Dickson, Dennis W.

Abstract Primary age-related tauopathy (PART) is a neurodegenerative entity defined as Alzheimer-type neurofibrillary degeneration primarily affecting the medial temporal lobe with minimal to absent amyloid-β (Aβ) plaque deposition. The extent to which PART can be differentiated pathoanatomically from Alzheimer disease (AD) is unclear. Here, we examined the regional distribution of tau pathology in a large cohort of postmortem brains (n = 914). We found an early vulnerability of the CA2 subregion of the hippocampus to neurofibrillary degeneration in PART, and semiquantitative assessment of neurofibrillary degeneration in CA2 was significantly greater than in CA1 in PART. In contrast, subjects harboring intermediate-to-high AD neuropathologic change (ADNC) displayed relative sparing of CA2 until later stages of their disease course. In addition, the CA2/CA1 ratio of neurofibrillary degeneration in PART was significantly higher than in subjects with intermediate-to-high ADNC burden. Furthermore, the distribution of tau pathology in PART diverges from the Braak NFT staging system and Braak stage does not correlate with cognitive function in PART as it does in individuals with intermediate-to-high ADNC. These findings highlight the need for a better understanding of the contribution of PART to cognitive impairment and how neurofibrillary degeneration interacts with Aβ pathology in AD and PART.

AbstractBackgroundMultiple imaging modalities have been individually shown to be useful in diagnosing Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB). Reduced striatonigral uptake on ioflupane‐SPECT reflects striatonigral dopamine dysfunction observed in DLB, while other imaging modalities assess different aspects of DLB, which potentially work complementarily when used together. We assessed how well ioflupane‐SPECT differentiates DLB from Alzheimer’s Disease Dementia (ADem) and whether adding another imaging modality to ioflupane‐SPECT would provide additional value.MethodIoflupane‐SPECT, MRI, FDG‐PET, and PiB‐PET were assessed on 35 DLB and 14 ADem patients (including 12 patients with eventual autopsy confirmation). Striatonigral dopamine transporter uptake was evaluated semi‐quantitatively with ioflupane‐SPECT using DaTQUANT software (GE Healthcare) to calculate z‐scores of putamen uptake. Hippocampal volume was calculated with structural MRI, cingulate island sign (CIS) ratio with FDG‐PET, and global cortical PiB retention with PiB‐PET.ResultLower DaTQUANT z‐scores of putamen were observed in DLB patients compared to ADem patients (c‐statistic 0.896, p<0.001). Ioflupane‐SPECT showed higher c‐statistic in differentiating DLB from ADem than hippocampal volume on MRI (c‐statistic 0.718, p=0.034), CIS on FDG‐PET (c‐statistic 0.869, p=0.003), or global cortical PiB retention on PiB‐PET (c‐statistic 0.869, p=0.002), but some overlap between two diagnostic groups was still observed with the single imaging modality. Among these imaging modalities, ioflupane‐SPECT was the only modality correlated with the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III, while only PiB‐PET correlated with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test score. Adding another imaging modality to ioflupane‐SPECT enhanced c‐statistics (+MRI c‐statistic 0.931, p<0.001; +FDG‐PET c‐statistic 0.957, p=0.005; +PiB‐PET c‐statistic 0.955, p=0.007), and ioflupane‐SPECT in combination with both FDG‐PET and PiB‐PET showed the highest c‐statistic of 0.974 (p=0.043).ConclusionIoflupane‐SPECT is an excellent imaging modality to identify DLB by detecting striatonigral dopamine dysfunction which is strongly associated with motor impairment in DLB. Correlative neuroimaging with MRI, FDG‐PET, or PiB‐PET may add small incremental value in differentiation of DLB and ADem. Supported by NIH grants (AG016574, AG006786, AG015866, NS100620, AG062677), grant from GE Healthcare, the Mayo Clinic Dorothy and Harry T. Mangurian Jr. Lewy Body Dementia Program, the Deal Family Foundation, and the Little Family Foundation.

AbstractBackgroundIt is important to determine the natural history of sporadic and familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and generate clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging and biofluid data for planning disease‐modifying trials.MethodAs part of the ARTFL LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD; U19 AG063911) protocol, investigators at 19 centers in North America will enroll 2100 participants with FTLD over the next 5 years beginning in early 2020.ResultAs of 1/20/20, the ARTFL/LEFFTDS (A/L) Consortium had enrolled 1832 participants, including 850 in kindreds with familial FTLD (239 associated with mutations in MAPT, 192 in GRN, 370 in C9orf72, 4 with mutations in both GRN and C9orf72, and 45 with a mutation in a different gene or no mutation in any known FTLD‐associated gene). Over 500 participants have undergone 2 or more annual visits to date. MRI has been performed in 1105. Biofluid samples have also been collected, with blood (DNA, plasma, serum, mRNA, PBMC) in 1413 and CSF in 303. Over 60 manuscripts using A/L data or samples have been published to date. Five clinical trials involving A/L and ALLFTD participants are in progress or planned. The longitudinal arm in ALLFTD will enroll 500 of existing A/L and 600 future participants for annual assessments with similar methodology to A/L. An additional 1000 FTLD patients will undergo focused one‐time clinical evaluations and biofluid collection.ConclusionThe data/samples from already‐enrolled and planned participants in ALLFTD and findings published to date underscore the utility of evaluating FTLD subjects. The absence of identifiable mutations in some with familial FTLD suggests that other genes are yet to be discovered. ALLFTD data will inform clinical trial design, and many participants will be eligible for future trials. The key data and samples in ALLFTD are available to interested investigators worldwide. Supported by: AG063911, AG045390, NS092089, AG016976, AG21886.

AbstractBackgroundPathological aging (PA) patients are individuals that are cognitively normal prior to death but have abundant and widespread amyloid‐β (Aβ) deposits. These individuals typically have few cored amyloid deposits with variable levels of diffuse parenchymal deposits and/or vascular deposits. There is little or no inflammatory reaction, neuritic pathology or neurofibrillary tangles in the cortex. Previously, we have shown that total Aβ levels in PA brain lysates were similar to the levels in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brain lysates, with overlap in the length of the Aβ peptides that were deposited and no major differences in SDS‐stable Aβ oligomeric assemblies. Despite these similarities, it is unclear whether PA represents a prodromal phase of AD or if the amyloid pathology of PA patients represents a less pathogenic variant. To explore this idea, we examined the seeding capacity of AD and PA brain homogenates to induce Aβ deposition and to secondarily induce tau pathology.MethodWe determined the seeding capacity of two AD, four PA and two control brain homogenates in transgenic mice expressing APPswe/ind with and without Tau‐P301L by intracerebral injection at neonatal day 0. At either 6, 9, 12 or 18 months, we assessed Aβ deposition and neurofibrillary pathology in all 4 genotypes by immunohistochemical and biochemical methods. Furthermore we examined the seeding activity of human AD brain lysates in brain slice cultures from APP/Tau transgenic mice.ResultIn our newborn mouse injections, we observed widespread Aβ seeding as evidenced by accelerated onset of diffuse parenchymal Aβ deposition that was largely proportional to the burden of parenchyma deposits in patient brains. In all cases, high levels of pial deposition were observed and Aβ42 was the predominant peptide deposited. Tau pathology was not induced in any animal, and with the absence of neuritic plaques there was no induction of tau positive neurites.ConclusionThis study provides evidence that the Aβ conformers associated with diffuse Aβ deposits in the brains of cognitively normal individuals possess seeding activities similar to those found in the brains of AD patients. The findings are consistent with the idea that pathological aging is on a continuum with AD.

AbstractBackgroundUsing an objective mathematical algorithm to assess corticolimbic involvement of neurofibrillary tangle pathology, we identified three AD subtypes: hippocampal sparing (HpSp) AD, typical AD, and limbic predominant AD. Typical AD brains were representative of the expected patterns of hippocampal and cortical involvement as outlined by Braak tangle stage. In contrast, we discovered an extreme phenotype that exists outside of the Braakian‐concept of neurofibrillary tangle patterns. Hippocampal sparing AD cases demonstrate unexpected sparing of the hippocampus relative to severely involved association cortices and limbic predominant AD cases demonstrate inundation of the hippocampus relative to mildly involved association cortices. Using these AD subtypes, our objective was to leverage our understanding of disease spectrum to uncover transcriptomic changes that underlie selective vulnerability of the hippocampus in AD.MethodWe performed RNA‐sequencing in 40 neuropathologically diagnosed AD cases (10 HpSp, 20 Typical and 10 Limbic) and 15 controls to uncover gene expression changes associated with phenotype differences allowing us to prioritize 44 genes for further exploration. Validation with NanoString and quantification with digital pathology were performed in an expanded cohort of 158 AD cases (36 HpSp, 79 Typical and 35 Limbic) and 32 controls. We quantified digital pathology measures of early tangle pathology (CP13), mature tangle pathology (Ab39), amyloid‐β (33.1.1). In addition, we measured cellular markers for microglia (CD68), endothelia (CD34), and astroglia (GFAP). Deep learning based prediction models were employed, which nominated the SLC38A2 gene as a predictor of AD.ResultThe SLC38A2 gene was originally prioritized in our RNA‐sequencing data based upon differential expression between controls and typical AD. We observed upregulation of SLC38A2 in all AD subtypes. RNA‐seq gene expression measures validated well with NanoString for SLC38A2 (R=0.97, p<0.001). Regression analysis identified early tangle (p=0.011) and late tangle measures (p=0.026) as significant predictors of gene expression, but not amyloid measures (p=0.74). Microgliosis approached significance (p=0.052), but with no contribution from endothelial cell burden (p=0.17) or astrogliosis (p=0.58). Age approached significance (p=0.06), but not sex (p=0.88) or APOE‐ε4 status (p=0.10).ConclusionOur data supports consideration of intra‐disease divergence with regard to case stratification and may reveal genes previously masked by heterogeneity of cohorts.

AbstractBackgroundOur understanding of the biological changes in the brain associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology and cognitive impairment remains incomplete. Unbiased discovery proteomic analysis of AD brain can help to increase our understanding of these changes.MethodWe analyzed dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, precuneus, and temporal cortex of control, asymptomatic AD, and AD brains from multiple different centers by label‐free quantitative mass spectrometry and weighted protein co‐expression analysis to obtain a consensus protein co‐expression network of AD brain. We also analyzed cerebrospinal fluid to investigate potential biomarkers related to this network.ResultThe network consisted of 13 protein co‐expression modules. Six of these modules correlated with amyloid‐β plaque burden, tau neurofibrillary tangle burden, cognitive function, and clinical functional status, and were altered in asymptomatic AD, AD, or in both disease states. These six modules reflected synaptic, mitochondrial, sugar metabolism, extracellular matrix, cytoskeletal, and RNA binding/splicing biological functions. The identified protein network modules were preserved in a community‐based cohort analyzed by a different quantitative mass spectrometry approach. They were also preserved in temporal lobe and precuneus brain regions. Some of the modules were influenced by aging, and showed changes in other neurodegenerative diseases such as frontotemporal dementia and corticobasal degeneration. The module most strongly associated with AD pathology and cognitive impairment was the sugar metabolism module. This module was enriched in AD genetic risk factors, and was also highly enriched in microglia and astrocyte protein markers associated with an anti‐inflammatory state, suggesting that the biological functions it represents may serve a protective role in AD. Proteins from the sugar metabolism module were increased in cerebrospinal fluid from asymptomatic AD and AD cases, highlighting their potential as biomarkers of the altered brain network.ConclusionIn this study of >2000 brains and nearly 400 cerebrospinal fluid samples by quantitative proteomics, we identify proteins and biological processes in AD brain that may serve as therapeutic targets and fluid biomarkers for the disease.

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to describe clinical features, [18F]‐fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)‐positron emission tomography (PET) metabolism and digital pathology in patients with logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) and pathologic diagnosis of diffuse Lewy body disease (DLBD) and compare to patients with LPA with other pathologies, as well as patients with classical features of probable dementia with Lewy bodies (pDLB).MethodsThis is a clinicopathologic case‐control study of 45 patients, including 20 prospectively recruited patients with LPA among whom 6 were diagnosed with LPA‐DLBD. We analyzed clinical features and compared FDG‐PET metabolism in LPA‐DLBD to an independent group of patients with clinical pDLB and regional α‐synuclein burden on digital pathology to a second independent group of autopsied patients with DLBD pathology and antemortem pDLB (DLB‐DLBD).ResultsAll patients with LPA‐DLBD were men. Neurological, speech, and neuropsychological characteristics were similar across LPA‐DLBD, LPA‐Alzheimer's disease (LPA‐AD), and LPA‐frontotemporal lobar degeneration (LPA‐FTLD). Genetic screening of AD, DLBD, and FTLD linked genes were negative with the exception of APOE ε4 allele present in 83% of LPA‐DLBD patients. Seventy‐five percent of the patients with LPA‐DLBD showed a parietal‐dominant pattern of hy pometabolism; LPA‐FTLD – temporal‐dominant pattern, whereas LPA‐AD showed heterogeneous patterns of hypometabolism. LPA‐DLBD had more asymmetrical hypometabolism affecting frontal lobes, with relatively spared occipital lobe in the nondominantly affected hemisphere, compared to pDLB. LPA‐DLBD had minimal atrophy on gross brain examination, higher cortical Lewy body counts, and higher α‐synuclein burden in the middle frontal and inferior parietal cortices compared to DLB‐DLBD.InterpretationWhereas AD is the most frequent underlying pathology of LPA, DLBD can also be present and may contribute to the LPA phenotype possibly due to α‐synuclein‐associated functional impairment of the dominant parietal lobe. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:520–533

Background and purposeCerebral microbleeds (MB) and superficial siderosis (SS) are frequent neuroimaging findings in patients with logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA), often with frontal lobe predilection. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is hypothesized to be the major pathologic determinant of MB/SS in these patients; however, neuroimaging‐pathologic data are limited.MethodsAll patients who had been prospectively recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research Group at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) between 2010 and 2015 and met the following inclusion criteria were included: (i) received an antemortem LPA diagnosis, (ii) had a gradient‐recalled echo T2*‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed, (iii) died and completed a brain autopsy. Demographic, genetic, neuroimaging, and clinical and pathologic characteristics were compared between patients with/without MB/SS. Two‐tailed Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used for comparison of categorical and continuous variables, respectively.ResultsThirteen patients met inclusion criteria, six (46%) had MB/SS on MRI. Moderate/severe CAA was associated with the presence of MB/SS (p = 0.029). As expected, MB/SS most frequently involved the frontal lobes, followed by the parietal lobes. No clear associations were found between regional MB/SS distribution and regional distribution of CAA or hypometabolism on [18F]‐fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography. There was some evidence for a regional association between MB/SS and uptake on Pittsburgh compound B, although not in all patients. No formal statistical analyses to assess topographic relationships were performed due to the small sample size.ConclusionsThe presence of MB/SS is a strong indicator of underlying moderate/severe CAA in LPA, although the biological mechanisms underlying the topographic distribution of MB/SS remain unclear.

Abstract Introduction The cytoprotective PTEN‐induced kinase 1 (PINK1)‐parkin RBR E3 ubiquitin protein ligase (PRKN) pathway selectively labels damaged mitochondria with phosphorylated ubiquitin (pS65‐Ub) for their autophagic removal (mitophagy). Because dysfunctions of mitochondria and degradation pathways are early features of Alzheimer's disease (AD), mitophagy impairments may contribute to the pathogenesis. Methods Morphology, levels, and distribution of the mitophagy tag pS65‐Ub were evaluated by biochemical analyses combined with tissue and single cell imaging in AD autopsy brain and in transgenic mouse models. Results Analyses revealed significant increases of pS65‐Ub levels in AD brain, which strongly correlated with granulovacuolar degeneration (GVD) and early phospho‐tau deposits, but were independent of amyloid beta pathology. Single cell analyses revealed predominant co‐localization of pS65‐Ub with mitochondria, GVD bodies, and/or lysosomes depending on the brain region analyzed. Discussion Our study highlights mitophagy alterations in AD that are associated with early tau pathology, and suggests that distinct mitochondrial, autophagic, and/or lysosomal failure may contribute to the selective vulnerability in disease.