Sydó, Nóra

Introduction: Exercise parameters such as peak heart rate (HR) are generally adjusted for age, whereas HR recovery is generally given as an absolute value: < 13 bpm at 1 minute post-peak exercise being abnormal. Hypothesis: We analyzed a large cohort of patients to determine the impact of age on HR recovery (HRRec) and if the prognostic performance of HRRec is improved by adjustment for age. Methods: Non-imaging exercise tests performed on patients aged 30-79 years from 1993 to 2010 were included. Patients with known cardiovascular diseases were excluded. Patients were assigned to 5 groups according to age: 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70-79. Mortality was reported according to HRRec during the first minute of active recovery using Cox regression analysis. Mortality was determined from Minnesota and National Death Indices. Results: 22,643 patients (64 % male) were included. The median HRRec in the age groups with IQR were as follows: 30-39: 20 [15-26]; 40-49: 19 [14-25]; 50-59: 18 [13-23]; 60-69: 15 [10-20]; and 70-79: 11 [6-16]. There were 1566 deaths (6.9%) over a mean follow-up of 11.8 ± 5.0 years. HRRec of 13 would fall at the 17 th percentile for patients 30-39 years old, but this increased to the 20 th , 27 th , 40 th , and 60 th percentiles with increasing age group. The mortality in age groups according to HRRec is shown in the Figure. For age groups 30-39 and 40-49, the hazard ratio for mortality at a HRRec of 11-12 bpm (i.e. just below the standard of 13) versus patients with a HRRec of ≥ 20 bpm was > 2.0. For age 50-59 and 60-69, however, a HRRec of < 11 bpm is necessary to obtain a doubling of risk, and for age 70-79 a HRRec of < 9 bpm is necessary. Conclusions: HRRec decreases significantly with age. The performance of abnormal HRRec defined as < 13 bpm is inconsistent across age groups. To standardize the ability of HRRec to identify at least a 2.0-fold increased risk, lowering the cup-point to < 11 bpm for ages 50-59 and 60-69 and < 9 bpm for age 70-79 is required.

Abstract Background Dyspnea on exertion (DOE) is defined as a subjective experience of breathing discomfort that consists of qualitatively distinct sensations (Effort/work of breathing, Chest tightness, Air hunger) that vary in intensity elicited by physical activity. Although DOE is a common presenting symptom in patients pertaining to cardiovascular and respiratory disorders, its prognostic importance in patients with no prior cardiovascular (CV) or respiratory disorders is unclear. Purpose The purpose of this study is to determine the prognostic significance of dyspnea on exertion (DOE) in patients with no prior diagnosis of CV or respiratory disorders. Methods We reviewed the Mayo Integrated Stress Center database for the period September 1993 through November 2010. Residents of Minnesota with no known heart disorders and no known history of COPD or other respiratory disorders were included in the study. Patients with abnormal ECG findings were excluded to rule out possible undiagnosed CV disorders. Limiting symptoms of DOE with reduced exercise capacity (FAC&lt;90%). Our primary outcome was mortality which was adjusted for age, sex, smoking history, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, negative chronotropic medications. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate hazard ratio using Cox regression models in SAS Studio. Results A total of 101,455 exercise tests were reviewed to identify 18960 patients (female = 6755, 35.6%) who met the study criteria. Mean age at the time of referral was 51.2±10 years (mean ± SD) and mean follow-up was 12±10 years (mean ± SD). There were 1331 (7%) deaths from all causes, out of which 368 (27.6%) deaths are from DOE patients, and there were 428 (2.2%) deaths from cardiac causes, out of which 141 (32.9%) deaths are from DOE patients. We found that DOE was an independent predictor of mortality from all causes with hazard ratio [95% CI] = 1.690 [1.488–1.918], p≤0.0001, and from cardiac causes with hazard ratio [95% CI] = 1.997 [1.613–2.473], p≤0.0001. Product-limit survival estimates of patients with and without DOE are shown in Figure 1. Conclusion Based on our study findings, we conclude that dyspnea on exertion is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with no baseline CV or respiratory disorders. Patients presenting with dyspnea alone as a presenting compliant should be evaluated thoroughly and treated accordingly to reduce the associated mortality outcomes. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier Plot Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract Introduction Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is an important diagnostic method to evaluate athletes and non-athletes, however we do not have widely accepted normal values for correct evaluation and interpretation in the young. Goals Our aim was to compare CPET parameters of young athletes and non-athletes and determine reference values. Methods Exercise tests were performed in young non-athletes, aged <18 years between 2011 to 2016 at Mayo Clinic. Athletes underwent detailed sports cardiology screening including CPET at Semmelweis University Heart and Vascular Center between 2016 and 2018. Individuals with cardiovascular disease were excluded. We created 2 subgroups in both sexes: 12–14 years (Group 1), 15–17 years (Group 2). Statistical analysis was performed using SAS with analysis of variance under the general linear model adjusting for age, body mass index and test effort based on peak respiratory exchange ratio (RER). Results A total of 212 athletes (92% male, 15.5±0.6ys) and 207 non-athletes (68% male, 15.0±0.7ys) were included in the analysis. In Group 1 boys, athletes have higher peak HR (200.0±9.2 vs 188.5±16.8 bpm, p<0.0001), HR reserve (117.1±14.5 vs 108.9±19.8 bpm p<0.05), VO2 max (53.7±6.6 vs 44.7±9.1 mL/kg/min p<0.0001), ventilation (VE) (120.3±25.0 vs 70.7±21.6 L/min p<0.0001) and RER (1.12±0.0 vs 1.07±0.08, p <.001) compared to controls. In Group 2 boys, there was no difference in peak HR and HR reserve, but athletes have higher VO2 max (57.2±4.7 vs 45.3±9.3 mL/kg/min, p<0.0001) and VE (150.7±23.7 vs 104.1±25.9 L/min, p<0.0001), similarly as Group 2 girls: VO2 max (46.3±3.6 vs 34.9±8.5 mL/kg/min p<0.0001), VE (118.7±12.5 vs 68.4±20.6 L/min, p<0.0001). In male athletes, peak HR (200.6±9.2 vs 196.5±7.4 bpm p<0.05) and HR recovery (34.2±9.8 vs 29.8±11.1 bpm p<0.05) decreases with age, while VO2 max (53.7±6.6 vs 57.2±4.7 mL/kg/min, p<0.001) and VE (120.3±24.9 vs 150.7±23.7 L/min, p<0.0001) increases. Lower cut-off values were determined in each group (Figure). Lower-cut off values Conclusion We created a unique Mayo-Semmelweis database of young athletes and non-athletes. As a result of intensive training, athletes show higher levels of CPET variables vs non-athletes. Our study provides CPET reference values in the pediatric age group, applying them could contribute to correct evaluation and interpretation of CPET, increasing its diagnostic potential.

Abstract BACKGROUND A decrease in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) with exercise is considered normal, but the significance of an increase in DBP has not been validated. Our aim was to determine the relationship of DBP increasing on a stress test regarding comorbidities and mortality. METHODS Our database was reviewed from 1993 to 2010 using the first stress test of a patient. Non-Minnesota residence, baseline cardiovascular (CV) disease, rest DBP &lt;60 or &gt;100 mm Hg, and age &lt;30 or ≥80 were exclusion criteria. DBP response was classified: normal if peak DBP–rest DBP &lt; 0, borderline 0–9, and abnormal ≥10 mm Hg. Mortality was determined from Mayo Clinic records and Minnesota Death Index. Logistic regression was used to determine the relationship of DBP response to the presence of comorbidities. Cox regression was used to determine total and CV mortality risk by DBP response. All analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and resting DBP. RESULTS Twenty thousand seven hundred sixty patients were included (51 ± 11 years, female n = 7,314). Rest/peak averaged DBP 82 ± 8/69 ± 15 mm Hg in normal vs. 79 ± 9/82 ± 9 mm Hg in borderline vs. 76 ± 9/92 ± 11 mm Hg in abnormal DBP response. There were 1,582 deaths (8%) with 557 (3%) CV deaths over 12 ± 5 years of follow-up. In patients with borderline and abnormal DBP response, odds ratios for obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and current smoking were significant, while hazard ratios for total and CV death were not significant compared with patients with normal DBP response. CONCLUSIONS DBP response to exercise is significantly associated with important comorbidities at the time of the stress test but does not add to the prognostic yield of stress test.

Background Heart rate ( HR ) recovery has been investigated in specific patient cohorts, but there is less information about the role of HR recovery in general populations. We investigated whether HR recovery has long‐term prognostic significance in primary prevention. Methods and Results Exercise tests performed between 1993 and 2010 on patients aged 30 to 79 years without cardiovascular disease were included. Mortality was determined from Mayo Clinic records and Minnesota Death Index. Total, cardiovascular , and non‐cardiovascular mortality was reported according to HR recovery <13 bpm using Cox regression. 19 551 patients were included, 6756 women (35%), age 51±10 years. There were 1271 deaths over follow‐up of 12±5 years. HR recovery declined after age 60, and was also lower according to diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, current smoking, and poor cardiorespiratory fitness but not sex or β‐blockers. Adjusting for these factors, abnormal HR recovery was a significant predictor of total (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]=1.56 [1.384–1.77]), cardiovascular (1.95 [1.57–2.42]), and non‐cardiovascular death (1.41 [1.22–1.64]). Hazard ratios for cardiovascular death according to abnormal HR recovery were significant in all age groups (30–59, 60–69, 70–79), in both sexes, in patients with and without hypertension, obesity, and diabetes mellitus, but not in patients taking β‐blockers, current smokers, and patients with normal cardiorespiratory fitness. Conclusions HR recovery is a powerful prognostic factor predicting total, cardiovascular, and non‐cardiovascular death in a primary prevention cohort. It performs consistently well according to sex, age, obesity, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus but shows diminished utility in patients taking β‐blockers, current smokers, and patients with normal cardiorespiratory fitness.