DeFilipp, Zachariah

Abstract The absence of a standardized definition for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) flares and data on its clinical course are significant concerns. We retrospectively evaluated 968 patients across 23 Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) transplant centers who achieved complete response (CR) or very good partial response (VGPR) within 4 weeks of treatment. The cumulative incidence of flares within 6 months was 22%, and flares were associated with a higher risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 4.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.19-7.36; P < .001). Flares were more severe (grades 3/4, 41% vs 16%; P < .001) and had more frequent lower gastrointestinal (LGI) involvement (55% vs 32%; P < .001) than the initial GVHD. At CR/VGPR, elevated MAGIC biomarkers predicted the future occurrence of a flare, along with its severity and LGI involvement. In multivariate analyses, higher Ann Arbor (AA) biomarker scores at CR/VGPR were significant risk factors for flares (AA2 vs AA1: aHR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.32-2.48; P = .001]; AA3 vs AA1: aHR, 3.14 [95% CI, 1.98-4.98; P < .001]), as were early response to initial treatment (aHR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.21-2.80; P = .004) and HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (aHR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.00-3.02; P = .049). MAGIC biomarkers also stratified the risk of NRM both at CR/VGPR and at the time of flare. We conclude that GVHD flares are common and carry a significant mortality risk. The occurrence of future flares can be predicted by serum biomarkers that may serve to guide adjustment and discontinuation of immunosuppression.

Background: In patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), low gastrointestinal (GI) microbial diversity is associated with risk of bloodstream infections (BSIs), acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD), and death. SER-155 is an investigational cultivated microbiome therapeutic rationally designed to improve clinical outcomes in allo-HCT patients by preventing pathogen domination, promoting epithelial barrier integrity, and reducing colonic inflammation. SER-155-001 is a 2-part, Phase 1b study evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of SER-155 in adults undergoing allo-HCT. Here, we present preliminary safety and tolerability data from the open-label Cohort 1 through Day 100 post HCT. Study Design and Methods: Adult recipients of allo-HCT were eligible for screening. Patients were excluded if they: a) were planned for umbilical cord blood or ex vivo T-cell depletion, b) had received a fecal microbiota transplant or any live biotherapeutic product within 3 months prior to screening, and/or c) had evidence of relapse or progression of hematologic malignancy (minimal residual disease was allowed). HCT conditioning and aGvHD prophylaxis were per investigator discretion. Following screening, patients received two treatment courses (before conditioning and after neutrophil engraftment) comprised of microbiome conditioning with 4 days of oral vancomycin (to facilitate engraftment of SER-155 strains) followed by 10 days of oral SER-155 (see study design schematic, Figure 1). The primary endpoint was the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and adverse events of special interest (AESIs), designated as invasive infection, BSI, and GI infection. Results: Fifteen adult patients were enrolled and 13 received study drug (safety population). Of these 13 patients, the median age was 67.0, all were White, and 54% were male. Underlying diseases included acute myeloid leukemia (6 patients [46.2%]); myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms (2 patients each [15.4%]; and acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, and classic Hodgkin's lymphoma (1 patient each [7.7%]). Ten patients (76.9%) received peripheral blood stem cells; 9 (69.2%) had an unrelated donor, 8 (61.5%) underwent a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen, and 3 (23.1%) received myeloablative conditioning. Eleven patients received allo-HCT, all patients had neutrophil engraftment within the expected timeframe and 10 had 100-day follow-up data available. Nine of these patients (81.8%) received tacrolimus/methotrexate-based GvHD prophylaxis. SER-155 was generally well-tolerated ( Table 1). Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were observed in all patients as is expected in this patient population. One TEAE considered unrelated to study drug, resulted in study discontinuation. Most AEs were gastrointestinal in nature with diarrhea being the most common AE. No SAEs were considered related to SER 155, and most SAEs and AESIs occurred after HCT and before starting the second course of SER-155. No deaths occurred prior to Day 100. Three deaths occurred after Day 100, all deemed to be unrelated to study drug by the investigators. No BSIs attributable to organisms in SER-155 occurred. Commencement of the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Cohort 2 (n=60) was initiated following approval of the Data Safety Monitoring Committee. Conclusions: In patients enrolled in this open-label Cohort 1 of this Phase 1b study, SER-155 was well-tolerated through Day 100. Although sample size is limited, the observed safety and tolerability profile of SER-155 in this patient population is consistent with multiple preclinical assessments supporting the safety of SER-155 for therapeutic use. Enrollment in the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled second cohort to assess safety, efficacy, and changes in microbiome composition and function is ongoing.

Introduction: Risk stratification approaches using clinical criteria or biomarkers in acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) have traditionally been implemented at diagnosis or initiation systemic treatment with corticosteroids. For patients who require second-line treatment, the significance of biomarkers at salvage therapy and the relationship between biomarker risk and choice of therapy are unknown. Methods: We studied adult patients who received second-line treatment for acute GVHD between January 2016 and December 2021 in the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD Consortium (MAGIC) database, which collects clinical data and longitudinal serum samples from allogeneic HCT recipients using a rigorous PRoBE study design. Exclusion criteria included relapse of underlying malignant disease prior to second-line therapy, missing response data, or missing serum sample. Serum samples collected from 7 days prior to 3 days after initiation of second-line therapy met criteria for biomarker analysis. The MAGIC algorithm probability (MAP) was calculated as a single value based on concentrations of ST2 and REG3α and was stratified at a threshold of 0.290 to define high MAP and low MAP groups. The primary objective evaluated the association between MAP and survival for patients receiving second-line therapy for acute GVHD. The key secondary objective was to investigate the MAP and choice of second-line systemic agent on Day 28 overall response rate (ORR) and survival. Results: In total, 316 adult patients received second-line treatment for acute GVHD; 149 patients (47%) were excluded for disease relapse (n=27), missing response data (n=48), or missing sample (n=74).Of the 167 evaluable patients, most had steroid-refractory acute GVHD (n=146, 87%), rather than steroid-dependent (n=8, 5%) or steroid-sensitive (n=14, 8%) disease. 62 patients received ruxolitinib while 102 received other systemic agents (best available therapy: BAT). Baseline clinical characteristics of the study population according to treatment choice were similar, except for donor type (Rux: MRD 15%, MUD 74%, haplo 11%; BAT: MRD 30%, MUD 67%, haplo 3%; P=0.014) and median days from corticosteroids to second-line treatment (Rux: 18, BAT: 12; P=0.02).In total, 81 patients had high MAPs and 86 patients had low MAPs, with similar distribution in each treatment cohort (P=0.53). For the entire cohort, the median follow-up for survivors was 22 months (range, 1.5-27).The MAP separated patients into 2 groups (high vs low) with significantly different mortality (NRM at 2 years, 76% vs 29%, P<.0001) and survival (OS at 2 years, 12% vs 63%, P<.0001). Patients who received ruxolitinib as second-line therapy had lower mortality (NRM at 2 years, 35% vs 60%, P<.002) and improved survival (OS at 2 years, 51% vs 32%, P<.008), compared to those who received other systemic agents. However, the outcomes of patients with high MAP were poor, regardless of second-line treatment choice ( Figure 1A). The MAP (low vs high), time from corticosteroids to second-line treatment (≥14 days vs < 14 days), GVHD grade at second-line (0-2 vs 3-4), and choice of second-line therapy (Rux vs BAT) were all significant (P<0.05) predictors of lower NRM and higher OS in multivariate analysis. The MAP also separated patients into 2 groups with significantly different D28 ORR (low: 49%, high: 30%, P<.0001). In agreement with prospective trials, ruxolitinib resulted in higher D28 response rates compared to other systemic therapies (ORR 54.9% vs 30.5%, P=0.005), which was observed in both low MAP (ORR, 64.5% vs 38.5%, P=0.017) and high MAP cohorts (ORR, 42.9% vs 22.6%, P=0.06) ( Figure 1B). The MAP (low vs high), GVHD grade at second line (0-2 vs 3-4), and choice of second-line therapy (Rux vs BAT) were significant predictors (P<0.05) of higher D28 ORR in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: The MAP measured at the initiation of second-line systemic treatment for acute GVHD predicts NRM and OS, as well as treatment response. The outcomes of patients with high MAP are poor, regardless of second-line treatment choice, and the higher CR rate in low MAP patients may drive higher survival rates. Incorporation of MAP into clinical trials in this setting warrants investigation. The results also support the current use of ruxolitinib as second-line treatment for acute GVHD, particularly in patients with low MAP.

The overall response rate (ORR) 28 days (D28) after treatment has been adopted as the primary endpoint for clinical trials of acute graft versus host disease (GVHD). ORR combines complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) because CR and PR have very similar non relapse mortality (NRM). D28 ORR has some disadvantages: first, physicians usually decide to modify immunosuppression much earlier than D28, and second, NRM does not always correlate well with ORR at D28, particularly for patients who present with intermediate risk or low risk disease. MAGIC serum biomarkers at day 14 (D14) of GVHD treatment have been shown to correlate better with NRM than clinical symptom response (Srinagesh et al, Blood Advances, 2019). We therefore hypothesized that a combination of clinical symptom severity and biomarkers at D14 of treatment would predict NRM at least as well and possibly better than clinical response at D28. We studied 1144 patients from 23 MAGIC sites who were systemically treated with at least 0.25 mg/kg/day of systemic steroids (prednisone equivalents) and had clinical data and serum samples available in the MAGIC database and biorepository. We divided the patients into a training set (n=764) and a validation set (n=380). We used 12-month NRM from the time of acute GVHD onset as the primary outcome of interest. We first trained a recursive partitioning algorithm in the training set to create a response model (MAGIC D14 clinical response) according to overall GVHD grade at both onset and D14 that predicted 12-month NRM and then applied it to the validation set. Patients that either progressed to grade III/IV GVHD, continued having grade III/IV GVHD, or only improved to grade II at D14 from grade III/IV at D0 had high NRM and were classified as non-responders. Patients with grade I/II GVHD at day 0 who had grade 0-II GVHD at day 14 and patients who improved to grade 0/I at day 14 from grade III/IV at day 0 had low NRM and were classified as responders. Although counterintuitive, responders included patients whose GVHD remained at grade II because the 12 month NRM of this group was only 20%. The new clinical model predicted NRM as well as the D28 standard response model in the validation set. When we integrated the D14 MAP biomarker score (low: ≤ 0.290 vs high: >0.290) with the new D14 clinical response (D14 MAGIC integrated response), we observed three response groups of integrated response with strikingly different 12 month NRM (8%, 35%, 76%, p<0.001), in contrast to the D28 standard response (Figure 1A, 1B). D14 complete response required MAGIC clinical response with low MAP; D14 partial response required either MAGIC clinical response with high MAP or MAGIC clinical non-response with low MAP; and D14 non-response required MAGIC clinical non-response with high MAP. The D14 response groups also displayed significant differences in 12 month OS (82%, 58%, 14% respectively, p<0.001) We then compared the D14 integrated response with the D28 standard response for 12 month NRM prediction. This D14 integrated response model was superior for time-dependent AUC (0.78 vs 0.71, P=0.03), sensitivity (0.71 vs 0.54), positive predictive value (0.52 vs 0.48) and negative predictive value (0.92 vs 0.89), with minimal loss in specificity (0.85 vs 0.87) in the prediction of 12-month NRM compared to the D28 standard response model. Using decision curve analysis, the D14 integrated response displayed higher net benefit (correct identification of patients that will experience NRM by 12 months) over the whole range of threshold probabilities/preferences for changing immunosuppression when 12-month NRM was used as the outcome. We conclude first, that the definition of response that uses onset and D14 grades is as accurate as D28 ORR model; and second, that a model using clinical grades and biomarkers on D14 more accurately predicts long term NRM than the standard D28 definition and may be useful as a clinical trial endpoint.

Introduction: During allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), conditioning regimens disrupt the epithelial barrier of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and broad-spectrum antibiotics cause microbiome disruption characterized by low microbial diversity and high abundance of pathogens that can dominate gut communities. Microbiome disruption is associated with increased translocation of pathogenic bacteria leading to risk of bloodstream infections (BSIs) and acute graft-vs-host disease (aGvHD). Nonclinical studies have demonstrated that domination with pathogens leads to immune activation and subsequent GvHD following exposure to bacterial antigens in the gut-associated lymphoid tissue [ Jenq 2015 Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, Stein-Thoeringer 2019 Science, Peled 2020 NEJM]. SER-155, an oral investigational cultivated microbiome therapeutic comprised of 16 bacterial Firmicutes strains, was designed to engraft in the GI tract, improve GI barrier integrity, and restructure the GI microbiome by introducing bacteria with immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties and driving a reduction in abundance of proinflammatory bacteria [ Halvorsen 2021 OFID, 2022 Bone Marrow Transplant]. Herein, we present preliminary clinical data through Day 100 from an open-label cohort of a Phase 1b study in patients undergoing allo-HCT (NCT04995653) and compare the incidence of GI pathogen domination in this cohort to a historical cohort. Methods: Study patients received two treatment courses of SER-155 (before conditioning and after neutrophil engraftment), each comprised of microbiome conditioning with 4 days oral vancomycin (to facilitate engraftment of SER-155 strains into the GI microbiome) followed by 10 days of oral SER-155. The primary endpoint was safety. Stool samples collected pre- and post-HCT were used to evaluate secondary endpoints, including engraftment of SER-155 strains (following each course of SER-155) and GI pathogen domination, defined as a relative abundance of a specific taxa at ≥30% ( Peled, 2020). Engraftment of SER-155 strains was assessed via strain-specific molecular probes (NanoString). Relative abundance of Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcaceae, Streptococcaceae and Staphylococcaceae was assessed with whole metagenomic shotgun sequencing (WMS). A post-hoc comparison of GI domination was made with a historical cohort of 459 HCT patients with similar patient characteristics from one of the study sites (MSKCC) using stool samples profiled by 16S-amplicon sequencing. Results: Fifteen adults (median age 67 years; 54% male) were enrolled and 13 received study drug. SER-155 was generally well-tolerated. Following each course of SER-155, the majority of the 16 strains in SER-155 were detected in evaluable patients (median = 11 strains in 8 patients before conditioning; median = 12 strains in 7 patients after neutrophil engraftment).Between the day of transplant (Day 0) and Day 30, GI domination with potentially pathogenic bacteria occurred in only 1 of 9 (11%) evaluable patients (Figure 1). In contrast, in the historical comparator cohort, 64% of patients (294 of 459) had pathogen domination during the same timeframe, with domination by Enterococcus being most common. Conclusions: The observation of SER-155 strain engraftment before transplant and low incidence of GI pathogen domination after transplant through Day 30 are encouraging, although these preliminary data are limited by the small size of this open-label cohort of HCT patients. These observations are consistent with the design and preclinical evaluation of SER-155, supporting further development of this investigational cultivated microbiome therapeutic. Enrollment in the second double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled cohort (approximately 60 participants) has initiated following a preplanned review by the Data Safety Monitoring Committee.

Abstract Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is the main cause of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Ann Arbor (AA) scores derived from serum biomarkers at onset of GVHD quantify GI crypt damage; AA2/3 scores correlate with resistance to treatment and higher NRM. We conducted a multicenter, phase 2 study using natalizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks T-cell trafficking to the GI tract through the α4 subunit of α4β7 integrin, combined with corticosteroids as primary treatment for patients with new onset AA2/3 GVHD. Seventy-five patients who were evaluable were enrolled and treated; 81% received natalizumab within 2 days of starting corticosteroids. Therapy was well tolerated with no treatment emergent adverse events in >10% of patients. Outcomes for patients treated with natalizumab plus corticosteroids were compared with 150 well-matched controls from the MAGIC database whose primary treatment was corticosteroids alone. There were no significant differences in overall or complete response between patients treated with natalizumab plus corticosteroids and those treated with corticosteroids alone (60% vs 58%; P = .67% and 48% vs 48%; P = 1.0, respectively) including relevant subgroups. There were also no significant differences in NRM or overall survival at 12 months in patients treated with natalizumab plus corticosteroids compared with controls treated with corticosteroids alone (38% vs 39%; P = .80% and 46% vs 54%; P = .48, respectively). In this multicenter biomarker–based phase 2 study, natalizumab combined with corticosteroids failed to improve outcome of patients with newly diagnosed high-risk GVHD. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT02133924.

Abstract Late acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is defined as de novo acute GVHD presenting beyond 100 days after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) without manifestations of chronic GVHD. Data are limited regarding its characteristics, clinical course, and risk factors because of underrecognition and changes in classification. We evaluated 3542 consecutive adult recipients of first HCTs at 24 Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) centers between January 2014 and August 2021 to better describe the clinical evolution and outcomes of late acute GVHD. The cumulative incidence of classic acute GVHD that required systemic treatment was 35.2%, and an additional 5.7% of patients required treatment for late acute GVHD. At the onset of symptoms, late acute GVHD was more severe than classic acute GVHD based on both clinical and MAGIC algorithm probability biomarker parameters and showed a lower overall response rate on day 28. Both clinical and biomarker grading at the time of treatment stratified the risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in patients with classic and late acute GVHD, respectively, but long-term NRM and overall survival did not differ between patients with classic and late acute GVHD. Advanced age, female-to-male sex mismatch, and the use of reduced intensity conditioning were associated with the development of late acute GVHD, whereas the use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide–based GVHD prevention was protective mainly because of shifts in GVHD timing. Because overall outcomes were comparable, our findings, although not definitive, suggest that similar treatment strategies, including eligibility for clinical trials, based solely on clinical presentation at onset are appropriate.

TPS7080 Background: In patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), loss of gastrointestinal microbial diversity is associated with risk of bloodstream infections (BSI), acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD), and death. SER-155 is a rationally designed investigational cultivated microbiome therapeutic, hypothesized to improve clinical outcomes in HCT by restoring colonization resistance to potential pathogens, promoting epithelial barrier integrity, and reducing colonic inflammation. SER-155-001 is a Phase 1b study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of SER-155 in adults undergoing HCT. Methods: This study will enroll approximately 70 subjects ≥18 years in an open-label Cohort 1 (n = 10) followed by a double-blind, placebo-controlled Cohort 2 (n = 60) randomized 1:1 to SER-155 or placebo. A variety of conditioning regimens, donor types, and GVHD-prophylaxis regimens are included. Exclusion criteria include history of severe colitis or active inflammatory bowel disease or total colectomy, umbilical cord blood or ex vivo T-cell depletion, exposure to fecal microbiota transplant or any live microbial therapeutic within 3 months prior to screening, and evidence of relapse or progression of hematologic malignancy (minimal residual disease is allowed). Following screening, participants in both cohorts receive 2 treatment courses (one before and one after HCT), each comprised of microbiome conditioning with oral vancomycin or placebo followed by SER-155 or placebo, plus a conditional 3rd treatment course if the subject receives antibiotics. Safety outcomes are followed through 52 weeks post HCT. The primary endpoint is the incidence and severity of adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse events of special interest. Secondary endpoints include rates of BSI, gastrointestinal infections, aGvHD, febrile neutropenia and overall survival. Microbiome related endpoints include engraftment of SER-155 bacterial strains in the gastrointestinal tract (PK endpoint) and fecal microbiome diversity, composition and metabolites. Results: Cohort 1 enrollment is complete, with 13 participants receiving SER-155. In December 2022, the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee supported continuation to Cohort 2 enrollment following review of safety data from Cohort 1. Enrollment in Cohort 2 is underway. Conclusions: This Phase 1b study is designed to assess the safety, and clinical efficacy of SER-155 in allogeneic HCT, expanding the clinical experience of microbiome- directed interventions in allogeneic HCT recipients. Clinical trial information: NCT04995653 .

AbstractTo develop a prognostic model for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for myelofibrosis (MF), we examined the data of 623 patients undergoing allo-HCT between 2000 and 2016 in the United States (the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research [CIBMTR] cohort). A Cox multivariable model was used to identify factors prognostic of mortality. A weighted score using these factors was assigned to patients who received transplantation in Europe (the European Bone Marrow Transplant [EBMT] cohort; n = 623). Patient age >50 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.96), and HLA-matched unrelated donor (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.98-1.7) were associated with an increased hazard of death and were assigned 1 point. Hemoglobin levels <100 g/L at time of transplantation (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.2-2.19) and a mismatched unrelated donor (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.25-2.52) were assigned 2 points. The 3-year overall survival (OS) in patients with a low (1-2 points), intermediate (3-4 points), and high score (5 points) were 69% (95% CI, 61-76), 51% (95% CI, 46-56.4), and 34% (95% CI, 21-49), respectively (P < .001). Increasing score was predictive of increased transplant-related mortality (TRM; P = .0017) but not of relapse (P = .12). The derived score was predictive of OS (P < .001) and TRM (P = .002) but not of relapse (P = .17) in the EBMT cohort as well. The proposed system was prognostic of survival in 2 large cohorts, CIBMTR and EBMT, and can easily be applied by clinicians consulting patients with MF about the transplantation outcomes.