Windschitl, Harold E.

8043 Background: Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a serine-threonine kinase that regulates the production vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and cell growth and proliferation. Inhibitors of mTOR have anti-mitotic and anti-angiogenic effects in various cancers (including melanoma). Everolimus (RAD-001), an orally administered inhibitor of mTOR, is well tolerated at a dose of 30 mg/week. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the role of RAD-001 in treating patients with metastatic melanoma (MM). Methods: A 2 stage, phase II multi-institutional trial was conducted in patients with MM to assess progression free survival (PFS) rate at 16 weeks was at least 50% against the alternative it was at most 30%. Data about expected baseline PFS were derived from historical controls. Each cycle was 8 weeks in duration. Inclusion criteria: measurable disease, ECOG performance score (PS) of 0–2. Exclusion criteria: presence of intracranial metastases, concurrent use of inducers of cytochrome 3A4 and abnormal hepatic, renal or bone marrow function. Correlative studies included changes pharmacodynamic endpoints to evaluate effect of therapy on signaling pathways. Results: 24 patients with MM were enrolled. Median age was 56 years (33–79), 21 (88%) had at 2 or more sites of metastatic disease. Most (75%) had stage M1c, with 13% each having 1a and 1b disease. PS was 0, 1 and 2 in 58, 38% and 4%, resp. All but 9 had received previous therapy for MM. Planned interim analysis was done after 20 patients were enrolled. Of these, 7 (i.e., 35%) were PF at 16 weeks, which exceeded the decision rule for restarting accrual. No patient had an objective response; all 7 had stable disease. There were no grade 3 toxicities. Grade 2 toxic events (at least possibly related to therapy) were: fatigue (17%), diarrhea (8%) and anemia (8%). Patients had a clinically relevant benefit, with the median PFS for all 24 patients of 3 months. Median overall survival was not reached. Three patients continue on therapy. RAD-001 treatment resulted in changes in serum VEGF levels. Conclusion: Interim analysis after enrollment of 20 patients suggests that RAD-001 is well tolerated and has sufficient anti-tumor activity in MM to warrant the opening of enrollment to the second stage of this trial. Further accrual is planned. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

20023 Background: EGFR is a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase belonging to the ErbB family of proteins. Anti-EGFR antibodies have shown efficacy as monotherapy and can enhance cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancers. We studied EGFR expression in primary colon cancers and its association with, microsatellite instability (MSI), clinicopathological variables and patient survival rates. Methods: Archival colon carcinomas were studied from patients with high risk Dukes’ stage B2 (n = 78) and C (n = 230) patients enrolled in a prior adjuvant trial of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin plus standard dose or high-dose levamisole (NCCTG 91–46–53). EGFR expression (anti-EGFR H11 antibody, DAKO) was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and intensity (0–3+), extent and their product (weighted score) were determined. MSI was analyzed using BAT26 and expression of hMLH1, hMSH2 and hMSH6 proteins by IHC. Patients were censored at 5 years after randomization for DFS and censored at 8 years post study randomization for overall survival (OS) data. Results: EGFR protein expression was detected in 216 of 308 (70%) of Dukes’ B2 and C primary colon carcinomas from patients and localized to the plasma membrane. EGFR expression variables (intensity, extent, weighted score) were increased in poor/undifferentiated compared to moderate/well differentiated tumors (p ≤ 0.036). Similar EGFR expression levels were found in MSI-H (n = 27) versus MSS (n = 203) colon cancers and for other clinicopathological variables. EGFR intensity was more likely moderate (2+) or strong (3+) in Dukes’ C versus B2 tumors (p = 0.088). In addition, higher EGFR intensity (2+, 3+) showed a trend toward worse disease-free survival (5 yr DFS %: 62.2 vs. 71.7; p = 0.095), but not overall survival (p = 0.14). Conclusions: EGFR overexpression is associated with increased tumor aggressiveness as indicated by poor tumor cell differentiation and reduced DFS in colon cancer patients receiving adjuvant 5-FU and levamisole. These findings indicate that EGFR may be an important therapeutic target in the adjuvant setting. [Table: see text]

21046 Background: The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) is a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase that is important for colon cancer cell growth and represents a therapeutic target. We studied EGFR expression in relation to rates of apoptosis and cell proliferation. Methods: TNM stage II and III colon carcinomas (n= 361) from patients treated in a 5-FU-based adjuvant trial were studied. EGFR expression (EGFR pharmDx™) and extent were analyzed and their relationship to rates of cell turnover, histologic grade, mismatch repair (MMR) status (defective if instability at BAT 26 locus plus loss of hMLH1, hMSH2 or hMSH6 proteins) and clinical outcome were determined. Results: EGFR plasma membrane staining was detected in 214 (59.3 %) colon carcinomas. Increased EGFR intensity (2+, 3+) was associated with a higher number of caspase-3- (p= 0.02) and Ki-67- (p< 0.001)positive tumor cells. Increased EGFR intensity (p= 0.02) and extent (p= 0.03) were associated with poor differentiation, and did not depend upon MMR status (Breslow-Day test p ≥ 0.46). Diffuse (vs. focal) EGFR extent was increased in tumors with defective MMR [22 of 32 (69%)] compared to those with intact MMR [136 of 271 (50%)] (p= 0.047). EGFR intensity was unrelated to MMR status. Neither EGFR intensity nor extent was significantly associated with patient survival. Conclusions: Stage II and III colon cancers with EGFR overexpression show adverse prognostic variables, i.e., increased rates of cell turnover and poor histologic grade, suggesting that EGFR may be an important target for adjuvant therapy. *Chi-square test for categorical data, Wilcoxin rank-sum test for continuous data [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

10529 Background: BAX mutations are associated with defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) in human colon cancers. However, the impact of BAX inactivation upon tumor cell apoptosis and proliferation in vivo remain unknown. We analyzed and compared caspase-3 and Ki-67 expression in tumors with and without BAX mutations. Methods: TNM stage II and III (n= 377) colon carcinomas were studied from participants in a 5-FU-based adjuvant therapy trial. Archival tumors were analyzed for instability at the BAT26 mononucleotide locus using polymerase chain reaction and hMLH1, hMSH2 and hMSH6 by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Frameshift mutations in a tract of eight deoxyguanosines within BAX were analyzed. Expression of caspase-3 and Ki-67 proteins were analyzed by IHC. Results: Thirty-nine of 377 (10%) tumors showed defective MMR defined as instability at BAT26 and loss of either hMLH1, hMSH2 and/or hMSH6 proteins. BAX mutations were found in 20 of 37 (54%) MMR deficient tumors and in 1 of 50 (2%) tumors with intact MMR. Mean and median number of caspase-3-positive cells were increased in tumors with defective MMR (p= 0.04), but did not differ based upon BAX status [ Table ]. However, tumors with BAX mutations showed higher Ki-67 labeling indices compared to those with wild type BAX (p= 0.01)[ Table ]. Neither BAX mutations nor caspase-3- positive cells were prognostic in a univariate analysis. Tumors with lower Ki-67 extent had improved overall survival (p=0.06), but not DFS (p=0.24). Defective MMR (vs intact) was associated with better DFS in a multivariate analysis (p= 0.03). Conclusion: MMR deficient colon cancers show frequent BAX inactivation, yet have increased apoptotic rates as indicated by increased caspase-3 expressing tumor cells. BAX mutation was associated with hyperproliferation suggesting a growth advantage compared to wild type tumors. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

8530 Background: RAD-001 (Everolimus) is an oral inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Interim analysis results from a phase II study of RAD-001 in patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) were presented at ASCO 2005. This study was re-opened using a higher dose based on an improvement in the 16 week progression free survival (PFS) rate and good tolerability. Methods: A two- stage, phase II multi-institutional trial was conducted in patients with MM to assess that 16 weeks PFS rate was at least 50%. Inclusion criteria: measurable disease, ECOG performance score of 0–2. Exclusion criteria: presence of intracranial metastases, concurrent use of inducers of cytochrome 3A4 and abnormal organ function. The dose of RAD-001 in the second cohort was increased to 10 mg daily (increased from 30 mg weekly) based on evidence of safety of the higher dose. Results: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled; baseline information is available on 27. Median age was 63 yrs; 15 (56%) had >2 sites of metastatic disease. Most (48%) had stage M1c disease. PS was 0, 1 and 2 in 58%, 38% and 4%. All but 4 (15%) had received prior therapy. Grade 3 adverse events included stomatitis and fatigue (2 each), leukopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, anorexia, dehydration, dyspnea, hyperglycemia, and hypersensitivity (1 each). Planned interim analysis was done after 20 patients were enrolled. 14 (70%) had progressed 16 weeks, failing to meet the decision rule needed (PFS >30%) to restart accrual. The median PFS for all 29 patients was 56 days. The median overall survival (OS) has not been reached. For the entire cohort of 53 pts treated on this study (at both dose levels), the median PFS, median OS were 59 and 286 days respectively. Conclusion: Interim analysis after enrollment of 20 patients at a higher dose of RAD-001 demonstrated significantly more toxicity and no added clinical efficacy. The 16 week PFS rate target was not reached, and accrual was suspended. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract Lessons Learned Everolimus does not have sufficient activity to justify its use as single agent in metastatic melanoma. Patients treated with 10 mg per day dose were most likely to require dose reductions. Everolimus appeared to reduce the numbers of regulatory T cells in approximately half of the treated patients; unfortunately, these effects were not correlated with clinical outcomes. Background Everolimus (RAD-001) is an orally active rapamycin analogue shown in preclinical data to produce cytostatic cell inhibition, which may be potentially beneficial in treating melanoma. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of everolimus in patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma (MM). Methods This study included two cohorts; cohort 1 received 30 mg of everolimus by mouth (PO) weekly, and cohort 2 was dosed with 10 mg of everolimus PO daily. The endpoints of the study were safety, 16-week progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and measures of immunomodulatory/antiangiogenic properties with therapy. Tumor samples before therapy and at week 8 of treatment were analyzed. Peripheral blood plasma or mononuclear cell isolates collected prior to therapy and at weeks 8 and 16 and at time of tumor progression were analyzed for vascular endothelial growth factor and regulatory T-cell (Treg) measurements. Results A total of 53 patients were enrolled in cohort 1 (n = 24) and cohort 2 (n = 29). Only 2 patients of the first 20 patients enrolled in cohort 2 had treatment responses (25%; 95% confidence interval, 8.6%–49.1%); this result did not allow full accrual to cohort 2, as the study was terminated for futility. Median OS was 12.2 months for cohort 1 versus 8.1 months in cohort 2; no PFS advantage was seen in either group (2.1 months vs. 1.8 months). Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 4 myocardial ischemia (3.4%); grade 3 fatigue, mucositis, and hyperglycemia (10.3%); and anorexia and anemia (6.9%). Everolimus significantly reduced the number of Tregs in approximately half of the treated patients; however, these effects were not correlated with clinical outcomes. Conclusion Everolimus does not have sufficient single-agent activity in MM; however, we have identified evidence of biological activity to provide a potential rationale for future combination studies.

PURPOSE: In the course of conducting a series of prospective clinical trials devoted to defining new treatment opportunities for hot flashes in cancer survivors, considerable experience has been acquired with related methodologic issues. This article has been written in response to many queries regarding this methodology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of seven different clinical trials that involved 968 patients was used for this work. Reliable and valid definitions of hot flash intensity were developed from patient-reported descriptions. Concomitant validity and reliability assessment of patient-completed diaries was undertaken to compare hot flash data with toxicity and quality-of-life (QOL) end points and to examine consistency across patient groups using variability analysis and correlation procedures. Parametric data from this meta-analysis was used to examine relative power considerations for the design of phase II and phase III clinical trials. RESULTS: Daily diaries used in these studies exhibited consistency and reliability and had few missing data. Hot flash frequency and hot flash score (frequency multiplied by average severity) variables produced almost identical end point results. For phase III placebo-controlled studies, 50 patients per treatment arm seem appropriate to provide sufficient power specifications to detect a clinically meaningful change in hot flash activity. For phase II trials, 25 patients per trial seem to provide reasonable estimates of eventual hot flash efficacy to screen potential agents for more definitive testing. CONCLUSION: Given the data gained from these experiences, we can plan and carry out more efficient trials to identify efficacious agents for the reduction of hot flash activity.

PURPOSE: To determine whether dronabinol administered alone or with megestrol acetate was more, less, or equal in efficacy to single-agent megestrol acetate for palliating cancer-associated anorexia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred sixty-nine assessable advanced cancer patients were randomized to (1) oral megestrol acetate 800 mg/d liquid suspension plus placebo, (2) oral dronabinol 2.5 mg twice a day plus placebo, or (3) both agents. Eligible patients acknowledged that loss of appetite or weight was a problem and reported the loss of 5 pounds or more during 2 months and/or a daily intake of less than 20 calories/kg of body weight. RESULTS: Groups were comparable at baseline in age, sex, tumor type, weight loss, and performance status. A greater percentage of megestrol acetate-treated patients reported appetite improvement and weight gain compared with dronabinol-treated patients: 75% versus 49% (P = .0001) for appetite and 11% versus 3% (P = .02) for ≥ 10% baseline weight gain. Combination treatment resulted in no significant differences in appetite or weight compared with megestrol acetate alone. The Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy questionnaire, which emphasizes anorexia-related questions, demonstrated an improvement in quality of life (QOL) among megestrol acetate–treated and combination-treated patients. The single-item Uniscale, a global QOL instrument, found comparable scores. Toxicity was also comparable, with the exception of an increased incidence of impotence among men who received megestrol acetate. CONCLUSION: In the doses and schedules we studied, megestrol acetate provided superior anorexia palliation among advanced cancer patients compared with dronabinol alone. Combination therapy did not appear to confer additional benefit.

Abstract Purpose: Proapoptotic BH3-only proteins (Bim, Bad, Bid, Puma, and Noxa) initiate apoptosis by binding to regulatory sites on antiapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins, directly neutralizing their cytoprotective function. Expression of these proteins in colon cancer patients may account for differences in recurrence and survival rates. Experimental Design: Archival tumor-node-metastasis stage II and III primary colon carcinomas from patients treated in 5-fluorouracil–based adjuvant therapy trials were studied. Immunohistochemical analysis of Bim, Puma, and Noxa proteins was done using tissue microarrays (n = 431). Immunoscores were determined and correlated with clinicopathologic variables and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. Results: Elevated expression of proapoptotic Bim (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.97; P = 0.033) and Puma (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.93; P = 0.022), but not Noxa, proteins in the tumor cytoplasm was significantly associated with more favorable OS in a univariate analysis, and elevated Bim expression was also associated with better DFS (P = 0.023). Patient age, tumor stage, and histologic grade were also prognostic. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that Bim (DFS, P = 0.030; OS, P = 0.045) and Puma (OS, P = 0.037) expression were independent predictors of OS after adjustment for histologic grade, tumor stage, age, and treatment. Furthermore, the combined variable of Bim and Puma was highly discriminant for both DFS (P = 0.0034) and OS (P = 0.0011). Conclusions: The proapoptotic BH3-only proteins Bim and Puma can provide prognostic information for stage II and III colon cancer patients receiving 5-fluorouracil–based adjuvant chemotherapy. Furthermore, our results support BH3-only proteins as molecular targets of novel anticancer drugs.

Abstract Purpose: Proapoptotic BH3-only proteins Bad and Bid initiate apoptosis by binding to regulatory sites on prosurvival Bcl-2 proteins to directly neutralize their function. We determined if expression of these proteins in colon cancers may account for differences in patient survival. Experimental Design: Tumor-node-metastasis stages II and III primary colon carcinomas from patients treated in 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy trials were studied. Immunohistochemical analysis of Bad and Bid proteins was done in tumors (n = 379) and adjacent normal mucosa. Expression was correlated with clinicopathologic variables, disease-free survival rates (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates. Results: High expression of the Bad protein [hazard ratio (HR), 0.64; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.43-0.96; P = 0.031] in the cytoplasm of tumor cells was significantly associated with more favorable OS in a univariate analysis. The combined Bad and Bid variable was prognostic for DFS (P = 0.027) and OS (P = 0.006). Stage and histologic grade, but not DNA mismatch repair status, were also prognostic for OS. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that high expression of Bad (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.97; P = 0.027) and Bid (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49-0.97; P = 0.034) were independent predictors of OS after adjustment for stage, grade, age, treatment, and study. The combined variable of Bad + Bid was independently associated with DFS (P = 0.020) and OS (P = 0.004). Conclusion: Proapoptotic Bad and Bid proteins are independent prognostic variables in colon cancer patients receiving adjuvant treatment. If validated, Bad and Bid expression may assist in risk stratification and selection of patients to receive adjuvant chemotherapy.