Back to Authors

Hong, Waun Ki

https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9329-5544

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 5

Genome-Wide Association Study of Genetic Predictors of Overall Survival for Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer in Never Smokers
Wu, Xifeng , Ye, Yuanqing , Aakre, Jeremiah A. , Chang, Gee-Chen , Yang, Pan‐Chyr , Roth, Jack A. , Marks, Randolph S., Lippman, Scott M. , Deschamps, Claude, Su, Wu‐Chou , Wang, Wen‐Chang , Huang, Ming‐Shyan , Chang, David W. , Hong, Waun Ki , Hsiung, Chao A. , Wang, Liang , Pu, Xia , Chang, Joe Y. , Lu, Charles , Li, Yan , Pankratz, V. Shane , Minna, John Dorrance , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T. , Yang, Ping

Cancer Research | May 24, 2013 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 4028-4038

10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-4033 Get It

Abstract To identify the genetic factors that influence overall survival in never smokers who have non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), we conducted a consistency meta-analysis study using genome-wide association approaches for overall survival in 327 never smoker patients with NSCLC from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) and 293 cases from the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). We then conducted a two-pronged validation of the top 25 variants that included additional validation in 1,256 patients with NSCLC from Taiwan and assessment of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) and differential expression of genes surrounding the top loci in 70 tumors and matched normal tissues. A total of 94 loci were significant for overall survival in both MD Anderson and Mayo studies in the consistency meta-analysis phase, with the top 25 variants reaching a P value of 10−6. Two variants of these 25 were also significant in the Taiwanese population: rs6901416 [HR, 1.44; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01–2.06] and rs10766739 (HR, 1.23; 95%CI, 1.00–1.51). These loci resulted in a reduction of median survival time of at least eight and five months in three populations, respectively. An additional six variants (rs4237904, rs7976914, rs4970833, rs954785, rs485411, and rs10906104) were validated through eQTL analysis that identified significant correlations with expression levels of six genes (LEMD3, TMBIM, ATXN7L2, SHE, ITIH2, and NUDT5, respectively) in normal lung tissue. These genes were also significantly differentially expressed between the tumor and normal lung tissue. These findings identify several novel, candidate prognostic markers for NSCLC in never smokers, with eQTL analysis suggesting a potential biologic mechanism for a subset of these observed associations. Cancer Res; 73(13); 4028–38. ©2013 AACR.
Predictors of Survival in Never-Smokers with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Large-Scale, Two-Phase Genetic Study
Ye, Yuanqing , Spitz, Margaret R., Gu, Jian , Lippman, Scott M. , Hong, Waun Ki , Roth, Jack A. , Yang, Ping , Wu, Xifeng , Pu, Xia , Wang, Liang , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T. , Minna, John Dorrance , Gu, Jian

Clinical Cancer Research | September 14, 2012 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 5983-5991

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-0774 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Lung cancer in never-smokers (LCINS) is increasingly recognized as a distinct disease from that in ever-smokers owing to substantial differences in etiology, clinical characteristics, and prognosis. Therefore, we aimed to identify prognostic markers specific for LCINS. Experimental Design: First, 11,930 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in 904 inflammation-related genes were genotyped, and their associations with overall survival in 411 patients with LCINS at MD Anderson Cancer Center were analyzed. Next, validation of the top 27 SNPs in 311 patients with LCINS at Mayo Clinic was conducted. Results: Three SNPs (IL17RA:rs879576, BMP8A:rs698141, and STY:rs290229) were validated (P < 0.05), and two SNPs (CD74:rs1056400 and CD38:rs10805347) reached borderline significance (P = 0.08) in the Mayo Clinic population. We validated a survival-tree created in the MD Anderson population exploring gene–gene interactions in the Mayo Clinic population. This survival-tree stratified patients into subsets with significantly different risks of death: patients with the rs1056400_GG/rs698141_GA + AA genotype had significantly higher risk of death in both MD Anderson (HR:2.32, 95%CI: 1.58–3.41) and Mayo (HR:1.97, 95%CI: 1.11–3.50) populations compared with those with the rs1056400_GG/rs698141_GG or rs1056400_GA + AA genotype. We evaluated these five SNPs in 996 ever-smokers from MD Anderson and found no significant associations. Conclusions: Our study provides strong evidence that inflammation-related genetic variations can affect clinical outcomes in LCINS, which may lead to significant biologic insight into these outcomes. Clin Cancer Res; 18(21); 5983–91. ©2012 AACR.
Abstract 2929: Predictors of survival in never-smokers with non-small cell lung cancer: A large-scale, two-phase genetic study
Ye, Yuanqing , Spitz, Margaret R., Gu, Jian , Lippman, Scott M. , Hong, Waun Ki , Roth, Jack A. , Wu, Xifeng , Pu, Xia , Wang, Liang , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T. , Minna, John Dorrance , Yang, Ping , Gu, Jian

Cancer Research | August 13, 2012 | Volume: 72 | Issue: 8_Supplement | Pages: 2929-2929

10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-2929 Get It

Abstract Lung cancer in never-smokers is increasingly recognized as distinct from that in ever-smokers owing to substantial differences in etiology, clinical characteristics, and prognosis. Therefore, we aimed to identify prognostic markers specific for lung cancer in never-smokers in a two-stage study. First, 11,930 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 904 inflammation-related genes were genotyped, and their associations with overall survival in 411 never-smokers with lung cancer at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center were analyzed. Next, fast-track validation of the top 37 SNPs in 311 never-smokers with lung cancer at Mayo Clinic was performed. Three SNPs (interleukin 17 receptor A:rs879576, bone morphogenetic protein 8A:rs698141, and spleen tyrosine kinase:rs290229) were validated (p<0.05), and two more SNPs (CD74:rs1056400 and CD38:rs10805347) were borderline significant (p=0.08) in the Mayo Clinic population. In combined analysis of the MD Anderson and Mayo Clinic patients, IL17RA:rs879576 resulted in a 40% reduction in the risk of death (p=4.1 × 10−5 [p=0.61, heterogeneity test]). We successfully validated a survival tree created in MD Anderson population based on gene-gene interactions in the Mayo Clinic population. This survival tree stratified patients into subsets with significantly different risks of death: patients at MD Anderson with the rs1056400_GG/rs698141_GA+AA genotype had a 2.32-fold higher risk of death (p=1.72 × 10−5) and 9-month shorter median survival time (MST) (p=4.5 × 10−4, log-rank test) than did those with the rs1056400_GG/rs698141_GG or rs1056400_GA+AA genotype in the discovery phase. Also, the patients at Mayo Clinic with the former genotype had an approximately twofold higher risk of death (p=0.02) and a strikingly shorter (by 26 months) MST (p=0.029, log-rank test) than did those with the latter genotype in the validation phase. We evaluated these five SNPs in 996 ever-smokers and found no significant associations. To our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically evaluate the associations of genetic variations in major inflammation-related genes with outcome of lung cancer in never-smokers. It provides strong evidence that inflammation-related genetic variations can affect clinical outcomes in these patients, which may lead to significant biological insight into these outcomes. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2929. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-2929
Evaluation of Difluoromethylornithine for the Chemoprevention of Barrett's Esophagus and Mucosal Dysplasia
Broaddus, Russell, Joshi, Nina, Gerner, Eugene W. , Half, Elizabeth , Lewin, Jan S. , Morlan, Bruce W., Hong, Waun Ki , Sinicrope, Frank A. , Kirsch, Ilan R.

Cancer Prevention Research | June 3, 2011 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 829-839

10.1158/1940-6207.capr-10-0243 Get It

Abstract Patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) and dysplasia are candidates for chemopreventive strategies to reduce cancer risk. We determined the effects of difluoromethylornithine (DMFO) on mucosal polyamines, gene expression, and histopathology in BE. Ten patients with BE and low-grade dysplasia participated in a single-arm study of DFMO (0.5 g/m2/d) given continuously for 6 months. Esophagoscopy with biopsies was conducted at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Dysplasia was graded by a gastrointestinal pathologist. Audiology was assessed (at baseline and at 6 months). Mucosal polyamines were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Microarray-based gene expression was analyzed using a cDNA two-color chip. DFMO suppressed levels of the polyamines putrescine (P = 0.02) and spermidine (P = 0.02) and the spermidine/spermine ratio (P < 0.01) in dysplastic BE (6 months vs. baseline) that persisted at 6 months following drug cessation. Among the top 25 modulated genes, we found those regulating p53-mediated cell signaling (RPL11), cell-cycle regulation (cyclin E2), and cell adhesion and invasion (Plexin1). DFMO downregulated Krüppel-like factor 5 (KLF5), a transcription factor promoting cell proliferation, and suppressed RFC5 whose protein interacts with proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Histopathology showed regression of dysplasia (n = 1), stable disease (n = 8), and progression to high-grade dysplasia (n = 1). Polyamines were suppressed in the responder to a greater extent than in stable cases. DFMO was well tolerated, and one patient had subclinical, unilateral ototoxicity. DFMO suppressed mucosal polyamines and modulated genes that may be mechanistically related to its chemopreventive effect. Further study of DFMO for the chemoprevention of esophageal cancer in BE patients is warranted. Cancer Prev Res; 4(6); 829–39. ©2011 AACR.
Progress in Chemoprevention Drug Development: The Promise of Molecular Biomarkers for Prevention of Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cancer—A Plan to Move Forward
Kelloff, Gary J. , Lippman, Scott M. , Dannenberg, Andrew J. , Sigman, Caroline C. , Pearce, Homer L., Reid, Brian J. , Szabó, Éva , Jordan, V. Craig , Spitz, Margaret R., Papadimitrakopoulou, Vali A., Lotan, Reuben, Aggarwal, Bharat B. , Bresalier, Robert S. , Kim, Jeri , Lu, Karen H. , Thomas, Melanie E., Rhodes, Helen, Brewer, Molly, Follen, Michele , Shin, Dong M. , Parnes, Howard L. , Siegfried, Jill M. , Evans, Alison A., Blot, William J. , Chow, Wong‐Ho , Blount, Patricia L., Wang, Kenneth K. , Lam, Stephen , Lee, J. Jack, Dubinett, Steven M., Engstrom, Paul F., Meyskens, Frank L. , O’Shaughnessy, Joyce , Hawk, Ernest T. , Levin, Bernard, Nelson, William G. , Hong, Waun Ki , Prevention, for the AACR Task Force on Cancer, Lee, J. Jack , Mills, Gordon B. , Arun, Banu , Maley, Carlo C. , Lee, J. Jack, Prevention, for the AACR Task Force on Cancer, Szabo, Eva , Lee, J Jack

Clinical Cancer Research | June 8, 2006 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 3661-3697

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-1104 Get It

AbstractThis article reviews progress in chemopreventive drug development, especially data and concepts that are new since the 2002 AACR report on treatment and prevention of intraepithelial neoplasia. Molecular biomarker expressions involved in mechanisms of carcinogenesis and genetic progression models of intraepithelial neoplasia are discussed and analyzed for how they can inform mechanism-based, molecularly targeted drug development as well as risk stratification, cohort selection, and end-point selection for clinical trials. We outline the concept of augmenting the risk, mechanistic, and disease data from histopathologic intraepithelial neoplasia assessments with molecular biomarker data. Updates of work in 10 clinical target organ sites include new data on molecular progression, significant completed trials, new agents of interest, and promising directions for future clinical studies. This overview concludes with strategies for accelerating chemopreventive drug development, such as integrating the best science into chemopreventive strategies and regulatory policy, providing incentives for industry to accelerate preventive drugs, fostering multisector cooperation in sharing clinical samples and data, and creating public-private partnerships to foster new regulatory policies and public education.