imaging is quickly improving and developing. Imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the whole body and molecular imaging with combined positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT), and MRI, enable imaging to support and enhance treatment lines in patients with local and advanced PCa. With the availability of multiple imaging modalities for the management of PCa, we aim in this review to offer a multidisciplinary viewpoint on the appropriate function of contemporary imaging in the identification of PCa.

Higher levels of tumor-derived extracellular vesicles are detected in metastatic prostate cancer compared to localized prostate cancer by standardized and calibrated flow cytometry.