Haglin, Jack M.

Objectives: In the field of orthopaedics, it has been evident that Medicare reimbursement rates have been relatively stagnant. Although, objective measures of how these financial trends have changed over the past couple of decades has been limited. If orthopaedic practitioners and hospital administrators wish to make progress and advance the degree of satisfactory reimbursement they can expect, a more thorough understanding of these trends is warranted. In this study, the field of orthopaedic shoulder, elbow, and upper arm surgery is being analyzed specifically. The objective of this analysis was to assess the monetary trends in Medicare reimbursement rates for the 10 most commonly utilized shoulder surgical procedures and the 10 most commonly utilized elbow and upper arm surgical procedures from 2000 to 2019. Methods: For this analysis, the current procedural terminology (CPT) code ranges that corresponded to “Surgical Procedures of the Shoulder” and “Surgical Procedures of the Humerus (Upper Arm) and Elbow” were determined. The Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Suppliers PUF CY 2017 document was then utilized to objectively determine the 10 most common CPT codes fororthopaedic shoulder surgical procedures and orthopaedic elbow and upper arm surgical procedures. The reimbursement data for each of these procedures was then compiled from The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. All monetary data points were adjusted for inflation to 2019 US dollars utilizing changes to the United States consumer price index. The average annual and the total percentage change in reimbursement were based on the adjusted trends for the 10 included shoulder procedures and the 10 included elbow and upper arm procedures. Results: After adjustment for inflation, the average reimbursement for the top 10 orthopaedic shoulder surgery procedures decreased by 25.8% from 2000 to 2019. The greatest mean decrease was observed in the “Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (e.g. rotator cuff) open; chronic (23412)” CPT code (-40.1%). No adjusted reimbursement rates were noted to be positive throughout the study period for surgical shoulder procedures. The procedure with the smallest mean decrease was the “Closed treatment of proximal humeral (surgical or anatomical neck) fracture; without manipulation (23600)” CPT code (-5.4%). From 2000 to 2019, the adjusted reimbursement rate for all included shoulder procedures decreased by an average of 1.6% per year. For the top 10 orthopaedic elbow and upper arm surgical procedures, the average reimbursement decreased by 19.5% from 2000 to 2019. The greatest mean decrease was observed in the “Osteoplasty,humerus (e.g., shortening or lengthening) (24420)” CPT code (-32.1%). The procedure with the only positive mean difference was “Closed treatment of humeral shaft fracture; without manipulation (24500)” CPT code (0.34%). From 2000 to 2019, the adjusted reimbursement rate for all included elbow and upper arm procedures decreased by an average of 1.2% per year. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the orthopaedic shoulder and elbow subspecialtyand its trends in Medicare reimbursement rates. When monetary data is corrected for inflation, Medicare reimbursement rates have shown a steady decline from 2000 to 2019. The 10 most common procedures of or relating to the shoulder have decreased by an average of 25.8% while the 10 most common procedures of or relating to the elbow or upper arm have decreased by an average of 19.5%. Additionally, only one procedure showed a positive increase in reimbursement rate (Closed treatment of humeral shaft fracture; without manipulation (24500)). If access to high quality and sustainable surgicalorthopaedic care is to persist in the United States, increased awareness of these trends is important for stakeholders to take note of.

Objective There is a paucity of data regarding financial trends for procedural reimbursements in otolaryngology. The purpose of this study was to evaluate monetary trends in Medicare reimbursement rates for the 20 most commonly billed otolaryngology procedures from 2000 to 2019. Study Design Analysis of physician reimbursement. Methods The American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery database was queried to determine the 20 most performed otolaryngology procedures. Next, the Physician Fee Schedule Look‐Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services was utilized to assess each of the top 20 most utilized Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes in otolaryngology, and reimbursement data was extracted. All monetary data was adjusted for inflation to 2019 U.S. dollars using changes to consumer price index. Average annual and total percentage change in reimbursement were calculated based on adjusted values for all included procedures. Results After adjusting for inflation, the average reimbursement for the total 20 procedures decreased by 37.63% from 2000 to 2019. The greatest single mean decrease was seen in CPT code 61782 for stereotaxis procedures on the skull, meninges, and brain (−59.96%), whereas the smallest mean decrease was in CPT code 30520 for septoplasty (−1.50%). From 2000 to 2019, the adjusted reimbursement rate for the combined procedures decreased by an average of 2.33% each year. Conclusion Medicare reimbursement for included procedures has decreased from 2000 to 2019. Increased awareness and consideration of these trends will be important for policy makers, hospitals, and surgeons in order to assure continued access to meaningful otolaryngology care in the United States. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope , 131:496–501, 2021

Background: An understanding of financial trends is important to advance agreeable reimbursement models in plastic surgery. This study aimed to evaluate trends in Medicare reimbursement rates for the 20 most commonly billed reconstructive plastic surgery procedures from 2000 to 2019. Methods: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File was used to identify the 20 reconstructive procedures most commonly billed to Medicare by plastic surgeons in 2016. Reimbursement data were extracted from The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for each CPT code. Monetary data were adjusted for inflation to 2019 U.S. dollars. Average annual and total percentage changes in reimbursement were calculated based on these adjusted trends. Results: The average adjusted reimbursement for all procedures decreased by 14.0 percent from 2000 to 2019. The greatest mean decrease was observed in complex wound repair of the scalp, arms, or legs (−33.2 percent). The only procedure with an increased adjusted reimbursement rate was layer-closure of the scalp, axillae, trunk, and/or extremities (6.5 percent). From 2000 to 2019, the adjusted reimbursement rate for all procedures decreased by an average of 0.8 percent annually. Conclusions: This is the first comprehensive study evaluating trends in Medicare reimbursement in plastic surgery. When adjusted for inflation, Medicare reimbursement for the included procedures has steadily decreased from 2000 to 2019. Increased consideration of these trends will be important for U.S. policymakers, hospitals, and surgeons to ensure continued access to meaningful reconstructive plastic surgery care.

AbstractBackgroundInnovation in computer‐assisted surgery (CAS) aims to increase operative accuracy and improve safety by decreasing procedure‐related complications. The application of reality technologies, to CAS has begun to revolutionize orthopedic training and practice.MethodsFor this review, relevant published reports were found via searches of Medline (PubMed) data base using the following medical subject headings (MeSH) terms: “virtual reality” or “augmented reality” or “mixed reality” with “orthopedics” or “orthopedic surgery” and all relevant reports we utilized.ResultsTrainees now have authentic and highly interactive operative simulations without the need for supervision. The practicing orthopedic surgeon is better able to pre‐operatively plan and intra‐operatively navigate without the use of fluoroscopy, gain access to three‐dimensional reconstructions of patient imaging, and remotely interact with colleagues located outside the operating room.ConclusionThis review provides a current and comprehensive examination of the reality technologies and their applications in Orthopedic surgery.

Abstract Background There is a paucity of data regarding financial trends for procedural reimbursement in the field of cardiology. A comprehensive understanding of such trends is important as continued progress is made to advance agreeable reimbursement models in cardiology while maintaining quality of care. Purpose To evaluate monetary trends in Medicare reimbursement rates for 10 commonly utilized cardiology procedures from 2000 to 2018. Methods Reimbursement data was extracted using The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services of the 10 included Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes in cardiology. The utilized CPT codes included each of the top two most frequently billed codes in the echocardiology, catheterization, pacemaker, electrophysiology, and device integrations divisions of our local cardiology department during the 2017 calendar year. All monetary data for each code was adjusted for inflation to 2018 US dollars (USD) utilizing changes to the United States consumer price index (CPI). If the code was redefined throughout the study period, the correct replacement code was utilized for each year as defined by the procedure. The R-squared and both the average annual and the total percentage change in reimbursement were calculated based on these adjusted trends for all included procedures. Results After adjusting for inflation, the average reimbursement for all procedures decreased by 38.2% from 2000 to 2018. The greatest mean decrease was observed in transthoracic echocardiogram (−64.4%). The only procedure with an increased adjusted reimbursement rate throughout the study period was biopsy of heart lining (+60.4%). From 2000 to 2018, the adjusted reimbursement rate for all included procedures decreased by an average of 2.8% each year, with an average R-squared value of 0.81, indicating a stable decline throughout the study period. Conclusion This is the first study to evaluate trends in procedural Medicare reimbursement for cardiology. When adjusted for inflation, Medicare reimbursement for included procedures has steadily decreased from 2000 to 2018. Increased awareness and consideration of these trends will be important for policy-makers, hospitals, and surgeons in order to assure continued access to meaningful cardiology care both at the local and global level.

Case: An 65-year-old immunocompetent female developed a Leclercia adecarboxylata infection following the repair of closed olecranon fracture. L. adecarboxylata is associated with polymicrobial infections, infections in immunocompromised patients and penetrating or open wounds. Following speciation, intravenous ceftriaxone was started. Two weeks later, the patient presented with leukopenia and neutropenia. Per infectious disease recommendations, the patient was switched to intravenous ertapenem with resolution of both infection and neutropenia. The olecranon fracture went on to heal fully. Conclusions: This case describes a rare postoperative monomicrobial infection with L. adecarboxylata in an immunocompetent host following musculoskeletal trauma and identifies L. adecarboxylata as a potential emerging hospital-acquired pathogen following orthopedic surgery.

Abstract Background Medical tourism (MT) is an increasingly utilized modality for acquiring medical treatment for patients globally. This review assimilates the current literature regarding MT, with particular focus on the applications, ethics and economics. Methods A systematic review of MEDLINE and PubMed Central databases for publications relating to MT from 2005 to 2018 yielded 43 articles for this review. Results Patients seeking elective bariatric, cosmetic and orthopedic surgery abroad are motivated by significantly lower costs, all-inclusive vacation packages and reduced wait times. Complication rates as high as 56% include infection, poor aesthetic and functional outcome and adverse cardiovascular events. Cross-border reproductive care has steadily increased due to less restrictive policies in select countries; however, the depth of research on outcomes and quality of care is abysmal. Stem cell therapy promise treatments that are often not well researched and offer minimal evidence of efficacy, yet patients are drawn to treatment through anecdotal advertisements and a last sense of hope. Transplant surgery sought to decrease wait times carries many of the similar aforementioned risks and may contribute to the practice of organ trafficking in countries with high rates of poverty. Patients and countries alike are motivated by a plethora of factors to engage in the MT industry but may be doing so without accurate knowledge of the quality, safety or potential for economic gain. Safety is of utmost importance to prevent surgical complications and the spread of treatment-resistant bacteria. Conclusions MT is growing in popularity and complexity. The lack of standardization in its definition and regulation leads to difficulty in epidemiologic and economic analysis and ethical issues of informed consent and health equity. The findings of this review may be used by the stakeholders of MT, including patients and providers, to enhance informed decision-making and quality of care.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate monetary trends from 2000 to 2018 in Medicare reimbursement rates for the most common general surgery procedures. Summary Background Data: A complete understanding of financial trends in general surgery in the United States is lacking. As such, an evaluation of trends in reimbursement rates in general surgery is important for defining the specialty's current and future financial health. Methods: The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services was queried for each of the 20 top codes top in general surgery. The total raw percent change in Medicare reimbursement rate for each procedure from 2000 to 2018 was calculated and averaged. All data was corrected for inflation. Both average annual and total percentage change were calculated based on these adjusted trends. Compound annual growth rate was calculated using the adjusted data. Results: After adjusting all data for inflation, the reimbursement rate for all included procedures decreased by an average of 24.4% throughout the study period. During this time, the adjusted reimbursement rate decreased by an average of 1.4% each year with an average compound annual growth rate of −1.6%. Conclusion: After adjusting for inflation, Medicare reimbursement rates in general surgery have steadily decreased from 2000 to 2018. It is important that these trends are understood and considered by surgeons, healthcare administrators, and policy-makers in order to develop and implement agreeable models of reimbursement while ensuring access to quality general surgery care in the United States.

OBJECTIVEThere is currently a paucity of literature evaluating procedural reimbursements and financial trends in neurosurgery. A comprehensive understanding of the economic trends and financial health of neurosurgery is important to ensure the sustained success and growth of the specialty moving forward. The purpose of this study was to evaluate monetary trends of the 10 most common spinal and cranial neurosurgical procedures in Medicare reimbursement rates from 2000 to 2018.METHODSThe Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services was queried for each of the top 10 most utilized Current Procedural Terminology codes in both spinal and cranial neurosurgery, and comprehensive reimbursement data were extracted. The raw percent change in Medicare reimbursement rate from 2000 to 2018 was calculated for each procedure and averaged. This was then compared to the percent change in consumer price index over the same time. Using data adjusted for inflation, trend analysis was performed for all included procedures. Adjusted R-squared and both the average annual and the total percent change in reimbursement were calculated based on these adjusted trends for all included procedures. Likewise, the compound annual growth rate was calculated for all procedures.RESULTSWhen all reimbursement data were adjusted for inflation, the average reimbursement for all procedures decreased by an average of 25.80% from 2000 to 2018. From 2000 to 2018, the adjusted reimbursement rate for all included procedures decreased by an average of 1.59% each year and experienced an average compound annual growth rate of −1.66%, indicating a steady annual decline in reimbursement when adjusted for inflation.CONCLUSIONSThis is the first study to evaluate comprehensive trends in Medicare reimbursement in neurosurgery. When adjusted for inflation, Medicare reimbursement for all included procedures has steadily decreased from 2000 to 2018, with similar rates of decline observed between cranial and spinal neurosurgery procedures. Increased awareness and consideration of these trends will be important moving forward for policy makers, hospitals, and neurosurgeons as continued progress is made to advance agreeable reimbursement models that allow for the sustained growth of neurosurgery in the United States.

Study Design: Descriptive analysis using publicly available data. Objectives: The purpose of this study was 2-fold: to assess patient-rated trustworthiness of spine surgeons as a whole and to assess if academic proclivity, region of practice, or physician sex affects ratings of patient perceived trust. Methods: Orthopedic spine surgeons were randomly selected from the North American Spine Society directory. Surgeon profiles on 3 online physician rating websites, HealthGrades, Vitals, and RateMDs were analyzed for patient-reported trustworthiness. Whether or not the surgeon had published a PubMed-indexed paper in 2016 was assessed with regard to trustworthiness scores. Total number of publications was also assessed. Individuals with >300 publications were excluded due to the likelihood of repeat names. Results: Recent publication and total number of publications has no relationship with online patient ratings of trustworthiness across all surgeons in this study. Region of practice likewise has no influence on mean trust ratings, yet varied levels of correlation are observed. Furthermore, there was no difference in trust scores between male and female surgeons. Conclusion: Total academic proclivity via indexed publications does not correlate with patient perceived physician trustworthiness among spine surgeons as reported on physician review websites. Furthermore, region of practice within the United States does not have an influence on these trust scores. Likewise, there is no difference in trust score between female and male spine surgeons. This study also highlights an increasing utility for physician rating websites in spine surgery for evaluating and monitoring patient perception.