Carta, Karina Auristela Gonzalez

Introduction: Exercise parameters such as peak heart rate (HR) are generally adjusted for age, whereas HR recovery is generally given as an absolute value: < 13 bpm at 1 minute post-peak exercise being abnormal. Hypothesis: We analyzed a large cohort of patients to determine the impact of age on HR recovery (HRRec) and if the prognostic performance of HRRec is improved by adjustment for age. Methods: Non-imaging exercise tests performed on patients aged 30-79 years from 1993 to 2010 were included. Patients with known cardiovascular diseases were excluded. Patients were assigned to 5 groups according to age: 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70-79. Mortality was reported according to HRRec during the first minute of active recovery using Cox regression analysis. Mortality was determined from Minnesota and National Death Indices. Results: 22,643 patients (64 % male) were included. The median HRRec in the age groups with IQR were as follows: 30-39: 20 [15-26]; 40-49: 19 [14-25]; 50-59: 18 [13-23]; 60-69: 15 [10-20]; and 70-79: 11 [6-16]. There were 1566 deaths (6.9%) over a mean follow-up of 11.8 ± 5.0 years. HRRec of 13 would fall at the 17 th percentile for patients 30-39 years old, but this increased to the 20 th , 27 th , 40 th , and 60 th percentiles with increasing age group. The mortality in age groups according to HRRec is shown in the Figure. For age groups 30-39 and 40-49, the hazard ratio for mortality at a HRRec of 11-12 bpm (i.e. just below the standard of 13) versus patients with a HRRec of ≥ 20 bpm was > 2.0. For age 50-59 and 60-69, however, a HRRec of < 11 bpm is necessary to obtain a doubling of risk, and for age 70-79 a HRRec of < 9 bpm is necessary. Conclusions: HRRec decreases significantly with age. The performance of abnormal HRRec defined as < 13 bpm is inconsistent across age groups. To standardize the ability of HRRec to identify at least a 2.0-fold increased risk, lowering the cup-point to < 11 bpm for ages 50-59 and 60-69 and < 9 bpm for age 70-79 is required.

Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented impact worldwide, co-infections with neglected tropical diseases like Malaria can occur and affect the heart. Objective: Describe a unique case of Malaria and SARS CoV2 infection occurring concurrently with cardiac complications. Clinical Case: A 69-year-old male, retired canoeing athlete, with well-controlled arterial hypertension, presented odynophagia, cough, and dyspnea on slight exertion for 2 days. On examination, O2 saturation was 91%, blood pressure 100/60 mmHg, regular heart rate of 110 bpm, positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2, elevated D-Dimer, and chest X-ray with evidence of viral pneumonia. He received supplemental oxygen, steroids, and paracetamol. Two days later, he presented with choluria, afternoon episodes of high fever preceded by chills and myalgia, and a thick blood smear showed Plasmodium falciparum (PF) trophozoites. Antimalarial treatment was started with primaquine 15mg, 20 mg of artemether, and 120 mg of Lumefantrine daily with the disappearance of fever until day 14 of onset of symptoms when he presented with acute heart failure (AHF) with a reduced ejection fraction of 45%. NYHA Class IV, arterial hypotension, sudden onset palpitations, and afternoon febrile episode. The electrocardiogram showed atrial fibrillation (AF) with a rapid irregular ventricular response of 120 bpm; The echocardiogram revealed a 7mm circumferential pericardial effusion, right ventricular dysfunction. Treatment with colchicine, enoxaparin, spironolactone, and bisoprolol was started. A new thick smear demonstrated the persistence of PF. A new antimalarial regimen was restarted, with the disappearance of the fever 48 hours after its onset, with the reversion of AF to sinus rhythm. Discussion: A unique case of concurrent COVID-19 and Malaria, which cause challenges to the heart and lead to cardiovascular complications. Conclusion: An exceptional case is presented, the coexistence of SARS-CoV-2 and PF infection-associated complications of myocarditis, pericarditis, new-onset AF, and AHF. This interaction should not go unnoticed, physicians’ awareness is key, and early diagnosis and treatment can be lifesaving, mitigate and offer the best chance of cure.

Introduction: Leadless pacing(LP) technology has been expanding in recent practice as an alternative to traditional pacing This technology is associated with reduce complications such as infection, dislodgment, and hardware burden. There has been recent reports on effusions with its implantation .Historically the manufacturer has recommend bolus of heparin or infusions We present the results and operative outcomes of patients who received a LP without initial heparinization or infusion from 2016 to 2021 at a single center. Objective We sought to describe the outcomes of LP implantation without the need of heparin administration. Methods: We report the clinical outcomes and operative findings of 200 patients who underwent LP implantation without initial heparin loading or infusions . An aggressive flushing strategy of the sheaths before and during the procedures was performed Data recorded include indication, ejection fraction (EF) R waves, capture thresholds, ventricular ectopy on deployment,recaptures, procedure times, and complications. Patients on chronic anticoagulation were excluded Results: A total of 200 patients were included , average age was 77 years and 20 (10%) had a reduced EF (<40%) pre-procedure. The most common indications included complete AV block (97, 48.5%) and atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response (76, 38%). All patients (100%) had successful establishment of ventricular pacing with no short-term complications postoperatively. Average R waves after deployment were 9.7 with average capture thresholds of 0.84 @ 0.24 Ventricular ectopy was seen for 134 (67%) of patients upon deployment with 62 (31%) patients requiring recaptures, and 29 (14.5%) requiring more than one recapture. There was no evidence of thrombus in the sheaths or implanting instruments . There were no embolic or thrombotic complications. Conclusions: LP implantation is highly effective and efficacious in establishing single-chamber ventricular pacing for a variety of conduction pathologies with minimal complications postoperatively. It appears that an aggressive flushing strategy of the implanting equipment & sheaths is safe & effective without the need of heparinization. Further studies will be require to validate this strategy

Abstract BACKGROUND A decrease in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) with exercise is considered normal, but the significance of an increase in DBP has not been validated. Our aim was to determine the relationship of DBP increasing on a stress test regarding comorbidities and mortality. METHODS Our database was reviewed from 1993 to 2010 using the first stress test of a patient. Non-Minnesota residence, baseline cardiovascular (CV) disease, rest DBP &lt;60 or &gt;100 mm Hg, and age &lt;30 or ≥80 were exclusion criteria. DBP response was classified: normal if peak DBP–rest DBP &lt; 0, borderline 0–9, and abnormal ≥10 mm Hg. Mortality was determined from Mayo Clinic records and Minnesota Death Index. Logistic regression was used to determine the relationship of DBP response to the presence of comorbidities. Cox regression was used to determine total and CV mortality risk by DBP response. All analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and resting DBP. RESULTS Twenty thousand seven hundred sixty patients were included (51 ± 11 years, female n = 7,314). Rest/peak averaged DBP 82 ± 8/69 ± 15 mm Hg in normal vs. 79 ± 9/82 ± 9 mm Hg in borderline vs. 76 ± 9/92 ± 11 mm Hg in abnormal DBP response. There were 1,582 deaths (8%) with 557 (3%) CV deaths over 12 ± 5 years of follow-up. In patients with borderline and abnormal DBP response, odds ratios for obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and current smoking were significant, while hazard ratios for total and CV death were not significant compared with patients with normal DBP response. CONCLUSIONS DBP response to exercise is significantly associated with important comorbidities at the time of the stress test but does not add to the prognostic yield of stress test.

Background Heart rate ( HR ) recovery has been investigated in specific patient cohorts, but there is less information about the role of HR recovery in general populations. We investigated whether HR recovery has long‐term prognostic significance in primary prevention. Methods and Results Exercise tests performed between 1993 and 2010 on patients aged 30 to 79 years without cardiovascular disease were included. Mortality was determined from Mayo Clinic records and Minnesota Death Index. Total, cardiovascular , and non‐cardiovascular mortality was reported according to HR recovery <13 bpm using Cox regression. 19 551 patients were included, 6756 women (35%), age 51±10 years. There were 1271 deaths over follow‐up of 12±5 years. HR recovery declined after age 60, and was also lower according to diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, current smoking, and poor cardiorespiratory fitness but not sex or β‐blockers. Adjusting for these factors, abnormal HR recovery was a significant predictor of total (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]=1.56 [1.384–1.77]), cardiovascular (1.95 [1.57–2.42]), and non‐cardiovascular death (1.41 [1.22–1.64]). Hazard ratios for cardiovascular death according to abnormal HR recovery were significant in all age groups (30–59, 60–69, 70–79), in both sexes, in patients with and without hypertension, obesity, and diabetes mellitus, but not in patients taking β‐blockers, current smokers, and patients with normal cardiorespiratory fitness. Conclusions HR recovery is a powerful prognostic factor predicting total, cardiovascular, and non‐cardiovascular death in a primary prevention cohort. It performs consistently well according to sex, age, obesity, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus but shows diminished utility in patients taking β‐blockers, current smokers, and patients with normal cardiorespiratory fitness.