Malki, MHD Monzr M. Al

Background: Venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMA) or low dose cytarabine is the standard of care for patients (pts) with newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. However, responses are transient, and loss of response is associated with poor outcome. The antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 promotes cell survival in AML and its overexpression is associated with resistance to venetoclax. Voruciclib, a potent oral CDK9 inhibitor (CDK9i), indirectly decreases Mcl-1 protein expression, and has synergistic activity with venetoclax in AML preclinical models. In the initial part of this study in 40 pts with R/R AML and B-cell malignancies, voruciclib at doses up to 200 mg administered on days 1-14 in a 28-day cycle was well tolerated, had no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), and showed biologic and clinical activity in heavily pretreated pts (Blood 2023:142; Supp 1:4286). We hypothesized that voruciclib in combination with venetoclax may achieve greater antileukemic effect. Methods: Pts with R/R AML were eligible if aged ≥18 years, ECOG performance status ≤1, adequate organ function, and no prior CDK9i therapy. Dose escalation followed a 3+3 design, and DLTs were assessed in Cycle 1. Voruciclib was administered at 7 dose levels between 50 mg and 300 mg on days 1-14 of 28-day cycles. Venetoclax was administered at 200 mg on days 1-21 and 400 mg on days 22-28. Disease response was assessed by the 2017 ELN criteria. Mcl-1 protein expression and phosphorylation of RNA Pol IISer2 were evaluated in PBMC in cycle 1. The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03547115). Results: Enrollment in this portion of the study is complete with 41 pts. Median age was 67 years (range 34-89). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (range 1-7), with 93% of pts having received venetoclax and HMAs, 51% having received an anthracycline, and 20% having had prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). 2017 ELN risk was adverse in 73% of pts and intermediate in 17%. The median duration on therapy was 1.5 months (range 0.2 to 9+). No DLTs were observed, and based on PK/PD analysis, dose escalation was stopped at 300 mg without reaching the maximum tolerated dose. The most common adverse events (all grades/grade ≥3) were nausea (32%/0%), febrile neutropenia (27%/24%), dyspnea (22%/2%) diarrhea (22%/2%), hypokalemia (22%/5%) and thrombocytopenia (22%/20%). Seven pts died during treatment, 5 due to an infection and 2 due to hemorrhagic events. Anti-leukemic activity was observed in 10 (31%) of 32 pts treated with voruciclib at doses from 100-300 mg; 2 pts had CRi (one referred to HSCT and one with 6 months of remission prior to progression), 1 pt had MLFS (ongoing at 9 months), and 7 pts had stable disease lasting ≥3 months. Among 25 pts with circulating peripheral blood blasts, 18 (75%) showed a significant reduction of circulating blasts by day 14 of the first cycle; however, circulating blasts increased again in 8 of 18 pts during single agent venetoclax administration on days 15 to 28. Voruciclib pharmacokinetics (PK) was dose proportional. At 300 mg steady state, mean AUC0-24 was 21,526 ng x hr/mL and mean Ctrough was 644 ng/mL, exceeding concentrations needed for target inhibition in preclinical models. Voruciclib did not affect venetoclax PK. Pharmacodynamic studies including Mcl-1 protein expression and RNA Pol IISer2 phosphorylation in PBMC by flow cytometry showed on target effects and is reported separately. Conclusion: The combination of voruciclib with venetoclax is well-tolerated and has activity in pts with AML and disease progression after venetoclax. Because of the rebound in peripheral blasts after 14 days off voruciclib, voruciclib administered on days 1-21 per cycle merits further evaluation.

The overall response rate (ORR) 28 days (D28) after treatment has been adopted as the primary endpoint for clinical trials of acute graft versus host disease (GVHD). ORR combines complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) because CR and PR have very similar non relapse mortality (NRM). D28 ORR has some disadvantages: first, physicians usually decide to modify immunosuppression much earlier than D28, and second, NRM does not always correlate well with ORR at D28, particularly for patients who present with intermediate risk or low risk disease. MAGIC serum biomarkers at day 14 (D14) of GVHD treatment have been shown to correlate better with NRM than clinical symptom response (Srinagesh et al, Blood Advances, 2019). We therefore hypothesized that a combination of clinical symptom severity and biomarkers at D14 of treatment would predict NRM at least as well and possibly better than clinical response at D28. We studied 1144 patients from 23 MAGIC sites who were systemically treated with at least 0.25 mg/kg/day of systemic steroids (prednisone equivalents) and had clinical data and serum samples available in the MAGIC database and biorepository. We divided the patients into a training set (n=764) and a validation set (n=380). We used 12-month NRM from the time of acute GVHD onset as the primary outcome of interest. We first trained a recursive partitioning algorithm in the training set to create a response model (MAGIC D14 clinical response) according to overall GVHD grade at both onset and D14 that predicted 12-month NRM and then applied it to the validation set. Patients that either progressed to grade III/IV GVHD, continued having grade III/IV GVHD, or only improved to grade II at D14 from grade III/IV at D0 had high NRM and were classified as non-responders. Patients with grade I/II GVHD at day 0 who had grade 0-II GVHD at day 14 and patients who improved to grade 0/I at day 14 from grade III/IV at day 0 had low NRM and were classified as responders. Although counterintuitive, responders included patients whose GVHD remained at grade II because the 12 month NRM of this group was only 20%. The new clinical model predicted NRM as well as the D28 standard response model in the validation set. When we integrated the D14 MAP biomarker score (low: ≤ 0.290 vs high: >0.290) with the new D14 clinical response (D14 MAGIC integrated response), we observed three response groups of integrated response with strikingly different 12 month NRM (8%, 35%, 76%, p<0.001), in contrast to the D28 standard response (Figure 1A, 1B). D14 complete response required MAGIC clinical response with low MAP; D14 partial response required either MAGIC clinical response with high MAP or MAGIC clinical non-response with low MAP; and D14 non-response required MAGIC clinical non-response with high MAP. The D14 response groups also displayed significant differences in 12 month OS (82%, 58%, 14% respectively, p<0.001) We then compared the D14 integrated response with the D28 standard response for 12 month NRM prediction. This D14 integrated response model was superior for time-dependent AUC (0.78 vs 0.71, P=0.03), sensitivity (0.71 vs 0.54), positive predictive value (0.52 vs 0.48) and negative predictive value (0.92 vs 0.89), with minimal loss in specificity (0.85 vs 0.87) in the prediction of 12-month NRM compared to the D28 standard response model. Using decision curve analysis, the D14 integrated response displayed higher net benefit (correct identification of patients that will experience NRM by 12 months) over the whole range of threshold probabilities/preferences for changing immunosuppression when 12-month NRM was used as the outcome. We conclude first, that the definition of response that uses onset and D14 grades is as accurate as D28 ORR model; and second, that a model using clinical grades and biomarkers on D14 more accurately predicts long term NRM than the standard D28 definition and may be useful as a clinical trial endpoint.