Rao, Ravi D.

8530 Background: RAD-001 (Everolimus) is an oral inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Interim analysis results from a phase II study of RAD-001 in patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) were presented at ASCO 2005. This study was re-opened using a higher dose based on an improvement in the 16 week progression free survival (PFS) rate and good tolerability. Methods: A two- stage, phase II multi-institutional trial was conducted in patients with MM to assess that 16 weeks PFS rate was at least 50%. Inclusion criteria: measurable disease, ECOG performance score of 0–2. Exclusion criteria: presence of intracranial metastases, concurrent use of inducers of cytochrome 3A4 and abnormal organ function. The dose of RAD-001 in the second cohort was increased to 10 mg daily (increased from 30 mg weekly) based on evidence of safety of the higher dose. Results: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled; baseline information is available on 27. Median age was 63 yrs; 15 (56%) had >2 sites of metastatic disease. Most (48%) had stage M1c disease. PS was 0, 1 and 2 in 58%, 38% and 4%. All but 4 (15%) had received prior therapy. Grade 3 adverse events included stomatitis and fatigue (2 each), leukopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, anorexia, dehydration, dyspnea, hyperglycemia, and hypersensitivity (1 each). Planned interim analysis was done after 20 patients were enrolled. 14 (70%) had progressed 16 weeks, failing to meet the decision rule needed (PFS >30%) to restart accrual. The median PFS for all 29 patients was 56 days. The median overall survival (OS) has not been reached. For the entire cohort of 53 pts treated on this study (at both dose levels), the median PFS, median OS were 59 and 286 days respectively. Conclusion: Interim analysis after enrollment of 20 patients at a higher dose of RAD-001 demonstrated significantly more toxicity and no added clinical efficacy. The 16 week PFS rate target was not reached, and accrual was suspended. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract Lessons Learned Everolimus does not have sufficient activity to justify its use as single agent in metastatic melanoma. Patients treated with 10 mg per day dose were most likely to require dose reductions. Everolimus appeared to reduce the numbers of regulatory T cells in approximately half of the treated patients; unfortunately, these effects were not correlated with clinical outcomes. Background Everolimus (RAD-001) is an orally active rapamycin analogue shown in preclinical data to produce cytostatic cell inhibition, which may be potentially beneficial in treating melanoma. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of everolimus in patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma (MM). Methods This study included two cohorts; cohort 1 received 30 mg of everolimus by mouth (PO) weekly, and cohort 2 was dosed with 10 mg of everolimus PO daily. The endpoints of the study were safety, 16-week progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and measures of immunomodulatory/antiangiogenic properties with therapy. Tumor samples before therapy and at week 8 of treatment were analyzed. Peripheral blood plasma or mononuclear cell isolates collected prior to therapy and at weeks 8 and 16 and at time of tumor progression were analyzed for vascular endothelial growth factor and regulatory T-cell (Treg) measurements. Results A total of 53 patients were enrolled in cohort 1 (n = 24) and cohort 2 (n = 29). Only 2 patients of the first 20 patients enrolled in cohort 2 had treatment responses (25%; 95% confidence interval, 8.6%–49.1%); this result did not allow full accrual to cohort 2, as the study was terminated for futility. Median OS was 12.2 months for cohort 1 versus 8.1 months in cohort 2; no PFS advantage was seen in either group (2.1 months vs. 1.8 months). Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 4 myocardial ischemia (3.4%); grade 3 fatigue, mucositis, and hyperglycemia (10.3%); and anorexia and anemia (6.9%). Everolimus significantly reduced the number of Tregs in approximately half of the treated patients; however, these effects were not correlated with clinical outcomes. Conclusion Everolimus does not have sufficient single-agent activity in MM; however, we have identified evidence of biological activity to provide a potential rationale for future combination studies.