DeFilipp, Zachariah

ABSTRACT Approximately 30% of patients with acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) develop steroid-refractory disease and have very poor outcomes. Ruxolitinib has become the standard of care for steroid-refractory acute GVHD, but it is unclear which patients derive benefit. The MAGIC Composite Score (MCS), an algorithm that combines clinical symptoms and biomarkers, has been validated to predict outcomes at the start of primary GVHD treatment. Here, we evaluated its performance at the initiation of second-line treatment in 278 patients. MCS stratified patients into three risk groups (MCS1-3), with the majority (88%) classified as intermediate or high risk. Increasing MCS score was associated with progressively higher 1-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) rates (16%, 41%, and 73%; p<0.001), lower 1-year survival (77%, 56%, and 24%; p<0.001), and lower complete response (CR) rates at day 28 (47%, 38%, and 20%, respectively; p<0.01). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for 1-year NRM was significantly higher with MCS compared to clinical symptoms alone (0.70 vs. 0.63; p=0.023). Among patients treated with ruxolitinib, higher MCS similarly predicted higher NRM and lower survival and CR rates. Patients classified as MCS2/3 had poor outcomes despite ruxolitinib, underscoring the need for novel therapies in this patient population. In conclusion the MCS is an accurate predictor of outcomes for patients who require second-line treatment and may be of use as an eligibility criterion for future clinical trials in this high-risk population. Key Points MAGIC Composite Scores that integrate clinical symptoms and biomarker scores predict outcomes of second-line therapy for acute GVHD more accurately than clinical symptoms alone. MCS identifies patients with high NRM despite treatment with ruxolitinib.

Abstract Introduction: Axatilimab is an anti–colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R) monoclonal antibody that targets monocytes and macrophages, key mediators of inflammation and fibrosis in chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). Axatilimab is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg (up to a maximum dose of 35 mg) every 2 weeks (Q2W) for patients with cGVHD after ≥2 prior lines of therapy, based on results from the pivotal phase 2 AGAVE-201 clinical trial (NCT04710576). Patients treated with the 0.3 mg/kg Q2W dose in the AGAVE-201 study were able to transition to 0.6 mg/kg every 4 weeks (Q4W) dosing based on the investigator's discretion and per study protocol criteria. Aims: To describe the safety and feasibility of transition from axatilimab 0.3 mg/kg Q2W to 0.6 mg/kg Q4W dosing using data from AGAVE-201. Methods: Patients treated with axatilimab 0.3 mg/kg Q2W in AGAVE-201 who had their Cycle 7 assessment and achieved a partial or complete response (PR/CR) per National Institutes of Health criteria that was sustained for ≥20 weeks or had not progressed were able to change their dosing schedule to 0.6 mg/kg Q4W (without dose capping) per the study protocol and investigator discretion. Safety and treatment duration were assessed in this post hoc analysis; patients who received additional systemic therapies were excluded. The data cutoff was March 30, 2025. Results: In the first 6 treatment cycles, 59 of the 80 patients (73.8%) randomized to axatilimab 0.3 mg/kg Q2W had a response to treatment (primary endpoint). Of these 59 patients, 19 (32.2%) transitioned to 0.6 mg/kg Q4W dosing. Among these 19 patients, demographics (median [range] age, 50.0 [20–73] y; male, 63.2%) and baseline clinical characteristics (median [range] number of organs involved at baseline, 3.0 [2–8]; severe disease, 73.7%; prior use of ibrutinib, ruxolitinib, or belumosudil, 89.5%) were comparable to the full cohort initially randomized to 0.3 mg/kg Q2W. Overall response rate in the first 6 treatment cycles among the 19 patients who switched to 0.6 mg/kg Q4W was 94.7% (95% CI, 74.0%–99.9%; CR, 5.3%; PR, 89.5%); 1 patient had stable disease and thus was eligible to switch, per investigator discretion. Patients were on treatment for a median (range) of 20.9 (2–32) months after switching doses; 16 of 19 patients (84.2%) maintained the 0.6 mg/kg Q4W dose after dose switching. The safety profile for axatilimab was generally similar before and after the dosing change. After switching to 0.6 mg/kg Q4W, 10 patients (52.6%) had grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); pneumonia was the only grade ≥3 TEAE reported in &gt;1 patient (n=2). TEAEs led to treatment interruptions in 4 patients (21.1%) and discontinuations in 3 patients (15.8%) after switching. The most common TEAEs after switching to 0.6 mg/kg Q4W were fatigue (n=5 [26.3%]), upper respiratory tract infection (n=5 [26.3%]), and headache (n=4 [21.1%]); 1 patient (5.3%) had an infusion-related reaction (n=1 [rash]). Incidences of on-target TEAEs were generally similar before and after the switch, including elevations in alanine aminotransferase (n=3 before switching and n=1 after) and amylase (n=0 and n=1).Conclusion: Transition to 0.6 mg/kg Q4W (without dose capping) is feasible and well tolerated in patients treated with axatilimab 0.3 mg/kg Q2W on the AGAVE-201 study. The Q4W dosing strategy at the 0.6 mg/kg dose identified no new safety signals. Patients had a prolonged duration of therapy, with a median of 20.9 months (1.7 y), and 84% of patients continued treatment, suggesting ongoing clinical benefit. These data provide evidence of the safety and feasibility of a 0.6 mg/kg Q4W dosing strategy in alignment with the AGAVE-201 protocol.

Abstract Changes in the clinical symptoms of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are currently used to assess treatment responses. The Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) consortium has recently revealed that the integration of serum biomarkers with clinical symptoms at the onset of treatment in a MAGIC composite score (MCS) more accurately predicts treatment response and 6-month nonrelapse mortality (NRM) than clinical symptoms alone. In this study, we evaluated whether the integration of serum biomarkers and clinical symptoms on day 28 (D28) would also better predict NRM than clinical response only (CRO). We analyzed data from 1135 patients receiving systemic treatment for acute GVHD and created a fourth MCS category for patients with complete resolution of symptoms and low-risk clinical biomarkers on D28. Using a classification and regression tree model with 6-month NRM as the end point, we identified status of MCS 0 or MCS 1 at D28 as responses, which we termed the MAGIC composite response (MCR). In the validation cohort (n = 309), MCR more accurately predicted 6-month NRM than CRO (area under the curve: 0.77 vs 0.69; P = .014) and demonstrated higher negative and positive predictive values. MCR correctly reclassified both clinical nonresponders and responders: 28 of 213 clinical responders (13%) became nonresponders with fivefold higher NRM (34.3% vs 6.8%, P &lt; .001) and a larger group (29/96, 30%) of clinical nonresponders became responders with sixfold lower NRM (7.6% vs 50.7%, P &lt; .001). These findings support the use of MCR as a superior surrogate end point for long-term GVHD control and survival in future clinical trials.

6554 Background: SER-155 is an investigational, oral, live biotherapeutic product (LBP) comprised of 16 bacterial strains designed to decolonize gastrointestinal (GI) pathogens, improve epithelial barrier integrity, and modulate immune responses to prevent bloodstream infections (BSI). In the placebo-controlled cohort 2 of the phase 1b study, SER-155-001 (NCT04995653), SER-155 was generally well tolerated with a safety profile similar to placebo and the incidence of BSIs, a secondary endpoint, was significantly lower after treatment with SER-155 when compared to placebo. We report exploratory analyses of biomarkers of T cell expansion relevant for immune reconstitution after HCT. Methods: Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 4 days of oral vancomycin (for microbiome conditioning) and 10 days of SER-155 or placebo/placebo administered pre-HCT (course 1) and post-neutrophil engraftment (course 2). Primary endpoints were safety and SER-155 strain engraftment (PK). Exploratory endpoints included plasma cytokine concentrations measured by ELISA and analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) by flow cytometry. Results: Demographics were comparable across treatment arms. 34 of 45 randomized participants were treated and received allo-HCT (SER-155, 20; placebo, 14); 28 received course 2 (SER-155, 19; placebo, 9). SER-155 strain engraftment was observed in the peri-transplant period (median 11.5 strains after course 1) and post-HCT (median 11 strains after course 2 and HCT Day 100). Significant differences and trends in cytokines of systemic inflammation and immune homeostasis were observed relative to placebo prior to HCT Day 0 and post-HCT. On HCT Day 0, both arms had similar concentrations of IL7 and IL15 (Table 1). However, after course 2, and at HCT Day 100, significantly higher concentrations of IL7 were observed in the SER-155 arm relative to placebo (p=0.02, and p=0.003, respectively). In a preliminary analysis of PBMCs from a subset of participants, a high frequency of CD4+ T cells were observed in the SER-155 arm at the same timepoints. For homeostatic cytokine IL15, no significant differences were observed between arms. Conclusions: The significantly higher concentrations of IL7 with SER-155 treatment and observed frequency of CD4+ T cells support the potential role of the GI microbiome in promoting homeostatic expansion of peripheral T cells and immune reconstitution important for successful HCT. Clinical trial information: NCT04995653 . Median plasma IL7 and IL15 (pg/mL), SER-155 vs. placebo (generalized linear model). HCT Day or event SER-155 IL7 Placebo IL7 SER-155 IL15 Placebo IL15 D0 13.8 13.0 31.9 30.4 D7 15.1 14.6 50.9 62.6 D14 12.8 15.5 56.6 69.8 Post-neutrophil engraftment 13.4 9.0 16.3 15.4 Post-course 2 7.4* 3.9 6.2 9.1 D100 7.1** 3.5 6.2 6.2 *p<0.05, **p<0.01.

Background: The majority of patients respond to steroid treatment for graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), but the typically high doses and prolonged courses can cause substantial morbidity. GVHD can be classified at onset into two groups with significant differences in treatment response and non-relapse mortality (NRM) by clinical criteria (Minnesota risk) but the more favorable standard risk group still experiences high rates of treatment failure and NRM [MacMillan, BBMT 2015]. We previously validated a serum biomarker-based (ST2+REG3α) risk stratification system, MAGIC algorithm probabilities (MAPs), that can stratify patients both at initiation and during treatment into risk groups for treatment response and NRM [Hartwell, JCI Insight 2017, Srinagesh, Blood Adv 2019]. GVHD that is Minnesota standard risk and has a low MAP (i.e., Ann Arbor 1) at start of treatment represents a low risk group with &gt;80% response rate to steroids and ~10% NRM [Etra, Blood 2023]. We hypothesized that serial monitoring of GVHD symptom severity and MAPs twice (days (d) 7 and 14) in patients with clinical and biomarker defined low risk GVHD could further stratify patients into clinically meaningful groups. Methods: We retrospectively determined MAPs at d7 and 14 in 450 patients with low risk GVHD who participated in a prospective, multi-center, observational trial and were treated with systemic steroids between 2015-2023. MAPs &lt;0.291 at days 7 and 14 were defined as low risk based on a previously validated threshold [Major-Monfried Blood 2018]. Clinical responses were scored as complete (CR), partial (PR), or non-response (NR) by standard criteria. Initiation of second line therapy was considered NR. Patients were categorized into three groups (A-C) based on clinical responses and MAPs at days d7 and 14. A: CR/PR by d14 and low MAP at both d7+14; B: stable or worse GVHD (NR) by d14 with low MAP at both d7 and 14; C: any response with a high MAP at d7 or 14. The endpoints were clinical response at day 28 (overall response rate, ORR=CR or PR), regardless of earlier response status, and 6-month NRM. Results: The median age of the study population was 54 years (range: 0-79); 19% of patients received PT-Cy for GVHD prophylaxis. Target organ involvement was skin ± upper GI (66%), lower GI (23%), isolated UGI (11%), and skin+liver (1%), and GVHD severity was grade I (35%), II (61%), and III (4%) at start of treatment. Patients in group A (n=310, 69%), clinical responders with low MAPs through day 14, had excellent d28 ORR (93%) and very low NRM (4%). GVHD in this group was considered ultra-low risk (ULR) and subset analyses revealed highly consistent d28 ORR and NRM, regardless of target organ severity, age (&lt;18, 18-59, &gt;60), HCT-CI score, conditioning intensity, and GVHD prophylaxis. Group B patients comprised clinical non-responders with low MAPs through day 14 (n=112, 25%); half of them responded by d28 and their NRM was low (8%), albeit double that of group A (p=0.079). Group C was small (n=28, 6%) and included both clinical responders (n=20, 4%) and clinical non-responders (n=8, 2%) who had at least one high MAP through day 14. Their d28 ORR was 54% but NRM increased four-fold (32%) and was significantly worse than patients who maintained low MAPs regardless of clinical response (p&lt;0.001). Conclusion: Serial monitoring by clinical response and biomarkers during the first two weeks of treatment identifies a small number of high risk patients whose GVHD is initially low risk (group C). This group experiences high NRM regardless of clinical response to steroid treatment and may benefit from treatment escalation. Patients with low risk GVHD who do not have an early clinical response to steroids but maintain low MAPs, (group B) have reasonably good long-term outcomes with standard treatment. Finally, serial monitoring identifies a very large subset of patients with ULR GVHD (group A) who respond exceptionally well to standard treatment and experience very low rates of 6-month NRM regardless of pre-transplant characteristics and GVHD prophylaxis. Such patients may benefit from treatment de-escalation strategies such as shorter courses of lower dose steroids, a strategy we are currently testing in a clinical trial (NCT05090384).

Abstract To examine the activity of ibrutinib in steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (SR-cGVHD) after the US Food and Drug Administration approval, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study. Data were standardly collected (N = 270 from 19 centers). Involved organs included skin (75%), eye (61%), mouth (54%), joint/fascia (47%), gastrointestinal (GI) (26%), lung (27%), liver (19%), genital (7%), and others (4.4%). The National Institutes of Health (NIH) severity was mild in 5.7%, moderate 42%, and severe 53%. Thirty-nine percent had overlap subtype. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was ≥80% in 72%. The median prednisone was 0.21 mg/kg (0-2.27). Ibrutinib was started at a median of 18.2 months after cGVHD onset and in earlier lines of therapy (second line, 26%; third, 30%; fourth, 21%; fifth, 9.6%; sixth, 10%; seventh or higher, 1.2%). Among evaluable patients, the 6-month NIH overall response rate (ORR; complete response [CR]/partial response [PR]) was 45% (PR 42%; CR 3%). The median duration of response was 15 months (range, 1-46). Liver involvement had association with 6-month ORR (multivariate [MVA] odds ratio, 5.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-14.2; P &lt; .001). The best overall response was 56%, with most (86%) achieving by 1 to 3 months. With a median follow-up for survivors of 30.5 months, failure-free survival (FFS) was 59% (53%-65%) at 6 months and 41% (36%-48%) at 12 months. On MVA, increased age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 1.0-1.02; P = .033), higher baseline prednisone (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.09-3.38; P = .032), and lung involvement (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.1-2.28; P = .016) had worse FFS. Ibrutinib discontinuation was most commonly due to progressive cGVHD (44%) or toxicity (42%). These data support that ibrutinib has activity in SR-cGVHD, provide new insight into factors associated with response and FFS, and demonstrate the toxicity profile associated with discontinuation.

Abstract The significance of biomarkers in second-line treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) has not been well characterized. We analyzed clinical data and serum samples at the initiation of second-line systemic treatment of acute GVHD from 167 patients from 17 centers of the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) between 2016 and 2021. Sixty-two patients received ruxolitinib-based therapy, whereas 102 received other systemic agents. In agreement with prospective trials, ruxolitinib resulted in a higher day 28 (D28) overall response Frate than nonruxolitinib therapies (55% vs 31%, P = .003) and patients who received ruxolitinib had significantly lower nonrelapse mortality (NRM) than those who received nonruxolitinib therapies (point estimates at 2-year: 35% vs 61%, P = .002). Biomarker analyses demonstrated that the benefit from ruxolitinib was observed only in patients with low MAGIC algorithm probabilities (MAPs) at the start of second-line treatment. Among patients with a low MAP, those who received ruxolitinib experienced significantly lower NRM than those who received nonruxolitinib therapies (point estimates at 2-year: 12% vs 41%, P = .016). However, patients with high MAP experienced high NRM regardless of treatment with ruxolitinib or nonruxolitinib therapies (point estimates at 2-year: 67% vs 80%, P = .65). A landmark analysis demonstrated that the relationship between the D28 response and NRM largely depends on the MAP level at the initiation of second-line therapy. In conclusion, MAP measured at second-line systemic treatment for acute GVHD predicts treatment response and NRM. The outcomes of patients with high MAP are poor regardless of treatment choice, and ruxolitinib appears to primarily benefit patients with low MAP.

Abstract We evaluate the impact of donor types on outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in myelofibrosis, using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry data for HCTs done between 2013 and 2019. In all 1597 patients, the use of haploidentical donors increased from 3% in 2013 to 19% in 2019. In study-eligible 1032 patients who received peripheral blood grafts for chronic-phase myelofibrosis, 38% of recipients of haploidentical HCT were non-White/Caucasian. Matched sibling donor (MSD)–HCTs were associated with superior overall survival (OS) in the first 3 months (haploidentical hazard ratio [HR], 5.80 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.52-13.35]; matched unrelated (MUD) HR, 4.50 [95% CI, 2.24-9.03]; mismatched unrelated HR, 5.13 [95% CI, 1.44-18.31]; P &lt; .001). This difference in OS aligns with lower graft failure with MSD (haploidentical HR, 6.11 [95% CI, 2.98-12.54]; matched unrelated HR, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.20-4.51]; mismatched unrelated HR, 1.82 [95% CI, 0.58-5.72]). There was no significant difference in OS among haploidentical, MUD, and mismatched unrelated donor HCTs in the first 3 months. Donor type was not associated with differences in OS beyond 3 months after HCT, relapse, disease-free survival, or OS among patients who underwent HCT within 24 months of diagnosis. Patients who experienced graft failure had more advanced disease and commonly used nonmyeloablative conditioning. Although MSD-HCTs were superior, there is no significant difference in HCT outcomes from haploidentical and MUDs. These results establish haploidentical HCT with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide as a viable option in myelofibrosis, especially for ethnic minorities underrepresented in the donor registries.

Abstract Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major cause of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Algorithms containing either the gastrointestinal (GI) GVHD biomarker amphiregulin (AREG) or a combination of 2 GI GVHD biomarkers (suppressor of tumorigenicity-2 [ST2] + regenerating family member 3 alpha [REG3α]) when measured at GVHD diagnosis are validated predictors of NRM risk but have never been assessed in the same patients using identical statistical methods. We measured the serum concentrations of ST2, REG3α, and AREG by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at the time of GVHD diagnosis in 715 patients divided by the date of transplantation into training (2004-2015) and validation (2015-2017) cohorts. The training cohort (n = 341) was used to develop algorithms for predicting the probability of 12-month NRM that contained all possible combinations of 1 to 3 biomarkers and a threshold corresponding to the concordance probability was used to stratify patients for the risk of NRM. Algorithms were compared with each other based on several metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, proportion of patients correctly classified, sensitivity, and specificity using only the validation cohort (n = 374). All algorithms were strong discriminators of 12-month NRM, whether or not patients were systemically treated (n = 321). An algorithm containing only ST2 + REG3α had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (0.757), correctly classified the most patients (75%), and more accurately risk-stratified those who developed Minnesota standard-risk GVHD and for patients who received posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based prophylaxis. An algorithm containing only AREG more accurately risk-stratified patients with Minnesota high-risk GVHD. Combining ST2, REG3α, and AREG into a single algorithm did not improve performance.

6554 Background: Acute graft- versus-host disease (aGvHD) is a life-threatening complication following allo-HCT. Microbiome dysfunction and associated GI barrier disruption may contribute to aGvHD via activation of inflammatory immune responses. Circulating biomarkers in the peri-transplant period are correlated with risk of severe aGvHD, including suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2), regenerating islet-derived 3-alpha (Reg3a) and inflammatory cytokines (IL6, IFNϒγ & TNFα). SER-155 is an investigational cultivated oral microbiome therapeutic designed to restructure the GI microbiome, improve GI barrier integrity and reduce GI inflammation and is being assessed in a 2-part Phase 1b study in adults undergoing allo-HCT. We present preliminary safety, GvHD, PK, and exploratory biomarker data from the completed open-label Cohort 1 through Day 100 post-HCT. Methods: Adult recipients of allo-HCT were eligible. HCT conditioning and aGvHD prophylaxis were per investigator discretion. Patients received 2 courses of SER-155 (pre-HCT and post-neutrophil engraftment, each comprised of 4 days of microbiome conditioning with oral vancomycin followed by 10 days oral SER-155. The primary endpoint was safety. Strain engraftment (PK) and biomarkers were assessed in stool and plasma samples. Results: Fifteen adults enrolled; 13 received at least 1 course of study drug (median age 67; 54% male), and 11 underwent allo-HCT. Following each course, the majority of the 16 SER-155 strains were detected in stool. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported in all patients with GI AEs the most common. No serious AEs (SAEs) were deemed related to SER-155. Most SAEs and AEs of special interest (ie, BSIs, invasive or GI infections) occurred between HCT and the 2nd SER-155 course. There were no deaths before Day 100. No BSIs were attributable to SER-155 strains. The rate of grade 2-4 aGvHD based on MAGIC criteria through Day 100 was 45.5%; no severe grade 3-4 aGvHD was observed. Median levels of plasma biomarkers REG3α, ST2 and inflammatory cytokines were not elevated relative to a reference range (Table). Conclusions: In this small open-label cohort, SER-155 was generally well-tolerated through Day 100 without drug-related SAEs and no severe aGvHD. Plasma biomarkers were not elevated at HCT Day 0 or neutrophil recovery. These preliminary observations align with the design and preclinical evaluation of SER-155. Clinical trial information: NCT04995653 . [Table: see text]